Powerful new Vulcan Centaur rocket gearing up for 1st Space Force mission
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
Credit: United Launch Alliance
In late 2024 or early 2025, United Launch Alliance (ULA)'s Vulcan Centaur rocket will fly its first of more than two dozen U.S. Space Force missions allocated under a national security space launch contract.
"It's incredibly exciting," Mark Peller, Senior Vice President of Vulcan Development and Advanced Programs at ULA , told Space.com recently. "We've stacked the rocket down at the Cape [in Florida] and are going through all the normal pre-launch processing."
Advertisement
The Vulcan Centaur rocket will replace ULA's workhorse Atlas V , which has been flying since 2002. ULA chose the BE-4 engine from Blue Origin to power the newer rocket's first stage, as opposed to the Russian-made RD-180 used by Atlas V.
"As we transition operations from Atlas to Vulcan," Peller said, "the team I formed to develop Vulcan continues to work though planned upgrades to Vulcan to improve its performance, its versatility and meet the evolving demands of our customers in a competitive marketplace."
Related: Facts about ULA's new Vulcan Centaur rocket
One of Vulcan's benefits is lower-cost launches, due to what ULA calls sensible, modular, autonomous return technology , or SMART for short. SMART allows for the most expensive rocket parts to be recovered post-launch, then refurbished for reuse. "The majority of the value of the rocket is in the back end that contains the engines and lots of other critical systems," Peller said.
SMART reuse draws on a non-propulsive solution to recover the back end downrange of the launch. "We use an inflatable heat shield, or 'aeroshield,' that we're co-developing with NASA to help slow the engine module as it reenters the atmosphere," Peller said. "In the final phases of flight, we deploy parachutes, and it does a soft splashdown in the ocean." The inflatable heat shield protects the back end, serving as a life raft, until the ULA team recovers it.
In addition to private-industry customers, NASA plans to use Vulcan , but the Space Force's USSF-106 mission is the next one on the books.
"The Vulcan Centaur launch system brings a large range of performance capabilities and technological innovations from its baseline configuration," Col. Doug Pentecost, deputy program executive officer for the Space Force's Assured Access to Space program, said in an emailed statement. "With the launch of Vulcan, we have completed our transition from the Russian engine and now have a single core rocket to deliver to our more demanding orbits."
The methane-fueled Vulcan has now flown two certification missions, a requirement for carrying out Space Force missions. While both missions were successful from ULA's perspective, they were not without their issues.
Vulcan's debut, called Cert-1 , launched on Jan. 8, 2024 from Florida's Cape Canaveral Space Force Station . The rocket carried the Peregrine lunar lander , built by Pittsburgh-based company Astrobotic.
a rocket hangs suspended outside an assembly hanger.
With a manifest featuring a variety of space-bound deliveries from 20 customers, such as a NASA laser array, a swarm of tiny robots, a physical bitcoin and even a hunk of Mt. Everest, Peregrine aimed to make America's first privately funded moon landing.
Vulcan Centaur performed well. But Peregrine came up short: Due to a propellant leak from a faulty helium pressure control valve, the lunar lander never made it to the moon; it drifted through space for 10 days, then was guided to a controlled destruction in Earth's atmosphere .
Vulcan's second certification mission launched on Oct. 4, also from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. In contrast with Vulcan's maiden voyage, this mission had no paying customers.
While launching Sierra Space's Dream Chaser was the original plan, the robotic space plane wasn't ready in time , so Vulcan lifted off with experiments and instrumentation enabling ULA to assess the rocket's performance. ULA CEO Tory Bruno clocked the launch's price tag in the "high tens of millions of dollars."
Less than a minute after liftoff on Oct. 4, an anomaly with one of the solid rocket boosters (SRBs) caused the rocket to veer slightly before the main engines quickly corrected course, allowing Vulcan to complete the flight as planned. "The vehicle was able to compensate for it and fly through it," Peller said of the SRB anomaly.
"It had a minimal impact on performance," he added. "The vehicle proved to be very robust."
ULA is still investigating what happened. "We made a lot of good progress based on some of the parts of the motor — the debris from that nozzle that were actually recovered," Peller said. "That's provided valuable physical evidence."
After the completion of the two flights, Vulcan's final stages of certification are underway. "The government has all the final data deliverables and are just doing their due diligence before they complete the formal certification process so we can move on and fly SF-106," Peller said.
Related Stories:
— ULA's 1st Vulcan Centaur rocket launch looks spectacular in these photos and videos
— ULA's Vulcan rocket launches private US moon lander, 1st since Apollo, and human remains in debut flight
— ULA delays Dream Chaser space plane launch to certify Vulcan Centaur rocket for US military missions
On a global level, spaceflight continues to change rapidly. 2024 has seen a range of new developments, which may alter the course the industry takes in the coming years.
