People Are 'Disappearing' Since Trump Took Office. Here's What That Means.
Last month, Frizgeralth de Jesús Cornejo Pulgar, an asylum-seeker from Venezuela, was scheduled for a routine hearing in immigration court.
But as Mother Jones reports, he never made it because he'd been whisked off without due process to El Salvador's Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) along with 230 Venezuelan immigrants.
Since President Donald Trump began to carry out what he claimed would be the 'largest deportation' campaign in U.S. history earlier this year, there have been a number of cases where immigrants like Cornejo Pulgar have just 'disappeared.'
In January, Ricardo Prada Vásquez, a Venezuelan man working a delivery job and picking up food at a McDonald's in Detroit, Michigan, was deported and 'disappeared' to El Salvador after taking a wrong turn into Canada.
'Ricardo's story by itself is incredibly tragic — and we don't know how many Ricardos there are,' Ben Levey, a staff attorney with the National Immigrant Justice Center who tried to locate Prada Vásquez, told The New York Times.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials ultimately confirmed to him that he had been deported but did not divulge his destination. After the abductions, families of men like Prada Vásquez search but the names of their loved ones disappear from the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's online detainee locator.
Could what's happening to immigrants under Trump be classified as 'enforced disappearances'? We spoke with academics and researchers who study how rogue states 'disappear' people.
According to the United Nations, an 'enforced disappearance' occurs when agents of the state (or groups acting with its authorization and support) arrest, detain, abduct or in any other way deprive a person of their liberty. The state then refuses to disclose the fate or whereabouts of the person concerned.
If you're wondering whether this is legal or illegal, it's actually neither. 'The inherent consequence of an enforced disappearance is that the person is placed outside the protection of the law, in a sort of legal limbo,' said Gabriella Citroni, an adjunct professor of international human rights law at the university of Milano-Bicocca in Milan, Italy, and a chair-rapporteur of UN expert group on enforced or involuntary disappearances.
Unlike other crimes under international law, such as torture, enforced disappearances were not prohibited by a universal legally binding instrument before a UN Convention came into effect in 2010.
Disappeared people frequently include political opponents, protesters, human rights defenders and community leaders, students and members of minorities, Citroni said.
'Typically, enforced disappearances are used to suppress freedom of expression or religion, or legitimate civil strife demanding democracy, as well as against persons involved in the defense of the land, natural resources and the environment and to fight organized crime or counter terrorism,' she said.
Enforced disappearance functions as a tool of terror in two ways, said Oscar Lopez, a journalist based in Mexico City working on a book about the origins of forced disappearance during Mexico's 'Dirty War.'
'First, the victim is deprived of due process and often subjected to torture as well as the psychological hell of not knowing what's going to happen to them and possibly fearing for their life,' he told HuffPost.
Secondly, enforced disappearance forces families and communities into a state of painful uncertainty, Lopez said. 'They don't know whether their relative is alive or dead and toggle between desperate hope and unbearable despair.'
When disappearances occur frequently enough, they can leave entire communities in a state of terror, unsure of who might be taken next, Lopez said.
What happens to people involuntarily disappeared depends 'very much on the context' in which they are taken, Lopez said. But generally speaking, if the person is kept alive, they're held in state custody for an indeterminate amount of time without the ability to communicate with their family or legal counsel ― aka they're 'held incommunicado.'
If the person is killed, their bodies are often disposed of in such a way that it becomes almost impossible for them to be found.
'This can mean burying them in unmarked graves, cremating their remains, or, as happened in Latin America, throwing their corpses out to sea,' he said.
Lopez pointed to a few examples: In Argentina, during the military dictatorship between 1976 and 1983, an estimated 30,000 people were disappeared. In nearby Chile, more than 1,000 people went missing under the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet, while in Guatemala, some 45,000 people were forcibly disappeared during the country's civil war, which lasted from 1960 to 1996. In North Korea, instances of enforced disappearances and abductions date back to 1950.
'There are more recent instances of enforced disappearance, too,' he said. 'In Syria, for example, it's estimated that 136,000 people were disappeared under the Assad dictatorship.'
But enforced disappearances aren't always carried out directly by state agents. said Adam Isacson, who leads border and migration work at the Washington Office on Latin America.
Hundreds of thousands of people have been disappeared each by irregular groups in Colombia and Mexico, operating with the tacit permission or even assistance of government officials.
