An Israeli strike kills 18 Palestinians in central Gaza as turmoil mounts over food distribution
DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip (AP) — An Israeli strike hit a street in central Gaza on Thursday where witnesses said a crowd of people was getting bags of flour from a Palestinian police unit that had confiscated the goods from gangs looting aid convoys. Hospital officials said 18 people were killed.
The strike was the latest violence surrounding the distribution of food to Gaza's population, which has been thrown into turmoil over the past month. After blocking all food for 2 1/2 months, Israel has allowed only a trickle of supplies into the territory since mid-May.
Efforts by the United Nations to distribute the food have been plagued by armed gangs looting trucks and by crowds of desperate people offloading supplies from convoys.
The strike in the central town of Deir al-Balah on Thursday appeared to target members of Sahm, a security unit tasked with stopping looters and cracking down on merchants who sell stolen aid at high prices. The unit is part of Gaza's Hamas-led Interior Ministry, but includes members of other factions.
A horrific scene
Witnesses said the Sahm unit was distributing bags of flour and other goods confiscated from looters and corrupt merchants, drawing a crowd when the strike hit.
Video of the aftermath showed bodies, several torn, of multiple young men in the street with blood splattering on the pavement and walls of buildings. The dead included a child and at least seven Sahmt members, according to the nearby Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital where casualties were taken.
There was no immediate comment from the Israeli military. Israel has accused the militant Hamas group of stealing aid and using it to prop up its rule in the enclave. Israeli forces have repeatedly struck Gaza's police, considering them a branch of Hamas.
An association of Gaza's influential clans and tribes said Wednesday they have started an independent effort to guard aid convoys to prevent looting. The National Gathering of Palestinian Clans and Tribes said it helped escort a rare shipment of flour that entered northern Gaza that evening.
It was unclear, however, if the association had coordinated with the U.N. or Israeli authorities. The World Food Program did not immediately respond to requests for comment by The Associated Press.
'We will no longer allow thieves to steal from the convoys for the merchants and force us to buy them for high prices,' Abu Ahmad al-Gharbawi, a figure involved in the tribal effort, told the AP.
Accusations from Israel
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz in a joint statement Wednesday accused Hamas of stealing aid that is entering northern Gaza, and called on the Israeli military to plan to prevent it.
The National Gathering slammed the statement, saying the accusation of theft was aimed at justifying the Israeli military's 'aggressive practices.' It said aid was 'fully secured' by the tribes, which it said were committed to delivering the supplies to the population.
The move by tribes to protect aid convoys brings yet another player in an aid situation that has become fragmented, confused and violent, even as Gaza's more than 2 million Palestinians struggle to feed their families.
Throughout the more than 20-month-old war, the U.N. led the massive aid operation by humanitarian groups providing food, shelter, medicine and other goods to Palestinians even amid the fighting. U.N. and other aid groups say that when significant amounts of supplies are allowed into Gaza, looting and theft dwindles.
Israel, however, seeks to replace the U.N.-led system, saying Hamas has been siphoning off large amounts of supplies from it, a claim the U.N. and other aid groups deny.
Israel has backed an American private contractor, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which has started distributing food boxes at four locations, mainly in the far south of Gaza for the past month.
Thousands of Palestinians walk for hours to reach the hubs, moving through Israeli military zones where witnesses say Israeli troops regularly open fire with heavy barrages to control the crowds.
Health officials say hundreds of people have been killed and wounded. The Israeli military says it has only fired warning shots.
A trickle of aid
Israel has continued to allow a smaller number of aid trucks into Gaza for U.N. distribution. The World Health Organization said on Thursday it had been able to deliver its first medical shipment into Gaza since March 2, with nine trucks bringing blood, plasma and other supplies to Nasser Hospital, the biggest hospital still functioning in southern Gaza.
In Gaza City, large crowds gathered Thursday at an aid distribution point to receive bags of flour from the convoy that arrived the previous evening, according to photos taken by a cameraman collaborating with the AP.
Hiba Khalil, a mother of seven, said she can't afford looted aid that is sold in markets for astronomical prices and was relieved to get flour for the first time in months.
'We've waited for months without having flour or eating much and our children would always cry,' she said.
Another woman, Umm Alaa Mekdad, said she hoped more convoys would make it through after struggling to deal with looters.
