A mysterious, 100-year solar cycle may have just restarted — and it could mean decades of dangerous space weather
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
The unexpected surge of solar activity during the ongoing solar maximum may be tied to a lesser-known, 100-year-long cycle that is just beginning to ramp up again, a new study suggests.
If that's true, the next few decades could see further increases in solar activity that may threaten Earth-orbiting spacecraft and continue to trigger vibrant auroras across the globe. However, other experts are skeptical of the new findings.
Solar activity naturally waxes and wanes throughout the solar cycle — a roughly 11-year period in which our home star goes from being mostly calm in a phase called solar minimum to being a chaotic mass that frequently spits out powerful solar storms at solar maximum, and back again. This cycle is also known as the "sunspot cycle" because the number of dark patches on the sun rises and falls due to changes in the sun's magnetic field, which completely flips during solar maximum.
However, there are several other cycles that dictate solar activity. One example is the Hale cycle, which governs how individual magnetic bands move across the sun's surface and has recently been shown to influence the progression of the sunspot cycle. Historical records also show that the sun has experienced several long-term fluctuations in solar activity over the past few millennia. These included the Maunder Minimum — a period of greatly reduced solar activity between 1645 and 1715.
Another, lesser-known repeating pattern in solar activity is the Centennial Gleissberg Cycle (CGC) — a variation in the intensity of sunspot cycles that rises and falls every 80 to 100 years. The CGC is still poorly understood, but it is likely tied to "subtle sloshing" of the magnetic fields in each of the sun's two hemispheres that slightly alters the Hale cycle, Scott McIntosh, a solar physicist at the newly formed space weather solutions company Lynker Space, who was not involved in the research, told Live Science.
Related: 10 supercharged solar storms that blew us away in 2024
In the new study, published March 2 in the journal Space Weather, researchers suggest that the CGC might have just "turned over," or started again. This could also explain why the ongoing solar maximum, which officially began in early 2024, has ended up being much harder to predict than initially expected.
The study team came to this conclusion after analyzing changes to the "proton flux," or number of positively charged particles, in Earth's inner radiation belt — the first of two doughnut-shaped bands of charged particles surrounding our planet. Collectively, these bands are known as the Van Allen belts.
The inner belt's proton flux decreases when solar activity increases because of interactions with Earth's upper atmosphere, which swells as it soaks up more solar radiation. On the flip side, the proton flux increases as solar activity decreases.
The new analysis shows that the flux increased over the past 20 years but has just started decreasing over the past year or so. This suggests that we have "just passed the CGC minimum" and that average solar activity will start to rise again, study lead author Kalvyn Adams, an undergraduate researcher at JILA, a joint institute of the University of Colorado Boulder (CU Boulder) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology, told Live Science.
The proton flux data were collected by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) satellites as they passed through the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) — a mysterious dent in Earth's magnetic field above South America and the South Atlantic Ocean where our planet's protective shield is the weakest. This was a key reason these trends became apparent, the researchers said.
"The SAA is a region where the Earth's magnetic field is weak and allows trapped protons to reach lower altitudes," Adams said. This allows the NOAA spacecraft to "see into" the inner radiation belt without having to fly directly into it, which would be extremely tricky, he added.
We may be nearing the end of the maximum phase of the current sunspot cycle, Solar Cycle 25 (SC25). This peak has been very active and has included some extreme space weather events, such as a supercharged geomagnetic storm in May 2024 that triggered some of the most widespread auroras in the past 500 years. However, this flourish of activity was not initially expected.
During the previous sunspot cycle, SC24, the sun was surprisingly quiet throughout solar maximum. This led space weather experts from NASA and NOAA to initially forecast that the same would happen during SC25, which they later admitted was a mistake.
The new research hints that SC24's lull was caused by the CGC minimum, likely making it the quietest sunspot cycle for around a century. If this is the case, then the unexpected activity of the current solar maximum means the sun is returning to "business as usual," McIntosh said.
Previous research had already suggested that the CGC may have played a role in the recent sunspot cycle confusion, including a 2023 study from members of Adam's research group and a 2024 paper that analyzed sunspot patterns with machine learning. However, the most recent findings are the first to suggest that the CGC minimum may be over.
The new study also suggests that the CGC may have a greater influence on the sunspot cycle than researchers previously realized, Adams said. As a result, solar cycle forecasters should "definitely" keep a closer eye on this phenomenon when predicting upcoming cycles, he added.
If the CGC is turning over, then upcoming sunspot cycles will likely be as active as the current cycle and could eventually get stronger as we approach the CGC maximum, the researchers wrote.
"We just passed the CGC minimum, and it will be another 40 to 50 years before the CGC maximum," Adams told Live Science. "As a result, the next CGC maximum will likely occur around Solar Cycle 28."