'Sometimes, as with the anti-communist paramilitaries in Colombia and death squads in 1980s El Salvador, the officials colluded with the groups out of some ideological alliance,' he said. 'Sometimes, as with corrupt Mexican cops who assist organized crime, they do it because they profit from it.'
In spite of existing court orders and legal challenges, the Trump administration continues its deportation policy in El Salvador, in partnership with the county's President Nayib Bukele.
Venezuelan migrants have been targeted in particular for deportation, many on unproven allegations of gang affiliation. That said, Trump has also repeatedly said he's 'all for' looking for ways to detain U.S. citizens in foreign jails.
Should we be calling what's happening now 'forced disappearances'? A report released by the UN in April suggests yes.
The incommunicado detentions appeared to involve 'enforced disappearances, contrary to international law,' the report said.
'Many detainees were unaware of their destination, their families were not informed of their detention or removal, and the U.S. and Salvadoran authorities have not published the names or legal status of the detainees,' the UN experts wrote. 'Those imprisoned in El Salvador have been denied the right to communicate with and be visited by their family members.'
Isacson agrees that we should be calling a spade a spade here.
'The only difference between that and what was done in 1970s Chile or Argentina is that loved ones have more reason to believe that their relatives are still alive and haven't been killed,' he said.
But even that certainty is not complete, he said: 'Can you say with 100% confidence that Andry Hernandez ― the gay Venezuelan stylist that disappeared two months ago ― is still alive right now? He probably is, but you absolutely cannot guarantee that, and no one will confirm it.'
The raids and deportations have certainly struck fear into American communities ― another classic characteristic of enforced disappearances. The Trump administration has openly said that its goal is to try to make life so difficult for immigrants that they 'self-deport.'
Fear of being sent to a notorious El Salvador prison, where inmates never see the light of day, plays into that goal, said Rod Abouharb, an associate professor of international relations who researches forced disappearances at the University College London.
'These raids send out a chilling effect on those individuals who may be undocumented and even those who are legally in the United States: that they may be caught up in one of these raids, disappear into the prison system, and deported to a third country they may have no connection with,' he told HuffPost.
The best thing Americans can do to object to efforts like this is to draw as much attention as possible to individual cases, Lopez said.
'Whether that's by holding protests, creating online petitions or posting on social media, ensuring that a person who the government has tried to disappear remains visible and in the public discourse can be a powerful way to draw national attention to their plight and the plight of others like them.' he said.
Isacson thinks it's important to encourage senate and congressional Democrats who've stood up and made headlines, like Sen. Chris Van Hollen (Md.). Back in April, Van Hollen pushed for a face-to-face meeting with Kilmar Abrego Garcia ― a Salvadoran native living in Maryland who was deported in March to El Salvador despite a 2019 court order barring his deportation to that country due to fear of persecution.
'Democrats will actually help themselves politically if they keep making a lot of righteous noise about this,' he said.
Americans should write to Republican moderates who seem quietly uncomfortable about forced disappearances and might be persuaded to action, Isacson said.
'All of us to stay vocal about this,' he said. 'Keep protesting, keep writing about it and keep calling your legislators.'
