Lawmakers agree not to fund DeSantis' Hope Florida call line
Legislative leaders agreed Friday not to fund a call line critical for Gov. Ron DeSantis' Hope Florida program, dealing a blow to one of his signature priorities.
During dealmaking to craft a state budget for the upcoming fiscal year, House and Senate leaders decided not to spend $2 million requested by DeSantis to staff 20 Hope Florida call line agents.
They also agreed not to give DeSantis four positions in the governor's office to create a new Office of Hope Florida.
The decisions come amid intense scrutiny by House Republicans into the four-year-old program envisioned by first lady Casey DeSantis, which is intended to move Floridians off of government assistance.
The call line 833-GET-HELP, which is emblazoned on promotional materials and news releases, is central to that effort. Hope navigators, who function as caseworkers, are supposed to use the helpline to direct Floridians to local churches and nonprofits.
The helpline is currently funded by federal child abuse prevention grants through the American Rescue Plan, which is set to expire.
It's not immediately clear what will happen to those positions during the upcoming fiscal year.
'I think we're going to have to probably have a discussion with the governor and his staff about how we go forward,' said Sen. Ed Hooper, a Clearwater Republican who is chairperson of the Senate's budget committee.
'Do they have funds available still left to do that? It'll get revisited in a few months, when we come back for next session.'
DeSantis spokesperson Bryan Griffin said in a statement that the program would continue, noting that the positions existed before they were repurposed for Hope Florida.
'The good work of Hope Florida will continue uninterrupted despite a fringe group of House members' political games over additional salaries & resources,' Griffin said in the statement.
DeSantis asked lawmakers to enshrine Hope Florida into state law this year, making it a permanent program in the governor's office.
House Republicans instead dug into the program and its charity arm, the Hope Florida Foundation.
The state program spans at least a dozen agencies, but administration officials struggled to explain how it functions or how it's been successful. During a tense House committee hearing in April, department heads didn't know that there was someone in charge of the Hope Florida program.
In its four years, Hope Florida has helped about 115,000 people, according to its website. By comparison, the 211 system, a similar referral service that does not use state funds, took in nearly a million calls last year.
Lawmakers also discovered that the Hope Florida Foundation was used last year to move $10 million from a settlement with a Medicaid contractor to two nonprofits, which shifted nearly all of it to a political committee led by DeSantis' then-chief of staff.
House Rep. Alex Andrade, a Pensacola Republican, said the series of transactions was illegal, and the state attorney's office in Leon County has an open criminal investigation relating to it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
6 minutes ago
- Newsweek
John Fetterman's Name Booed at Pennsylvania 'No Kings' Rally
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Senator John Fetterman was booed when his name was mentioned during a rally in his home state of Pennsylvania on Saturday. Newsweek reached out to Fetterman's office for comment via email on Sunday. Why It Matters Mediaite reported that the rally was part of the "No Kings" protest movement, one of many held nationwide on June 14. Demonstrations took place in hundreds of U.S. cities, according to Reuters, with large-scale gatherings reported in major hubs such as Philadelphia; Los Angeles; Austin, Texas; Portland, Oregon; and New York. The demonstrations aligned with both the president's 79th birthday and the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary celebration in Washington D.C. What To Know In a clip from C-SPAN, Leah Greenberg, co-founder of the progressive nonprofit Indivisible, told the crowd in Philadelphia: "Now, this is not a rally for one party. We've got Democrats here today. We've got Republicans and independents here today. "We are looking to the leaders who will fight for us because even today, there are folks among the Democratic Party who think we should roll over and play dead. Anyone seen John Fetterman here today?" This remark was met with audible boos from the attendees. U.S. Senator John Fetterman on June 2, 2025, in Boston. U.S. Senator John Fetterman on June 2, 2025, in a Democrat, has voiced support for the military parade—which according to White House director of communications Steven Cheung was attended by some 250,000—in a Saturday post on X, formerly Twitter, writing that it was "appropriate to celebrate the 250 years of sacrifice, dedication and service." The senator was criticized earlier this month in an opinion piece published by the editorial board of The Philadelphia Inquirer—Fetterman's home state newspaper—which accused him of neglecting his political duties. Fetterman has often broken with his party on key issues such as the Israel-Hamas war and border security. His views prompted speculation that he was leaving the Democratic Party to join the Republicans—rumors he dismissed earlier this year. During a January appearance on ABC's The View, he said he has "been on record" saying that "I am not going to become a Republican." He added: "I would make a pretty terrible Republican because, you know, pro-choice, pro really strong immigration, pro-LGBTQ… I don't think I'd be a good fit. So, I'm not going to change my party and if I am… I'll give you the exclusive." What People Are Saying Pennsylvania Senator John Fetterman on X: "This parade is comprised of our sons, daughters, mothers and fathers—the very best of us. Regardless of your politics, it's appropriate to celebrate the 250 years of sacrifice, dedication and service." What Happens Next Fetterman is up for reelection in 2028.
