
Michelle Obama says 'creating life is the least' a woman's body does, faces heat from pro-life activists
Former first lady Michelle Obama
Former First Lady Michelle Obama is drawing criticism after saying that creating life is "the least" of what a woman's reproductive system does. The remarks came during the latest episode of her podcast 'IMO with Michelle Obama & Craig Robinson.
'
In a wide-ranging discussion on women's health and abortion rights, Obama said the conversation around reproductive issues has been unfairly narrowed. "Women's reproductive health is about our life," she said. "It's about this whole complicated reproductive system that the least of what it does is produce life. It's a very important thing that it does, but you only produce life if the machine that's producing it — if you want to whittle us down to a machine — is functioning in a healthy, streamlined kind of way.
"
The former first lady emphasised that the lack of medical research and understanding of women's health often leads to narrow or misguided political decision-making, particularly among male lawmakers. She also criticised Republican men for inaction on abortion rights, accusing them of "trading out women's health for a tax break or whatever it is."
Additionally, Obama aimed at GOP women, suggesting some had voted for US President Donald Trump because of their husbands' influence.
"There are a lot of women who vote the way their man is going to vote," she said. "It happened in this election."
Conservative pushback
Her comments quickly ignited backlash on social media and from conservative figures, who accused Obama of diminishing the importance of motherhood.
"Motherhood is the most beautiful and powerful gift God gave women. Creating life isn't a side effect, it's a miracle," wrote Danielle D'Souza Gill, a prominent pro-life advocate and wife of Rep.
Brandon Gill, R-Texas. "Don't let the Left cheapen it."
Isabel Brown, a conservative author and influencer, also lashed out. "I am SO sick and tired of celebrities and elitists attempting to convince you that your miraculous superpower ability to GROW LIFE from nothing is somehow demeaning and 'lesser than' for women," she posted.
Social media users echoed those sentiments, with some questioning whether Obama's comments reflected her views on her own children. "How do her kids feel after hearing their mother demeaning motherhood?" one user wrote.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Musk vs Trump: Is Musk taking a step closer to mending broken relationship with Trump? Here is a full list of tweets deleted by Tesla CEO after feud
US President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk Is Musk taking a step closer to ending the feud with Trump because Tesla CEO's latest move seems to be hinting in that direction? James Fishback, principal architect of the "DOGE checks" initiative, who had called out Musk for his tweets against Donald Trump , hailed Tesla CEO after he deleted all the posts against the US President. He pointed out Musk's deleted posts and said that now to take another step and apologies to President Trump. "Elon has deleted his slanderous tweets about the President of the United States. Good first step. Next up: full-throated apology to Trump and his family," he said. It all started with Fishback, replying to Musk's tweet over think about making another party" American party. "Elon, Keep tweeting about your 'new political party' and Japanese fertility rates all you want. You owe President Trump a full-throated apology, and every hour you delay, it'll make an eventual apology less sincere. You can substantively disagree with the President on policy, but you should not have baselessly and personally attacked him. " Fishback said. Responding to Fishback, Musk posted several tweets but after a short brief, those tweets were deleted from the account. His response to some tweets are still existing but the riginal tweets has been deleted. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo Not only those but all his previous tweets, targeting the president, has been deleted including the Epstein files. It seems that Musk may be seeing different ways to mends and go back from their broken ties. The political rift became public earlier this week when Musk slammed one of Trump's most touted legislative efforts, referred to by the president as his 'big, beautiful bill', calling it a 'disgusting abomination.' The remark surprised Republican leaders and got a rare serious reaction from President Trump. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said from the Oval Office. He didn't stop there. Taking direct aim at Musk's businesses, the president said: 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts.' Musk, in return, accused Trump of 'ingratitude' and escalated the standoff by reposting claims, without evidence, suggesting Trump's name appeared in government documents linked to Jeffrey Epstein.


Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Trump's Patience With Putin Leaves Senate Sanctions Push on Hold
President Donald Trump's suggestion that he may let Russia and Ukraine keep fighting has left US lawmakers in an awkward spot over their plan to force a ceasefire with 'bone-crushing' sanctions against Moscow. The Senate bill has more than 80 co-sponsors, an all-but-unheard-of level of bipartisan support. Yet although that kind of veto-proof backing is enough for the Senate to press ahead without White House backing, supporters show no sign they're ready to challenge the president. Trump's comments on Thursday — he said he hadn't even looked at the bill, but will do what he wants 'at the right time' — put the brakes on what had seemed to be an accelerating push to advance the proposal as soon as this month. Republican co-author Lindsey Graham, who said earlier in the week that he aimed to have the Senate plan in place by the Group of Seven leaders' summit to be held in Kananaskis, Alberta, -17, seemed to ease off the gas in a tweet after Trump's comments. 'I have coordinated closely with the White House on this endeavor from day one,' he wrote. Trump, however, has shown little interest in backing Graham's plan, and the White House has insisted that any decision on sanctions will be the president's alone. Instead, he's signaled he may walk away from efforts to force a settlement amid growing frustration with his inability to deliver the quick peace deal he promised on the campaign trail. Graham's Democrat co-author Richard Blumenthal said the pair are still working on changes to the bill to make it more acceptable to the White House. European leaders, meanwhile, are pushing ahead with plans to impose more restrictions on Russian financial institutions and the shadow fleet of tankers Moscow uses to export its oil. Those limits have squeezed Russia's economy — but not President Vladimir Putin's resolve to continue fighting. Russia's war in Ukraine, conceived as a days- or weeks-long 'special military operation,' is well into its fourth year. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz made the case for turning up the heat on Putin during an Oval Office meeting with Trump on Thursday, but came away sounding cautious. 'I asked the president to go along with us to put more pressure on this government, on Putin, to come to an end with this terrible war,' Merz told Fox News. 'I was a little bit more optimistic a couple of weeks ago, when the first diplomatic initiatives were more or less successful.' Since then, talks have moved slowly amid a yawning gulf between Russian and Ukrainian demands, and fighting has raged. A daring Ukrainian strike on June 1, using drones smuggled into Russia to hit its strategic bombers at bases thousands of miles from the front lines, provided a stunning show of Kyiv's capabilities. While some in the US administration were privately impressed with the attack, there were also signs of unhappiness that it would only harden Putin's resolve to fight on, according to allied officials who asked not to be identified discussing matters that aren't public. Trump said he'd asked Putin not to retaliate. But the Russian leader rejected that appeal, and mounted deadly new missile and drone strikes on Kyiv and other cities Friday. The attacks continued overnight, including the largest barrage of the war so far against Kharkiv in Ukraine's northeast. At least three people were killed and 21 injured as the city, which had a prewar population of about 1.4 million people, was struck with dozens of drones, aerial glide bombs and at least two missiles, many aimed at apartment buildings and private homes. Pressed by reporters, Trump didn't completely rule out new sanctions, even suggesting that he might impose them on Ukraine as well as Russia. 'They're waiting for me to decide on what to do, and I'll know maybe very soon,' Trump said. 'It's a harsh bill, yeah, very harsh.' Earlier in the week, Trump shared a social media post suggesting the Senate move ahead with the bill to give him leverage against Putin, even if the plan might not make it into law. Andriy Yermak, a top aide to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, remained hopeful about the plan after a visit to Washington. 'The Graham package contains very painful sanctions. If this is voted through, they will start working very quickly,' he told Ukraine's 1 1 network on Friday. Asked about the prospect Trump might impose restrictions on Kyiv, he said, 'there were no signals on that.' The draconian nature of the penalties in the Senate bill — aimed at cutting off Russia's large and lucrative exports of oil, gas and other products with threats of 500% tariffs on buyers, including big US trading partners like China and India — would make them costly for the US if Putin didn't immediately back down. Global energy prices would spike, just as trade flows seized up. 'It's a risky but courageous proposition,' said Ben Harris, director of economic studies at Brookings Institution. Ukrainian officials estimate cutting oil exports would starve Russia of $60 billion a year, the amount it's currently spending on the war. The bill gives Trump a fail-safe, requiring the administration to certify that Russia isn't serious about peace talks or has violated a ceasefire before imposing the maximum penalties. The measure also codifies many of the sanctions already imposed on Russia, from financial and trade restrictions to bans on top officials. That would complicate any attempt by the administration to seek the potential economic deals with Moscow that Trump has touted without an end to the war. Last month, testifying before the Senate, Secretary of State Marco Rubio made Trump's position clear. The president thinks Russia will likely walk away from Ukraine peace talks if the US threatens more sanctions, he said. With assistance from Alex Wickham, Alberto Nardelli and Olesia Safronova. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Vivek Ramaswamy's photo with kids faces racist slur again: 'Why don't Americans deport this Indian?'
A heartwarming picture of Indian-origin Republican leader Vivek Ramaswamy was bombarded with racist and anti-immigrant comments by X users, as the MAGA world imploded with Donald Trump and Elon Musk attacking each other in public. Vivek Ramaswamy was closely aligned with the MAGA movement until Christmas 2024, when he criticised aspects of American culture and strongly reaffirmed his support for the H-1B visa programme. At the time, he was serving as co-chief of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. While Musk initially backed Ramaswamy's stance on H-1B visas, he reportedly disapproved of his subsequent actions. As a result, Ramaswamy stepped down from DOGE even before Donald Trump's inauguration. Ramaswamy had also put his hat in the ring for the US presidential polls but later withdrew from the race, despite backing from both Musk and Trump. As the two heavyweights locked horns on social media, Ramaswamy posted a photo carrying his two children — Karthik and Arjun — and wrote: "It's why we do it." The post had no connection with the MAGA crisis but was still met with vicious trolling. However, the comment section quickly turned hostile, with many users mocking Ramaswamy — some pointing out that 'Americans wear socks inside shoes,' likely referencing an earlier interview where he appeared barefoot. One user even asked Grok to change the background of the photo to a 'garbage-filled street in India.' "Why don't Americans deport this Indian?" one asked. "Is there a scientific reason as to why I find this photo repulsive?" a third user said. "Send him back to India... In the name of Jesus Christ," another wrote. "Do it in India," a hater said. Some X users pressed Ramaswamy to share his views on the Trump–Elon Musk feud, urging him to take a clear stand. While a few praised him for 'seeing it all much ahead of time,' others were curious about the extent of his falling out with Musk before he was shown the door at DOGE. One user questioned the MAGA movement's double standards, asking why it embraces Elon Musk — who wasn't born in the US — but not Vivek Ramaswamy, who was born in Cincinnati.