The Insidious Message Behind Kristi Noem's 'ICE Barbie' Cosplay
Teen Remains In ICE Detention Despite Police Admitting To Pulling Her Over By Mistake
Fed Up With ICE Crackdowns? Here's How To Actually Make A Difference For Immigrants.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
ICE subpoenas Chicago for records of applicants in city ID program used by immigrants
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement subpoenaed the Chicago City Clerk's Office in April for the personal information of applicants to a municipal ID program popular with immigrants, an apparent new tactic in Republican President Donald Trump's plan to target Chicago as he seeks to ramp up deportations. The clerk's office received the summons on April 17 requiring the city to turn over the past three years of CityKey records, according to a copy obtained by the Tribune in a Freedom of Information Act request. The program was launched in 2017 by former Mayor Rahm Emanuel and city Clerk Anna Valencia as part of a stand against Trump. Asked whether the city complied with the subpoena, Law Department spokesperson Kristen Cabanban indicated some type of response but would not directly confirm whether it turned over documents to ICE, which demanded several years worth of data. 'We were responsive, within the bounds of the law and consistent with our Welcoming City Ordinance,' Cabanban said Friday. While Emanuel and Valencia trumpeted the safety of the CityKey application during its inception, promising that federal officials would not be able to track down applicants because the city wouldn't keep identifying documents, the situation has recently changed. Overwhelmed by demand for the IDs by Venezuelan migrants at in-person events in fall 2023, Valencia started offering an online application in December 2024. To meet state document requirements, the Clerk's Office has kept application materials for more than 2,700 people who used the online CityKey system since then, according to Diana Martinez, a spokesperson for Valencia. 'I don't think that's inconsistent,' Martinez said in a phone interview. 'That's why we were so careful to make sure that people were aware of what submitting their information to the online platform meant. … We try to let people know if you're at all concerned about your identity, please go in person.' The ICE subpoena called on the city to 'provide a copy of the application and all supporting documents for all individuals who applied for a CityKey identification card between April 17, 2022, and April 17, 2025, and used any foreign document as proof of identity, including but not limited to: consular identification card, foreign driver's license, or foreign passport.' The Tribune also obtained an ICE subpoena sent to Chicago's Department of Streets and Sanitation on March 21 that sought payroll records for current and recent employees as part of a worker eligibility audit. That department also deferred questions on its subpoena to Cabanban, who again said, 'We were responsive, within the bounds of the law and consistent with our Welcoming City Ordinance.' ICE spokesperson Erin Bultje declined to comment on both subpoenas, citing 'an ongoing investigation.' CityKey appeals to immigrants because it allows noncitizens to obtain a city government-issued ID. Now under a second Trump administration, ICE is going after those applications, including identification documents, after a recent explosion in demand for CityKey during the Venezuelan migrant crisis. It's unclear how many of the 87,100-plus individuals who sought a CityKey during the time period encompassed in ICE's subpoena are immigrants. The city clerk policy is to only retain records for those who apply via the online portal. The CityKey subpoena indicated the records were sought as part of an immigration enforcement investigation and demanded the clerk turn them over by May 1. The email address listed as the destination for the clerk's subpoena response included the abbreviation for the Document and Benefit Fraud Task Force and Chicago's Homeland Security Investigations division, the investigative arm of ICE. The task force's website says its mission is to 'target and dismantle the transnational criminal organizations and individuals that threaten U.S. national security and public safety – and address vulnerabilities that exist in the immigration system.' Meanwhile, the ICE subpoena for Streets and Sanitation records asked for forms for all employees confirming they are legally authorized to work in the U.S., a list of current employees and ex-staffers terminated 12 months prior to the subpoena date, payroll data for all employees and their Employer Identification Number, a list of all current city contractors and a list of all staffing companies and their rosters. The Streets and Sanitation subpoena references a 'Form I-9 Inspection,' an ICE audit that concerns whether an employer has complied with verifying its employees' eligibility to work in the U.S. The federal agency's website says employers who 'knowingly hired or continued to employ unauthorized workers' may be subject to civil fines or criminal prosecution. Both the clerk and Streets and Sanitation were warned in the subpoena that a 'failure to comply with this subpoena may subject you to an order of contempt by a federal District Court.' Immigrants and immigrant advocates have raised concerns about federal investigators getting their hands on identifying CityKey documents since the program's 2017 inception. A similar program in New York City raised red flags when Republican lawmakers sued to stop then-Mayor Bill de Blasio from purging applicants' personal information, though that legal challenge failed. Upon the municipal ID's debut, the city pledged not to keep copies of any personal information that applicants provide. But Martinez said the Clerk's Office keeps documents from people who applied for the card via the new online website because of an internal