US tariffs dampen mood of global exporters, study shows
The wave of new U.S. tariffs has severely dampened the mood among exporters and 42% of companies now expect their export revenues to decline markedly, according to a global survey by
Allianz Trade
published on Tuesday.
The credit insurer surveyed 4,500 exporters in Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Poland, Britain, the United States, Singapore and China about global trade in March and April, before and after the tariffs spiral on April 2.
Before Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day', when the president announced new tariffs against almost all trading partners, only 5% of companies had expected their export revenues to decline.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Invertir $200 en Amazon CFD podría devolverte un segundo salario
preg.marketingvici.com
Undo
"In stark contrast to the great optimism before 'Liberation Day', this year's Global Survey confirms what we're observing in all markets: uncertainty and fragmentation will be with us for a long time," said Aylin Somersan Coqui, CEO of Allianz Trade.
Globally,
export losses
of $305 billion are expected in 2025, she added.
Live Events
Germany had been expected to be badly affected by tariffs due to its export-oriented economy. In Germany, 39% of respondents expect a decline in their export revenues following the tariff announcement.
German exporters were significantly more concerned about
geopolitical risks
and
protectionism
(35%) than their counterparts in other countries (29%).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
NASA Layoffs: Is Trump's budget cut approved by Congress? NASA asks employees to opt for early retirement, deferred resignation, or voluntary separation. Here's last date and terms of departure
NASA has introduced a range of new programs aimed at reducing its workforce. These changes follow proposed budget cuts by the Trump administration for the 2026 fiscal year. The programs are voluntary and give employees multiple options for leaving the agency. New Programs for Staff Exit NASA sent memos to employees on June 9, announcing early retirement, deferred resignation, and voluntary separation incentive options. These programs are part of a larger workforce reduction effort. The goal is to reduce the number of NASA employees significantly by 2026. Also Read: 1923 Season 1 Netflix: Why will Netflix air only Season 1? Here's how and when to stream internationally by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like If You Eat Ginger Everyday for 1 Month This is What Happens Tips and Tricks Undo Reasons Behind Staff Reductions The Trump administration has proposed a 24% cut to NASA's overall budget for 2026. This proposal aims to lower the employee count from 17,391 to 11,853, a 32% drop. The proposed budget is still under review by Congress and not yet finalized. Deadline for Employee Decisions NASA has asked employees to decide by July 25 if they want to participate in the new staff reduction options. Those who opt into the Deferred Resignation Program will likely stop working soon afterward but will continue to receive pay until January 9, 2026. Live Events Also Read: This is why nearly 700,000 Americans lost Medicaid coverage in one month Terms of Departure According to the agency, employees who sign the separation agreement will start administrative leave within one to two weeks. Most participants are expected to complete their employment by January 9, 2026. Some critical staff may receive approval to delay their departure until April 1 or as late as September 30, 2026. Similar Changes Across Other Agencies NASA's new programs follow similar moves at other government agencies. Around 75,000 federal workers have already taken deferred resignation offers. Changes have also occurred at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), which recently ended remote work. Most of the 5,500 staff at JPL are now required to return to the office or resign. FAQs Why is NASA reducing its workforce now? NASA is responding to proposed budget cuts for 2026. These cuts aim to reduce spending and the number of employees across the agency. When will most participating employees leave NASA? Most employees who accept the offer will stop working by January 9, 2026. Some may stay until April or September 2026, based on need.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Iran claims US bases to be targeted if conflict breaks out between countries
Iran threatened Wednesday to target US military bases in the region if conflict breaks out, while President Donald Trump said he was "less confident" about reaching a nuclear deal. Amid escalating tensions, a US official said staff levels at the embassy in Iraq were being reduced over security concerns, while the UK Maritime Trade Operations, run by the British navy, advised ships to transit the Gulf with caution. Watch: Iran swears to annihilate Israel in revenge: who will strike first & why? Here are 5 deadly triggers Tehran and Washington have held five rounds of talks since April to thrash out a new nuclear deal to replace the 2015 accord that Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018. Since returning to office in January, Trump has revived his "maximum pressure" campaign on Tehran, backing nuclear diplomacy but warning of military action if it fails. Also Read: Trump travel ban shows 'deep hostility' towards Iranians, Muslims, says Iran "All its bases are within our reach, we have access to them, and without hesitation we will target all of them in the host countries," Iran's Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said in response to US threats of military action if the talks fail. "God willing, things won't reach that point, and the talks will succeed," the minister said, adding that the US side "will suffer more losses" if it came to conflict. The United States has multiple bases in the Middle East, with the largest located in Qatar. Also Read: Why has Iran been banning people from walking dogs in public? Iran and the United States have recently been locked in a diplomatic standoff over Iran's uranium enrichment, with Tehran defending it as a "non-negotiable" right and Washington calling it as a "red line". Trump had previously expressed optimism about the talks, saying during a Gulf tour last month Washington was "getting close" to securing a deal. But in an interview published Wednesday, Trump said he was "less confident" the United States and Iran could reach a deal, in response to a question on whether he believed he could stop Tehran from enriching uranium. 