
Terrifying hidden detail in Trump's popular new executive order sparks fears of another pandemic
Many celebrated when President Donald Trump signed a new executive order this week restricting research that could trigger the next pandemic.
The order banned US funds from being used to sponsor research abroad known as 'gain-of-function', when pathogens are deliberately made more infectious or deadly.
'It's a big deal', said the President, while putting pen to paper in a White House briefing Monday, 'It could have been that we wouldn't have had the problem we had if we had this done earlier'.
But a closer look at the fine-print of the order suggests it does not go as far as the full-scale ban on the research that many had hoped for.
Trump's executive only bans federal funds from being used in 'countries of concern' like China and Iran. In the US and other allied countries, it allows federal funding of the work to continue — but proposes more monitoring from the US government.
Thomas Renz, a vaccine-skeptic lawyer and supporter of Trump, claims the new policy doesn't end gain-of-function. He says it 'codifies it.'
He told The Daily Pulse: 'They're going to allow it under new regulations. And by doing that, they're essentially saying, "We're fine with gain-of-function as long as it follows the current rules."
'So in that way, they're actually legitimizing gain-of-function work in this country, which is absolutely mind-blowing to me,' he added.
Donald Trump is pictured above preparing to sign the executive order on gain-of-function research. He is flanked by his secretary for health Robert F. Kennedy Junior, the head of the NIH, Dr Jay Bhattacharya, and the head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Dr Mehmet Oz. White House Secretary Will Scharf is shown handing the President the order
Trump signed the executive order in a 20-minute session in the White House Monday flanked by the HHS secretary as well as the head of the NIH, Dr Jay Bhattacharya and the head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, Dr Mehmet Oz.
A copy of the order posted online reads: 'The Biden Administration allowed dangerous gain-of-function research within the United States with insufficient levels of oversight.
'It also actively approved, through the National Institutes of Health, Federal life-science research funding in China and other countries where there is limited United States oversight or reasonable expectation of biosafety enforcement.'
It continued: 'This recklessness, if unaddressed, may lead to the proliferation of research on pathogens (and potential pathogens) in settings without adequate safeguards, even after Covid-19 revealed the risk of such practices.'
Your browser does not support iframes.
It also asks the head of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, Michael Kratsios, to come up with new guidelines for monitoring the research in the next 120 days.
In 2014 under the Obama administration, all federal funding on experiments that could make certain viruses more dangerous was halted.
Trump reversed this ban in 2017, allowing the experiments to continue — although under a very tight framework.
After the Covid pandemic, however, last year the Biden administration brought in a sweeping set of federal laws for monitoring the research.
The new order seeks to build on this Biden era framework, and come up with a new method for monitoring the experiments.
Biden's move has already faced criticism for failing to set up an independent federal agency to monitor the research.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
15 minutes ago
- The Sun
Man, 41, given just two years to live after mistaking ‘bizarre' symptom for a trapped nerve
WHEN Andres Albaladejo noticed a "bizarre" symptom in his left arm he didn't think it was anything sinister. Little did the 41-year-old know it was the first sign of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and he would have just two to three years to live. 4 4 Andres and his wife, Carmen Albaladejo, 39, noticed a twitch in his left arm in April 2023 but didn't think it was anything sinister. A visit to the chiropractor confirmed Andres had a trapped nerve, but the weakness in his left arm continued, so Andres went to a neurologist. The neurologist performed three EMGs - a medical test that measures the electrical activity in muscles - and referred Andres to an ALS - amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - clinic in October 2023. The clinic said Andres had ALS - a progressive neurodegenerative disease that affects nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord - and told him and his family he had two to three years to live. In September 2024, Andres underwent stem cell therapy - to slow down or reverse the progression of the disease - which worked, but the effects have now worn off. Carmen is now concentrating on making as many memories as possible with Andres and their 11-year-old daughter, Sophia. Andres, a former school resource officer, from Tampa, Florida, US, said: "I was heartbroken when I heard the news, like my life was being taken