Secular, socialist not in Ambedkar's draft, time to rethink: RSS
New Delhi:
RSS
general secretary
Dattatreya Hosabale
said on Thursday that a rethink on the need to have the words "
secularism
" and "
socialism
" in the Preamble to the Constitution must be undertaken as these words were added during the
Emergency period
and were not part of the original draft laid down by BR Ambedkar.
"During the Emergency, two words were added to the Indian Constitution's Preamble -- secularism and socialism. These were not in the Preamble drafted by Babasaheb Ambedkar. These words were added when Parliament was not functioning and the judiciary was made helpless," he said.
"Later (post-Emergency), no attempts were made to remove these two words," Hosabale said. "Now, it needs to be considered whether these two words should remain in the Constitution," he added. Hosabale was speaking at a programme on '50 Years of Emergency' held here, which was also attended by Union Minister Nitin Gadkari, Madhya Pradesh Deputy Chief Minister Rajendra Shukla and other prominent
BJP leaders
.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Cardiologist Reveals: The Simple Morning Habit for a Flatter Belly After 50!
Lulutox
Undo
"The Preamble is eternal. Are the thoughts of socialism as an ideology eternal for India?" he asked.
"Secularism could be part of various central and state policies as it was earlier," he said.
Live Events
Without naming Congress leader and leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha,
Rahul Gandhi
, the RSS leader said those who imposed Emergency are now roaming around with the Constitution in their pockets.
"They have not apologised to the people of the country till today. They haven't sought forgiveness...They will have to apologise to the nation," Hosabale added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Protests Over Jihad In New MA Pol Sc Syllabus
New Delhi: References to jihad, terrorism, self-determination in Kashmir and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) in Delhi University's revised MA political science syllabus have drawn objections from members of the university's Standing Committee on Courses. The syllabus, for implemented from the 2025-26 academic year, has already been approved by DU's Academic Council and Executive Council but awaits a final nod from the standing committee, where it was recently reviewed and sent back for revision after several faculty members voiced objections. At the centre of the objections is the elective paper, DSE 17: Politics and Ethnic Conflicts in J&K, which aims to examine "historical, constitutional and political aspects of J&K, internal and external dimensions, separatism, insurgency, migration of Pandits from the Valley, human rights and Armed Forces Special Act-related issues". The course also includes topics such as "debates on state autonomy, factors of terrorism, and secessionist politics". The syllabus features readings on India's national identity, Hindu nationalism and the politics of anxiety. Some members of the standing committee objected to the topics proposed to be taught in the paper. Another paper, DSE 51: Religious Nationalism and Political Violence, which examines the mobilisation of religious identity in political conflicts, also came under the scanner. According to its stated objective, the course seeks to understand "how religion becomes a political resource for mobilisation and contestation in different contexts, especially in multi-religious societies". It adds that "the course also interrogates the complex relationship between religion, modernity, nationalism and violence". You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi There are references to RSS in DSE 14: Identities and Political Transformation in India, which includes the organisation as part of a reading by famous French scholar Christophe Jaffrelot, a known critic of Hindu nationalism and the Narendra Modi govt. Also flagged was DSE 63: Discourses on Hindu Nationalism, which proposes to study "the core issues of Hindu nationalism which is the most contested subject of debate in the Indian politics". The syllabus engages with key thinkers and includes readings like "Essentials of Hindutva" by Vinayak Damodar Savarkar. On the international front, DSE 28: Pakistan and the World includes discussions on 'Pakistan's ideological foundations and nationalism; Islam and the military; The Kashmir problem – genesis, wars, proxy war and peace process; Islamic radicalism, trans-border terrorism and Jihad', and Pakistan's evolving foreign policy, particularly in relation to India, Afghanistan and China. The inclusion of such framing in a university-level elective has also drawn pointed queries from a section of the committee. "These papers are not academic in nature. They are ideologically driven and meant to push a particular narrative. The inclusion of such content under the garb of curriculum reform is unacceptable," declared professor Harendra Nath Tiwari, a member of the standing committee. The panel has asked the political science department to revise the syllabus by removing the controversial papers and objectives. A fresh draft is expected to be presented when the standing committee reconvenes on July 1. The DU administration had earlier said the syllabus had to be reworked keeping India as the focal point of teaching. These objections come amid a wider pattern of contestation around syllabus revisions at DU. In recent months, changes to both undergraduate and postgraduate curricula — particularly under the New Education Policy framework — have faced criticism from sections of the academic community. In May, a controversy erupted over the removal of proposed papers on the Israel and Palestine conflict, issues in Kashmir and one on dating app-related suicides from the undergraduate syllabus of the psychology department.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Justice Sayeed: Dedicated police team needed to tackle drug menace effectively
1 2 3 4 Nagpur: Justice MA Sayeed, former member of the Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission, has urged the creation of separate police teams for protocol duties and crime investigation to improve the efficiency of anti-narcotics operations. Addressing the city police's Anti-Drug Day programme under Operation Thunder, Justice Sayeed said that the present structure overstretches the force, hampering focused investigation. "The Malimath Commission has already suggested this segregation. The city commissioner must formally move the home ministry," he said. Justice Sayeed stressed the importance of creating dedicated investigation units trained specifically for narcotics-related offences under the NDPS Act. "You need a strong, informed team to tackle the drug menace effectively. This is not just about arrests, it's about long-term disruption of the supply chain," he said. Highlighting the crucial role of NGOs, legal services authorities, and schools in sensitizing both youth and families, he said, "We always speak of rights, but the conversation must start with ethics, duties and discipline. If we want to create good citizens, we must guide the youth before they stray," he said, recalling how during his stint in Nagpur in 2001, he once saw school students casually smoking at a pan shop. