Hack.Diversity to cease operations after final cohort
After almost 10 years of working to diversify the Boston tech startup workforce, the nonprofit plans to shut down this summer.
Story Highlights The tech diversity nonprofit will shut down Aug. 30.
Declining partnerships and internships led to financial challenges for Hack.Diversity.
Over 600 fellows graduated, with 80% securing high-paying tech jobs.
After almost 10 years of working to diversify the Boston tech startup workforce, Hack.Diversity plans to shut down this summer.
The nonprofit dedicated to boosting diversity in tech startups said its current cohort would continue as planned, but that it would not be enrolling any additional cohorts afterward and will cease operations on Aug. 30.
The closure of Hack.Diversity marks the loss of another pivotal resource for the Boston tech ecosystem, coming a week after Innovation Studios, the nonprofit co-working space provider with studios in Boston and Roxbury, filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection.
The Roxbury location of Innovation Studios specifically catered to programs for entrepreneurs and founders of color. Now, with the loss of Hack.Diversity, diverse startup founders will have fewer opportunities and resources available, making it harder to break into a crowded tech ecosystem.
The closure is coming during a time when diversity initiatives across the United States, including those in Boston, are facing scrutiny and criticism from the federal government. According to co-founder and board member Jeff Bussgang, the nonprofit began preparing for the potential attack on diversity last year, changing the language around DEI and emphasizing overall excellence instead.
Sign up for The Beat, BostInno's free daily innovation newsletter. See past examples here.
Fellowships provided by Hack.Diversity were primarily funded through partnerships with companies, as well as grants and contributions. As AI tools continue to advance, Bussgang says there's a decreasing need for entry-level coding positions. Coding AI tools have improved so significantly in helping engineers write and adjust code, to the point where 95% of the code in one quarter of Y Combinator startups was written by AI, according to Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan.
Bussgang and the board at Hack.Diversity decided that there was no clear path forward for Hack.Diversity into 2026.
'The best junior engineers are going to be those that figure out how to leverage the tools to self-teach, which potentially exacerbates the access problem and the diversity problem in the industry,' Bussgang said. 'Because people who are going to have those tools might be the ones that have the resources and the influences around them because they're raised in the ecosystem.'
The nonprofit dropped from 30 partner companies to 18 within the last couple of years, as more companies dropped internship positions altogether, Michelle De La Isla, the current CEO of Hack.Diversity told The Business Journal. According to De La Isla, fewer partnerships result in fewer internships, and fewer internships have a direct impact on funding.
"That was what really impacted us. Our philanthropic partners are incredible, but HACC doesn't work without internships, host companies or jobs for the fellows," De La Isla said.
expand
Michelle De La Isla, new CEO of Hack.Diversity.
Gary Higgins / Boston Business Journal
The nonprofit faced financial challenges last year after it announced that it would cut eight jobs as part of a restructuring due to budgetary restraints. According to its 2024 impact report, the nonprofit operated at a loss of $440,000 in 2024, compared to a net income of $200,000 the previous year, as reported by Pro Publica.
Hack.Diversity has undergone a series of changes since it spun out of the New England Venture Capital Association. Jody Rose, who served as NEVCA's president and co-founder of Hack.Diversity stepped down from her role within a year, and Michell De La Isla, the former Mayor of Topeka, Kansas, stepped into the role as CEO in 2023.
The nonprofit was originally founded in 2016 with the mission to connect talented STEM students of color with strong companies in Greater Boston in the hope of dismantling the barriers between the local innovation economy and the Black and Latino communities. Hack.Diversity also conducts racial equity, diversity and inclusion training at partner companies.
In pursuit of helping Black and Latino communities, Hack.Diversity conducted a fellowship program to help underrepresented tech workers secure internships at companies seeking to diversify their workforce.