'The gangs used to take our shares and the shares of our children who slept hungry and thirsty,' she said.
Separately, Israeli strikes overnight and early Thursday killed at least 28 people across the Gaza Strip, according to the territory's Health Ministry. More than 20 dead arrived at Gaza City's Shifa Hospital, while the bodies of eight others were taken to Nasser Hospital in the south.
___ Follow AP's war coverage at https://apnews.com/hub/israel-hamas-war

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Protester in Kendrick Lamar's Super Bowl 59 halftime show arrested
The protester who waved around a Palestinian flag during Kendrick Lamar's Super Bowl 59 halftime show has been arrested, more than four months after the incident. Louisiana State Police announced on Thursday, June 26 that 41-year-old Zul-Qarnain Kwame Nantambu turned himself in after authorities obtained an arrest warrant. During Super Bowl 59 on Feb. 9, Lamar closed out his halftime show performance with his single "tv off." During the song, a man dressed in black went rogue on stage and ran around the set while he waved a Palestinian flag that read "Sudan" and "Gaza." The protester then stood atop a black lowrider vehicle and moved toward the 50-yard-line before security tackled him to the ground. The NFL confirmed to USA TODAY the day after Super Bowl 59 that the person had the flag hidden on himself before the show. Officials said state troopers began to investigate the incident after it occurred and identified the protester as Nantambu. An investigation revealed Nantambu confirmed he was hired as an extra for the performance and while he was allowed to be on the field, he "deviated from his assigned role" and did not have permission to perform the demonstration. Authorities added that law enforcement apprehended Nantambu during the show after he allegedly refused to comply with a stop order. After the incident, New Orleans police said the protester would not be arrested or charged, but it was the state police who conducted the action. Louisiana State Police arrested Nantambu and charged him with resisting an officer and disturbing the peace by interruption of a lawful assembly. He is currently booked into the Orleans Parish Justice Center. The NFL previously told USA TODAY the protester would be banned for life from all of the league's stadiums and events. "We take any attempt to disrupt any part of an NFL game, including the halftime show, very seriously and are pleased this individual will be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law," the NFL said in a statement to the Associated Press. After the incident, Nantambu told NBC News he wanted to use the moment to "highlight the human suffering" related to the Israeli-Hamas war. Nantambu is also related to an incident involving a former NFL player, as he confirmed to TMZ Sports that he was the victim in an alleged shooting involving Antonio Brown. According to an arrest warrant in Miami-Dade County (Florida), first reported by the Washington Post, Brown is facing a charge of attempted murder with a firearm stemming from an altercation outside of a May 16 boxing event in Miami.


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
With Iran strike, Trump broke the spell of Iraq — and reset US foreign policy
President Donald Trump has finally moved the United States past the traumas of the Iraq War. With the bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities in Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz, the United States made the world a safer place in the long run. But the attack and subsequent cease-fire between Israel and Iran also represents a reset of American foreign policy. Advertisement The president rejected both the naivety of neoconservatism and the shortsightedness of isolationism. For one thing, Trump, to the dismay of 'non-interventionists,' came to terms with the serious limitations of diplomacy with Islamists. Advertisement Iran was given decades to strike an agreement. It was more interested in a nuclear weapon. Even after Israel had severely degraded its military capabilities and nuclear facilities, seizing supremacy of the air, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei wouldn't surrender his program. Stay up to date on the latest developments in the US airstrike on Iran The idea that diplomats were on the cusp of forging a deal with Iran is dubious. Advertisement Trump also realized that diplomacy is useless without enforced red lines. For decades, the Iranian leadership, hard-liners and 'moderates' alike, ignored its commitments without any repercussions. Simply because we were misled about the extent of Iraq's WMD program doesn't mean that no other country is pursuing them. Iran didn't make much of a secret about its intent, after all. Advertisement Also, let's not forget that the Islamic Republic has been assailing Americans for 45 years. Some of us are old enough to remember hostages being paraded by revolutionaries, the bloody Beirut bombing and servicemen being killed and maimed by Iranian IEDs. All of this should have been unacceptable. But every president since Bill Clinton has been made a fool of by the Iranians on the nuclear issue. Trump, though, accepted