In January, for example, Houston's Venus Aerospace teamed up with NASA to test a rotating detonation rocket engine (RDRE) , which could revolutionize the propulsion capabilities of combustion engines. In May, India's national space agency, the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO), successfully tested a liquid-fueled rocket engine built using additive manufacturing, or 3D printing. And SpaceX continues to advance rocket reusability, recently "catching" its Starship Super Heavy booster with the launch tower's "chopstick" arms.
As we move further into the 2020s, the spaceflight industry has only become more important. Scientific, military, and commercial interests all rely on an increasingly private-funded launch industry to bring us closer to the stars.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Golden Dome: Revolutionary missile defense or money pit?
Imagine a future where North Korea launches a surprise missile barrage, China unleashes a wave of hypersonics, and Russia sends intercontinental ballistic missiles arcing over the North Pole. In this nightmare scenario, the only thing standing between those warheads and millions of lives is a massive new missile defense system called The Golden Dome. However, that assumes it doesn't end up being a total boondoggle. Initially announced as The Iron Dome for America, and then glitzed up as The Golden Dome, the project, estimated to cost up to $175 billion, was ordered by President Donald Trump, who said during a May 20 press briefing that 'it should be fully operational before the end of my term, so we'll have it done in about three years.' The Dome, whether Iron or Gold, would create an all-encompassing missile shield that can detect, track, and destroy virtually any incoming aerial threat, like drones and ballistic missiles, before it strikes U.S. territory. It has been described by Space Force Gen. Michael Guetlein as a project on the scale of the Manhattan Project, the top-secret World War II initiative that produced the atomic bomb. But where that project delivered a functional weapon in just a few years, The Golden Dome faces far more complicated technical, financial, and strategic hurdles. In this video, we break down what The Golden Dome is, and isn't, like how it's not a big shimmering bubble over America and is instead an integrated network of sensors, interceptors, and data systems backed up by AI-enhanced decision-making tools. And a number of systems already in operation today will form the backbone of The Golden Dome. The Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense system, whose origin can be traced back to the Strategic Defense Initiative, uses advanced SM-3 and SM-6 interceptors to target missiles in the midcourse and terminal phases. The Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system, operated by the U.S. Army, is capable of high-altitude terminal intercepts and has a proven track record in live-fire testing and a handful of real-world engagements. Meanwhile, Patriot batteries, upgraded with PAC-3 and PAC-3 MSE missiles, serve as the last line of defense, targeting incoming threats at lower altitudes and closer ranges. We also dive into the price tag, which was initially estimated at $175 billion, but will likely come in at around $500 billion to $900 billion over 20 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office. And then there's the question of whether it will actually work. This type of missile defense system has never been built before, and will require dozens of systems, some of which don't exist yet, and they all have to function together seamlessly, in real time, from anywhere on the planet, but also in space. So, yeah, we'll see. A Marine Corps reply-all email apocalypse has an incredible real-life ending Army shuts down its sole active-duty information operations command Army plans to close more than 20 base museums in major reduction Former Green Beret nominated to top Pentagon position to oversee special ops The Navy's new recruiting commercial puts the 'dirt wars' in the past
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
NASA shuts down X accounts as fears swirl about massive cuts to science initiatives
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration has started consolidating dozens of its social media accounts. It'll archive platforms in coming weeks focused on the moon, the Earth's climate, the Perseverance Mars rover, and the Orion spacecraft: the Artemis program vehicle that will one day take astronauts back to the lunar surface. Some of the rudderless agency's accounts told their hundreds of thousands — or even millions — of followers not to be alarmed. 'Don't worry, my mission isn't going anywhere,' accounts for the Perseverance and Curiosity Mars rovers and the Voyager spacecraft assured on Monday. NASA said its social media portfolio had grown to more than 400 accounts spread out across dozens of platforms. 'While each account has served an important purpose in telling our story, our focus is to improve the user experience through more cohesive messaging. We are reducing the overall number of accounts for a simplified presence that continues to inform, educate, and inspire the public,' NASA's Commercial Crew program account explained. But followers voiced concerns that streamlining communications — reportedly from 400 accounts down to just 35 — may make communication even more of a challenge for NASA. Some said NASA was 'Thanos snapping,' or described the cull as "Red Wedding Stuff.' 'This account is/was a pioneer of social media,' space journalist Elizabeth Howell said of the Curiosity Rover account. Not everyone agreed. Spaceflight photographer John Kraus said the effort was 'long overdue' and the 'right direction,' noting that the Orion and Space Launch Systems accounts could be relegated to focus on one for the entire Artemis program. 'How can we inspire the next generation when over 100 accounts on a single platform flood it with frequent posts — often multiple times daily — prioritizing posting for the sake of their own existence over quality content? It's overwhelming,' he said of X. Jared Isaacman, Trump's former pick for NASA administrator, signaled his support for that take. It comes amid renewed concerns regarding further reductions in personnel and the recently released Fiscal Year 2026 budget proposal. A summary of the proposal said the Office of Communications would be restructured by eliminating functions 'not statutorily mandated,' consolidating duplicative functions, and automating 'routine tasks.' There are reports claiming this effort is already underway. Shifting focus largely on human spaceflight, the agency's proposal would slash funding for crucial initiatives that have been the product of decades of research at NASA. Those would include 41 space missions, the agency's climate monitoring satellites and top climate lab, the ongoing Mars Sample Return mission, and upcoming missions to Venus. In all, total funding would be cut by nearly a quarter, and the Planetary Society says there would be a 'devastating 47 percent cut to the agency's science program.' The budget still needs to pass through Congress. 'If enacted, this plan would decimate NASA. It would fire a third of the agency's staff, waste billions of taxpayer dollars, and turn off spacecraft that have been journeying through the Solar System for decades. Humanity would no longer explore the universe as it does today, and our ability to confront deep, cosmic questions would be set back an entire generation,' astrophysicist Dr. Asa Stahl wrote. Jacqueline McCleary, an assistant professor of physics at Northeastern University, called the proposed budget a 'strategic mistake.' 'Even if you want to dismantle a project or dismantle a satellite, it takes time, it takes resources,' McCleary said. 'You can't just lock the doors and [let] it sit in a warehouse forever. Sudden cuts like these are paradoxically very wasteful of taxpayer money because they're not controlled.'