During its 10 years in operation, the nonprofit graduated over 600 fellows who have been placed at more than 30 companies. Despite the closure of Hack.Diversity, Bussgang said the New England Venture Capital Association will maintain the alumni network and Slack channels for Hack.Diversity alumni to continue to network and share resources.
According to De La Isla, over 80% of Hack.Diversity alumni who were not returning to school after the fellowship ended up getting hired at the end of their fellowship. The average salary for the program's alumni averaged between $115,000 and $150,000.
"At this point in time, the organization of Hack.Diversity may be ceasing operations after this cohort, but the spirit of Hack lives in every single one of the fellows that we've been able to serve," De La Isla said "To keep Hack alive and to pay for all the goodness that they received, it is their opportunity to now open doors for others. And if they carry that on, Hack will live on, because Hack lives through them."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
11 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Another major furniture chain closes stores, no bankruptcy
The furniture industry has faced several financial issues that other industries have encountered, including rising labor and product costs driven by inflation, higher interest rates on their debt obligations, and fierce competition. A slowdown in the real estate market in recent years is one of the top reasons why consumers haven't been buying new furniture. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter When people buy a new house, they often buy new furniture to go with their new residence. If houses aren't selling, furniture isn't either. Related: Another popular furniture retailer files Chapter 11 bankruptcy Furniture manufacturers have faced economic fallout from furniture store struggles. When furniture stores have difficulty selling inventory in their showrooms, they don't purchase more products from manufacturers. High-quality custom wood cabinetry manufacturer and retailer Worthy's Run Furniture LLC filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on May 28 to reorganize its business. The Hagerstown, Md., furniture manufacturing and retail company filed its Subchapter V petition, listing up to $50,000 in assets and $100,000 to $500,000 in liabilities. The company did not indicate a reason for filing for bankruptcy in its petition. North Carolina furniture manufacturer and supplier Progressive Furniture, which provides products to major retailers, will close down its business at the end of the year and lay off all 30 of its employees, after its primary supplier in Mexico, which provided 60% of its products, decided to close its business. Progressive imports wooden furniture from both Asia and Mexico. Progressive Furniture, a subsidiary of ready-to-assemble furniture company Sauder Woodworking, sells its products through Walmart, Target, Home Depot, Lowe's, Amazon, Wayfair, and other furniture retailers. The company, which operates a warehousing and distribution plant in Claremont, N.C., said it will fulfill existing orders and honor warranties until it closes. It has no plans to file for bankruptcy. Furniture retailers with financial problems will sometimes file for bankruptcy to reorganize their businesses to continue operating. Popular 5th Avenue Furniture Warehouse Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection to restructure its debts, facing a disputed tax claim. The Bay Shore, N.Y., furniture store filed its Subchapter V petition on June 6 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York, listing $100,000 to $500,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in debts, including $2.37 million owed to its largest creditor, the New York State Department of Taxation & Finance. More bankruptcy: Iconic auto repair chain franchise files Chapter 11 bankruptcyPopular beer brand closes down and files Chapter 7 bankruptcyPopular vodka and gin brand files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy In other cases, furniture retailers might close store locations without filing for bankruptcy. Iconic furniture store chain Scandinavian Designs revealed that it will close its Sioux Falls, S.D., store location by the end of June after six years of operation, the Argus Leader reported. Related: Another popular furniture company files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy The Boise, Idaho-based furniture store chain reportedly informed employees on May 15 that it would close the Sioux Falls location in four to six weeks. The company called the closing a "financial business decision," an employee said. The Sioux Falls store opened in January 2019 in a former Toys R Us location, which closed in June 2018, as the toy store chain filed for bankruptcy and liquidated its assets. The South Dakota closing comes a year after Scandinavian Designs closed a store in the Fair Oaks, Calif., community near Sacramento. The company has not revealed any plans to close additional stores or to file for bankruptcy. Scandinavian Designs did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Scandinavian Designs, which also operates The Outlet by Scandinavian Designs and Dania Furniture, was established in 1963 in San Rafael, Calif. The company currently operates 47 stores in 15 states, stretching from California to Maryland. Related: Iconic furniture chain shuts troubled store, no bankruptcy plans The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Miami Herald