'A shame' Iran currently enriches uranium to 60 percent, far above the 3.67-percent limit set in the 2015 deal and close though still short of the 90 percent needed for a nuclear warhead. Western countries, including the United States and its ally Israel, have long accused Iran of seeking to acquire atomic weapons, while Tehran insists its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes. Last week, Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said enrichment is "key" to Iran's nuclear programme and that Washington "cannot have a say" on the issue. During the interview with the New York Post's podcast "Pod Force One", which was recorded on Monday, Trump said he was losing hope a deal could be reached. "I don't know. I did think so, and I'm getting more and more -- less confident about it. They seem to be delaying and I think that's a shame. I am less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago," he said. "Something happened to them but I am much less confident of a deal being made... Maybe they don't wanna make a deal, what can I say? And maybe they do. There is nothing final." Trump maintained that Washington would not allow Tehran to obtain nuclear weapons, saying "it would be nicer to do it without warfare, without people dying". On May 31, after the fifth round of talks, Iran said it had received "elements" of a US proposal for a nuclear deal, with Araghchi later saying the text contained "ambiguities". Iran has said it will present a counter-proposal to the latest draft from Washington, which it had criticised for failing to offer relief from sanctions -- a key demand for Tehran, which has been reeling under their weight for years. On Monday, the United Nations nuclear watchdog began a Board of Governors meeting in Vienna that will last until Friday to discuss Iran's atomic activities and other issues. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) meeting followed a report issued by it criticising "less than satisfactory" cooperation from Tehran, particularly in explaining past cases of nuclear material found at undeclared sites. Iran has criticised the IAEA report as unbalanced, saying it relied on "forged documents" provided by its arch-foe Israel. In January 2020, Iran fired missiles at bases in Iraq housing American troops in retaliation for the US strike that killed top Iranian general Qassem Soleimani days before at Baghdad airport. Dozens of US soldiers suffered traumatic brain injuries.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Oil's Lost Decade Is About to Be Repeated
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- For as long as most of us can remember, a rule of thumb has held true: Every year, the world's production of oil goes up by one million barrels a day. In 1983, the figure stood at 56.6 million barrels. In 2023, 40 years later, it was 40 million barrels more: 96.3 million. Annual figures may jump around thanks to wars, recessions, and the rise and fall of economies, but averaged over the longer term, every decade we've added an extra 10 million daily barrels to the headline total. But you have to look closer than that. Much of what's labeled 'oil production' isn't oil at all, but gases such as ethane, propane and butane as well as biofuels. If you consider only crude oil — the stuff subject to OPEC's quota policies, with prices quoted on the nightly news — production is barely increasing at all. Global output this year will be just 360,000 daily barrels greater than in 2015, according to the latest outlook from the US government's Energy Information Administration. Even looking forward to 2026, crude output is likely to remain below the production peak the world hit in 2018. This will be the first time the industry hit a lost decade since the 1980s, when it was buffeted by the aftermath of the 1970s oil crises and decline of the Soviet bloc. As electric vehicles take more market share and climate damage grows, subsequent decades will be even worse. That's certainly what you'd expect from the way the oil industry is investing. Upstream oilfield spending will fall 6% this year to $420 billion, the International Energy Agency wrote last week, less than the $450 billion going to solar. Fossil fuels as a whole will receive $1.1 trillion of investment, just half the $2.2 trillion for clean energy. Those figures suggest reports of the death of ESG have been greatly exaggerated. Spending on new supplies of oil and gas did indeed increase after Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, but only slightly. The growth wasn't enough to lift investment even to the levels seen in the late 2010s, let alone the fat years in the early part of that decade. Inflation makes the picture even more stark. Clean technology is getting cheaper, with the price of the best standard solar modules falling 20% over the past year to 9 cents per watt, according to BloombergNEF. That means each dollar spent is buying more energy than in the past. The opposite is happening in the oil patch — particularly in the US, where President Donald Trump's 50% steel tariffs are making it far more expensive to buy pipes and machinery. After adjusting for costs, activity levels in the upstream oil and gas sector are set to fall globally by about 8% this year, according to the IEA, the first drop since 2020. That's being felt most sharply by US shale players, some of the highest-cost and most price-sensitive producers out there. They're retrenching rapidly as the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries pumps extra barrels into an oversupplied market. The signs are showing up throughout the chain, from exploration to development. Since the end of March alone, about 5.6% of all operating drill rigs in the US have been pulled from the fields, according to global energy technology company Baker Hughes, leaving the drill fleet almost a third smaller than at its last peak in late 2022. That suggests companies are spending less on exploration. The number of wells being actively fracked is also the lowest since 2021, in the teeth of Covid-19 — evidence that they're not rushing to get production out of the fields they've already discovered, either. In previous eras, slumps in those measures were often justified by the large backlog of developed wells being kept in reserve until prices recovered, but even this so-called fracklog is shrinking. The number of such drilled but uncompleted wells now stands at 5,332, about half the level in early 2020. December's figure was the lowest on record. If you thought the Gulf would come to the rescue, don't hold your breath. These days, Saudi Arabian Oil Co. is spending more on gas than on crude. Its largest development project is the Jafurah gas field, due to start production later this year. Riyadh's decision last year to cut Aramco's maximum oil capacity target only makes sense if prospects for crude demand are dimming. Look to China, and you can see why. Apparent oil consumption has been falling ever since September 2023, based on government data. Even the more granular estimates by state-owned China National Petroleum Corp. suggest demand will hit its ceiling this year, five years earlier than expected. Consumption of gasoline and diesel will be 400,000 barrels a day lower than in 2021, according to the IEA, as EVs, more-efficient vehicles, and shifts to public transport cause usage to evaporate. The situation in India, as my colleague Javier Blas has written, may be even worse. As we've argued, the oil industry is already past its peak. The decades to come will only be worse. More From Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. David Fickling is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering climate change and energy. Previously, he worked for Bloomberg News, the Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times. More stories like this are available on
