Ex-MACC chief questions integrity of probe into Pamela Ling
Former MACC chief commissioner Dzulkifli Ahmad said all enforcement agencies, including the anti-graft agency, must follow due process to protect individuals' rights and ensure justice.
PETALING JAYA : A former chief commissioner of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has raised concerns about the integrity and legality of the graft and money laundering investigation into Pamela Ling – who is missing – and her husband Hah Tiing Siu.
Dzulkifli Ahmad said it was a cause for concern that Ling's lawyer had revealed that her client was called in and had her statement recorded on nine separate occasions after being released from remand.
He said that once someone was arrested and their statement taken, the law only allowed further questioning if they were reclassified as a witness, and that too only with the approval of the deputy public prosecutor.
'Under the MACC Act and established legal procedure, it is a fundamental principle of due process that the power of arrest should only be exercised when sufficient evidence has been gathered to support a formal charge.
'Arrests made prematurely – at a stage where investigations are still in progress – may not only be unjustified but also risk contravening both the rule of law and the core tenets of justice,' he said in a statement today.
Dzulkifli said MACC should emulate its own approach in other high-profile cases, such as those involving former prime minister Ismail Sabri Yaakob and business figures like Vivy Yusof, where no arrests were made during investigations.
'These examples reflect a more measured and lawful approach that should be consistently applied,' he said, adding that all enforcement agencies, including MACC, must follow due process to protect individuals' rights and ensure justice.
Earlier today, Sangeet Kaur Deo said Ling had claimed that she had been arrested and remanded without a proper legal basis and in breach of due process.
Sangeet said the travel ban, imposed since October, and the repeated questioning reflected treatment that was 'far from ordinary and totally inconsistent' with that expected of a witness assisting in investigations.
She added that after relentlessly pursuing Ling, MACC had remained silent about her disappearance.
MACC released a detailed chronology of its investigation into Ling and Hah this afternoon, which revealed that Ling had previously refused to cooperate in a graft probe and was arrested in Singapore before being returned to Malaysia.
Ling reportedly went missing on April 9 while on her way to the MACC headquarters to give her statement.
Her brother, Simon Ling, claimed his sister was abducted. He said the e-hailing car in which Ling was travelling was intercepted by three unidentified vehicles and that she was instructed to get into one of them.
Yesterday, the e-hailing driver who took Ling to the MACC headquarters on April 9 said he was forced to mark the ride as completed after Ling was taken by her abductors, who were wearing police uniforms and vests.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Court sets July 2 for decision on shipping company's pre-trial discovery application against RHB
KUALA LUMPUR, June 11— The High Court here today fixed July 2 to decide on a pre-trial discovery application filed by Maritime Network Sdn Bhd against RHB Bank Berhad concerning the financial institution's internal guidelines and due diligence procedures governing foreign-exchange transactions. Judge Leong Wai Hong fixed the date after hearing submissions by both parties in chambers last Friday. This was confirmed by the shipping company's counsel, P. Taneswaran, and the bank's counsel, Gan Khong Aik, when contacted. According to them, the proceeding is scheduled at 9 am on the said date. Maritime Network filed an originating summons on March 3 this year, seeking a court order to compel the bank to disclose the financial institution's internal guidelines and due diligence procedures governing foreign-exchange transactions. The action was initiated by the company's director, Datuk Seri through Messrs Tanes, Khoo & Paulraj at the High Court here, naming the RHB Bank Berhad as the defendant. Maritime Network, established in 2002, commenced the action after discovering that several international fund transfers into its multi-currency USD account had been returned without prior notice or adequate justification. According to the affidavit, these transfers, though originating from previously unfamiliar senders, made explicit reference to valid invoices issued by the company. Despite Maritime Network's request that the bank withhold any reversal pending a thorough review, the funds were unilaterally returned. Meanwhile, the bank claimed that it has complied with the required financial standard known as Minimum Due Diligence (MDD). The company is therefore demanding a sight of the MDD guidelines used by the bank through pre-trial discovery to determine if it has breached its duty of care. — Bernama
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Appeals court to decide Aug 19 on activist's challenge to online speech law under Communications and Multimedia Act 1998
PUTRAJAYA, June 11 — The Court of Appeal has fixed August 19 to deliver its decision in an appeal brought by an activist over the dismissal of her lawsuit that had challenged the validity of parts of a provision in the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 that criminalises offensive online comments. A three-man bench consisting of Federal Court judge Datuk Lee Swee Seng and Court of Appeal judges Datuk Hashim Hamzah and Datuk Azman Abdullah set the decision date after parties completed their submissions earlier today. Heidy Quah Gaik Li, the founder of Refuge for Refugees is claiming the use of the words 'offensive' and annoy' in Section 233 of the Act are invalid as it goes against two fundamental human rights protected by the Federal Constitution. Section 233(1)(a) states that it is an offence for a person to make, create or solicit, and initiate the transmission of any online comment which is 'obscene, indecent, false, menacing or offensive' with 'intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass another person. In September 2023, the Shah Alam High Court dismissed Quah's lawsuit, leading her to file an appeal in the Court of Appeal. The hearing today was a continuation of proceedings that had begun earlier. Justice Lee was serving as a Court of Appeal judge before being elevated to the Federal Court in May this year. During today's hearing, senior federal counsel Liew Horng Bin representing the Malaysian government submitted that speech involving expletives, profanity, crude references, hate speech or incitement to violence are not expressions protected under Article 10 (1) (a) of the Federal Constitution. He argued that the right to free speech should be used to disseminate truth, respect for human dignity and perform essential informing function. On the other hand, lawyer Datuk Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, representing Quah argued the words 'offensive' or annoy contained in Section 233 is inconsistent with Article 10 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution, namely the right to equality and freedom of speech. He argued that the two words in Section 233 are not a 'permissible restriction' under public order as prescribed in the Federal Constitution. In July 2021, Quah, 31, was charged in the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court for allegedly making 'offensive' online comments in a Facebook post. In April the following year, the Sessions Court granted her a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) due to the charge under section 233(1)(a) being defective. — Bernama
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Penang police rescue three Indonesians allegedly held captive for a year, arrest four suspects
GEORGE TOWN, June 11 — Penang police rescued three Indonesian men believed to have been held captive for nearly a year in a condominium on Jalan Dr Wu Lien Teh here yesterday, Berita Harian reported. The case reportedly came to light after a man from Aceh, Indonesia, lodged a report while searching for his family member who had been missing for a year. According to the Malay daily, the three victims were confined to the residence with their feet chained to iron bars on the window. They are believed to have no prior connection with one another, and their passports were allegedly held by a suspect under the pretense of securing employment. One of the victims managed to send his location to his family in Aceh, prompting the complainant to approach the police, according to the report. Police are currently investigating the case, including the motive for the confinement and the possible involvement of other suspects. Following the rescue, Berita Harian reported that four individuals, including a foreign woman, were remanded for four days starting today to assist with the investigation under Section 344 of the Penal Code, which pertains to wrongful confinement for an extended period. The remand order was issued by Magistrate Azlan Basri at the George Town Court. Penang police chief Datuk Hamzah Ahmad confirmed the case and the arrests when contacted.