records retention policy concerning data submitted online. For most of CityKey's existence, all applications were processed at printing events where clerk staffers purged the papers on the spot after the ID was produced. Martinez said the online retention schedule, created by working with state officials to comply with the Illinois Records Act, mandates the clerk store CityKey documents submitted online for three years after the ID expires. The card lasts two years for ID holders under 14 years old and five years for recipients between 14 and 64. There is no CityKey expiration for those 65 and up, so their records are never expunged, Martinez said. All of that data is stored with the local software vendor Omicron Technologies, Martinez said, stressing there are multiple disclaimers on the online portal about the document retention. The website asks users to agree to the following: 'By using the CityKey online platform, you are agreeing to allow the Office of the City Clerk to keep a record of all the information you submit during your application process.' Asked whether the Clerk's Office intends to clarify its messaging to online applicants about if their records are safe, Martinez said, 'We actually don't guarantee that.' 'That's been our message throughout, especially once we launched the online platform,' Martinez said. 'We always want to encourage people to go in person if they have any concerns around their identity, whether it's undocumented people, whether it's domestic violence survivors or any other population.' The online disclaimers don't mention those specific groups, however, or the potential risks of their data being stored. The CityKey FAQ section only warns, 'Yes, the information submitted to the online platform is retained according to the City's retention schedule.' 'Protecting people's information is our number one priority,' the FAQ says. 'We worked closely with community advocates, data security professionals, and the City's technology department to create a program that is safe and secure.' In total, 145,825 CityKeys have been issued since its 2017 inception, per numbers provided by Martinez. For the period of time in the ICE subpoena — April 17, 2022, to April 17, 2025 — 87,163 individuals had applied for CityKey, 2,717 of them via the online portal starting in December. During Chicago's migrant crisis that began in 2022, new arrivals often sought official government identification while their federal asylum applications remained in limbo. The municipal ID also serves as a Chicago Public Library card, a Ventra transit pass and a prescription drug benefits card. To qualify for a CityKey, an applicant must provide documentation proving their identity and residency. Immigrants have used their Department of Homeland Security paperwork, passport, birth certificate, consular card or a letter from a nonprofit temporarily housing them. Many of the asylum seekers had come from Venezuela, which does not maintain embassies and consulates in the U.S. due to poor diplomatic relations. But the crowds at the events grew so large that migrants camped outside and fought for spots in line, leading Valencia to implore City Council for help at a budget hearing in October 2023. 'We're beyond the demand,' the clerk told aldermen. 'We're being crushed.' That was also when she floated the online portal.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Here's where to see fireworks in Mass. this weekend
Massachusetts residents looking to catch a fireworks show should travel to Abington, Dalton, Foxborough or Winchester this weekend. All four towns will have events that feature fireworks displays on June 7, according to the state's department of fire services's website. See below for where you can find fireworks displays for this weekend: Abington: A fireworks display celebrating Founders Day will take place at Memorial Field at 9 p.m. on Saturday. Dalton: The Dalton Fair at American Legion Park at 255 North St. will have a fireworks show at 10 p.m. on Saturday Foxborough: A fireworks display for Founders Day will take place at Booth Fields at 79 South St. from 9:05 p.m. to 10 p.m. on June 7. Winchester: A fireworks show for Winchester Town Day will be happening at Manchester Field at 458 Main St. this Saturday at 9:15 p.m. Fireworks are illegal in Massachusetts for those without a certification or licensing. The fire service department's website urges residents to 'leave fireworks to the professionals.' 'Between 2019 and 2023, Massachusetts medical facilities treated more than 200 people for burns and other injuries associated with fireworks,' the website reads. 'Two dozen people were treated for severe burn injuries that covered 5% or more of the victim's body.' Former Boston Celtics coach does not want Knicks job: 'Absolutely not' Trump opens up about 'the biggest scandal' in many years in foreign visit McDonald's launches new McFlurry flavor inspired by summertime I-93 south in Woburn closed due to 'police activity', MassDOT says Man officials say killed someone in drunk head-on crash on Mass. bridge is arraigned Read the original article on MassLive.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Admin Laments South Sudan Deportation Debacle It Created
