Gerik police: Fog, poor lighting caused truck to fatally hit elephant calf, not driver negligence
IPOH, May 14 — No negligence was found in the accident involving a container truck that fatally struck a male elephant calf at Kilometre 80 on the Gerik-Jeli stretch of the East-West Highway (JRTB) last Sunday.
Gerik police chief Supt Zulkifli Mahmood said preliminary investigations revealed that the area was foggy at the time of the incident, which occurred at 2.50 am. He also noted that the road lacked street lighting.
Zulkifli had previously reported that the baby elephant crossed the road suddenly and was struck by a 28-year-old truck driver, who was transporting poultry.
A viral video on social media showed an emotional scene of a mother elephant attempting to move the truck that had hit her baby. She remained at the site for over five hours, trying to 'save' her calf, a heartbreaking display that touched the hearts of many. — Bernama
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
34 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
81% of vape-related poisonings linked to ‘magic mushroom' flavour
National Poison Centre pharmacist Fadhli Razali warned that the synthetic cannabinoids found in 'magic mushroom' vapes can trigger violent or erratic behaviour. PETALING JAYA : A staggering 81% of vape-related poisoning cases handled by Universiti Sains Malaysia's poison centre involved products branded as 'magic mushroom' vapes, most of which were used by teenagers and young adults. The National Poison Centre (PRN) said it had seen a sharp rise in such cases since 2022, with many users experiencing seizures, hallucinations, vomiting, and behavioural changes after just one or two puffs. 'These are not harmless vapes. Most samples that we tested did not even contain real psilocybin, but synthetic drugs that can cause serious harm or death,' the centre's pharmacist Fadhli Razali said in a statement. He said between 2020 and 2024, the centre recorded 76 calls involving suspected illicit vape exposure. In 2022 alone, 65% of cases involved such vapes (17 cases), followed by 79% in 2023 (27 cases) and 68% so far this year (26 cases). PRN said the problem had increased among young people, with 41% of cases involving teens aged 15 to 19, and 53% involving those in their early 20s. 'These vapes are easily manipulated to include dangerous substances. Without strict control, it becomes an open door to drug abuse,' he said. Fadhli also warned that the synthetic cannabinoids found in these vapes could trigger violent or erratic behaviour, causing harm to users and those around them. He said these products, often sold online and marketed as trendy or exotic, were now considered a public health threat by PRN. 'We urge all state governments to act urgently and uniformly in banning vape sales, and the federal government must begin enforcing its laws immediately,' he said. He said PRN fully supported the current move by state governments to outlaw vape products and called for a nationwide ban to protect youths from a 'hidden but dangerous drug epidemic'.
Daily Express
3 hours ago
- Daily Express
High Court denies PM Anwar's request to refer legal questions to Apex Court
Published on: Wednesday, June 04, 2025 Published on: Wed, Jun 04, 2025 By: Bernama Text Size: KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here today dismissed Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's application to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court, including whether the Prime Minister enjoys immunity from lawsuits. The legal questions relate to a lawsuit filed by Anwar's former research assistant, Muhammed Yusoff Rawther, concerning an alleged sexual assault seven years ago. Judge Roz Mawar Rozain made the ruling after finding that none of the articles of a Federal Constitution (FC) cited by Anwar's legal team give rise to any real, substantial or justiciable question of constitutional law requiring determination by the Federal Court under Article 128(2) of the FC or Section 84 of Courts of Judicature Act 1964. 'From a judicial perspective, the proposed questions do not appear to meet the threshold of genuine constitutional controversy,' she said. The Prime Minister filed the application on May 23, seeking the High Court, which is hearing the suit, to refer the eight legal questions to the Federal Court. The eight legal questions include whether, under Articles 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution, a sitting Prime Minister enjoys limited immunity from lawsuits concerning allegations of personal conduct that occurred before his appointment. In her brief grounds, Judge Roz Mawar said the eight proposed questions are speculative, not necessary to the disposal of this case, and do not concern the interpretation or validity of any constitutional provision. Regarding the immunity, the judge said Articles 39, 40, and 43 on Executive Authority, which Anwar applies to refer, are structural provisions that allocate executive powers but do not confer personal immunity. 