Tech safety groups slam House GOP proposal for 10-year ban on state AI regulation
A host of tech safety groups and at least one Democrat are blasting House Republicans' proposal to block states from regulating artificial intelligence (AI) models for the next 10 years, arguing consumers will be less protected.
Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), the ranking member on the Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade Subcommittee, said on Monday the proposal is a 'giant gift to Big Tech.'
'The Republicans' 10-year ban on the enforcement of state laws protecting consumers from potential dangers of new artificial intelligence systems gives Big Tech free reign to take advantage of children and families,' she wrote, adding the proposal, 'shows that Republicans care more about profits than people.'
The Republican tax bill, released by the House Energy and Commerce Committee on Sunday night, proposes barring states from enforcing laws or regulations governing AI models, AI systems or automated decision systems.
The proposal includes some exemptions for laws that intend to 'remove legal impediments' or 'facilitate the deployment or operation' of AI systems, as well as those that seek to 'streamline licensing, permitting, routing, zoning, procurement or reporting procedures.'
State laws that do not impose any substantive design, performance, data-handling, documentation, civil liability, taxation, fee, or other requirement' on AI systems would also be allowed under the proposal.
Schakowsky claimed the proposal would give AI developers a green light to 'ignore consumer privacy protections spread,' let AI-generated deepfakes spread, while allowing them to 'profile and deceive' consumers.
The bill underscores the Trump administration's focus on AI innovation and acceleration over regulation. President Trump has rolled back various Biden-era AI policies that placed guardrails on AI developers, arguing these were obstacles to the fast development of AI.
The Tech Oversight Project, a nonprofit tech watchdog group, pointed out Congress has failed to pass most AI-related legislation, prompting action on the state level.
'The so-called 'state's rights' party is trying to slip a provision into the reconciliation package that will kneecap states' ability to protect people and children from proven AI harms and scams. It's not only hypocritical, it's a massive handout to Big Tech,' Tech Oversight Project Executive Director Sacha Haworth said.
'While Congress has struggled to establish AI safeguards, states are leading the charge in tackling AI's worst use cases, and it comes as no surprise that Big Tech is trying to stop that effort dead in its tracks,' Haworth added.
It comes amid a broader debate over federal preemption for AI regulation, which several AI industry heads have pushed for as state laws create a patchwork of rules to follow.
Last week, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman testified before Congress, where he expressed support for 'one federal framework,' and expressed concerns with a 'burdensome' state-by-state approach.
The Open Markets Institute, a DC-based think tank advocating against monopolies, called it a 'stunning assault on state sovereignty.'
'This is the broligarchy in action: billionaires and lobbyists writing the laws to lock in their dominance, at the direct expense of democratic oversight, with no new rules, no obligations, and no accountability allowed. This is not innovation protection—it's a corporate coup,' wrote Courtney C. Radsch, director of the Center for Journalism and Liberty at Open Markets Institute.
U.S. states considered nearly 700 legislative proposals last year, according to an analysis from the Business Software Alliance.
Nonprofit Consumer Reports also came out against the proposal, pointing to the potential dangers of AI, such as sexually explicit deepfakes.
'This incredibly broad preemption would prevent states from taking action to deal with all sorts of harms, from non-consensual intimate AI images, audio, and video, to AI-driven threats to critical infrastructure or market manipulation,' said Grace Geyde, a policy analyst for Consumer Reports, 'to protecting AI whistleblowers, to assessing high-risk AI decision-making systems for bias or other errors, to simply requiring AI chatbots to disclose that they aren't human.'
Commerce and Energy Committee Chair Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.) defended the committee's reconciliation proposal later Monday.
'This reconciliation is a win for Americans in every part of the country, and it's a shame Democrats are intentionally reflexively opposing commonsense policies to strengthen the program,' he wrote.
Meanwhile, some tech industry groups celebrated the proposal.
NetChoice, the trade association representing some of the largest tech firms in the world like Google, Amazon and Meta, said the 'commendable' proposal will help American 'stay first in the research and development' of emerging tech. 'America can't lead the world in new technologies like AI if we tie the hands of innovators with overwhelming red tape before they can even get off the ground,' said NetChoice Director of Policy Pat Hedger.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
21 minutes ago
Harvard calls Trump's proclamation to block foreign students from attending university 'illegal retaliatory step'
Harvard University is calling President Donald Trump's proclamation to block foreign students from attending the university another "illegal retaliatory step." "This is yet another illegal retaliatory step taken by the administration in violation of Harvard's First Amendment rights," Harvard said in a statement. "Harvard will continue to protect its international students." Trump signed the proclamation on Wednesday afternoon, invoking the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit the entry of noncitizens from entering the U.S. to study at Harvard for at least six months. Trump argued the institution is "no longer a trustworthy steward" of international students. The proclamation also directed the secretary of state to consider revoking the visas of foreign students already in the U.S. to study at Harvard. "I have determined that the entry of the class of foreign nationals described above is detrimental to the interests of the United States because, in my judgment, Harvard's conduct has rendered it an unsuitable destination for foreign students and researchers," the proclamation said. Last month, the Department of Homeland Security tried to revoke Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program -- which allows the school to sponsor foreign students – but a federal judge issued a temporary order blocking the move. Trump justified the sudden move Wednesday by claiming Harvard has refused to provide information about international students, has "extensive entanglements with foreign countries," and has discriminated in their admissions practices. The proclamation also claimed crime rates have "drastically risen" at the school and requires the government to probe the potential misconduct of foreign students. "These concerns have compelled the Federal Government to conclude that Harvard University is no longer a trustworthy steward of international student and exchange visitor programs," the proclamation said.