that Iran was not Iraq. Few argue that our experiment of imposing a democratic government on Islamic nations failed. Neither Afghanistan nor Iraq evolved into anything resembling a free nation. US drops $500M bombs on Iran Tam Nguyen / NYPost Design The US military dropped 14 'bunker buster' bombs on Iran's Fordow nuclear enrichment plant Saturday night and on two other key sites. Prior to the airstrikes, Israel initiated extensive attacks on Iran's nuclear infrastructure and military. Satellite images show how part of the mountain protecting the facility was completely obliterated. This marks the first time that the US used the 15-ton GBU-57 bunker buster bombs in anger. 'Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behavior,' Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said following the attack. Iran, though, was never going to be another social engineering project. The Trump administration's goal was to deny the regime nuclear weapons. There could not have been a clearer objective. Advertisement Our long-standing ally did the heavy lifting, severely degrading Iran's military capabilities. We, hopefully, finished the job without a single American casualty. Yet the failures of a foreign technocratic nation-building project have turned many Americans into cynics and panic-mongers. There was hysteria after Trump posted that though it wasn't 'politically correct' to use the term regime change, 'if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a regime change??? MIGA!!!' Advertisement Attempting to divine the president's heavily punctuated thinking is a precarious undertaking. Still, it's extraordinarily unlikely Trump ever meant the United States was mulling a way to install a new Iranian government by force. The president was likely attempting to frighten the mullahs into a cease-fire. An invasion of that nation would have taken a major buildup of troops and movement of military assets. There was never any sign that such a plan was in motion. Nor has anyone suggested such an undertaking. Nor is there any popular will to do it. Advertisement Yes, the Israelis also talked up 'regime change.' Stirring up paranoia and anxiety in an opponent is a psychological component of warfare. Israel, moreover, is fighting an enemy that's incessantly threatening its existence. It, quite rationally, wants to destroy its foe. It's also quite rational for the United States to desire a less fundamentalist and bellicose government in Iran. Advertisement Simply because Iraqis rejected our ideas doesn't mean those ideas aren't worthwhile — or that we shouldn't help those who organically embrace them. Our primary concern is American interests. But engaging in a foreign policy wholly stripped of any idealism also leads to ugly places. There have been five uprisings in Iran over the past decade. If the Iranian people have the means and ability to overthrow an autocratic regime and cobble together a less destabilizing government, however unlikely, we certainly shouldn't stand in their way. Perhaps most importantly, Trump understands that a superpower doesn't act terrified when threatened. Others should be terrified of us. The United States seems to have forgotten its own strength after the failures of the Iraq War, which convinced an entire generation that even limited conflicts would spiral us into World War III. This week's Iranian 'attack' on a US base in Qatar had all the earmarks of a face-saving, symbolic maneuver designed for a domestic audience. The truth is that we humiliated our enemy and denied them a chance at a nuke. We have no clue how all this ends. What we do know is this: The United States is no longer paralyzed by the past. David Harsanyi is a senior writer at the Washington Examiner.


Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Iran-Israel war could pull in the United States, offering no good choices
Editor's note: Welcome to Double Take, a regular conversation from opinion writers Melinda Henneberger and David Mastio tackling news with differing perspectives and respectful debate. DAVID: If Donald Trump has a superpower it is in being a disrupter. With two keystrokes, — 'W E' — on Tuesday, he sent the whole foreign policy establishment into a tizzy. 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran. Iran had good sky trackers and other defensive equipment, and plenty of it, but it doesn't compare to American made, conceived, and manufactured 'stuff.' Nobody does it better than the good ol' USA,' Trump said on his social platform, Truth Social. I thought it was Israel that was controlling the skies over Iran and bombing the country back into the pre-nuclear age, but apparently it is 'U S,' that stands for us and United States, I guess. I had been enjoying the irony of our proxy, Israel, taking the war to Iran's terror-supporting government after their years of supporting terrorist proxies in Lebanon (Hezbollah), Gaza (Hamas) and Yemen (Houthis) who threaten U.S. interests while Iran can proclaim it doesn't know anything about it. Remember when the embryonic Hezbollah carried out the 1983 Marine barracks bombing in Beirut that killed more than a dozen American Marines? MELINDA: Sure I do. You are right about Iran's horrible