Newsweek
16 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Minnesota Democrat Assassination Puts Security Under Spotlight
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The assassination of a Minnesota state legislator has politicians on both sides of the aisle discussing the effectiveness of security details. Both Democrats and Republicans have called for the security of politicians at a state and federal level to be examined after Minnesota politicians Mellisa Hortman and John Hoffman and their spouses were shot on Saturday. The Context Minnesota Democratic state Representative Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark were shot and killed early Saturday morning at their Brooklyn Park home in an act of "targeted political violence," Governor Tim Walz said during a press conference Saturday. The gunman was posing as law enforcement. Walz called the shooting "a politically motivated assassination." The gunman, who remains at large, had targeted the home of Hortman after shooting state Senator John Hoffman and his wife at their home in Champlin. They both underwent surgery after the attack. What To Know The shooting prompted Democratic leadership in Congress to call for an investigation into their current security situations. Both of the politicians shot on Saturday were Democrats. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer asked that security be raised for the two Democratic senators for Minnesota, Amy Klobuchar and Tina Smith, while House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries asked security officials to "ensure the safety of our Minnesota delegation and members of Congress across the country", according to Axios. The astern facade of the United States Capitol building in Washington D.C. in February 2017. The astern facade of the United States Capitol building in Washington D.C. in February 2017. Getty Images The most senior Democrat on the House Homeland Security Committee, Bennie Thompson, likewise called on the Capitol Police " to assist in providing real solutions for increased security for members." Congressional Republicans also reportedly held a meeting in response to the shootings on Saturday, and discussed the potential for increasing security measures at politicians' homes and at airports when they are traveling. After it was discovered that the suspect involved in the shooting, Vance Boelter, had leaflets related to the "No Kings" protest movement, several events in Minnesota were shut down, with a spokesperson for the event telling Newsweek that it was done, "Out of an abundance of caution." What People Are Saying In a statement shared with Newsweek, organizers of No Kings said: "Out of an abundance of caution and in adherence to guidance from Governor Walz and the Minnesota State Patrol, all remaining No Kings events in Minnesota are being canceled immediately. "This decision comes in light of the ongoing shelter-in-place order and the tragic shooting that targeted two elected officials and their spouses. We are doing this in accordance with local and state guidance given the suspect is still at large impersonating a police officer. "Our hearts are with the victims, their families, and the communities shaken by this violence. We are in close contact with our hosts, attendees, and state and local officials and remain committed to ensuring all other events around the country proceed peacefully and safely." What Happens Next The search for Boelter remains ongoing. Anyone with information about his location has been advised to contact the authorities.
CBS News
22 minutes ago
- CBS News
Transcript: Sen. Tom Cotton on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," June 15, 2025
The following is the transcript of an interview with Sen. Tom Cotton, Republican of Arkansas, that aired on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" on June 15, 2025. MARGARET BRENNAN: And we're joined now in Washington by Senator Tom Cotton, who is the chairman of the Intelligence Committee. Good morning and Happy Father's Day to you. SEN. TOM COTTON: Thank you, Margaret. MARGARET BRENNAN: So, I know you are staying on top of all these events. When it comes to what President Trump has said publicly, he seems to be indicating not just that the U.S. had nothing to do with the attack on Iran, but he's saying this is not America's fight, unless Iran hits the U.S. Should it be such a bright line? SEN. COTTON: Well, what the President said in his overnight post was a clear message to the Ayatollahs, that if you hit America in any way, whether our troops or our citizens or our ships, for instance, then you're going to feel the full force and strength of the US military in a way no one's ever seen. That's a clear deterrent message, setting aside the threat that the nuclear program poses to Israel and to the United States, because let's remember, the Iranian regime has been terrorizing Americans. It's killed thousands of Americans. It's taken them hostage. It still chants "death to America," it's building missiles that can strike not just our troops or our friends in the region, but soon enough here in the United States as well. And that's why President Trump has been consistent for his 10 years in political life that we cannot allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. We cannot allow them to have a path to a nuclear weapon with uranium enrichment. That's the deal that he was trying to negotiate for the last two months. But as he said early last week, Iran was simply too stubborn. They weren't willing to come to the table and negotiate. And I have to disagree with the