logo
MIT taught her well. That is why Megha Vemuri could speak for others

MIT taught her well. That is why Megha Vemuri could speak for others

Indian Express3 days ago

Like many students around the United States, those studying at the prestigious Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) are proud bearers of the American tradition of the class ring. Redesigned every year, these signet-style rings bear the insignia of the school: At MIT, it is a beaver, nicknamed the 'the brass rat', that is engraved on the flat top, with one side of the bezel featuring a rendition of the Boston skyline and the other side, a view of the Cambridge — specifically the university campus — skyline. Before they graduate, MIT students wear the ring in a way that the beaver and the Boston side of the bezel face them. At their commencement, the new graduates are asked to 'flip the brass rat' — with the beaver now facing away from them, symbolising their entry into the wider world, and the campus skyline, which now faces the students, reminding them of the legacy, and its accompanying responsibilities, that they bear.
At the commencement ceremony for the Class of 2025 on Thursday, yet another cohort of MIT students flipped the brass rat and prepared to step into the rest of their lives, carrying with them both knowledge and a sense of their history, forever intertwined with the history of their alma mater, that binds them as a community. In the now-viral speech delivered by Megha Vemuri, the president of the Class of 2025, she refers to this precious load when she speaks to her fellow graduates about the 'privilege of access…to a place like this (MIT)' and the 'immeasurable responsibility' they enter the world with. Remove the references to the ongoing destruction of Gaza, the suffering of the Palestinians and the silence or complicity of institutions like the one she is graduating from, Vemuri's address is no different from those delivered at commencement and graduation ceremonies at other schools, across the US and in other countries, at other times. In their four years of undergraduate studies, MIT's students, like students elsewhere, have only been learning about and preparing for their responsibilities in the world beyond the campus walls. They must now, Vemuri says, actually take on the burden.
The uproar that has followed Vemuri's speech, with MIT barring her from her graduation ceremony the next day and commentators and pundits decrying her attempt to 'hijack' the event to make it about her 'personal beliefs', follow the same absurd script that has played out in university campuses across the US for almost 20 months now. A student exercised her right to free speech — without calling for violence or hate against any community — in order to point to a great injustice in the world where she and her fellow students are expected to play their roles. That was all. In her speech, Vemuri notes, 'As scientists, engineers, academics and leaders, we have a commitment to support life.' The university's actions, and the many instances of social media denunciation of her words, then beg the question: Are MIT's students expected to demonstrate this commitment only to certain kinds of lives? If yes, then who are the people that are to be excluded from this world of responsibility that Vemuri and her cohort enter? That Vemuri understands the double standards that prop up such a view of the world is clear when she notes, 'While we graduate and move on with our lives, there are no universities left in Gaza.'
Vemuri is not alone in showing a wider regard, a greater range for her compassion, than appears to be allowed to students, and she's not the first to be penalised for it. In Trump's America, foreign students have already been put on notice, their visas — their futures — threatened for the slightest straying from the strict lines drawn by the powers-that-be. Vemuri, of course, doesn't have to worry about a visa, being an American citizen, but she might, as several have pointed out, have some cause for concern when it comes to her prospects. Is an independent-minded, outspoken person — a brown-skinned woman, no less — considered good employee material in the US today? Open espousal of the Palestinian cause has reportedly already led to several firings, including at major companies like Microsoft and Google. In any case, in an America where democratic norms are under assault from an administration that brooks no dissent, it is scary to be any kind of minority, and not just one that's on a visa.
But that is the remarkable thing about Vemuri: She said what she wanted to say right when she lost whatever protection life as a student offered. Politically active students always tend to be condescended to, told that they don't know how the real world works, but Vemuri, at least, appears to be more than prepared for it. With or without the brass rat.
pooja.pillai@expressindia.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US expected to block Gaza ceasefire vote at UNSC
US expected to block Gaza ceasefire vote at UNSC

Time of India

time12 minutes ago

  • Time of India

US expected to block Gaza ceasefire vote at UNSC

The UN Security Council will vote Wednesday on a resolution calling for a ceasefire and unrestricted humanitarian access in Gaza , a measure expected to fail due to a US veto. It is the 15-member body's first vote on the subject since November, when the United States , a key Israeli ally, also blocked a text calling for an end to fighting. The new resolution "demands an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza respected by all parties." It also calls for the "immediate, dignified and unconditional release of all hostages held by Hamas and other groups." Underlining a "catastrophic humanitarian situation" in the Palestinian territory , the resolution additionally demands the lifting of all restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza. Live Events It will be put to vote at 4:00 pm Wednesday (2000 GMT), but several diplomats indicated to AFP that they expected the US to wield its veto power. They added that the representatives from the 10 elected members of the Council, who will introduce the text, tried in vain to negotiate with the American side. The veto, if applied, would be the first by Washington since US President Donald Trump took office in January. Israel has faced growing international pressure to end its war in Gaza, which was triggered by the unprecedented October 7, 2023 attack by Hamas on Israeli soil. That scrutiny has increased over flailing aid distribution in Gaza, which Israel blocked for more than two months before allowing a small number of UN vehicles to enter in mid-May. A US-backed relief effort called the Gaza Humanitarian Fund (GHF) has also come under criticism for going against long-standing aid principles by coordinating relief efforts with a military belligerent.

