France To Challenge Iran's Hostage Diplomacy Before The UN Top Court
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague, Netherlands, on January 11, 2024. (Photo ... More credit: Dursun Aydemir/Anadolu via Getty Images)
On May 16, 2025, France filed an Application instituting proceedings against Iran before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) with regard to a dispute which, according to the Application, concerns 'serious and repeated breaches by Iran of its obligations under the [Vienna]
The Application, as submitted by France, specifically concerns Iran's detention of two French nationals, Ms Cécile Kohler and Mr Jacques Paris. As indicated by France, Ms Cécile Kohler, a modern literature teacher, and her companion, Mr Jacques Paris, a retired mathematics teacher, were on a tourist visa in Iran before they were arrested on May 8, 2022, by Iranian law enforcement. They have been accused of spying - charges which they have denied. They have been imprisoned ever since. It was not until June 18, 2022, that Iran officially informed France about the arrest of two French nationals. Over the last three years of their imprisonment, the two have only been able to speak with the French consular authorities on four occasions, during individual visits lasting an average of around ten minutes, which took place under very close surveillance and in restrictive conditions. Furthermore, France was effectively prevented from providing legal representation for Ms Cécile Kohler and Mr Jacques Paris. Despite its repeated requests, France has never been able to obtain substantial information on the ongoing legal proceedings concerning the two French nationals still detained in Iran.
France alleges that this 'hostage diplomacy' is being implemented with the specific aim of forcing France to perform or refrain from certain acts. This involves, paraphrasing the terms used in the 1979 International Convention against the Taking of Hostages, seeking to obtain a real or supposed counterpart as an 'explicit or implicit condition' for the release of the persons concerned.
With the Application to the ICJ, France seeks to found the Court's jurisdiction on Article 36 of the Statute of the Court, read in conjunction with Article I of the Optional Protocol to the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations concerning the Compulsory Settlement of Disputes of 24 April 1963, to which both France and Iran are parties.
France requests the ICJ to declare that Iran has failed, and continues to fail, to fulfill its obligations under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. France also requests the ICJ to order Iran to take all necessary measures without delay to put an end to these violations and to redress all their consequences. France further requests that Iran be ordered to refrain from taking any further measures that would constitute a violation of its obligations and to provide assurances and guarantees of non-repetition of such conduct.
This is an important step taken by France to challenge Iran's hostage diplomacy. Hostage diplomacy refers to the practice of strategic detention of foreign nationals by a state to pressure another government into making political or economic concessions. Over the years, Iran has used hostage diplomacy as a strategic foreign policy tool, toying with the lives of people. However, Iran is not alone in playing such games. Russia, North Korea, and China, among others, are common culprits of this State-level hostage taking. Some experts suggest that State-level hostage takings have increased in recent years. As such, the issue requires further attention. Engaging the ICJ on the issue is an important legal avenue for justice and accountability, and a tool in the toolbox that cannot be underestimated.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
36 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
International Criminal Court Says It's Contained Cyber Incident
The International Criminal Court contained a 'sophisticated and targeted' cybersecurity incident that it first identified last week, the organization said in a statement Monday. The Hague, Netherlands-based tribunal said it the incident was swiftly discovered and contained through its alert mechanisms, and it is now working to assess the impact and mitigate any potential effects. The ICC didn't provide further details about the incident in its statement.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
ICE detentions of non-criminal immigrants spike; about 8% have violent convictions, analysis of new data shows
Detentions of immigrants without criminal histories have risen sharply since May amid a broader push to expand immigration enforcement, according to a CBS News analysis of data from the Department of Homeland Security. White House adviser Stephen Miller announced a push for a new, higher target of 3,000 arrests daily in late May. From the first week of May to the first week of June, new ICE detentions of people facing only civil immigration charges, such as entering the country without authorization, rose by over 250%. President Trump has repeatedly said his administration is focusing deportation efforts on criminals. Until recently, federal agents working to enforce his orders have detained more immigrants with criminal convictions or pending criminal charges than those without them each week, the data shows. But even among those with criminal convictions — about 40% of detainees since Jan. 20 — the majority were not for violent offenses. Overall, roughly 8% of all detainees had been convicted of violent crimes, CBS News found. "What we're doing is we're really going after the criminal aliens, of which we have plenty to work with," Mr. Trump said at an event promoting his legislative package on Thursday. At a White House news conference with the president Friday, Attorney General Pam Bondi was asked about enforcement and said, "The violent criminals in our country are the priority now." However, top White House officials, including "border czar" Tom Homan, have also said anyone who entered the country illegally could face removal. Homan told CBS News in May that while ICE would prioritize public safety and national security threats, "If you're in the country illegally, you're not off the table," adding, "It's a violation of law to enter this country illegally." More than 97,000 people have been detained over Mr. Trump's first five months in office, CBS News' analysis found, while ICE arrests, which do not always result in detentions, topped 100,000 earlier this month. A record 59,000 people were currently being held in ICE detention as of June 23 — nearly half of them with no criminal record, CBS News reported last week. The data CBS News analyzed for this report comes from ICE and was released to the Deportation Data Project, a group of academics and lawyers who collect and publish immigration data. The group sued to obtain the data after filing a Freedom of Information Act request. ICE did not respond to a request for comment. Since the first week of June, the number detained with only civil immigration charges was double that of individuals with criminal convictions. This represents an abrupt reversal from the first four months of Mr. Trump's second term, when the number of immigration detainees with a criminal record outnumbered those detained on civil immigration charges. The new target of 3,000 daily arrests announced by Miller is a sharp increase from the the 660 daily arrests made on average during Mr. Trump's first 100 days in office. Out of the more than 97,700 people ICE has detained since Mr. Trump took office, more than 39,500, or about 40%, had criminal convictions. Of those, nearly 23,000 were removed as of mid-June. Among those with criminal convictions, about 8,200 — 8.4% — had convictions for violent crimes, including 478 convicted of homicide and about 6,800 convicted of assault or sexual assault. Violent offenses, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, include crimes that are "threatening, attempting, or actually using physical force against a person." Additionally, about 5,000 had drug-related convictions. Traffic-related offenses made up the largest category of crimes among those with prior convictions, with driving under the influence of alcohol the single most common violation. In an interview with CBS News's Major Garrett in May, Homan blamed "sanctuary city" policies for leading to more arrests of those without criminal convictions. "When sanctuary cities force us into the neighborhood to find that bad guy, many times that person is with others that are illegally in the country but may not be a criminal target," he said. "Well, they're going to go too." Homan has called these "collateral arrests." People without criminal convictions are also easier targets for removal, said Ariel Ruiz Soto, a senior policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank. That's because they tend to be easier to find and more concentrated in one place, he added. "It requires significantly more resources to go after one person who may be armed and dangerous as opposed to going outside a Home Depot and trying to gather a larger number of people," he told CBS News. A CBS News poll completed in early June indicates that mass deportation of non-criminals is unpopular among Americans. The poll found that Americans who believe Mr. Trump's deportation efforts are focused on dangerous criminals support those efforts. But among those who do not think criminals were the focus, support dropped dramatically. Heightened ICE activity has sparked protests across the country in recent weeks, especially in Los Angeles, where Mr. Trump called in the National Guard in response. California's Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom accused the administration of "indiscriminately targeting hardworking immigrant families, regardless of their roots or risk." Some Republican elected officials have also expressed concern. Six GOP members of Congress wrote a letter to ICE acting director Todd Lyons requesting that ICE reveal how many convicted criminals have been deported since January. "Every minute that we spend pursuing an individual with a clean record is a minute less that we dedicate to apprehending terrorists or cartel operatives," they wrote. Ruiz Soto, of the Migration Policy Institute, told CBS News that based on Homan's statements on immigration enforcement, he isn't surprised that detentions are predominantly non-criminals. "There's been a disconnect from the beginning about the rhetoric from President Trump that seems to emphasize a focus on violent and the 'worst of the worst' criminals compared to what his cabinet and DHS has been saying from Day One," he said. "When you look at the numbers it's very clear that has not been the case since the beginning."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Banishes GOP Rep From MAGA as Civil War Gets Ugly