Using "back-of-the-envelope calculations," we can assume that when this happens, solar activity could be around twice as high as it has been during the current maximum, Adams added. However, it is hard to tell for sure, because the CGC's effect on solar activity "can be a little inconsistent," he admitted.
Related: 15 dazzling images of the sun
If future solar maxima are more active than the ongoing peak, it could spell trouble for satellites, which can be knocked out of orbit as Earth's upper atmosphere swells. Several spacecraft have already fallen foul of this in the past few years. However, the problem could get worse in the coming decades due to the rapid expansion of private satellite "megaconstellations" that may be ill-equipped to deal with radiation spikes.
"Most [private] satellites usually take into account a model of the space climate when they are being made," Adams said. But they "are not considering the long-term variations that we are seeing."
Increased solar activity could also be a problem for astronauts, who are vulnerable to harmful radiation shooting out of our home star, Adams added. And there will likely be lots more people in space in the coming decades due to upcoming missions to the moon and Mars, as well as an increase in private spaceflight.
But not everyone completely agrees with the new findings.
McIntosh, who was one of the first researchers to correctly forecast SC25 when he previously worked at the National Center for Atmospheric Research at CU Boulder, told Live Science that it is "too early" to make any firm conclusions about the CGC.
The main issue is that proton flux has only gone down over the past year, so it could just be a temporary dip caused by the natural variability of the sun, McIntosh said. As a result, the study team probably needs a couple more years of data for their results "to be definitive," he added.
There's also no baseline data for comparing CGC cycles, since satellites have only been able to accurately track proton flux over the past 30 to 40 years.
RELATED STORIES
—X-class solar flares hit a new record in 2024 and could spike further this year — but the sun isn't entirely to blame, experts say
—'Like they were demon possessed': Geomagnetic super storms are causing tractors to dance from side to side across US farms
—No, you didn't see a solar flare during the total eclipse — but you may have seen something just as special
McIntosh also warned that the new study could be overestimating the effects of the CGC on the sunspot cycle, because we still don't know how the two cycles interact. At present, researchers are also struggling to agree on what the CGC is and how we define it, he added.
However, while McIntosh does not entirely agree with the new study, he did say it is "intriguing" and "well intentioned," and that the findings could help forecast the next sunspot cycle. While the CGC remains mysterious, it is likely "an intrinsic part of the [sunspot cycle] puzzle," he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
4 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
The World Is Running Out of Clean Water. This Technology Promises to Fix It.
Half of all people on earth experience severe water scarcity at least one month out of the year, according to the UN. A radical new kind of desalination technology is finally on the cusp of helping to slake the world's thirst. The pitch: Put desalination plants on the ocean floor.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Threat to Kill SpaceX Presents One Hidden Safety Concern
Because of a political fallout, tech mogul and SpaceX owner Elon Musk has now attracted the verbal ire of President Trump. While sparring over social media, the President suggested that he could and would cancel Musk's government contracts relative to SpaceX. Briefly, this led Musk to claim that SpaceX would "decommission" the crucial Dragon spacecraft, but later reversed his position, saying, "Ok, we won't decommission Dragon." This is the very same type of vessel which recently led to the rescue of astronauts Butch Wilmore and Sunni Williams who were stranded on the International Space Station for much longer than originally planned. And it's the fate of the International Space Station that is actually the number one reason why an utterly defunded SpaceX might be a very dangerous thing. In 2024, NASA awarded SpaceX a contract valued at $843 million. The purpose? To deorbit the International Space Station by the end of the decade. Basically, the ISS is not designed to stay in orbit forever, and before it is replaced by something more permanent, it will have to be safely moved to a low Earth orbit. This means that SpaceX is currently tasked by the U.S. government to build the United States Deorbit Vehicle (USDV). "Selecting a U.S. Deorbit Vehicle for the International Space Station will help NASA and its international partners ensure a safe and responsible transition in low Earth orbit at the end of station operations," Ken Bowersox said in a NASA statement last a hypothetical world in which Trump decides to rescind all government contracts for SpaceX, that would presumably include killing the all-important job of SpaceX building the USDV. And if SpaceX doesn't build the USDV, who will help mitigate the very real fallout of a large space station? Again, hypothetically, there are other organizations that have spacecraft, but as the stranding of Wilmore and Williams recently demonstrated, SpaceX has proven to be the most reliable way for the U.S. to get people in and out of space. In fact, the whole reason that Wilmore and