15 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Big beverage brand unexpectedly files Chapter 11 bankruptcy
For decades, it seemed like consumers have very little beverage choice. If you went to the grocery store, the soft drink aisle was dominated by Coca-Cola and PepsiCo products. You had a few juice brands, and there might be packaged iced tea, and some really terrible instant coffee type drinks. Related: Bankrupt retail chain closing over 200 more stores The entire ready to drink, coffee and iced tea market did not exist. You also did not have energy drinks and the new craze around adding protein to beverages was not a thing. Outside of the grocery store, most markets had a local coffee chain, or even a large one, like Dunkin', but beverages was not a major category. Now, it seems that a ton of companies, everything from convenience stores to restaurants and dedicated cafés understands that beverages are very high margins. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter American consumers have also shown a willingness to try these things. Bubble tea has built a bit of a market and Starbucks sells way more than coffee. Even McDonald's plans to expand its beverage lineup because it seems like easy money. The reality is that there's too much competition in the space. When you have Coca-Cola, closing dozens of brands and a number of promising companies not making it, you realize that high margins are great, but a crowded marketplace is not. Image source: REDA/Getty Images Some brands operate out of site. You may not know US Foods or Cheney Bros., but they probably supplied the restaurant chain (or local restaurant) you last ate at. Caraway Tea is one of those large, but off the radar companies. The brand explained its business on its website. "As a family-owned business, Caraway cares about your business as much as you do. From our modest beginnings to today's respected reputation as an established leader in the tea co-packing and manufacturing industry. We turned our passion for truly fine tea into being the most customer obsessed, premier private label tea manufacturing company," it shared. More bankruptcy: Iconic auto repair chain franchise files Chapter 11 bankruptcyPopular beer brand closes down and files Chapter 7 bankruptcyPopular vodka and gin brand files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy Co-packing is not a term most people understand. Basically, it's when a third-party works with a brand to bring their product to retail, exactly the way they want it. Many food brands use a co-packer once they hit a certain scale. "We provide customers a different kind of experience with diversified co-packing services tailored to meet your needs. We offer custom blending and packing of fine-grade teas, herbs and unique botanicals for discerning brands," Caraway explained. While its partners may decide what recipe they want, or the types of teas they plan to sell, Caraway sources the product and prepares it for retail. That could mean loose tea or ready-to-drink beverages. "From China and Sri Lanka to India and Japan, we continue to develop deep source connections and personal relationships, working directly with artisan tea growers and single-family estates who use only organic sustainable agricultural practices who share our passion to produce teas that yield diverse, subtle flavors that cannot be found in other tea offerings - you can taste the difference," the company posted. Caraway Tea has now filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection with $100,000 to $500,000 in assets, and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities. The voluntary petition indicates the company has fewer than 50 creditors. Related: Disney World closing three iconic attractions permanently The company, which does wholesale tea under its own name appears to still be operating. It makes no mention of the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing on its website and its blog has not been updated since 2023. Caraway Tea does not appear to have any social media pages. The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Forbes
21 hours ago
- Forbes
AI Agents Are Coming To Healthcare
