Australia's most decorated soldier loses appeal against war crimes defamation ruling
Australia's most decorated living war veteran Ben Roberts-Smith on Friday lost his appeal of a civil court ruling that blamed him for unlawfully killing four Afghans while he served in Afghanistan.
A federal court unanimously rejected his appeal of a judge's ruling in 2023 that Mr Roberts-Smith was not defamed by newspaper articles published in 2018 that accused him of a range of war crimes.
Justice Anthony Besanko had ruled that the accusations were substantially true to a civil standard and Mr Roberts-Smith was responsible for four of the six unlawful deaths he had been accused of.
Mr Roberts-Smith has never faced criminal charges, which must be proven to the higher standard of beyond reasonable doubt.
He was not in the Sydney court on Friday to hear the ruling, and his lawyers refused to comment. They have a final option of appealing to the High Court.
Mr Roberts-Smith, 46, is a former Special Air Service Regiment corporal who was awarded the Victoria Cross and the Medal for Gallantry for his service in Afghanistan. Around 39,000 Australian soldiers served in Afghanistan and 41 were killed.
His SAS colleagues are among those calling for him to become the first of Australia's Victoria Cross winners to be stripped of the highest award for gallantry in battle.
Mr Roberts-Smith has been financially supported by Australian billionaire Kerry Stokes whose media business Seven West Media is a rival of Nine Entertainment that published the articles that Mr Roberts-Smith argued defamed him.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Erin Patterson is accused of luring her guests to fatal lunch as tears flow under intense cross examination
Erin Patterson has been reduced to tears under intense cross examination where she was branded 'two-faced' by a senior prosecutor. The 50-year old has been put under the spotlight now for three days after she was called as the defence's one and only witness. Patterson has pleaded not guilty to the murders of Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson. They died after consuming death cap mushrooms served in beef Wellingtons during lunch at her Leongatha home on July 29, 2023. On Friday, Crown prosecutor Dr Nanette Rogers bombarded Patterson with accusations that she deliberately murdered her lunch guests by coating the beef Wellingtons she served with death cap mushrooms. The trial has been going on now since April 28 at the Supreme Court of Victoria sitting at the Latrobe Valley Law Courts in Morwell, east of Melbourne. While the jury heard at the beginning of the trial the prosecution would offer no motive as to why Patterson allegedly murdered her guests, Dr Rogers suggested the mother of two had actually hoped her estranged husband Simon would attend. The jury has heard Simon Patterson pulled out of the lunch the night before, leaving his parents, uncle and auntie to face the meal without him. Patterson has maintained to anyone who has asked that she loved Don and Gail Patterson. 'I suggest that you didn't love them; correct or incorrect?' Dr Rogers asked Patterson. 'That's not true,' the alleged killer responded. 'I suggest that you were angry that they took Simon's side in your argument with him in 2022 about the child allowance?' Dr Rogers continued. 'That's not true,' Patterson insisted. The jury has heard Patterson's relationship with her estranged husband had become frosty at the end of 2022 over issues with child support and unpaid school fees. 'And that feeling towards them continued; correct or incorrect?' Dr Rogers said. 'Incorrect,' came the response. Dr Rogers accused Patterson of pretending to love her in-laws while secretly loathing them. 'You had two faces: a public face of appearing to have a good relationship with Don and Gail, as shown to people ... and police in your record of interview; agree or disagree?' Dr Rogers said. 'Are you asking me to agree if I had two faces?' Patterson asked. 'I had a good relationship with Don and Gail.' But Dr Rogers continued her onslaught against Patterson, who grabbed for tissues throughout a gruelling day in the witness box. 'I suggest that your private face was the one you showed in your Facebook Messenger use; correct or incorrect?' Dr Rogers said. 'Incorrect,' Patterson said. The jury has heard Patterson expressed frustration with both her in-laws and Simon to those Facebook mates in a series of chat messages. 'That is how you really felt about Simon Patterson as expressed to your Facebook friends; correct or incorrect?' Dr Rogers continued. 'Incorrect.' 'And that you did not regard him as being a decent human being at his core; correct or incorrect?' Dr Rogers alleged. 'Actually, I still believe that,' Patterson said. Dr Rogers suggested Patterson only invited the Wilkinsons because she thought it would make it more likely that Don and Gail would accept the invitation. 'Did you invite Ian and Heather to lunch to ensure that Don and Gail would also attend?' Dr Rogers asked. 'I didn't need to do anything. I just needed to invite Don and Gail and they'd come because they loved me,' Patterson said. 'Did you ask Ian and Heather in an attempt by you to get Simon to attend as well?' Dr Rogers asked. 'No,' Patterson replied. 'I suggest to you that you thought Simon would be more likely to accept the invitation if he knew that his parents and Ian and Heather were also attending,' Dr Rogers said. 'I suggest you told him you had a medical issue to encourage him to attend.' Patterson denied all of the allegations, maintaining what happened at the lunch was a tragic accident. 'They did love me and I did love them,' she said of Simon's parents. 'I do love them.' The trial continues. .