Williams were stranded was because the Boeing Starliner — a rival aerospace venture to SpaceX — was unable to complete a return trip because of safety concerns. Concurrent with all of this, Blue Origin's New Glenn craft isn't even close to being ready. Notably, Blue Origin's other craft, the New Shepard, isn't designed to go far enough into space to be useful to the ISS. One might wonder if SpaceX really needs the money. And it's possible the company doesn't. As Musk pointed out on June 3, the entirety of what NASA pays to SpaceX ($1.1 billion) is dwarfed by SpaceX's current revenue ($15.5 billion). Basically, SpaceX's Starlink services are making plenty of money for the company, so if Trump rescinded even just that contract valued at roughly $800 million, it wouldn't come close to putting SpaceX out of business. Legally, Trump might be able to try and sever ties between SpaceX and the U.S. government, specifically, NASA. But practically speaking, this seems very unlikely long-term. Right now, SpaceX is the best bet for creating a safe deorbit for the ISS. And, if any more astronauts get stranded — from any country — it seems like Musk's Dragons are still the most reliable space Threat to Kill SpaceX Presents One Hidden Safety Concern first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 6, 2025
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jellyfish Lake: Palau's saltwater pool with a toxic bottom and surface waters brimming with millions of jellyfish
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. QUICK FACTS Name: Jellyfish Lake, or "Ongeim'l Tketau" in Palauan Location: Palau, Western Pacific Coordinates: 7.161200817499221, 134.37633688402798 Why it's incredible: The lake has three layers, including one inhabited by millions of jellyfish and another containing poisonous gas. Jellyfish Lake is a pool of saltwater on Eil Malk island in Palau that is brimming with golden jellyfish — a subspecies not found anywhere else on Earth. The lake typically houses around 5 million jellyfish, according to the Coral Reef Research Foundation (CRRF) — although there have been years, including 2005, when the number of jellies exceeded 30 million. Jellyfish Lake is highly stratified, meaning it is separated into distinct layers. Golden jellyfish inhabit the top layer, which extends from the surface down to about 43 feet (13 meters) deep. Between 43 and 50 feet (13 to 15 m) deep, the lake contains pink bacteria that prevents light and oxygen from reaching the bottom layer of the lake, which sits between 50 and 100 feet (15 to 30 m) deep. The lake is connected to the ocean through small cracks in Eil Malk's limestone rock, but it is nevertheless considered an isolated ecosystem, according to CRRF learning resources. Jellyfish Lake formed toward the end of the last ice age, roughly 12,000 years ago, due to ice melt and sea level rise. Sea water filled depressions in Palau's islands and elsewhere, creating three types of lakes: stratified lakes, such as Jellyfish Lake; mixed lakes, which are connected to the ocean via large tunnels; and transitional lakes, which are also connected to the ocean, but via smaller tunnels. Related: 'A challenge and an opportunity for evolution': The extreme, hidden life thriving in Earth's most acidic and alkaline lakes Jellyfish Lake's pink layer exists because the conditions in that layer suit a type of bacteria that are pink in color. These bacteria create a barrier between the lake's oxygenated top layer and its oxygen-free bottom layer. This barrier bobs up and down depending on density changes in the water. The lack of oxygen beneath the pink layer is deadly for most life. What's more, plant and animal decomposition at the bottom of Jellyfish Lake releases poisonous hydrogen sulfide gas, which means only certain microbes can survive there, according to the CRRF. Jellyfish Lake's endemic golden jellyfish (Mastigias papua etpisoni) population likely evolved from a handful of spotted jellyfish (Mastigias papua) that became trapped when sea levels dropped following the lake's formation. Unique conditions inside the lake forced the jellies to adapt, leading to a new subspecies, which is named after Palau's former president, Ngiratkel Etpison. MORE INCREDIBLE PLACES —Lake Salda: The only place on Earth similar to Jezero crater on Mars —Lake Kivu: The ticking time bomb that could one day explode and unleash a massive, deadly gas cloud —Rainbow swamp: The flooded forest in Virginia that puts on a magical light show every winter Golden jellyfish have a symbiotic relationship with single-celled, photosynthetic algae that give them nutrients in exchange for a place to live. The jellyfish follow an unusual migration pattern that involves swimming towards the sun as it rises and sets, always avoiding the lake's edges where jellyfish-eating sea anemones (Entacmaea medusivora) lurk. These predatory anemones prefer the shadows, so golden jellyfish have evolved to stay in sunlit waters. Every morning, the jellies crowd along the lake's eastern shadow line, and visitors may occasionally see a "wall" of jellyfish forming underwater, according to the CRRF. While golden jellyfish have stinging cells, the sting is so mild that humans can't feel it. Visitors can safely swim in Jellyfish Lake, but people should take care not to accidentally introduce non-native species to the lake, as these can, and already do, endanger the fragile ecosystem, according to the CRRF. Discover more incredible places, where we highlight the fantastic history and science behind some of the most dramatic landscapes on Earth.