UN Security Council will vote on a resolution demanding a Gaza ceasefire, with US veto expected
UN Security Council will vote on a resolution demanding a Gaza ceasefire, with US veto expected

Hindustan Times

time26 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

UN Security Council will vote on a resolution demanding a Gaza ceasefire, with US veto expected

UNITED NATIONS — The U.N. Security Council will vote Wednesday on a resolution demanding an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, and the Trump administration is expected to veto it because it does not link the ceasefire to the release of all the hostages held by Hamas. The resolution before the U.N.'s most powerful body also does not condemn Hamas' deadly attack in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which ignited the war, or say the militant group must disarm and withdraw from Gaza — two other U.S. demands. The U.S. vetoed the last resolution on Gaza in November, under the Biden administration, because the ceasefire demand was not directly linked to the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages. Similarly, the current resolution demands those taken by Hamas and other groups be released, but it does not make it a condition for a truce. Calling the humanitarian situation in Gaza 'catastrophic,' the resolution, put forth by the 15-member council's 10 elected members, also calls for 'the immediate and unconditional lifting of all restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza and its safe and unhindered distribution at scale, including by the U.N. and humanitarian partners.' President Donald Trump's administration has tried to ramp up its efforts to broker peace in Gaza after 20 months of war. However, Hamas has sought amendments to a U.S. proposal that special envoy Steve Witkoff has called 'totally unacceptable.' The vote follows a decision by an Israeli and U.S.-backed foundation to pause food delivery at its three distribution sites in the Gaza Strip after health officials said dozens of Palestinians were killed in a series of shootings near the sites this week. Israel and the United States say they supported the establishment of the new aid system to prevent Hamas from stealing aid previously distributed by the U.N. The United Nations has rejected the new system, saying it doesn't address Gaza's mounting hunger crisis, allows Israel to use aid as a weapon and doesn't comply with the humanitarian principles of neutrality, impartiality and independence. The U.N. says its distribution system throughout Gaza worked very well during the March ceasefire and is carefully monitored. The resolution demands the restoration of all essential humanitarian services in line with humanitarian principles, international humanitarian law and U.N. Security Council resolutions. Several U.N. diplomats from different countries, speaking on condition of anonymity because discussions have been private, said they expect the United States to veto the resolution. They also said they expect a similar vote to the one in November, when the 14 other council members supported the resolution. Israel's U.N. Mission said Ambassador Danny Danon, who will speak after the vote, will say the resolution undermines humanitarian relief efforts and ignores Hamas, which is still endangering civilians in Gaza. He also will say the resolution disregards the ceasefire negotiations that are already underway, the mission said. Gaza's roughly 2 million people are almost completely reliant on international aid because Israel's offensive has destroyed nearly all food production capabilities. Israel imposed a blockade on supplies into Gaza on March 2, and limited aid began to enter again late last month after pressure from allies and warnings of famine. 'The world is watching, day after day, horrifying scenes of Palestinians being shot, wounded or killed in Gaza while simply trying to eat,' U.N. humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher said in a statement Wednesday. He called for a flood of aid to be let in and for the world body to be the one delivering it. The Security Council has voted on 14 Gaza-related resolutions and approved four since the war began. That is when Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducting 251. They are still holding 58 hostages, a third of them believed to be alive, after most of the rest were released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. Israel's military campaign has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which doesn't say how many of the dead were civilians or combatants. The ministry is led by medical professionals but reports to the Hamas-run government. Its toll is seen as generally reliable by U.N. agencies and independent experts, though Israel has challenged its numbers. writer Farnoush Amiri at the United Nations contributed to this report.

Pakistan's Bilawal Bhutto Zardari called out by journalist at UN
Pakistan's Bilawal Bhutto Zardari called out by journalist at UN

Business Standard

time27 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Pakistan's Bilawal Bhutto Zardari called out by journalist at UN

Pakistan's former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari was called out here by a journalist on his comments about alleged demonisation of Muslims in India. The former Pakistan foreign minister, who is leading a team of experts to inform the world about the recent conflict with India, was briefing the media about their perspective on Tuesday. During the question-answer session, Egyptian-American journalist Ahmad Fathi, UN correspondent of American Television News (ATN), asked Bilawal about his comments on India's treatment of Muslims and reminded him that it was an Indian Muslim military officer who was briefing the media during the conflict. Let me start with a statement you made today, saying that the recent terrorist attack in Kashmir is being used as a political tool to demonise Muslims in India. Sir, I have watched the briefings on both sides, and as far as I recall, there were Muslim Indian military officers who were conducting the briefing on the Indian side, Fathi said. He was about to ask his second question when Bilawal stopped him mid-sentence. The Pakistani leader then went on to criticise India and continued his usual rhetoric. Tensions between India and Pakistan escalated after the Pahalgam terror attack, with India carrying out precision strikes on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in the early hours of May 7. Pakistan attempted to attack Indian military bases on May 8, 9, and 10. The Indian side strongly responded to the Pakistani attempts by inflicting heavy damage to a number of key Pakistani military installations, including air bases, air defence systems, command and control centres and radar sites. On May 10, the militaries of the two countries agreed on an understanding to end the hostilities. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store