Weedkiller ban could help swifts, starlings and toads thrive, says MP
Banning toxic weedkillers could support swifts, starlings and toads in towns and cities, an MP has said ahead of a debate in Parliament.
The Green Party's Sian Berry has proposed a public sector ban on the chemicals, which councils can currently use to destroy 'undesired plants' in areas which they manage.
Ms Berry told the PA news agency that the Government had demonstrated 'worrying attitudes to nature from the Government in quite a few of their policies', but added the ban is a move that lawmakers can 'genuinely do for nature to make up for that slightly'.
MPs are due to debate Ms Berry's Plant Protection Products (Prohibition on Public Sector Use) Bill on Friday which, if agreed, would block English town halls from using certain professional-grade chemicals on land such as verges and parks after 2028.
It would extend to other public authorities in England after 2031.
'We are taking steps towards solving the nature crisis in the UK,' Ms Berry said.
'We're trying to make sure that, at the very least, local authorities, town and cities don't use the really bleakly effective and quite toxic chemical glyphosate in our towns and cities where people might come into contact with it, and where it's going to have a really dramatic effect on the biodiversity of streets and parks and council estates and other areas that local authorities manage.'
The MP said an ongoing 'nature crisis' was 'a lot to do with insects but then also the other species that insects support, so you've got birds that depend on having insects well supported within cities'.
She warned that cities feature 'vast areas where there are no biodiversity, there are no links between the biodiverse areas'.
The MP for Brighton Pavilion said: 'Swifts are in huge decline. They do nothing all day but fly around eating insects.
'Starlings, other birds that really do need that biodiversity in order to thrive.
'In Brighton, we've got a twitten (a Sussex narrow lane) that runs between two streets on a steep hill, that is known as the 'toad road' because it's literally where the amphibians will migrate between gardens in order to spread out and be biodiverse throughout the city.
'Getting them to stop spraying that is really, really important because the plants that grow up around the edges of that are exactly where those amphibians will hide when they're migrating, so there's lots of different ways in which a small amount of plants growing in sensible places around the city streets is a really, really good idea for biodiversity.'
Ms Berry added: 'From going to war on bats and newts, which is very harsh – bats and newts are great – to talking about parts of the green belt as grey belt, as denigrating areas that might be overgrown or scruffy, when actually those are incredibly biodiverse areas.
'And if we're going to be developing them, we have to be very, very careful.'
She warned that councils 'have been horrendously squeezed and manual weeding can take some budget up in terms of paying people to do a bit more work than if they just wander down the street spraying chemicals everywhere', but called for 'dedicated funding' to help authorities fund the move.
Some authorities have already stopped using glyphosate.
South Kesteven District Council in Lincolnshire agreed to reduce its use of the chemical last month.
Councillor Rhys Baker, the authority's environment and waste cabinet member, said in a statement that the authority would 'strive for viable alternatives to minimise its use for the future which would best protect our biodiversity and ecology', at the same time 'balancing aesthetics, safety, cost and biodiversity'.
But Brighton and Hove City Council in East Sussex brought in a 'controlled-droplet application of glyphosate' last year, after 'relying solely on manual weeding' for five years.
The authority's environment committee chairman councillor Tim Rowkins vowed at the time not to use the chemical on wildflowers 'unless they are presenting a hazard'.
According to the council, roots broke up footpaths and weeds blocked drains.
Richard Benwell, chief executive of the Wildlife and Countryside Link, said Ms Berry's Bill is 'an excellent proposal that would help free our urban environment from harmful and unnecessary chemical use'.
He added: 'When they are sprayed around towns and cities, chemicals like glyphosate can kill off habitats and food sources for wildlife and add to the toxic cocktail polluting our rivers.