A digital workforce is coming to healthcare. getty Y Combinator calls 2025 the 'year of AI agents,' and singled out healthcare as a key focus area. Bill Gates predicts that agents will 'upend the software industry, bringing about the biggest revolution in computing since we went from typing commands to tapping on icons." Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently proclaimed that agents "present a trillion-dollar opportunity.' You get the point. Agents are all the rage throughout the tech industry. But what exactly are agents? What role might they play in healthcare? And what's holding them back from realizing their potential? Because early chatbots used decision trees and scripted responses, they struggled with in-depth conversations. With ChatGPT's release, millions of people discovered how to interact with large language models across an almost unlimited range of topics. Agents build on that foundation. They are LLMs enhanced with capabilities such as retrieval, memory, and tools—enabling them to carry out narrowly defined tasks without human supervision (e.g., booking a flight or responding to a customer service request). While copilots assist humans, agents take over tasks entirely. Agentic AI coordinates multiple task-specific agents to accomplish multi-step goals. Many healthcare provider organizations are struggling. Their workforces are strained and shorthanded. Margins are thin, labor costs are rising, and many processes are inefficient and wasteful. Meanwhile, patients often struggle to access timely, affordable, and effective care. Numerous industries, such as banking, travel, and personal finance, have improved productivity and service by doing more with fewer people. Agents may unlock similar opportunities in healthcare. Always on, scalable, and tireless, agents could automate a range of administrative and even clinical processes. That's why many view agents not just as tech, but as operational infrastructure and digital labor. As Luminai CEO Kesava Kirupa Dinakaran explained, 'When you think about how computers can drive value, it's by improving operations. At their core, healthcare organizations are all about operations.' The hope is that agents can expand access, lower costs, improve experiences, and enhance outcomes. A burgeoning wave of companies is racing to deliver AI agents that enable provider organizations to do more with less. Call centers are today's leading use case. Most patients still make appointments by phone, and many skip them due to scheduling hassles. Agents can manage inbound calls by conversing with patients and taking the next best actions (e.g., scheduling an appointment or making a referral). When agents cannot handle an end-to-end call, they can verify key details, summarize the conversations, and hand off to human staff. Assort Health Co-CEO Jeff Liu explained that his company aims to help healthcare organizations 'train the best operators they ever had.' By turning scheduling protocols into rules engines and plugging agents into EHRs, his co-CEO Jon Wang reported that their company automates most inbound calls—routing the rest to call center workers and nurses in priority order. Similarly, Hello Patient CEO Alex Cohen reports that his company's 'fully generative voice and SMS agents handle real-time front‑office calls and proactively re-engage patients, letting clinics boost access and fill schedules without adding headcount.' Agents are also handling outbound calls. Notable's agents prepare patients for clinic visits by verifying their insurance benefits, clarifying (and documenting) their reason for the visit, and checking them in for their appointments. Qventus' agents help optimize patients for procedures and surgeries by providing preparation instructions, sending appointment reminders, answering general care questions, and coordinating pre-admission testing. Infinitus deploys agents to perform health risk assessments and help patients access specialty therapies and rare disease programs. Some agents support patients between and after visits. Ambience Healthcare is developing agents that send follow-up instructions, medication reminders, and scheduling prompts based on visit notes. Hippocratic AI provides a constellation of agents for nurse-level clinical tasks, such as making post-discharge follow-up calls and closing care gaps. The company calls this 'super staffing' since many organizations lack the staff to do enough of this work on their own. Sword Health, a digital physical therapy platform, uses agents to onboard patients, provide customer service, and even help them return hardware. And Cedar recently launched an AI voice agent, Kora, to handle billing inquiries, explain charges, surface payment options, and connect patients with financial assistance. Agents are not limited to patient-facing roles—they're also streamlining the back office. For example, one of Luminai's agents reads incoming faxes and automatically triggers downstream workflows like refills and referrals. VoiceCare AI automates communication between provider organizations, insurers, and patients. Its