NBC Sports
23 minutes ago
- NBC Sports
Missouri Senate passes plan to keep Chiefs at Arrowhead Stadium
There's nothing like a ticking clock to get things done. The Missouri Senate, faced with the inevitability of the Chiefs and Royals leaving for Kansas, passed on Thursday morning a plan to keep both teams from leaving. The consensus was reached at a time when many doubted the ability of the Senate to strike a deal. The legislation, which devotes more than $1.5 billion to the football and baseball stadiums, was crafted at a special session called by governor Mike Kehoe. To get there, Senate Republicans increased the aid package for recent St. Louis tornadoes from $25 million to $100 million. This lured enough Democrats to support such a large expenditure for a pair of private businesses that arguably don't need to be subsidized by taxpayers. Ultimately, the stadium effort prevailed by a vote of 19-13. The GOP-controlled House is expected to adopt the plan on Monday. For the Chiefs, Missouri will kick half of the $1.15 billion needed for renovations to Arrowhead Stadium. This doesn't mean the deal is done. The Chiefs could still choose to go to Kansas, where a new stadium would be built. While the team's lease runs through 2030, Kansas has said its offer expires on June 30. If so, the Chiefs will be making a decision sooner than later.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Prediction: This Unstoppable Stock Will Be the World's First $5 Trillion Company. (Hint: It's Not Apple.)
Nvidia's growth will propel it to the $5 trillion market cap spot first. Nvidia's growth would be reaccelerating if it weren't for U.S. export restrictions. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › While Apple historically wins the race to various valuation milestones, I think a different company will beat it to the punch to the $5 trillion level, and no, it isn't Microsoft either. I believe that Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) will win this race, and thanks to its unwavering growth, it will leave both of these two in the dust in the march toward $5 trillion. Just how quickly will Nvidia reach that valuation milestone? It may be quicker than you think. Nvidia's impressive rise can be tied to one trend: artificial intelligence (AI). Nvidia's primary products are graphics processing units (GPUs), which are high-powered computing devices that can process many calculations in parallel. GPUs can also be connected in clusters to amplify this effect, which is why you hear about AI supercomputing clusters being built with more than 100,000 GPUs. Nvidia is at the top of the GPU world, and most estimates point toward it having roughly a 90% market share. Few companies achieve that level of dominance, and no other company has ever been as dominant in a trend that is as important and quickly growing as AI. Nvidia's is truly an unprecedented story. That's why some investors (like me, in the past) underestimated Nvidia's potential. We've barely scratched the surface of what's possible with AI, and AI has yet to be fully integrated into workflows or personal life. This will require an unbelievable amount of computing power, which benefits Nvidia. A report by Dell'Oro Group says that 's data center capital expenditures in 2024 reached $455 billion, and Nvidia believes that number will it $1 trillion by 2028. If that's the case, then Nvidia's growth is far from over, something that its fiscal first-quarter results showcased. One thing that slightly affected Nvidia in the quarter was the loss of its China business. On April 9, the Trump administration established new rules that prevented Nvidia from selling H20 chips designed to meet the United States' previous export restrictions to China. This chip accounted for $4.6 billion of sales in Q1, which ended April 27, and Nvidia missed out on $2.5 billion in additional sales. Furthermore, the company expects about $8 billion in sales to be lost during the second quarter. This is unfortunate for Nvidia and hampers its growth case, but it provides some interesting numbers. For comparison's sake, let's add the lost $2.5 billion in sales to Q1's total and the $8 billion in Q2's projection. If we do that, these are the following growth rates that Nvidia would be posting (if it meets its guidance): Quarter Actual or Projected Revenue YOY Growth Rate Adjusted Revenue Adjusted YOY Growth Rate Q1 FY 2026 $44.1 billion 69% $46.6 billion 79% Q2 FY 2026 $45 billion 71% $53 billion 102% Data source: Nvidia. Note: YOY = Year over year. For reference, during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2025, Nvidia's growth rate was 78%. This clearly indicates a trend: Growth is accelerating despite Nvidia's massive size if the H20 sales are added back in for a proper comparison. Another point to note is that Nvidia's management tends to beat its internal revenue guidance, so these figures may be a bit conservative. Regardless, if the U.S. government didn't create some headwinds for Nvidia, its stock would be soaring due to accelerating revenue, but that gets buried behind the China story. Regardless, I think this is a bullish sign for investors, and this growth will likely persist for some time. Wall Street currently projects Nvidia will grow its revenue by just 26% next year, but I think that is an underprojection. Even if it does match Wall Street's expectations, it will generate around $250 billion in revenue. At Nvidia's current price-to-sales (P/S) ratio, that would value the company at over $5 trillion, so if it meets expectations (which I think it will blow away), it could reach that $5 trillion level as soon as next year. That growth makes Nvidia a screaming buy right now, as I think there's another growth story kicking off that investors aren't ready for. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $656,825!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $865,550!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Keithen Drury has positions in Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Prediction: This Unstoppable Stock Will Be the World's First $5 Trillion Company. (Hint: It's Not Apple.) was originally published by The Motley Fool
