logo
The FURRIES Act would ban Texas students from using litter boxes in school. Critics say it targets a problem that doesn't exist.

The FURRIES Act would ban Texas students from using litter boxes in school. Critics say it targets a problem that doesn't exist.

Yahoo02-05-2025

A new Texas bill is gaining attention for seeking to ban 'animal behavior' in public schools. It's called the Forbidding Unlawful Representation of Roleplaying in Education Act, aka the FURRIES Act — and it seeks to stop students from 'using a litter box for the passing of stool, urine, or other human byproducts.'
The bill, named after the 'furry' subculture, which broadly refers to people with a particular interest in animal characters with humanlike qualities, bans dressing up like an animal (such as by wearing tails, collars, ears or leashes) in schools, and bars hissing, meowing and other animallike tendencies. It also prohibits 'surgical' interventions that would make a student appear more animallike.
But according to some lawmakers, educators and members of the public, the act is seeking to solve problems that don't actually exist — particularly when it comes to where students are, or are not, using the bathroom. Here's what to know.
The FURRIES Act was first introduced on March 13 by Stan Gerdes, a Republican Texas state representative. He claimed that an unspecified 'furry-related incident' happened in the Smithville Independent School District outside of Austin, prompting him to file a formal piece of legislation.
That same day, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott referenced the act at the 2025 Texas Pastors Policy Conference in Austin in a speech promoting school choice, where he stated that some students were using litter boxes at school.
In a Tuesday hearing about the bill, Texas state Rep. James Talarico, a Democrat, pushed back and asked Gerdes to confirm the claims that inspired the FURRIES Act. Gerdes was unable to provide specifics.
'This is all part of Abbott's smear campaign against our public schools,' Talarico wrote in a post on X.
In fact, none of the claims about litter box usage in schools have ever been verified — and the idea that students are forgoing toilets in favor of cat litter boxes has been debunked time and time again.
Rumors about kids using litter boxes in schools have circulated since at least January 2022, per a New York Times article that explained how a Midland County, Mich., school district was accused of supplying feline-friendly accommodations for students before it denied having litter boxes.
Meanwhile, in March 2022, Republican Nebraska state Sen. Bruce Bostelman apologized after repeating the debunked rumor — which was circulating in Facebook groups for parents in both Nebraska and Iowa — during a televised debate.
But by the fall of 2022, at least 20 conservative candidates and elected officials falsely claimed that year that schools were accommodating students who identified as cats, according to a review by NBC News.
That includes New Hampshire Republican Senate candidate Don Bolduc, who claimed at a campaign event that students were using litter boxes, as well as exhibiting other animal behaviors like licking one another, at Pinkerton Academy in Derry, N.H. A spokesperson for the school denied this, stating the boxes were used for their pre-veterinary and animal management classes.
In October 2022, podcaster Joe Rogan told guest Tulsi Gabbard that his friend's wife 'works at a school that had to install a litter box in the girls' room because there is a girl who was a furry, who identifies as an animal' — further giving fuel to the rumors. But weeks later, Rogan walked back the comments, admitting on his podcast that there 'doesn't seem that there's any proof that they put a litter box in there.' Reuters Fact Check also separately confirmed in October 2022 that there are no schools providing litter boxes for students.
And it's not just (not) happening in America, either: In May 2023, CBC reported that a school in Quebec, Canada, also had to debunk its own kitty litter rumor.
So far, there is only one piece of evidence that says some schools are supplying kitty litter for student use: Colorado's Jefferson County school district, which includes Columbine High School, previously stated that it keeps litter in classrooms in case students need to relieve themselves during an emergency lockdown.
Some people, such as Talarico, a vocal school voucher critic, see the litter box rumors as a way to incite a moral panic where none exists to stoke distrust in public education.
Grand Forks, N.D., Superintendent Terry Brenner told Education Week in November 2022 that the kitty litter hoax is part of an agenda 'started by a small minority group and a political wing' who are 'trying to dismantle public education as we know it.'
'By starting all of this disinformation, they can say, 'public schools aren't the answer,'' he explained. ''Students aren't achieving academically, socially, behaviorally, or emotionally. So, let's get the voucher system going.''
President Trump has made it a mission to radically change education in the United States, indicating his intent to dismantle the Department of Education earlier this year. Some critics of that plan say that doing so will give more power to private and religious institutions, furthering the class and education divide.
The litter box rumors also come amid another ongoing bathroom battle in public schools over the rights of trans students to use the restroom that aligns with their gender identity.
Scott Ellis, executive director of Great Lakes Bay Pride, which services the Midland LGBTQ community in Michigan, spoke to Michigan Advance in February 2022 about the ways in which the litter box panic harms children.
'We've gotten to a place where in order to put down those who are either exploring their gender identity or identify maybe differently than their sex assigned at birth, we start equating these things — like in this particular case, 'furries' being a role-play versus somebody's identity,' he said. 'Those are not the same thing.'
While furries are not inherently a part of the LGBTQ community, despite common misconception, self-described 'gay furries' did take credit for hacking into anti-trans government websites in 2023.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump Says 'Bring in the Troops' as LA Riots Escalate
Donald Trump Says 'Bring in the Troops' as LA Riots Escalate