President Donald Trump excommunicated Congressman Thomas Massie from MAGA after he dared criticize the president's decision to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities. Massie, a Kentucky Republican, told CBS' Face the Nation Sunday that Trump's decision to bomb the Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan facilities made it 'a good week for the neocons and the military industrial complex who want war all the time.' 'We are exhausted,' he said. 'We are tired from all of these wars, and we're non-interventionists. I mean, this was one of the promises. I mean, are you going to call President Trump's campaign an isolationist campaign? What he promised us was, we would put America first.' Massie further claimed there was 'no imminent threat' to the United States and that Congress should not have ceded its authority. In response to the interview, Trump went on a lengthy Truth Social rant against Massie on Sunday, calling him 'weak, ineffective, and votes 'NO' on virtually everything put before him (Rand Paul, Jr.), no matter how good something may be.' 'Congressman Thomas Massie of Kentucky is not MAGA, even though he likes to say he is. Actually, MAGA doesn't want him, doesn't know him, and doesn't respect him,' Trump wrote. 'He is a negative force who almost always Votes 'NO,' no matter how good something may be. He's a simple minded 'grandstander' who thinks it's good politics for Iran to have the highest level Nuclear weapon, while at the same time yelling 'DEATH TO AMERICA' at every chance they get.' 'MAGA should drop this pathetic LOSER, Tom Massie, like the plague!' he added. In a separate interview with Fox News Digital published after Trump's post, Massie said he felt 'misled' by the president's actions, and was not alone in the MAGA camp. 'I didn't think he would let neocons determine his foreign policy and drag us into another war.' Massie continued, 'Other people feel the same way, who supported Trump—I think the political danger to him is he induces a degree of apathy in the Republican base, and they fail to show up to keep us in the majority in the midterms.' Massie also labelled JD Vance's statement that the U.S. is only at war with Iran's nuclear program as 'ludicrous.' 'He's engaged in war,' Massie said. 'We are now a co-belligerent in a hot war between two countries. You can't say this isn't an act of war, that it's a strike outside of a war. This is inside, geographically and temporally, of a war.' Massie then took to his X account to reply, tagging Trump and stating the president 'declared so much War on me today it should require an Act of Congress. #sassywithmassie.' On Sunday, Trump's political operation, backed by a war chest of $500 million, launched Kentucky MAGA, a super PAC dedicated to defeating Massie in a May 2026 primary, Axios first reported. Trump pollster Tony Fabrizio and aide Chris LaCivita will run the PAC, which LaCivita said will do 'whatever it takes' to oust Massie. In his earlier remarks to CBS, Massie questioned the president's authority to conduct a war without Congress' approval. 'Congress was on vacation last week when all this was happening,' Massie said. 'We haven't been briefed. They should have called us all back and, frankly, we should have debated this war powers resolution that [Representative] Ro Khanna and I offered instead of staying on vacation and doing fundraisers and saying, 'Oh, well, the president's got this under control. We're going to cede our constitutional authority.'' Massie and Khanna, a Democrat, proposed a War Powers Resolution last week that was meant to reassert Congress' sole authority under the Constitution to declare war. 'The ongoing war between Israel and Iran is not our war,' Massie said in a statement. 'Even if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution.' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth defended on Sunday the administration's actions in Iran, saying it complied with the War Powers Resolution of 1973. The act says the president must notify Congress within 48 hours of military action and cannot deploy troops for longer than 90 days without a formal declaration of war. Massie also defended MAGA supporters like Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican from Georgia, and former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who've opposed the intervention, saying they were simply 'exhausted' from Americans fighting abroad. Massie's remarks came a day after he slammed the strikes as 'not constitutional' in an X post and slammed House Speaker Mike Johnson for not demanding the president ask for congressional authorization. 'Why didn't you call us back from vacation to vote on military action if there was a serious threat to our country?' Massie replied to Johnson's post praising Trump's actions. 'I introduced a War Powers Resolution on Tuesday, while Congress was on vacation. We would have had plenty of time to debate and vote on this.' He also said Trump's decision constituted an 'act of war.' 'When two countries are bombing each other daily in a hot war, and a third country joins the bombing, that's an act of war,' he wrote. 'I'm amazed at the mental gymnastics being undertaken by neocons in DC (and their social media bots) to say we aren't at war… so they can make war." The Daily Beast has reached out to Massie and the White House for further comment.