'Many public authorities in the UK and around the world have realised that this trigger-happy approach to chemical use is at odds with a green future.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Verge
an hour ago
- The Verge
Anthropic launches new Claude service for military and intelligence use
Anthropic on Thursday announced Claude Gov, its product designed specifically for U.S. defense and intelligence agencies. The AI models have looser guardrails for government use and are trained to better analyze classified information. The company said the models it's announcing 'are already deployed by agencies at the highest level of U.S. national security,' and that access to those models will be limited to government agencies handling classified information. The company did not confirm how long they had been in use. Claude Gov models are specifically designed to uniquely handle government needs, like threat assessment and intelligence analysis, per Anthropic's blog post. And although the company said they 'underwent the same rigorous safety testing as all of our Claude models,' the models have certain specifications for national security work. For example, they 'refuse less when engaging with classified information' that's fed into them, something consumer-facing Claude is trained to flag and avoid. Claude Gov's models also have greater understanding of documents and context within defense and intelligence, according to Anthropic, and better proficiency in languages and dialects relevant to national security. Use of AI by government agencies has long been scrutinized because of its potential harms and ripple effects for minorities and vulnerable communities. There's been a long list of wrongful arrests across multiple U.S. states due to police use of facial recognition, documented evidence of bias in predictive policing, and discrimination in government algorithms that assess welfare aid. For years, there's also been an industry-wide controversy over large tech companies like Microsoft, Google and Amazon allowing the military — particularly in Israel — to use their AI products, with campaigns and public protests under the No Tech for Apartheid movement. Anthropic's usage policy specifically dictates that any user must 'Not Create or Facilitate the Exchange of Illegal or Highly Regulated Weapons or Goods,' including using Anthropic's products or services to 'produce, modify, design, market, or distribute weapons, explosives, dangerous materials or other systems designed to cause harm to or loss of human life.' At least eleven months ago, the company said it created a set of contractual exceptions to its usage policy that are 'carefully calibrated to enable beneficial uses by carefully selected government agencies.' Certain restrictions — such as disinformation campaigns, the design or use of weapons, the construction of censorship systems, and malicious cyber operations — would remain prohibited. But Anthropic can decide to 'tailor use restrictions to the mission and legal authorities of a government entity,' although it will aim to 'balance enabling beneficial uses of our products and services with mitigating potential harms.' Claude Gov is Anthropic's answer to ChatGPT Gov, OpenAI's product for U.S. government agencies, which it launched in January. It's also part of a broader trend of AI giants and startups alike looking to bolster their businesses with government agencies, especially in an uncertain regulatory landscape. When OpenAI announced ChatGPT Gov, the company said that within the past year, more than 90,000 employees of federal, state, and local governments had used its technology to translate documents, generate summaries, draft policy memos, write code, build applications, and more. Anthropic declined to share numbers or use cases of the same sort, but the company is part of Palantir's FedStart program, a SaaS offering for companies who want to deploy federal government-facing software. Scale AI, the AI giant that provides training data to industry leaders like OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, and Meta, signed a deal with the Department of Defense in March for a first-of-its-kind AI agent program for U.S. military planning. And since then, it's expanded its business to world governments, recently inking a five-year deal with Qatar to provide automation tools for civil service, healthcare, transportation, and more.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's Tesla faces $3bn hit from Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
