
Scuffle breaks out at Naveen Jaihind's meeting as minister's supporters disrupt event
1
2
3
4
5
Rohtak: A meeting of politician-turned-social activist Naveen Jaihind was held on Sunday at a BPL flat here, where supporters of minister Arvind Sharma also arrived, resulting in a ruckus.
A physical scuffle broke out between both sides, prompting Naveen Jaihind to call the police.
Jaihind convened the meeting for his supporters, but some individuals reportedly aligned with Arvind Sharma arrived from distant areas. While Jaihind was speaking, a few men grabbed the microphone and began interrupting, urging him to stay away from the ongoing dispute between MLA Ramkumar Gautam and minister Arvind Sharma.
Their comments sparked outrage among Jaihind's supporters, leading to the scuffle.
Ramesh Sharma, who came from Pillukheda to attend the meeting, claimed he was merely explaining an issue that began over jalebi (a sweet dish) when supporters of Jaihind manhandled him and forced him out. He confirmed the altercation took place during this exchange.
Sudama Phogat, a resident of Rithal who also attended the meeting, said he was invited by Jaihind via a Facebook post.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Köln: Gutes Hören sucht 700 Testhörer für Hörgeräte ohne Zuzahlung
Gutes Hören
Undo
According to him, Naveen Jaihind had no right to speak on the issue between Ramkumar Gautam and Arvind Sharma. "We came to the meeting to suggest that both leaders resolve their issues amicably. Minister Arvind Sharma also wants peace and sent us with that intention. But we were not treated with respect," he said.
Activist Naveen Jaihind accused minister Arvind Sharma of sending disruptive elements to sabotage the meeting.
"A minister in the state govt is sending goons to create conflict at a peaceful gathering. Who gave Arvind Sharma the licence to instigate such chaos? Is it arrogance of power?" Jaihind questioned.
He warned the minister not to try intimidating him and demanded an official investigation by chief minister Nayab Saini. "What if something serious happened? Who would be held accountable?" he asked.
Jaihind claimed that Sharma was upset over losing credit for the Lord Parshuram Jayanti event recently held in Peharawar village of the district.
"That credit went to jailed spiritual leaders, whose followers are now publicly claiming that Sharma brought busloads of devotees from Haryana Roadways under the guise of organising the event," he alleged.
Rohtak: A meeting of politician-turned-social activist Naveen Jaihind was held on Sunday at a BPL flat here, where supporters of minister Arvind Sharma also arrived, resulting in a ruckus. A physical scuffle broke out between both sides, prompting Naveen Jaihind to call the police.
Jaihind convened the meeting for his supporters, but some individuals reportedly aligned with Arvind Sharma arrived from distant areas. While Jaihind was speaking, a few men grabbed the microphone and began interrupting, urging him to stay away from the ongoing dispute between MLA Ramkumar Gautam and minister Arvind Sharma. Their comments sparked outrage among Jaihind's supporters, leading to the scuffle.
Ramesh Sharma, who came from Pillukheda to attend the meeting, claimed he was merely explaining an issue that began over jalebi (a sweet dish) when supporters of Jaihind manhandled him and forced him out.
He confirmed the altercation took place during this exchange.
Sudama Phogat, a resident of Rithal who also attended the meeting, said he was invited by Jaihind via a Facebook post. According to him, Naveen Jaihind had no right to speak on the issue between Ramkumar Gautam and Arvind Sharma. "We came to the meeting to suggest that both leaders resolve their issues amicably. Minister Arvind Sharma also wants peace and sent us with that intention.
But we were not treated with respect," he said.
Activist Naveen Jaihind accused minister Arvind Sharma of sending disruptive elements to sabotage the meeting. "A minister in the state govt is sending goons to create conflict at a peaceful gathering. Who gave Arvind Sharma the licence to instigate such chaos? Is it arrogance of power?" Jaihind questioned.
He warned the minister not to try intimidating him and demanded an official investigation by chief minister Nayab Saini.