'No express or implied protection against civil liability exists. Constitutional silence on immunity must be interpreted in favour of equal legal accountability. 'The articles cited by the defendant's legal team are inoperative in the context of his application for constitutional reference,' she said. The judge further stated that the defendant's contention that allowing a civil suit based on pre-appointment conduct may undermine the Prime Minister's ability to discharge executive functions is flawed. She explained that this was because no immunity is implied in Article 43 as the provision deals solely with tenure and does not prescribe or imply immunity from judicial proceedings. The judge said no clause in Article 43 shields a sitting Prime Minister from accountability in respect of private acts committed prior to assuming office. 'One, no immunity is implied in Article 43; the provision deals solely with appointments and tenure and does not prescribe or imply immunity from judicial proceedings,' she said. Judge Roz Mawar said furthermore, the defendant (Anwar) has affirmed readiness to proceed with trial, and there is no evidence that the suit impairs his ability to perform constitutional duties and this court finds no special circumstances warranting a stay of proceedings. The court also dismissed Anwar's application to stay the hearing of the suit and ordered the trial to commence on June 16 as fixed earlier. She then ordered the defendant to pay the costs of RM20,000 to the plaintiff (Muhammed Yusoff). Lawyer Datuk Seri Segaran, Datuk Megat Abdul Munir Megat Abdullah Rafaie, Alan Wong Teck Wei representing Anwar, while lawyer Muhammad Rafique Rashid Ali, Nurmustanir Md Nor and Muhammad Amirul Ar-Rasyid Azman acting for Muhammed Yusoff. According to a supporting affidavit for the application, Megat Abdul Munir, who is authorised to represent the defendant, said that if the suit were to proceed, it would affect Anwar's ability to effectively perform his executive functions and undermine the doctrine of separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution. 'The plaintiff's claim is politically motivated and, if not examined constitutionally at an early stage, could erode public confidence, diminish the dignity of the constitutional office, and disrupt the executive's ability to perform its constitutional duties,' Megat Abdul Munir said in the affidavit. Megat Abdul Munir further stated that if the court intends to refer these constitutional questions to the Federal Court as a special case, it would be appropriate for the suit's proceedings to be stayed pending the Federal Court's determination of these questions. Muhammed Yusoff filed the suit on July 14, 2021, and Anwar, in his statement of defence, contended that Muhammed Yusoff had lied under oath to the authorities regarding the alleged sexual assault incident. The PKR president, who filed a counterclaim on Sept 28, 2021, alleged that Muhammed Yusoff had fabricated the story about the sexual assault to tarnish his political career and prevent him from becoming prime minister. Meanwhile, Raja Segaran told a press conference said they respectfully disagreed with the outcome of today's outcome and will be filing an immediate appeal to the Court of Appeal. 'We will also be applying for a stay of trial proceedings to preserve the integrity of the appeal process and ensure that the defendant is not prematurely subjected to proceedings that may ultimately be held to be constitutionally impermissible,' he said. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Police receive seven reports after 80 haj pilgrims stranded at KLIA
KUALA LUMPUR: Police have confirmed receiving reports on the 80 haj pilgrims stranded at the Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) after being duped with the offer to perform haj using Mujamalah visas. Dang Wangi district police chief ACP Sulizmie Affendy Sulaiman said so far, seven reports have been lodged by the affected individuals. "I can confirm that we have received the reports, and the case is being investigated under Sections 420 and 511 of the Penal Code," he said in a statement on Wednesday (June 4). On June 3, the media reported that around 80 individuals preparing to depart for the haj were stopped by a special task force at KLIA, reportedly after their travel agency had arranged for them to travel using tourist visas instead of the promised Mujamalah visas. The pilgrims reportedly failed to obtain the Mujamalah visa due to a technical issue with the Nusuk system. However, the travel agency allegedly insisted on flying them out using tourist visas, resulting in them being denied departure. The Mujamalah visa is a special visa issued by the government of Saudi Arabia to certain individuals or groups and is not part of the official haj quota allocated to Malaysia. – Bernama