Newsweek

time39 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Says 'Bring in the Troops' as LA Riots Escalate

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump called for troops to enter Los Angeles amid rioting in the Californian city that stemmed from protests against immigration enforcement. The Republican president is deploying 2,000 California National Guard troops to L.A. to quell the intense violence, despite opposition from Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom. "Looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!" Trump posted to his Truth Social platform in the early hours of Monday morning. This is a developing story. Updates to follow.

BlackRock, State Street to urge dismissal of collusion case, Bloomberg says
BlackRock, State Street to urge dismissal of collusion case, Bloomberg says

Business Insider

time2 hours ago

  • Business Insider

BlackRock, State Street to urge dismissal of collusion case, Bloomberg says

BlackRock (BLK), Vanguard Group, and the asset management arm of State Street (STT) are headed to court over a lawsuit brought by Republican state attorneys general claiming they colluded to reduce coal output, Josh Sisco and Silla Brush of Bloomberg reports. Lawyers from the companies are set to urge a federal judge to dismiss the case. The suit claims the firm have large stakes in coal producers and profited when energy prices soared. Confident Investing Starts Here:

Unsubstantiated 'chemtrail' conspiracy theories lead to legislation proposed in US statehouses
Unsubstantiated 'chemtrail' conspiracy theories lead to legislation proposed in US statehouses

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Unsubstantiated 'chemtrail' conspiracy theories lead to legislation proposed in US statehouses

BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — As Louisiana Rep. Kimberly Landry Coates stood before her colleagues in the state's Legislature she warned that the bill she was presenting might 'seem strange' or even crazy. Some lawmakers laughed with disbelief and others listened intently, as Coates described situations that are often noted in discussions of 'chemtrails' — a decades-old conspiracy theory that posits the white lines left behind by aircraft in the sky are releasing chemicals for any number of reasons, some of them nefarious. As she urged lawmakers to ban the unsubstantiated practice, she told skeptics to 'start looking up' at the sky. 'I'm really worried about what is going on above us and what is happening, and we as Louisiana citizens did not give anyone the right to do this above us,' the Republican said. Louisiana is the latest state taking inspiration from a wide-ranging conspiratorial narrative, mixing it with facts, to create legislation. Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee signed a similar measure into law last year and one in Florida has passed both the House and the Senate. More than a dozen other states, from New York to Arizona, have introduced their own legislation. Such bills being crafted is indicative of how misinformation is moving beyond the online world and into public policy. Elevating unsubstantiated theories or outright falsehoods into the legislative arena not only erodes democratic processes, according to experts, it provides credibility where there is none and takes away resources from actual issues that need to be addressed. 'Every bill like this is kind of symbolic, or is introduced to appease a very vocal group, but it can still cause real harm by signaling that these conspiracies deserve this level of legal attention,' said Donnell Probst, interim executive director of the National Association for Media Literacy Education. Louisiana's bill, which is awaiting Republican Gov. Jeff Landry's signature, prohibits anyone from 'intentionally" injecting, releasing, applying or dispersing chemicals into the atmosphere with the purpose of affecting the 'temperature, weather, climate, or intensity of sunlight.' It also requires the Department of Environmental Quality to collect reports from anyone who believes they have observed such activities. While some lawmakers have targeted real weather modification techniques that are not widespread or still in their infancy, others have pointed to dubious evidence to support legislation. Discussion about weather control and banning 'chemtrails' has been hoisted into the spotlight by high-profile political officials, including Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. Recently, Marla Maples, the ex-wife of President Donald Trump, spoke in support of Florida's legislation. She said she was motivated to 'start digging' after seeing a rise in Alzheimer's. Asked jokingly by a Democratic state senator if she knew anyone in the federal government who could help on the issue, Maples smiled and said, 'I sure do.' Chemtrails vs. contrails Chemtrail conspiracy theories, which have been widely debunked and include a myriad of claims, are not new. The publication of a 1996 Air Force report on the possible future benefits of weather modification is often cited as an early driver of the narrative. Some say that evidence of the claims is happening right before the publics' eyes, alleging that the white streaks stretching behind aircrafts reveal chemicals being spread in the air, for everything from climate manipulation to mind control. Ken Leppert, an associate professor of atmospheric science at the University of Louisiana Monroe, said the streaks are actually primarily composed of water and that there is 'no malicious intent behind' the thin clouds. He says the streaks are formed as exhaust is emitted from aircrafts, when the humidity is high and air temperature is low, and that ship engines produce the same phenomenon. A fact sheet about contrails, published by multiple government agencies including NASA and the Environmental Protection Agency, explains that the streaks left behind by planes do not pose health risks to humans. However, the trails, which have been produced since the earliest days of jet aviation, do impact the cloudiness of Earth's atmosphere and can therefore affect atmospheric temperature and climate. Scientists have overwhelmingly agreed that data or evidence cited as proof of chemtrails 'could be explained through other factors, including well-understood physics and chemistry associated with aircraft contrails and atmospheric aerosols,' according to a 2016 survey published in the journal Environmental Research Letters. In the survey of 77 chemists and geochemists, 76 said they were not aware of evidence proving the existence of a secret large-scale atmospheric program. 'It's pure myth and conspiracy,' Leppert said. Cloud seeding While many of the arguments lawmakers have used to support the chemtrails narrative are not based in fact, others misrepresent actual scientific endeavors, such as cloud seeding; a process by which an artificial material — usually silver iodide — is used to induce precipitation or to clear fog. 'It's maybe really weak control of the weather, but it's not like we're going to move this cloud here, move this hurricane here, or anything like that,' Leppert said. Parker Cardwell, an employee of a California-based cloud seeding company called Rainmaker, testified before lawmakers in Louisiana and asked that an amendment be made to the legislation to avoid impacts to the industry. The practice is an imprecise undertaking with mixed results that isn't widely used, especially in Louisiana, which has significant natural rainfall. According to Louisiana's Department of Agriculture and Forestry, a cloud seeding permit or license has never been issued in the state. Geoengineering While presenting Louisiana's bill last week, Coates said her research found charts and graphics from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on spraying the air with heavy metals to reflect sunlight back into space to cool the Earth. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2022 directed the Office of Science and Technology Policy, with support from NOAA, to develop an initial governance framework and research plan related to solar radiation modification, or SRM. A resulting report, which Coates holds up in the House session, focuses on possible future actions and does not reflect decisions that had already been made. SRM 'refers to deliberate, large-scale actions intended to decrease global average surface temperatures by increasing the reflection of sunlight away from the Earth,' according to NOAA. It is a type of geoengineering. Research into the viability of many methods and potential unintended consequences is ongoing, but none have actually been deployed. Taking focus In recent years, misinformation and conspiratorial narratives have become more common during the debates and committee testimonies that are a part of Louisiana's lawmaking process. And while legislators say Louisiana's new bill doesn't really have teeth, opponents say it still takes away time and focus from important work and more pressing topics. State Rep. Denise Marcelle, a Democrat who opposed Louisiana's bill, pointed to other issues ailing the state, which has some of the highest incarceration, poverty, crime, and maternal mortality rates. 'I just feel like we owe the people of Louisiana much more than to be talking about things that I don't see and that aren't real,' she said. ___ Associated Press writers Kate Payne in Tallahassee, Florida, and Jack Dura in Bismarck, North Dakota, contributed to this story.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store