"What if something serious happened? Who would be held accountable?" he asked.
Jaihind claimed that Sharma was upset over losing credit for the Lord Parshuram Jayanti event recently held in Peharawar village of the district. "That credit went to jailed spiritual leaders, whose followers are now publicly claiming that Sharma brought busloads of devotees from Haryana Roadways under the guise of organising the event," he alleged.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Germany tightens migration rules: 3-year citizenship ends, family visas frozen for some
Germany has introduced stricter rules on naturalisation and family reunification for certain categories of migrants. The changes, approved by Chancellor Friedrich Merz 's government on May 28, aim to reduce irregular migration and ease pressure on integration systems. Citizenship pathway extended Under the new policy, the option for "well-integrated" migrants to apply for German citizenship after just three years of residence has been discontinued. All applicants will now be required to complete at least five years of legal residency, meet German language proficiency at the B1 level, and demonstrate financial self-sufficiency. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: 1 simple trick to get all TV channels Techno Mag Learn More Undo The earlier fast-track provision allowed those with C1-level language skills and a record of community contribution to naturalise in three years. Officials now say the change is intended to create a more uniform path to citizenship. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Family reunification suspended Live Events You Might Also Like: Germany prepares to abolish its fast-track path to Citizenship Another key measure is the temporary suspension of family reunification rights for individuals holding subsidiary protection status. For the next two years, these migrants will not be permitted to bring immediate family members—such as spouses and children—to join them in Germany. This freeze affects an estimated 380,000 people and comes amid a backdrop of rising migration. Until now, Germany has issued around 12,000 family reunification visas annually under this category. Government's justification of these reforms Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt stated that the changes are necessary to manage the country's migration and integration capacity. 'We need to reduce the pull factors that make Germany a top destination for irregular migration,' he said. You Might Also Like: Germany's immigration policies set for overhaul as Conservatives take power The government argues that the volume of new arrivals and pending family reunification applications has placed a strain on housing, education, and social services. Political context of the reforms introduced Several civil society groups and migration experts have criticised the policy, warning that it could lead to prolonged family separation and slow the integration process for migrants already living in Germany. However, supporters of the move believe it reflects growing public concern over migration levels and ensures that naturalisation is based on deeper integration and contribution to German society. The reforms come at a time of increasing pressure from conservative and far-right parties. The Alternative for Germany (AfD), which has campaigned on limiting immigration, continues to gain traction in regional polls. Chancellor Merz has described the policy shift as a 'balanced response' to national priorities, stating that the goal is to maintain social cohesion and manage migration flows responsibly. The government is expected to fast-track the new rules through the Bundestag. Since the legislation does not require Bundesrat approval, it is likely to be enacted before the summer recess. Migrants currently applying for citizenship or family reunification are advised to review the new requirements and consult official sources or legal advisors.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'LA under siege by marauding criminals': Kash Patel slams lawlessness; says FBI can act without permission
FBI director Kash Patel vows to end LA riots FBI Director Kash Patel on Monday strongly condemned the ongoing protests and riots in Los Angeles, vowing that the federal agency will take all necessary steps to restore order amid rising unrest over Trump administration immigration policies and ICE raids. In a firm message posted on X, Patel said, 'Just so we are clear, this FBI needs no one's permission to enforce the constitution. My responsibility is to the American people, not political punch lines. LA is under siege by marauding criminals, and we will restore law and order. I'm not asking you, I'm telling you.' The protests, which began in response to aggressive ICE operations across Southern California, have escalated over the weekend. Thousands of demonstrators have taken to the streets, with some incidents turning violent, including arson, vandalism, and clashes with law enforcement. Several vehicles were torched, roads blocked, and tensions remain high in Latino neighbourhoods where immigration enforcement has been concentrated. Pate and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino held a high-level call with senior leadership to assess the federal response to the crisis. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Sanitize & Smooth Clothes Fast with Philips Steamer Philips Garment Steamers Shop Now Undo According to the FBI, they pledged full support and resources from headquarters to manage the situation, praised FBI components across the country for their readiness, and reinforced their commitment to tracking down and prosecuting anyone who attacks law enforcement officers. Bongino also issued a stern warning to rioters through his own post on X. 'If you choose violence tonight, this message is for you. We will be investigating and pursuing all available leads for assault on a federal officer, in addition to the many arrests already made,' he wrote. 'And, although we'll pursue every case, we don't need to catch every single perp, we just need to catch you… We will not forget. Even after you try to. ' Patel followed up with another post targeting those who attack law enforcement officers. 'Hit a cop, you're going to jail… doesn't matter where you came from, how you got here, or what movement speaks to you. If the local police force won't back our men and women on the thin blue line, we FBI will,' he said. The statements from federal law enforcement come amid mounting criticism from Democratic leaders, including former US Vice President Kamala Harris and California governor Gavin Newsom, who have called the federal deployment of troops and raids as excessive and politically motivated.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Better if he was dead': Kenyan mother's search for son year after protests
I search for my child amidst the protest's turmoil. Fear and desperation consume me as I scan the chaotic scene. Susan Wangari has lost count of the morgues, hospitals and police stations she has visited in search of her son, who went missing at the height of Kenya's mass protests last June. She last saw Emmanuel Mukuria, 24, on the morning of June 25, 2024, the day that thousands of Kenyan youths thronged the streets of Nairobi and stormed parliament in protest at planned tax rises and corruption. "It would be better if my son were dead; at least I could visit his grave," she told AFP. Rights groups say at least 60 people were killed during the protests in June and July, and more than 80 abducted by the security forces since then, with dozens still missing. Mukuria's friends say he was arrested during the protests in the city centre, where he worked as a minibus tout. "We do not have peace in this house," his mother, 50, told AFP during a visit to her single-room home in the Kasarani slum area. "I sleep lightly at night in case he comes knocking at my window like he always did," she said. "Every time we hear that bodies have been found somewhere, we are anxious to know whose they are." Two men told her they shared a cell with Mukuria, but they are too afraid to speak publicly about their ordeal. One was only released in February, giving her hope that her son is still alive in captivity. "They told me they were beaten and questioned about the protests. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya IC Markets Mendaftar Undo They were being asked who paid them to participate," Wangari said. Last month, President William Ruto, in a clear admission that security forces had engaged in kidnappings, said all those abducted during the protests had been "returned to their families". Rights groups say dozens are still missing and police have shown little progress in investigating the disappearances despite Ruto claiming an "accountability mechanism" was put in place. Questioned by AFP, the president's office said the police were "handling the brief", while a police spokesman referred AFP back to the president's office. The police spokesman said they had no information on Mukuria's case. An officer-in-charge at the station where Wangari reported him missing said the matter was still under investigation. - Delayed justice - Many other families are still dealing with the aftermath of the violence. Rex Masai, 29, was the first to die during the protests, shot and killed in the city centre on June 20. The inquest into his death is still dragging on. "We are hoping for the best but we are not near the truth," Masai's mother Gillian Munyao told AFP at her home, where a photo of her dreadlocked son hangs on the wall. She found her son lying lifeless in a pool of blood at a clinic where he was taken that day. The state prosecutor has said a lack of witnesses has delayed progress in the case. One potential witness was scared off for fear he might be "forcibly disappeared" by the police, Munyao said. Hussein Khalid, head of rights group Vocal Africa, blamed a "lack of cooperation by the authorities". "When you get evidence, the unfortunate bit is you have to take it to the police themselves," he said. He lost count of the number of funerals he attended after the protests, estimating between 20 and 30. "Was it necessary to unleash this kind of brute force against young, innocent Kenyans?" he said. Politicians have shown little interest in accountability or learning from the unrest. "People were killed, we sympathised, we moved on," Bashir Abdullahi, a member of the ruling coalition,told parliament during a debate on the protests last month. But for victim's families, the search for justice "means a lot", said Masai's father, Chrispin Odawa. "The wound will never heal," he said.