CEO, Parag Jhaveri, reported that their agent, Joy, can wait on hold for more than 30 minutes, navigate phone trees, sustain multi-hour conversations, and take actions like updating claims and filing requests. Building a well-scripted, polished demo is easy. Delivering reliable performance on real-world healthcare tasks is much harder. Agents often score far short of human performance. For one, healthcare is complex—filled with edge cases, exceptions, and contextual nuance. As legendary software engineer Steven Sinofsky noted, automation is ultimately about handling exceptions, not the routine. Several technical barriers stand in the way. Healthcare data is deeply siloed and fragmented. Lisa Bari, Head of External Affairs at Innovaccer, warns against deploying agents without full contextual data. Also, while LLMs enable agents to handle a wide range of inputs, they can produce uncontrolled outputs. Longer conversations and more contextual data can reduce accuracy and increase latency. Moreover, error rates compound across multi-step processes. For example, an agent with 98% per step will complete a five-step task successfully only 90% of the time (0.98⁵). Developers use various strategies to make agents more reliable. As Sword Health product lead Rik Renard, RN, emphasized, "Evaluating agents' output against pre-specified criteria is essential for deploying reliable agents, yet few people discuss this.' Many agentic systems use specialized knowledge graphs to contextualize information and 'coordinating agents' to link multiple, narrow task-specific agents. Technical guardrails help ensure agents stay within scope and flag questionable output for human review. Still, picking the right use cases is critical. Notable Chief Medical Officer Dr. Aaron Neinstein told me that his company first deploys agents in low-risk areas (e.g., patient intake) to build trust before expanding into more complex workflows. Even with clear use cases, deployment remains hard and no shortcuts exist. As Cedar CEO Dr. Florian Otto summed it up, 'Agents must be built workflow by workflow and only deployed when they reliably work well.' Agents must also integrate with other tech systems—like EHRs and CRMs—to access contextual data and execute tasks. Most use native API integrations, though some interact through the same point-and-click interfaces that healthcare workers use. Ultimately, in an 'agentic economy,' agents must interact with one another—communicating information, transferring resources, collaborating, and tracking transactions. This will require persistent identity and seamless communication protocols, which developers are now building. Several companies, including Salesforce, Microsoft, and Innovaccer, have launched platforms to orchestrate multi-agent healthcare workflows. "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.' Arthur C. Clark famously explained, "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.' If you haven't interacted with an AI agent or tried a modern voice model, you should. This isn't your mother's old pharmacy's IVR system. The technology has crossed the uncanny valley — it feels like magic. But unlike magic, it's not infallible. In high-stakes situations, unreliable AI can cause real harm. As extreme examples, consider how the National Eating Disorder Association's chatbot 'Tessa' encouraged users with eating disorders to diet, or how a companion allegedly pushed a teenager to commit suicide. Agents, however, are more than chatbots. They are tireless digital workers who are always ready to complete specific tasks. When stitched together, they can form multi-agent systems—or 'agent swarms'— that handle complex, interdependent processes and behaviors. Yet, US and EU regulators have approved exceedingly few healthcare AI agents. Hardian Health's Dr. Hugh Harvey warns, "Health systems and clinicians using unregulated AI agents must accept all the risk.' Will they be willing? While regulatory approval is cumbersome, it may be necessary to speed adoption. Also, unlike magic, AI agents aren't plug-and-play. Implementing agents is a massive change-management undertaking. Patients will need to adjust their expectations and learn to interact differently with technology and healthcare. In his book Alchemy, Rory Sutherland explains that in our 'unrelenting quest' for greater efficiency, we often forget to ask 'whether people like efficiency as much as economic theory believes they do.' Take the 'doorman fallacy:' a hotel that replaces doormen with automatic doors may save money, while overlooking the other valuable functions doormen provide, such as hailing taxis, providing security, welcoming guests, and signaling the hotel's status. Similarly, healthcare workers often do far more than their simple job description. For example, if agents automate scheduling, who will reassuringly mention that 'everyone loves Dr. Smith' or that she tends to run late at the end of the day? Of