Wealthy residents of stunning beauty spot outraged by plans to build giant WATER PARK next to their homes

Daily Mail​

08-05-2025

Residents who live in a picturesque part of Utah have been left outraged that the owners of Splash Summit Water Park want to move its existing Provo location right on top of their prime real estate.
The park currently sits a mile or so northwest from the Slate Canyon, where the company wants to move. Splash Summit reportedly wants to relocate there due to aging infrastructure and the size limitations of its current property.
Specifically, the plan stipulates that the new park will take up 130 acres of city-owned land at the base of the canyon, which borders dozens of people's homes.
Residents have come out in droves to say this will destroy the natural beauty of Slate Canyon, where many people go every day to get breathtaking views of the Wasatch mountains.
The plan, which has not yet been formally submitted to the Provo City Council, would mean many homeowners will no longer get to marvel at snow-capped peaks when they step out into their backyards.
Instead, they'd have brightly-colored slides, sprawling parking lots and retail space to look at.
'Where we are is so beautiful and to think of the natural beauty taken away from us is scary,' resident Quinton Parrish told ABC 4.
Parrish also pointed out that there is a drainage basin at the bottom of Slate Canyon which he believes could be overwhelmed by all the concrete in the new park. This, he said, could create a scenario where dozens of homes are flooded by runoff and snow melt.
Tyler Peterson, another resident, said he was excited about the new park but not too thrilled about the traffic it would undoubtedly bring to the area.
Last week, the plan was first presented by the water park's project manager, Bryan Bayles, at a Neighborhood District 2 meeting, the Daily Herald reported.
Well over 200 people showed up to hear out Bayles, who is insisting this won't just be a water park. There will be an expanded frisbee golf course, pickle ball courts and other amenities to appeal to a wider customer base, he said.
'We envision people coming to see the new entertainment options at Splash Summit, walking to the neighborhood retail, grabbing dinner,' Bayles said at the meeting.
'We envision a place where families and friends can gather to play pickleball or any other numerous enhanced outdoor activities. It's a place where kids will have something to do that is close to home, where they can come and be kids again,' he added.
The city's comment period on the proposed park remains open, and residents were not shy before and after the meeting to make their thoughts known.
'Please, please preserve our beautiful Slate canyon! The road from the state hospital to Slate canyon is gorgeous, when all you can see is the mountainside and sky. This is a Provo treasure—please do not pollute it with retail, waterparks, hotels, billboards, and anything else. We don't need it. We DO need to be good stewards of our natural treasures,' Joanna Harmon wrote on May 7.
One anonymous person opposed to the park said they have lived in Aspen Summit, a housing development on the border of Slate Canyon, for five years and described the proposal as 'such a disappointment for all Provo residents.'
'The idea of moving Splash Summit and further developing the last quiet, beautiful space around Slate Canyon runs contrary to all of the values I thought we Utahns stood for,' Jess Brown wrote on May 3, adding that the outdoors 'improves our mental health.'
Others also showed concern about the area's ability to handle the increased traffic in the event this park were ever built.
'I live in the Slate Canyon neighborhood. I use the streets and the park and hike the trail on the mountainside regularly. Slate Canyon is not designed to handle that much traffic,' an anonymous resident wrote on May 1.
Bayles appeared undeterred by the overwhelming backlash, defiantly stating that 'we could be proposing to build heaven right here in Provo and people would oppose it. Good solutions require compromise.'
The park's developers still need to submit a formal application to the city, which means plans have not been reviewed and public hearings have not been scheduled.