history and bad intentions. DAVID: If Trump has been consistent in one thing so far in his presidency it is that he is going to keep us out of foreign 'forever' wars, especially ones that smell like the one in Iraq, right next door to Iran. Is that all in the rearview mirror? I hope not. MELINDA: I have a big job on my hands here, because I'm going to have to argue with not only you, but also with myself, since I don't know the right answer. I do know a few things: Iranians have been putting up with repressive and rapacious leaders longer than I've been alive. Trump should never have backed us out of the Iran nuclear deal that was working; we used to have inspectors with eyes on at least some sites. Trump also said no new wars would start on his watch. And wasn't one of his biggest selling points that he and Bibi Netanyahu were so tight that Israel would do whatever he said? Yet here we are and off we go. What's that saying again? Fool me 1000 times, and I guess it's because we wanted to be fooled? I think the only time I have supported a military intervention was to end ethnic cleansing in Bosnia, and of course what we did not do in Rwanda was shameful. Like you, I very definitely do not want us in another war. Yet even I, who barely even believe in bombs and certainly do not believe in this president or his team, have to admit that I am a little bit torn over whether a man with the impulse control of a squirrel should do the world a favor and drop some bunker-busters on the Fordow plant. Why? Because no one wants Iran to have a nuclear weapon. DAVID: I, too, am tempted by the idea that Trump could drop a few of those 30,000-pound bombs from a flight of B-2 Spirits on that cave full of uranium centrifuges. Maybe in a few hours we could wash our hands of the whole thing. MELINDA: The counterargument is that we have no idea where that one act would end. Remember how quick Iraq was going to be? We have 40,000 troops in the region, and I do wish Trump hadn't run off so many capable diplomats. Last Sunday, I attended Mass at Our Lady and St. Rose in KCK, and in his terrific homily, Monsignor Stuart Swetland, the pastor and president of Donnelly College, who is a Navy vet, noted that the doomsday clock now stands at 89 seconds to midnight. Tick, tick, tick. First the parade, then the war? Again, like you, I really hope not. DAVID: I sure understand where the Israelis are coming from. For far longer than a quarter-century, Iranian leaders have been saying they want to 'wipe Israel off the map.' And that's not even really what they say because they hate Israel so much they can't even say Israel. State media in Iran calls it the 'Zionist regime.' And with the murderous baby-killing, teen-raping ways of Iran's proxies like Hamas, the Israelis have no reason not to take Iran literally. A nuclear bomb is the last step to the Final Solution. But do we always have to join Israel in the fight? Isn't it enough that while the rest of the world has turned their backs, we have given Israel everything it needs to defeat those who threaten it? The more I think about it, the more I think we do, whatever Trump's campaign promises. I don't want to be viewed in history like the generation of Americans who turned away Jews fleeing the Holocaust. Do I want Pete Hegseth and Donald Trump and Tulsi Gabbard to lead this affair? Do I trust them to make the right choices to minimize our involvement and to not start another generational occupation of a broken nation? No, I do not, but I don't think we have a choice. MELINDA: We always have a choice, and I trust neither Trump and Co. nor Bibi. But oh, God, you know I will never get over some of our World War II-era decisions. In 1941, the U.S. made it even harder for those trying to flee the Nazis to make it to America. FDR did so much good, yet I will never understand how he could have turned away the German ocean liner St. Louis in 1939, and refused to save those 937 Jewish refugees on that boat who were close enough to safety to see the lights of Miami. On this, the 100th anniversary of 'The Great Gatsby,' I admit that the last couple of times I have reread what to me is the Great American Novel, I couldn't help thinking at some moments of those aboard the St. Louis looking with true yearning at those Miami lights and feeling, oh boohoo you, Jay Gatsby, staring at that green light at the end of Daisy's dock and searching for the impossible American dream of reconnecting two people who, even within the world created by Fitzgerald, really only ever existed in your own mind. Our government said little to nothing about the Nazi concentration camps well after we knew about them, and why did we not go in sooner to save more Jews imprisoned there? So are you banging on a bruise here in saying we need to stand with Israel? Yes. The more I think about it, though, the more I think the risks of a wider war are too great. I'm still not sure that I know the right answer, but Iran is so weak right now, and I hope that diplomatic efforts work. 'We're strong, we're prepared, we're defensive and present,' said our historically underprepared but always defensive defense secretary, Pete Hegseth. I don't know if that scared Iran, but it did worry me.