Elon Musk's Tesla is facing a $3bn (£2.2bn) hit from Donald Trump's tax and spending Bill. Buried in the US president's 1,000-page Bill are plans to eliminate a $7,500 tax incentive for electric vehicle (EV) buyers and ban a similar scheme in California, highlighting a potential reason that Mr Musk has vowed to 'kill' the legislation. Wall Street analysts said axing the tax break for drivers would cost Tesla about $1.2bn, while the Californian ban threatens a further $2bn profit hit. The president's 'big, beautiful bill' has prompted a furious reaction from Mr Musk, who left his role as a White House cost-cutting tsar last week. The world's richest man has since called the tax and spending legislation a 'disgusting abomination' and called on US politicians to 'kill the Bill'. When asked about Mr Musk's reaction on Thursday, Mr Trump said: 'I don't know if we'll have a great relationship any more.' Ryan Brinkman, a JP Morgan analyst, wrote in a research note that 'Tesla appears to have the most to lose from the shifting regulatory backdrop, perhaps to the tune of $3.2bn'. He expects the measures to cut Tesla's profits in half this year. Such fears led to Tesla's share price falling by 7pc on Thursday. Mr Musk has been personally lobbying US senators to block the passage of the Bill, which is expected to add $2.4 trillion to the US deficit. According to NBC, he called Mike Johnson, the Republican US House speaker, in an effort to save the green tax credit, while he has also amplified the views of US senators who oppose the legislation on X. The billionaire has so far presented his opposition to the Bill as a matter of principle, arguing that it undermines the work he did at the department for government efficiency (Doge) to slash government spending in an effort to lower taxes and borrowing. In a post on X, Mr Musk said the Bill 'defeats all the cost savings achieved by the Doge team at great personal cost and risk'. In another, he labelled the planned law the 'Debt Slavery Bill'. However, the JP Morgan research highlights the potential personal cost to Mr Musk from the legislation. Much of his wealth is derived from Tesla, which has already suffered as a result of his association with Mr Trump. Sales have slumped in Europe amid a political boycott of the electric vehicles. Mr Musk's net worth has fallen by $64bn so far this year, according to Bloomberg, though he still commands an estimated $368bn fortune. The entrepreneur has sought to rally Republican voters to lobby against the Bill and threatened to 'fire all politicians who betrayed the American people' in November's mid-term elections. Mr Musk was the largest political donor in the US last year, giving $290m to encourage voters to elect Mr Trump and other Republicans. Mr Musk had previously defended Mr Trump's vision of cutting electric vehicle subsidies, insisting the changes would 'only help Tesla' by hurting its rivals. 'I think we should get rid of all credits,' he said last year. However, since quitting the White House, Tesla and Mr Musk have taken aim at many of the proposals in Mr Trump's planned Bill. Last week, Tesla Energy, its solar and battery storage business, said: 'Ending energy tax credits would threaten America's energy independence and the reliability of our grid.' The rift has angered Mr Trump, Axios reported. The website said Mr Johnson told colleagues Mr Trump was 'p----d off' with the Tesla boss and told reporters he was 'not delighted that Elon did a 180'. Mr Trump told reporters that Mr Musk was 'upset' but rejected claims that he was blindsided by the Bill. The president said: 'I am very disappointed. Elon knew the inner workings of this Bill, better than almost anybody sitting here. All of a sudden he had a problem. I am very disappointed in Elon, I helped him a lot.' The changes to EV credits are expected to hit sales of battery-powered cars across the US. Dan Ives, a technology analyst with Wedbush Securities, said the changes would 'hurt EV demand by 10pc across the industry'. A survey from Insurify, meanwhile, found 45pc of EV buyers said they would not have bought a new car without the $7,500 incentive. It found 36pc of Tesla buyers would have not made a purchase without the benefit. Mr Trump's tax and spending Bill passed the House of Representatives by a narrow margin and is now before the Senate. Tesla was contacted for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.


News24
an hour ago
- News24
Ahee, Papa Penny, ahee! MKP MP lightens up Safa's appearance in Parliament
Screenshot The attempted grilling of Safa by Umkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) MP and musician Gezani Kobane, popularly known as Papa Penny, during the association's appearance before the parliamentary portfolio committee for sport on Tuesday left many South Africans in stitches. The musician-turned-politician asked Safa chief financial officer (CFO) Gronie Hluyo why he was still in the employ of Safa when he was facing serious charges of fraud and corruption while other staff members had already faced discipline and suspension. Reading his prepared question, Papa Penny was the talking point after the meeting. Some people called for Parliament to have translators and allow members to speak in their own languages.