Michigan food banks working to meet needs despite USDA funding freeze
A funding freeze at the United States Department of Agriculture and employee layoffs are being felt by food banks in Michigan.
Food banks across Metro Detroit say they're adapting as best they can.
Forgotten Harvest and Gleaners Community Food Bank help feed thousands of families struggling with food insecurity. Sheila Marshall, COO of Forgotten Harvest, says on any given day, they're working with millions of pounds of food.
"Minimum 1.2, max a little over 2 million pounds, but it moves fast because the need is there," said Marshall.
Marshall says she sees food banks like Forgotten Harvest as a way for people who are struggling to spend their money on other necessities.
"We allow people to be able to do some other things with funds because we provide them with the basic necessities so that the load is not so difficult for them," she said.
But local food banks are facing a double whammy of sorts. The USDA is pausing $500 million worth of food deliveries across the country, all while pandemic-era food assistance programs are no longer available.
"Unfortunately, we learned this year that we will be 1.4 million pounds less of food to serve our community," said Kristin Sokul, the senior director of advancement communications with Gleaners.
If that gap isn't remedied, Sokul says about 25,000 fewer Metro Detroiters will have access to the food they provide. In 2024, food from the USDA accounted for about 27% of Gleaners' supply.
"What that means is we have less variety or less volume for each of those households; that's families, children, seniors and veterans who are relying on us to get balanced nutrition," said Sokul.
Both Forgotten Harvest and Gleaners say they're determined to get food and distribute it.
"We're not resting on our laurels; we have a commitment to this community," said Sokul. "We're tightening our belts with our expenses, so if we didn't have to spend on something this year, we're not, so we can buy that food."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Calavo (CVGW) Stock Trades Down, Here Is Why
Shares of fresh produce company Calavo Growers (NASDAQ:CVGW) fell 17.3% in the afternoon session after the company reported weak first-quarter 2025 (fiscal Q2) results, which fell short of Wall Street's estimates across all key metrics, including sales, operating profit, and earnings per share. Top-line growth benefited from higher average avocado prices, which offset a year-on-year decline in volume. The volume decline was attributed to constrained supply out of Mexico and USDA inspection delays. Looking ahead, management expects volume growth to pick up, driven by new customer wins and expanded programs with existing accounts, as well as continued strength from the California avocado season. Overall, this quarter could have been better. The stock market overreacts to news, and big price drops can present good opportunities to buy high-quality stocks. Is now the time to buy Calavo? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Calavo's shares are somewhat volatile and have had 13 moves greater than 5% over the last year. But moves this big are rare even for Calavo and indicate this news significantly impacted the market's perception of the business. The biggest move we wrote about over the last year was 9 months ago when the stock gained 12.4% on the news that the company reported strong second-quarter results. Revenue and adjusted EBITDA beat expectations, even if the magnitude of the beat was small. Keeping up with the positive theme, management's commentary was constructive: "Our third quarter results reflect continued momentum in our flagship avocado temporary industry supply disruptions from Mexico during the quarter, we generated strong financial results due to our operational flexibility." Lastly, peer Mission Produce (AVO) also reported strong results on the same day, showing that the industry seemed healthy. Calavo is down 8.6% since the beginning of the year, and at $23.30 per share, it is trading 21.4% below its 52-week high of $29.64 from September 2024. Investors who bought $1,000 worth of Calavo's shares 5 years ago would now be looking at an investment worth $397.61. Here at StockStory, we certainly understand the potential of thematic investing. Diverse winners from Microsoft (MSFT) to Alphabet (GOOG), Coca-Cola (KO) to Monster Beverage (MNST) could all have been identified as promising growth stories with a megatrend driving the growth. So, in that spirit, we've identified a relatively under-the-radar profitable growth stock benefiting from the rise of AI, available to you FREE via this link.