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Australian woman accused of mushroom poisoning admits possible online search for deadly fungi
An Australian woman on trial for allegedly murdering three of her relatives with a mushroom-laced meal told a court it was possible she had searched online for death cap mushrooms, although she could not recall doing so. Erin Patterson, 50, is accused of killing her former in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, both aged 70, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, 66, after allegedly serving them a Beef Wellington dish laced with death cap mushrooms at her home in Leongatha, a small town in regional Victoria, on 29 July 2023. Heather's husband, Ian Wilkinson, a local pastor, was also hospitalised after the meal but later recovered. Ms Patterson has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one of attempted murder. Prosecutors allege that the mushrooms were deliberately included in the lunch as part of a calculated plot. Ms Patterson denies this, describing the incident as a 'terrible accident'. The trial, taking place in the town of Morwell, has captured national attention. Journalists, podcasters, and documentary crews have descended on the regional courtroom. The Australian Broadcasting Corporation's daily podcast covering the trial is currently the most listened-to podcast in the country. During cross-examination on Friday, prosecutor Nanette Rogers questioned Ms Patterson about computer records that showed searches for death cap mushrooms – on the citizen science website iNaturalist using the Bing search engine on 28 May 2022. The court heard the user viewed sightings of the deadly fungus near Melbourne, including one logged at Bricker Reserve in Moorabbin. 'I suggest that person was you. Correct or incorrect?' Dr Rogers asked. Ms Patterson replied: 'I don't remember doing it. It's possible it was me.' She also said she wasn't certain whether one of her two children might have conducted the search. 'I suggest you had an interest in death cap mushrooms on May 28, 2022, agree or disagree?' the crown prosecutor asked. 'Depends what you mean by interest,' Ms Patterson responded. Dr Rogers pointed to inconsistencies in the accused's behaviour, suggesting she maintained a 'public face' of affection towards her in-laws while privately harbouring resentment, referencing messages in which Ms Patterson had criticised Don and Gail Patterson, as well as her estranged husband Simon Patterson. 'Are you asking me to agree if I have two faces?' shot back Mr Patterson. 'I had a good relationship with Don and Gail.' She also rejected the suggestion that she had invited Simon Patterson, who ultimately declined to attend, in order to serve him a toxic meal. Text messages presented in court showed Ms Patterson expressing disappointment at his absence. 'I wanted it to be a special meal as I may not be able to host a lunch like this again for some time,' she wrote. Ms Patterson admitted to misleading guests about the purpose of the lunch, initially claiming it was arranged to discuss a serious health condition. She later told the court that she had lied about having cancer in order to cover up her plans for weight-loss surgery, which she had felt embarrassed to disclose. The court also heard that after her guests fell ill, Ms Patterson did not alert health authorities to the potential presence of foraged mushrooms in the dish, despite suspecting that her dried wild mushrooms may have been stored in the same container as store-bought ones. Asked why she had not come forward with this information, she said the victims were already receiving treatment for suspected mushroom poisoning and that she feared being blamed. 'You got up, you drove your children to school ... and then you got rid of the dehydrator,' Dr Rogers said. Ms Patterson replied, 'Correct.' Justice Christopher Beale told jurors the trial – originally expected to run for six weeks – would now likely continue for at least another fortnight. Ms Patterson will resume giving evidence when the court reconvenes on Tuesday following the King's Birthday public holiday in Victoria. Closing addresses and legal instructions to the jury will follow.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Man who left his wife with a permanent disability then dumped her at hospital is sent to jail
A man who shot his wife while she lay in bed and then dumped her at hospital has been jailed for seven years. Kamal Eljamal, 35, fired several shots through the garage roof of his home in Condell Park in Sydney 's south-west in January 2023. One of the bullets went through the mattress of the bed where his 37-year-old wife, Georgina Vlahos, was laying at the time. The bullet fractured her spine and ribs, leaving her with a permanent spinal disability. After shooting his wife, Eljamal drove her to the hospital and told staff that he 'found her like this'. He then returned home to clean the house. Eljamal pleaded guilty to causing grievous actual bodily harm and using a pistol while not authorised to do so on February 5. Ms Vlahos had forgiven her husband, but the injuries remained extremely serious. 'She will never walk again,' District Court Judge Sean Grant said on Friday. 'A message needs to be sent to the community that if you possess and use a firearm (unlawfully), you will be sent to jail for a long time.' When police arrived to search the property the day after the incident, they found several bullet holes around the house. Eljamal's pistol was never found. 'It is disturbing that the firearm has not been recovered and remains in the community,' Judge Grant said. Eljamal had previously been convicted for supplying illicit drugs and had a longstanding substance abuse disorder, the court was told. Since his arrest in February 2023, Eljamal has completed two stints in full-time rehabilitation therapy and spent time in custody. Judge Grant took his efforts to rehabilitate into account, but was unable to conclude he would not be before a court again. He maintained Eljamal should not benefit from the injuries he inflicted by receiving a lesser sentence to care for his wife. As a result of her spinal impairment, Ms Vlahos requires assistance to complete daily tasks including showering and using the toilet. But there were other people who had been, and could continue, providing her assistance, the judge said. Eljamal was ordered to serve at least four years and three months in prison. With backdating for time already served, Eljamal will be eligible for parole in April 2028.