reporter who said that Israel strikes in Iran ended those negotiations. It was Iran's- Iran's stubbornness that ended them. President Trump was clear about that, and he is still clear that there is time if they want to come back to negotiate an end to the uranium enrichment program, that he would accept that. But he's given them chance after chance, as he said. MARGARET BRENNAN: But in terms of the line, he's drawing on military force, should the U.S. involvement be purely defensive and deterrent, or should the U.S. be willing to be engaged in these military operations? SEN. COTTON: Well, I don't think he's drawn that line. He's been very clear that all options remain on the table to defend our own people, to support Israel-- MARGARET BRENNAN: -- He hasn't said that-- SEN. COTTON: But he- well, he said that for 10 years, and he said it for months leading up to this moment. He said that Iran can make a deal and live happily without death or there will be bombing. So, I think he's appropriately kept all options on the table. He made clear in the early days of this conflict, on Thursday night and Friday morning, that we back Israel to the hilt. There's almost 700,000 Americans in Israel at any time. So of course, we're going to protect Israel, and that we have the best military technology in the world. And he said that he has proudly provided Israel with those weapons, both in his first term and in this term as well. So, we back Israel to the hilt all the way. But he's appropriately keeping all options on the table. MARGARET BRENNAN: But he's emphasizing again and again, this isn't us. This isn't America. This isn't an American operation. SEN. COTTON: So far in this operation, we have not been involved in offensive strikes. We've been involved in other ways, through our provision of Israel with weapons over the years, or our defense of Israel and its citizens and our citizens in Israel. Now he has said his objective remains the same, which is Iran's nuclear disarmament, and he has said that that can happen still through a deal, I don't think-- MARGARET BRENNAN: --He prefers diplomacy. SEN. COTTON: And he would like Iran to come back to the table. I think now that Iran sees that Israel and America mean business and surrender its enrichment capabilities voluntarily. If that doesn't happen, though, I think the strikes are going to continue. MARGARET BRENNAN: But to the point, if it's really about destroying the nuclear program that Iran has, you know this very well, that there's this underground facility at Fordow, very deep, under a mountain. It's long been assessed that only the U.S. has the capability with a bunker buster bomb to take it out. Should the United States offer that kind of massive ordnance penetrator to Israel to finish the job? SEN. COTTON: Well, I'm not going to speculate about the methods that the United States or Israel might use-- MARGARET BRENNAN: --But should they?-- SEN. COTTON: --to protect our own interests. I'll simply say this, it is, as you say, widely known that Israel does not have heavy bombers. It doesn't have those 30,000 pound penetrating munitions. But as we saw with Hezbollah last fall, as we saw in Iran on Thursday night, when the Mossad had infiltrated officers and agents and manufactured drones in Iran, Israel has more than a few tricks up their sleeve, and I wouldn't be surprised if Israel has other cards yet to play. MARGARET BRENNAN: So, when it comes to differences in intelligence assessments, the U.S. intelligence that was made public in March said at the time the U.S. does not assess Iran's building a nuclear weapon, and that the supreme leader has not reauthorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended back in 2003. Was there more recent US intel sharing or intel indicating that there was some kind of sprint for a bomb? Because that seems a very different assessment from what Israel's claiming. SEN. COTTON: Well, unfortunately, Iran enriched a lot of the uranium to near weapons-grade over the four years of the Biden administration-- MARGARET BRENNAN: --But that's not weaponization, you know that-- SEN. COTTON: -- They are- they are close to having enough pure weapons-grade uranium for several weapons. Now that's not the only step to having a weapon. You also have to have the weapon design. We've seen indications that Iran is once again exploring those weapon designs. And then if you want to use a missile, obviously you have to marry up the warhead to the missile. But Iran has other delivery methods as well, through terrorist proxies. So I think that's one of the reasons why both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu thought we- things that were coming to a head. A second reason is Iran is rapidly producing ballistic missiles, both medium range to target Israel, and short range to target our troops, and they add substantially to those stockpiles every single month. And at a time when Iran is both continuing its work on its nuclear program and trying to rebuild its offensive missile capacity, that the window to actually stop Iran from entering that zone of immunity was rapidly closing. MARGARET BRENNAN: But why Thursday night? SEN. COTTON: Well, as President- MARGARET BRENNAN: -- There seems to be a difference in this-- SEN. COTTON: --Well as President-- MARGARET BRENNAN: --idea of a sprint. SEN. COTTON: Well, as President Trump said on Friday morning that he had given Iran 60 days to make a deal. That was day 61-- MARGARET BRENNAN: --And he scheduled talks on day 63 you know that. I mean, this was a, this wasn't really a hard deadline. SEN. COTTON: He gave them 60 