Newsweek
6 hours ago
- Newsweek
SNAP Cuts Warning Over $85 Million of Nutrition Assistance
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Rhode Island could foot the bill for $85 million in SNAP benefits if the Republican budget bill passes, a senator has said. Why It Matters Under the Republican-led One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which is making its way through the legislative process, states could be made to pay for a portion of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits. As it stands, states pay for half of the administrative costs of running the program, while the U.S. Department of Agriculture pays the other half. The USDA also covers the entire cost of benefits. In Rhode Island—which ranks 15th in the country for SNAP usage, according to an analysis by Trace One—SNAP is delivered to about 144,000 residents, providing monthly benefits to low- and no-income families. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities think tank reported in March that shifting some of the cost of SNAP benefits to states would negatively affect state budgets "at a time when many states are facing revenue downturns." What To Know Senator Jack Reed, a Democrat, has said the Ocean State could be on the hook for $85 million of the roughly $343.5 million the state receives from the USDA to pay for SNAP benefits. Other provisions outlined in the bill, such as expanding work requirements and limiting future benefit increases, could "reduce monthly nutrition assistance for children from low-income families, seniors, disabled Americans, and veterans below what is necessary to maintain a healthy diet," a June 6 news release from Reed's office said. Reed said the entire state would be affected by the proposed SNAP cuts, not only through a potential loss of benefits for recipients but also lost productivity and increased expenditures in other public areas, such as health care. He said it would also affect the state's businesses and economy. A stock image of a SNAP sign in a retailer's window. A stock image of a SNAP sign in a retailer's window. GETTY "Every dollar in federal SNAP investment generates over $1.50 in economic activity," Reed said. "If you start taking hundreds of millions of dollars out of the local economy, it means stores close, farms go under, and food prices keep going up. Ultimately, the Republican plan would make it harder for Rhode Island families to afford their grocery bills." The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities said in its March report: "States are not in a position to absorb these substantial additional costs. In fiscal year 2024, tax revenue fell in 40 states after adjusting for inflation, and many states are projecting budget shortfalls in the short and long term." Other states have also warned that they could be forced to pay millions to keep SNAP benefits available if the bill passes in its current form. In late May, the Wisconsin Department of Health Services said the state would lose about $314 million in food assistance if the legislation came to pass. Michigan has also warned that it could be forced to foot a $900 million bill for food assistance. What People Are Saying Senator Jack Reed, a Democrat from Rhode Island, said in a news release issued on June 6: "When Republicans threaten to cut SNAP benefits, they're really threatening public health, working families, and our economy. Access to food is essential for everyone. The Republican plan would mean less food for the poor, fewer jobs, and less economic activity in the community. It would increase hunger and hardship." Darcy Milburn, the director of Social Security and health care policy at the Arc of the United States, told Newsweek: "Any cuts to SNAP funding would make it even harder for people with disabilities and their families to access the food they need to live healthy lives. We urge Congress to reject proposals for any cuts to SNAP, and to work on a bipartisan basis to strengthen and protect this critical program." Lisa Roth Blackman, the chief philanthropy officer of the Rhode Island Community Food Bank, said in a news release: "The impact that this cut will have on families, children, seniors, and veterans will be catastrophic. Kids will be less ready to learn in school. Working adults won't have the energy to work. Seniors will be forced to make terrible choices about whether to pay for prescriptions and healthcare or food. And veterans and people with disabilities will struggle to get the food they need to survive and thrive." President Donald Trump, who has not commented directly on the SNAP provisions, wrote on Truth Social following the passage of the bill in the House of Representatives: "It's time for our friends in the United States Senate to get to work, and send this Bill to my desk AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!" What Happens Next The bill moves to the GOP-controlled Senate this week, where lawmakers may propose changes to the legislation.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Senate GOP deeply divided over cutting cost of ‘big, beautiful bill'