from me piece by piece - I still have so much of me to give. "I'm angry that I won't be here to see my little girl grow into the smart, kind, and beautiful woman I know she will be. I think that hurts the most. "Instead, she has to watch me fall apart in front of her eyes. "I just hope that throughout all of this, my daughter still sees me as her hero, as I face this disease with determination and strength." Eric Dane's Brave Battle: ALS Diagnosis and a Triumphant Return to Work Carmen noticed Andres' left arm was twitching in April 2023, but they both thought it was a pinched nerve. Soon after, Andres started experiencing weakness in his left arm, which he thought was strange. His wife, Carmen, a senior accountant, said: "I noticed the twitching in his left arm and asked what was going on. IT WAS BIZARRE. "I asked if he could feel it, if he was doing anything to make it twitch, but he said no. "We thought it was a pinched nerve, but over time, he started experiencing arm weakness, and he wasn't able to grip with his left arm." Two to five years to live In June 2023, Andres went to the chiropractor, and an X-ray showed he did have some nerve compression, which came as a relief to the couple. After treatments with the chiropractor, the arm weakness did not go away, and Andres was sent to a neurologist. Carmen said: "At the time, the doctors said they were going to schedule him for a disc replacement surgery for the disc that was compressing his nerve. "But before they went ahead and did that, they did three EMGs with the neurologist becoming more concerned each time as the twitching was travelling to his chest." Andres was then transferred to an ALS clinic, where, after a strength test, he was diagnosed with ALS - the same condition Stephen Hawking had - and given a prognosis of two to five years. Carmen and Andres were shocked and confused by the diagnosis, so they asked for a second opinion, which confirmed the ALS diagnosis. From having a pinched nerve to being diagnosed with a terminal disease eight months later - we were in shock and denial Andres Albaladejo Carmen said: "From having a pinched nerve to being diagnosed with a terminal disease eight months later - we were in shock and denial. "It was devastating, you can never imagine it happening to you or a loved one. "In eight months, our lives completely changed. We thought it was nerve compression, and now Andres has a terminal illness with a prognosis of two to five years. "It is a lot to hear in one appointment." Andres is currently taking an ALS medication to slow the progression of the disease. In September 2024, friends, family and strangers clubbed together to raise $26,235 (around £19,323) for stem cell therapy in the Cayman Islands in a bid to attempt to slow down or reverse the progression of the disease. 4 4 Currently, there are no FDA-approved stem cell therapies for ALS available in the US, but there are several trials to investigate the safety and efficacy of using stem cells to potentially slow or halt the progression. Carmen said the treatment worked, but the effects have now worn off, and they can't afford another round of treatment. She said: "We are facing the disease head-on and dealing with it every day. "At this point, we are getting our affairs in order, as we can not see any promising treatments we can afford. "We are trying to stay strong and make the best out of our situation." Carmen recently bought a book for their daughter, Sofia, to sit with Andres and fill out so she can have memories of her dad. Carmen said: "It is called 'about my father' a book that she will put together. "She will get to ask him questions about his childhood, and get to know him from a different perspective. "It allows her to have something that she could treasure forever." What is ALS? Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal type of motor neuron disease. It causes progressive degeneration of nerve cells in the spinal cord and brain. Early symptoms may include: Muscles weakness and twitching - this can be in the arms, legs, or even the tongue, causing difficulty with fine motor skills, such as gripping objects, or difficulty with speech. Muscle cramps - These can be painful and may affect various muscles, including those in the hands and feet. Fasciculations - These are muscle twitches that can be persistent and may interfere with sleep. Tripping and falling - Loss of motor control in the legs and feet can lead to difficulties with balance and coordination. Dropping things - Hand weakness can make it difficult to hold and manipulate objects. Slurred speech - Difficulty speaking and swallowing can occur due to weakness in the muscles controlling speech and swallowing. Difficulty swallowing - This can make eating and drinking challenging. The exact cause of ALS is unknown, but it's believed to be a combination of genetic and environmental factors. While about 10 per cent of ALS cases are familial (meaning they have a family history), the majority are sporadic, occurring without a known family history. If you suspect you have ALS, the first step is to see your GP.


Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
RFK Jr appoints new vaccine committee – including vaccine sceptic doctor
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has appointed a new vaccine advisory panel, including a medical doctor who has claimed that Covid vaccines 'may damage [children's] brains, their heart, their immune system, and their ability to have children in the future.' The move comes just two days after the US health secretary unprecedentedly dismissed all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the body responsible for advising on vaccine recommendations to prevent and control diseases. Of the eight new members, four have actively spoken out against vaccination in some form. The most controversial pick is Dr Robert Malone, a prominent opponent of mRNA vaccines who also falsely claims to have invented the technology. While Dr Malone was involved in some of the early research on mRNA, his role was minimal at best, say experts. Dr Malone has previously stated that mass vaccination programs during the pandemic were enabled by 'mass formation psychosis,' an unrecognised medical term he coined, which he says also explains how Nazi Germany carried out the Holocaust. He was temporarily banned from X (formerly Twitter) for spreading misinformation about Covid-19, including claims that mRNA vaccines are experimental gene therapy that could cause irreparable harm, particularly to children. Also on the panel is Dr Martin Kulldorff, a former Harvard Medical School professor who was dismissed from his position in 2024. Dr Kulldorff was a key figure in the Great Barrington Declaration, an open letter published in 2020 that opposed widespread lockdowns and was widely criticised by experts as dangerous and anti-scientific. Of the panel, which includes Joseph Hibbeln, Retsef Levi, Cody Meissner, James Pagano, Vicky Pebsworth and Michael Rossm, four who have previously worked on committees associated with either the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), or the Food and Drug Administration. 'All of these individuals are committed to evidence-based medicine, gold-standard science, and common sense,' Mr Kennedy said in a post on X. It's not clear what process these figures went through, but it typically takes more than a year to be appointed to a federal advisory panel. Dr Noel Brewer, a professor in public health at the University of North Carolina who was a member of the ACIP, said it typically takes more than a year to be appointed as a member of a federal advisory panel – and that he went through a 1.5 year process to serve on ACIP. 'You apply by writing an essay,' he told the Telegraph. 'Once you're approved, you fill out maybe 20 or 30 forms. You disclose all of your financial stakes in companies and all sources of income. Then you get ethics training.' The health secretary added that the panel would attend a CDC meeting on June 25, where advisors are expected to deliberate and vote on who should receive a number of vaccines, including the flu shot, Covid-19 boosters, and vaccines for RSV, HPV, and meningococcal disease. Dr Peter Hotez, a vaccine expert and Dean for the National School of Tropical Medicine at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, said: 'Kennedy is leading a MAHA [Make America Healthy Again] pseudoscience agenda, mostly as an economic stimulus for a very corrupt wellness/influencer industry'.


Reuters
33 minutes ago
- Reuters
UN nuclear watchdog says Iran in breach of obligations, Iran announces counter-measures
VIENNA/DUBAI, June 12 (Reuters) - The U.N. nuclear watchdog's board of governors declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations on Thursday and Tehran announced counter-measures, as tensions rose in the Middle East before further U.S.-Iranian nuclear talks. U.S. and Iranian officials will hold a sixth round of talks on Tehran's accelerating uranium enrichment programme in Oman on Sunday, the Omani foreign minister said on Thursday. But security fears have risen since U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday American personnel were being moved out of the region because "it could be a dangerous place" and that Tehran would not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon. The International Atomic Energy Agency's policy-making Board of Governors declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in almost 20 years, raising the prospect of reporting it to the U.N. Security Council. The step is the culmination of several stand-offs between the Vienna-based IAEA and Iran since Trump pulled the U.S. out of a nuclear deal between Tehran and major powers in 2018 during his first term, after which that accord unravelled. An IAEA official said Iran had responded by informing the nuclear watchdog that it plans to open a new uranium enrichment facility. The move by Iran was among several measures being taken because of the resolution, Iranian state TV said. The IAEA official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Iran had given no further details such as the location of the site. Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesperson for Iran's atomic energy organisation, told state TV that Tehran had informed the IAEA of two countermeasures including "the upgrading of centrifuges in Fordow (enrichment plant) from first to sixth generation, which will significantly boost the production of enriched uranium". Enrichment can be used to produce uranium for reactor fuel or, at higher levels of refinement, for atomic bombs. Iran says its nuclear energy programme is only for peaceful purposes. Reiterating Iran's stance that it will not abandon the right to nuclear enrichment as a signatory to the global Non-Proliferation Treaty, a senior Iranian official told Reuters that rising tensions in the region were intended to "influence Tehran to change its position about its nuclear rights." The Iranian official said a "friendly" country had alerted Tehran to a potential strike on its nuclear sites by arch-adversary Israel and reiterated that the Islamic Republic would not abandon its commitment to nuclear enrichment. "We don't want tensions and prefer diplomacy to resolve the (nuclear) issue, but our armed forces are fully ready to respond to any military strike," the Iranian official said. Iranian state media reported that Iran's military had begun drills earlier than planned to focus on "enemy movements". The decision by Trump to remove some personnel from the region comes at a volatile and highly sensitive moment in the oil-producing Middle East, where security has already been destabilised by the Gaza war between Israel and Palestinian militant group Hamas that began in October 2023. Oil prices initially rose after Trump's announcement but later eased. Foreign energy companies were continuing their operations as usual, a senior Iraqi official overseeing operations in southern oilfields told Reuters on Thursday. Trump has threatened to strike Iran if the nuclear talks do not progress, and in an interview released on Wednesday said he had become less confident that Tehran would agree to stop enriching uranium. The Islamic Republic wants a lifting of the U.S. sanctions imposed on the country since 2018.