Fast Company
3 hours ago
- Fast Company
Can AI use inspire us to grow in new ways?
There's a growing concern that artificial intelligence is leading us to a place where we think less and rely on it more. Headlines warn that AI is eroding our critical thinking skills, creating a world of work where human ingenuity might take a backseat to automated convenience. After all, when generative AI can draft a report, summarize a dense article, or generate a marketing plan in seconds, where's the incentive for leaders and employees to sharpen the skills we relied on before? These concerns aren't baseless. Automation has always sparked questions about how reliance on technology impacts our brains and behaviors. Examples like GPS leading us to abandon our navigation skills or calculators replacing mental math, provide a glimpse into the broader challenge AI presents. Research confirms that AI may be changing the way we think today: Constant exposure to AI tools can reduce our ability to think critically. Should workplaces abandon AI and turn the clock back? Of course not. That's neither practical nor productive. AI isn't a fleeting trend. It's a transformational shift that's here to stay. The genie is out of the bottle, and its applications in nearly every area of life and work are deepening by the day. But this raises an important question: If AI is inevitable, how can we ensure it doesn't simply make us passive users, but instead inspires us to grow and evolve in new ways? The answer lies in how we redefine the skills we value and develop in ourselves and future generations. Instead of seeing AI as a competitor to human intelligence, we must think of it as an enabler that challenges us to excel in areas where AI can't. We must consider how to develop AI fluency. Our human advantage To thrive in an AI-dominated world, enterprises need to invest in the abilities that AI can amplify but not replicate. Part of developing a fluency in AI is recognizing where it excels and where we as humans can outperform it. Here are three areas where humans excel over technology. 1. Critical thinking and judgement Generative-AI tools can surface answers faster than ever, but humans must decide which answers are valid, relevant, and ethical. In an era of AI-generated content, our ability to ask the right questions, evaluate information critically, and spot biases will be more essential than ever. 2. Creativity and problem solving AI can assist in generating ideas, but the ability to connect seemingly unrelated concepts or imagine entirely new possibilities—known as taking a creative leap—remains inherently human. As automation tackles more routine work, businesses will increasingly seek individuals who can navigate ambiguity and generate innovative solutions. 3. Emotional intelligence and leadership Machines lack the empathy, communication skills, and interpersonal insights required to foster collaboration, inspire teams, and guide organizations through change. Our human edge lies in understanding other humans, which AI cannot replicate. Adaptability is an essential skill As AI becomes embedded in nearly every aspect of work and life, our approach to growth and development needs to evolve alongside it. Today, upskilling is less about acquiring static knowledge and more about developing the agility to apply new skills in dynamic, ever-changing contexts. Being adaptable is a skill unto itself. As AI introduces new opportunities and challenges, our success will hinge on our ability to constantly upskill and adjust to what's next. Organizations and individuals alike must embrace this new reality. For businesses, that means prioritizing upskilling programs that focus on the human-AI partnership. That could mean, for instance, teaching employees how to leverage AI effectively while continuing to contribute their unique human value. For individuals, it requires shifting from passive consumption of AI outputs to active engagement and integration. Instead of simply asking AI to provide answers, we need to think critically about the prompts we design, the follow-up questions we pose, and the frameworks we use to evaluate and synthesize its outputs. AI is a catalyst for human growth The narrative that AI is making us stupid misses the bigger picture. Like every major technological leap in history, AI is changing the nature of how we work, think, and create. But it's not a replacement for human intelligence. It's an accelerator. The responsibility is ours to wield it wisely, using it to complement and expand our capabilities rather than diminish them. The future of work won't belong to those who resist AI or passively lean on it. It will belong to those who use it as a catalyst for growth, wielding this revolutionary technology to push the boundaries of what humans can achieve. The question isn't whether we'll need skills in an AI-driven world. It's what kinds of skills will define human success. And the answer, as it turns out, is a sharper, more agile, and more curious version of ourselves.