A lot of things happened. Here are some of the things. This is TPM's Morning Memo. Sign up for the email version. It had been two weeks since U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy of Massachusetts ordered the Trump administration to allow the detainees it was trying to ship off to South Sudan to talk to their lawyers – and as of Wednesday, the lawyers told the Supreme Court, they had still not heard from the detainees who have been stuck in Djibouti this whole time. Then yesterday the Trump administration filed a perplexing declaration telling Judge Murphy about all the hardship ICE agents are enduring trying to guard the detainees in the harsh conditions of the U.S. base in Djibouti. The WaPo headline captured the administration-centric perspective: 'ICE officers stuck in Djibouti shipping container with deported migrants.' Who is stuck with whom exactly? The decisions to deport them to South Sudan and to keep them temporarily in Djibouti are entirely the administration's, despite what it has told the Supreme Court. It was the administration's idea in the first place, as an incensed Murphy has pointed out. He's already called out the Trump DOJ on this for claiming he forced them into this predicament. In the May hearing, the Trump DOJ floated this solution as an alternative to bringing the detainees back to the United States. Murphy took them up on it, but explicitly said the administration could always bring them back stateside. The NYT has new reporting on how all this unfolded. As of yesterday, the detainees' legal team had still not heard from them. As the government stonewalls in another of the 'facilitate' cases, U.S. District Judge Stephanie Gallagher of Maryland has ordered weekly status reports and expedited discovery into what the Trump administration is doing to retrieve Cristian, the anonymous Venezuelan wrongfully deported under the Alien Enemies Act in violation of an existing settlement agreement. Gallagher also told Cristian's lawyers that they are 'free to seek sanctions on an expedited basis' if the Trump administration doesn't engage in discovery in good faith. The case is proceeding in striking parallel alongside another Maryland case. It was two months ago when an irate U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis ordered expedited discovery in the Abrego Garcia case. At the time it was a huge deal that portended contempt of court proceedings against the Trump administration for defying her order to 'facilitate' the wrongfully deported Salvadoran's return. But that proceeding has dragged on and almost become background noise. Still, this week Xinis granted leave to Abrego Garcia's lawyers to file a motion for sanctions for the government's discovery violations. Some of that dispute is under seal, but we know from some public proceedings in the case that the Trump administration has been barely responsive to the discovery Xinis ordered to determine whether she should find government officials in contempt of court. I go deeper on the ruling here. Roger Parloff unpacks it here. ICE agents mistakenly detained a U.S. marshal last month during an immigration sweep at a federal building in Tucson Even amid all the other lousy conduct by the Trump administration in the anti-immigration cases, this case stands out. The administration has refused to accept a judge's proposal that lawyers for Columbia University student Yunseo Chung, a pro-Palestinian protestor who has avoided arrest for months, simply accept service, which would trigger that start of removal proceedings. 'The government is simply refusing to take yes for an answer,' her lawyer quipped. The government's insistence that it will only accept arresting Chung has baffled U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald of the Southern District of New York. Yesterday, she put a stop to it, issuing an injunction prohibiting the government from arresting Chung or transferring her out of jurisdiction of her court. The judge then went further in suggesting what this is all really about, ordering the government to give 72-hours notice before the detain Chung on new trumped-up charges to give her a chance 'to be heard regarding whether any such asserted basis for detention constitutes a pretext for First Amendment retaliation.' U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs of Boston issued a temporary restraining order against the Department of Homeland Security blocking it from enforcing a ban on international students trying to enroll at Harvard. Harvard immediately filed suit over Trump's proclamation on Wednesday, was in court by Thursday, and won the TRO later in the day. The Guardian: 'The University of Michigan is using private, undercover investigators to surveil pro-Palestinian campus groups, including trailing them on and off campus, furtively recording them and eavesdropping on their conversations, the Guardian has learned.' Secretary of State Marco Rubio gave life to President Trump's February executive order targeting the the International Criminal Court by sanctioning four of its judges. The sanctions freeze any U.S. assets of the judges in retaliation for two of the judges voting to authorize an ICC investigation of U.S. military actions in Afghanistan and for the other two authorizing arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli defense minister Yoav Gallant. DNI Tulsi Gabbard has installed one of her top advisers in a position within the office of the inspector general of the intelligence community, which is investigating the Signal group chat fiasco in which Gabbard participated. The Trump-Musk blowup is dominating political news coverage today, and I'd feel remiss not noting it. But I'm not sure what to do with it. Both men are so inauthentic and their transactional 'relationship' so contrived, that nothing about the public rupture feels any more real than their bromance did. I can't get any more invested in it than I would a pro wrestling story arc. I will grant that the performative breakup is emblematic of the current moment both in its inauthenticity and in the Gilded Age histrionics of the billionaire man-child v. billionaire man-child. Adam Bonica continues his trenchant analysis of the DOGE rampage by comparing its layoffs to the budget increases in the House GOP's big bill: The executive director of the Skadden Foundation has resigned after the Skadden law firm struck a deal with President Trump to avoid being targeted with a punitive executive order. 'My hope is that Skadden charts a path that respects the rule of law and honors the core values of the Skadden Foundation,' Kathleen Rudenstein wrote in a post announcing her resignation.