course, healthcare workers aren't perfect or always available. Several company leaders I spoke with say patients prefer interacting with their agents over healthcare workers. But this remains to be seen. Outside healthcare, Klarna—the buy now, pay later company—recently walked back its ambitious efforts to replace two-thirds of its customer service workforce with AI agents. It turns out many customers still want to talk to real people. Agents will also reshape how healthcare workers do their jobs. By offloading drudgery, agents could empower some. Yet others may resent having to babysit new digital coworkers that could potentially replace them. Interestingly, one company CEO shared that executives and managers–not frontline staff–are often the most resistant. Perhaps they worry agents will shrink their teams and reduce their influence. Or, more likely, they may feel daunted by all that responsible deployment demands: surfacing tacit knowledge, defining ground truths, streamlining workflows, and retraining workers for new forms of human-AI collaboration. Infinitus CEO Ankit Jain explained his company 'sells outcomes, not technology.' It focuses on supporting change management, recognizing that 'organizations must be able to crawl before they walk and then run.' For agents to succeed, organizations must look inward. Technology is an amplifier. It can boost productivity or magnify inefficiency. Healthcare organizations, which strongly pull towards inertia, must actively reexamine their operations, rebalance their workforces, and reinforce their digital governance. Otherwise, poorly integrated agents could cause confusion and chaos. Optimizing workflows is essential. So is relieving downstream constraints. For example, a flawless appointment-scheduling agent is of limited value if doctors' schedules are always full. An outreach agent that flags patient needs is only helpful if there are enough nurses and clinicians available to respond. Taken together, these developments point toward a future that's both promising and uncertain. 'Technology is neither good nor bad; nor is it neutral.' Healthcare's digital history has taught us hard lessons: technology can help, but it cannot miraculously solve all problems. And tech doesn't work in isolation—lasting change depends on rethinking people, processes, and priorities, not just deploying tools. Roy Amara famously observed, 'We tend to overestimate the effect of a technology in the short run and underestimate the effect in the long run.' That seems likely with AI agents. In the near term, agents will make existing workflows faster and cheaper—answering calls, managing intake, and making appointments. Next, they may improve those workflows—coordinating across channels, adding personalization, and responding with context. Eventually, they may enable entirely new approaches, with networks of agents operating semi-autonomously across systems. At the heart of this evolution is a core tension: leverage versus certainty. Agents promise a kind of abundance—tireless labor at negligible cost. But that leverage introduces risk. For now, they'll likely remain in administrative domains, where errors are less costly and rarely dangerous. Still, care delivery is also quite inefficient. Care models for both acute and chronic illness have barely changed in decades—and the clinician-patient encounter remains healthcare's choke point. Here, too, agents may help: handling triage, guiding protocol-driven decisions, even managing chronic conditions. Much of this is already technically feasible. But real progress will require much more: rigorous evaluation, regulatory clarity, updated business models, cultural acceptance, redesigned teams, and seamless escalation paths to human care. Melvin Kranzberg's First Law reminds us: 'Technology is neither good nor bad; nor is it neutral.' The promise of agents is real—but conditional. Their impact depends on how we design, deploy, and govern them. Will agents make care more personalized—or more transactional? Will they return time to clinicians—or reduce their autonomy and turn them into machine supervisors? Will they bring people closer together—or insert more distance? Will they relieve burden—or hollow out the human core of care? Agents are coming. What they become depends on us. I thank the following people for discussing this topic with me: Ray Chen and Jonathan Fullerton (Ambience Healthcare), Jeffery Liu and Jon Wang (Assort Health), Florian Otto (Cedar), Hugh Harvey (Hardian Health), Alex Cohen (HelloPatient), Rick Keating (Hippocratic AI), Ankit Jain (Infinitus), Abhinav Shashank and Lisa Bari (Innovaccer), Pankaj Gore (Insight Health), Kesava Kirupa Dinakaran (Luminai), Aaron Neinstein and Tushar Garg (Notable), David Atashroo (Qventus), Rouhaan Shahpurwala ( Rik Renard and Kevin Wong (Sword Health), Maria Gonzalez Manso (Tucuvi), Parag Jhaveri (VoiceCare AI), Sergei Polevikov (WellAI), and Stuart Winter-Tear.
