South Korea and Japan make pact to strengthen ties
THE nation's newly-elected President Lee Jae-myung and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba have agreed during a telephone call to strengthen bilateral ties, a South Korean presidential spokesperson and Japan's foreign ministry said.
The call comes after the two leaders said they aimed for their countries to continue coordination on North Korea issues.
Lee, a left-leaning leader who was elected last week, has said pragmatism was key to his diplomacy and that he would continue with security cooperation between South Korea, Japan and the United States.
Lee told Ishiba that he wanted to deal with geopolitical crises within the framework of three-way cooperation with Tokyo and Washington, Kang Yoo-jung, Lee's spokesperson, told reporters.
Reaffirming the significance of bilateral ties, the two leaders agreed to meet in person to further develop relations, Kang said.
Ishiba told Lee that he wished to further advance bilateral relations 'through mutual efforts based on the foundation built by both governments so far', according to a statement from Japan's foreign ministry.
The call between the two leaders lasted for about 25 minutes, the ministry said. — Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
South Korea's new President Lee Jae-myung asks citizens to recommend Cabinet members
SEOUL: South Korean President Lee Jae-myung's (pic) Cabinet is now in the making, and his office has introduced a 'public referral system' to take recommendations for the key positions from everyday people. Calling it a move aimed at getting the people involved in the president's personnel nominations, Lee's office said it will be taking recommendations for Cabinet ministers, vice ministers and heads of state-run institutions from June 10 until June 16. Recommendations can be sent to the official website run by the Ministry of Personnel Management, President Lee's official social media accounts or by email. Those interested are to fill in the candidate's area of specialty, the candidate's personal information, such as name, gender, phone number and workplace, the reason to recommend the candidate and one's own information. Self-recommendations are accepted. 'True democracy begins when citizens exercise their sovereignty, get involved and make a change,' Lee said in a Facebook on June 10. No specific restrictions are in place for South Koreans aged 14 or older submitting a recommendation for a nomination, Lee's spokesperson Kang Yu-jung said in a briefing. Lee's office will collect data on candidates submitted to the National Human Resources Database and proceed with a vetting process to form a shortlist of candidates, a stage which will not involve citizen engagement. The presidential secretary for civil service discipline will participate in the vetting process, which would also involve an 'open' review, Kang added. The presidential office has not elaborated on whether the number of recommendations a candidate receives could affect the president's decision-making process in his nominations. Grassroots recommendations for holders of public office was among Lee's presidential campaign pledges unveiled at a press conference in late May. Before the briefing on June 10, Prime Minister nominee Representative Kim Min-seok was Lee's only Cabinet pick. But later on the same day, Lee appointed six more vice ministers of the Finance Ministry, Foreign Ministry and Industry Ministry. According to the presidential office, these vice ministerial appointments were made outside the public recommendation process. Lee is currently working with ministers appointed by disgraced ex-President Yoon Suk-yeol. Kim, the prime minister nominee, said in a news conference on June 10 that the introduction of a system allowing grassroots recommendations for minister posts is a 'very natural process in that democracy is in the process of expanding.' It was the latest move by the liberal president to get ordinary people involved in his decision-making process, as his administration has described itself as 'the government of popular sovereignty.' Earlier on June 8, Lee revealed via posts on social platform X that a recent announcement of plans to broadcast reporters asking questions of officials of the presidential office live during briefings was based on 'a proposal he received through a reply to his social media.' He then added on the X post, 'We always take note of the various opinions of our citizens (online), as they often carry realistic ideas and suggest ways for a practical improvement.' - The Korea Herald/ANN
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
China's Li says US-China reach framework on trade, will report back to leaders
LONDON: China's Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang said on Tuesday that the Chinese and the U.S. negotiating teams had agreed a framework on trade after two days of talks, and would take that back to their leaders. "The two sides have, in principle, reached a framework for implementing the consensus reached by the two heads of state during the phone call on June 5th and the consensus reached at the Geneva meeting," Li told reporters. - Reuters
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, US Appeals court decides
U.S. President Donald Trump holds a chart as he delivers remarks on tariffs in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 2, 2025. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo A federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on Tuesday while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them on grounds that Trump had exceeded his authority by imposing them. The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. means Trump may continue to enforce, for now, his "Liberation Day" tariffs on imports from most U.S. trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on Canada, China and Mexico. The appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Trump cited to justify them, but it allowed the tariffs to remain in place while the appeals play out. The tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with U.S. trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. The ruling has no impact on other tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that the U.S. Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies. The Trump administration quickly appealed the ruling, and the Federal Circuit in Washington put the lower court decision on hold the next day while it considered whether to impose a longer-term pause. The ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small U.S. businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties and the other by 12 U.S. states. Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA. The 1977 law has historically been used to impose sanctions on enemies of the U.S. or freeze their assets. Trump is the first U.S. president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said that the tariffs imposed in February on Canada, China and Mexico were to fight illegal fentanyl trafficking at U.S. borders, denied by the three countries, and that the across-the-board tariffs on all U.S. trading partners imposed in April were a response to the U.S. trade deficit. The states and small businesses had argued the tariffs were not a legal or appropriate way to address those matters, and the small businesses argued that the decades-long U.S. practice of buying more goods than it exports does not qualify as an emergency that would trigger IEEPA. At least five other court cases have challenged the tariffs justified under the emergency economic powers act, including other small businesses and the state of California. One of those cases, in federal court in Washington, D.C., also resulted in an initial ruling against the tariffs, and no court has yet backed the unlimited emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed. - Reuters