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Invisible Patch Is Helping Women Regain Confidence LeanPatch Learn More Undo He chose to confront and counsel them. Praising the police force, Sayeed said that it is easy to label police as corrupt, but he has seen first-hand the kind of hard work Maharashtra police puts in. "Public, police, and judiciary must work together, not in isolation. Mutual respect and trust are essential," Former Nagpur commissioner of police (CP) and retired DGP Bhushan Kumar Upadhyay backed Operation Thunder's approach, calling it a "corrective shift" in drug law enforcement. "The real problem lies with the peddlers, not the users. Drug addicts are victims, they need help. The ones filling their pockets by ruining lives are the ones who should be behind bars," he said. Upadhyay, who served in Nagpur for over a decade, stressed the need for consistency in such operations. "Peddler networks regenerate if not continuously crushed. Long-term intelligence, regular enforcement and coordination with agencies are key." CP Ravinder Singal briefed the audience on the impact of Operation Thunder. Over 1,000 suspects have been apprehended, and the SIMBA app has been central in tracking offender data. "From tip-offs to late-night raids, we've covered every angle. One mother told us how her teenage son got hooked to drugs and slowly slipped into burglary. The downward spiral begins silently — early awareness is our best weapon," he said. Inspector general Dilip Bhujbal emphasised multi-agency collaboration and noted the operation's reach across educational and public zones. MLA Ashish Deshmukh too praised the initiative and recalled past de-addiction efforts in Khaparkheda that revealed how drug dependency often fuels petty crimes. Acting vice-chancellor of the Nagpur University, Madhavi Khode-Chaware, was also present at the occasion.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Former CJI seeks level-playing field in simultaneous poll plan
NEW DELHI: Former Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud has raised some concerns about simultaneous state and parliamentary elections in his submissions to a joint parliamentary committee and called for a level-playing field between smaller and national parties, people aware of the matter said on Thursday. The proposal to align elections – known colloquially as one nation, one election (ONOE) – was a part of the BJP's 2024 poll manifesto. (PTI) Ex-CJI Chandrachud and another former CJI, JS Khehar, are set to attend on July 11 a meeting of the JPC examining the Constitution (129th Amendment) Bill and the Union Territories Laws (Amendment) Bill, which are intended to roll out simultaneous polls in the country, the people cited above said. The 39-member JPC — headed by Bharatiya Janata Party leader PP Chaudhary — was set up in December 2024. Although there is no time frame for the submission of the report, the term of the JPC has been extended till the first day of last week of the upcoming Monsoon Session. The proposal to align elections – known colloquially as one nation, one election (ONOE) – was a part of the BJP's 2024 poll manifesto and is backed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who argues that it will trim election costs and shift focus to governance. But the proposal is fiercely opposed by a raft of political parties and activists who allege that it will hurt democratic accountability and federalism. The bills propose the alignment process to begin in 2029 and the first simultaneous elections in 2034. 'Justice Chandrachud has also given his opinion about the proposed ONOE. In his submission to JPC in April, he has pointed out that concerns about simultaneous elections possibly marginalising smaller or regional parties because of the dominance of better resourced national parties is a significant policy aspect which warrants legislative attention,' said the person quoted above. A clutch of regional parties such as the Rastriya Janata Dal (RJD) have alleged that the proposed legislation can dent federalism. 'The former CJI has noted that to ensure a level playing field among political parties, the rules governing electoral campaigning, particularly those relating to campaign finance, must be strengthened. Referring to the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 that impose ceilings on the amount a candidate can spend for campaign, there are no corresponding limits on the expenditure incurred by political parties themselves he said. This gap in regulation weighs the electoral process towards parties with greater financial resources he said,' the person quoted above said. On the fear that simultaneous elections may infringe upon the right of voters to choose their elected representatives, the former CJI pointed out that even in instances where the duration of either the Lok Sabha or the assembly expires before the full term, the legislation provide for conducting mid-term elections, ensuring that the Indian electorate remains continuously represented by their duly elected representatives. 'He is of the view that the proposal would be violative of the basic structure doctrine only if the facet of non-simultaneous elections to every tier of the government is a basic feature of the Constitution,' the person quoted above said. Chandrachud is also learnt to have weighed in on the provisions for no-confidence motion. 'He has pointed out that the cardinal principle of parliamentary democracy is that the council of ministers, headed by the Prime Minister, must always have the support of the House. This principle will be diluted if there is a time bar on introducing the no-confidence motion. Similarly, one of the common features of a multi-party democracy such as India is the inability of any party or coalition of parties to secure the majority in the House. If the issuance of a notice of no-confidence is contingent on the motion of confidence, there is a real possibility of the minority government continuing in power. This is contrary to democratic tenets,' said the person quoted above. The bill now being examined by JPC suggests adding Article 82(A) (simultaneous elections to the House of the People and all legislative assemblies) and amending Articles 83 (duration of Houses of Parliament), 172, and 327 (power of Parliament to make provisions with respect to elections to Legislatures). It also states that the provisions of the amendment will come into effect on an 'appointed date,' which the President will notify on the first sitting of the Lok Sabha after a general election. As per the bill, the 'appointed date' will be after the next Lok Sabha elections in 2029, with simultaneous elections slated to begin in 2034. According to a person aware of the details, the meeting on July 11 will see JPC also interact with former Union minister and Congress leader M Veerappa Moily and former Congress lawmaker EMS Natchippan. From the first elections in Independent India in 1952 until 1967, polls were held simultaneously across the country. But since the Lok Sabha and state assemblies can be dissolved before their tenures end, the state and national elections came to be held at different times after that. Several committees, including a parliamentary panel, the Niti Aayog and the Election Commission of India, have studied simultaneous polls in the past, backing the idea but flagging logistical concerns.