days. On day 61 the strikes began. MARGARET BRENNAN: Day 63, Steve Witkoff wanted to meet with him. But if this was a covert race to weaponize, though it- it raises questions here, because it appears President Trump's offer is to negotiate with the existing regime that is in place in Iran. Do you support a deal with the existing regime in Iran to stay in place? Do you support his push for diplomacy? SEN. COTTON: President Trump has always said his goal is to end Iran's nuclear weapons program, which means the surrender of its uranium enrichment capability-- MARGARET BRENNAN: -- Right. This would be offering them a lifeline, wouldn't it? SEN. COTTON: Well, it would be protecting our interests and securing Israel's interests as well on Iran not having a nuclear weapon. We've seen what happens when they don't have nuclear weapons. They're deliberately targeting civilian areas in Israel. We've seen their campaign of terror against Americans over the decades. That's why we can't allow them to have a nuclear weapon. And presidents have said for 20 years, presidents have said that. George Bush said it didn't act on it, Barack Obama and Joe Biden, frankly, aided and abetted Iran's nuclear program. Only Donald Trump has drawn that line and is willing to enforce that line. MARGARET BRENNAN: But he's not enforcing that line. It is Israel that's bombing. As you just said, the United States is not involved in these offensive operations-- SEN. COTTON: -- But in Israel, we are helping- we're-- MARGARET BRENNAN: -- Do you- but do you share the President's assessment that the way to finish this is through negotiating with the existing regime that the Israelis have called for the Iranian people to rise up against? SEN. COTTON: I think there's multiple ways to eliminate Iran's enrichment capability. They are today what they were Thursday morning, before these strikes started. As the President has said repeatedly, they can make a deal, or there's going to be bombing. MARGARET BRENNAN: I want to move to some domestic issues, but very quickly, I know in the past, you have said that former officials who have a direct threat against them from Iran should continue to receive security. President Trump pulled it. Should they get it now? SEN. COTTON: We should probably revisit the threat that all persons face. Remember, President Trump faced assassination threats from Iran as well. In this moment of tension to ensure that no one who worked for President Trump in the first term or works for him now could be the target of Iranian agents. MARGARET BRENNAN: And that security detail was pulled by the president himself. On immigration, the Trump administration has decided to pull back its policy a little bit. They are pausing raids on farms, hotels and restaurants. Arkansas has a lot of agricultural business in your state. Do you support this decision? SEN. COTTON: I think we need to have robust worksite enforcement. I don't think ICE is going to show up at one or two restaurants where they have an illegal migrant working. Usually, it's unscrupulous employers who have large numbers of illegal immigrants working in their work sites. And whatever work site it is, whatever industry it is, ICE has to be able to go and enforce our immigration laws and remove illegal immigrants. MARGARET BRENNAN: But the President has pulled back from that. That was the change in policy last week when it came to farms, in particular. SEN. COTTON: I don't think we should pull back on any kind of enforcement at all. I think worksite enforcement in all industries needs to be able to move forward. And I think ICE agents on the front lines need the support of political leadership. MARGARET BRENNAN You would want more enforcement, including in manufacturing, including in construction, which could impact the economy? SEN. COTTON: We should not declare any industry or any work site that uses large numbers of illegal immigrants off-limits for enforcement of federal law. MARGARET BRENNAN: I also want to ask you about the enforcement to date. As you know, there has been outcry. We've seen protests across the country because of the enforcement policies. You wrote an op-ed supporting President Trump's decision to send in federalized National Guard troops and active-duty Marines to California. You referred to it as the threat from the radical left , an overwhelming show of force to end the riots, and talked about communities being terrorized. Given the amount of tension in the country right now, is that really the language to use? SEN. COTTON: Yes, when you see left wing street militias who are throwing bricks and frozen water bottles at police officers and shooting them with fireworks, and unfortunately, you have mayors and governors in some places that won't allow police to maintain order, the next step is to call in the National Guard, and if the governor won't call on the National Guard, then the President has to federalize them. We always hope that the local police are allowed to do their job and have sufficient numbers to do their job to maintain order and protect innocent life and property. But if they can't, or they're not allowed to, the National Guard has to be on scene to restore civil order. MARGARET BRENNAN: LAPD says they were handling when things turned violent, yesterday, they fired rubber bullets, but they said they had it under control. SEN. COTTON: The LA police chief said last weekend that his forces were overwhelmed, and they couldn't manage the situation. MARGARET BRENNAN: Senator Cotton, thank you very much for your time today. Face the Nation will be back in a minute, so stay with us.