Senate Republicans are deeply divided over how to cut the cost of House-passed legislation to enact President Trump's agenda, which Elon Musk has attacked as a 'mountain of disgusting pork' and fiscal conservatives on Capitol Hill say doesn't do enough to cut the deficit. Facing a jittery bond market and scathing criticism from Musk, GOP lawmakers have expanded their search for ways to reduce the deficit by cutting Medicare, the Defense Department and the Federal Reserve — areas of the budget that were considered off limits just a few weeks ago. But each new proposal is creating new divisions. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) is warning colleagues to steer clear of cutting Medicare spending, even though proponents of the idea insist it would be targeted only on 'waste, fraud and abuse.' 'I don't like this idea of fiddling with Medicare at all,' Hawley said. 'I think it's a bad idea. We should not do that. I've counseled against it.' 'How about instead we cap the price [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] is paying for prescription drugs? Why touch Medicare?' he asked. Other Republicans want to look at Medicare Advantage plans provided by private insurance companies as an alternative to traditional Medicare. They say that 'fly-by-night' health care providers are abusing the program and bilking the federal government. Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) said lawmakers are discussing a proposal sponsored by Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) that could save up to $275 billion by cracking down on insurance companies that over-charge Medicare Advantage. 'No one is more concerned about our national debt than I am. I would like to cut more money on this bill. If it was up to me, we would be going from $7 trillion a year to $6.5 trillion,' Marshall said, proposing a half-trillion dollars in deficit reduction over the next decade. Some Republicans are also calling for a closer look at defense spending, arguing that the Pentagon needs to see its budget shrink along with the rest of government. While the House-passed bill includes $150 billion in new funding for the Defense Department for new programs, such as Trump's 'Golden Dome' missile defense shield, fiscal conservatives say there's a lot of bloat in the defense budget that should be eliminated. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) says defense hawks have a 'hidden agenda' to use Trump's big, beautiful bill to pump up military spending beyond what the nation could afford. 'It's a frustration for those of us who think it ought to be about fiscal restraint and/or cutting taxes, or both. It ends up becoming a spending bill and the spending is $150 billion on top of [what] they were already increasing the military' in the regular appropriations process, he said. 'If you're fiscally conservative, you have to be fiscally conservative everywhere. You can't be for blowing the budget out on the military,' he argued. Marshall says he would also support military spending cuts. 'I'm one of the few Republicans that thinks that defense has more than enough money,' he said. But cuts to the Pentagon's budget would face strong pushback from Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Defense Appropriations Committee Chair Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who argue that Trump's defense budget is inadequate. Wicker earlier this year called for $175 billion in new defense funding to be included in the reconciliation package but later relented to $150 billion, which he says is the minimum needed. McConnell is expected to press Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth about Trump's defense appropriations request on Tuesday. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) has proposed stopping interest payments to banks that deposit cash at the Federal Reserve, which he says would save $1 trillion over the next decade. But that proposal is already facing a backlash from the banking industry, which has come to depend on the payments as a steady cash flow. Strategists at JPMorgan Chase & Co. are warning that eliminating interest payments would create turmoil in the financial markets and predict the proposal isn't going anywhere, according to Bloomberg News. Proposals in the House-passed bill to cut nearly $800 billion in Medicaid spending and $267 billion in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program spending are running into objections from Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.). So are provisions to terminate renewable energy tax breaks that could strand tens of billions of dollars in investments to Republican states, such as West Virginia, where the Appalachian Regional Clean Hydrogen Hub is in danger of losing funds if construction isn't underway before the end of the year. Sens. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), John Curtis (R-Utah) and Shelley Moore Capito ( are sounding the alarm over the immediate phase-out of clean energy tax breaks, which they warn would disrupt their state economies and cost jobs. On the other side of the argument are conservatives such as Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), who say the bill doesn't go far enough to cut off Medicaid benefits to illegal immigrants, and Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), who wants to immediately repeal the climate-oriented tax breaks enacted by Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. 'We're talking about Medicaid, we're talking about EITC, earned income tax credit, child tax credit, and eligibility for claiming the benefits of dependents for income tax purposes. Those things should be benefits available to citizens and lawful permanent residents and not others, not illegal migrants,' Lee told The Hill. Lee says the House bill doesn't completely shut off federal benefits to illegal migrants and declared 'that's the problem.' Scott, meanwhile, says subsidies for clean energy programs need to be cut off promptly to help reduce the deficit. 'We got a fiscal crisis,' he said. 'We have to balance our budget. 'We should completely eliminate the Green New Deal, that's No. 1,' he declared. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
