logo
Election 2025: Four compete for three seats in Troy city council at-large race

Election 2025: Four compete for three seats in Troy city council at-large race

Yahoo19-04-2025

Apr. 19—Four people are seeking three at large seats on Troy City Council in the May election.
All four are Republicans. Candidates include incumbents Lynne Snee, Todd Severt and Susan Westfall along with newcomer Kay Friedly.
The at-large race is joined on the ballot by races for council's 3rd and 6th Wards, also featuring Republican candidates. A November race in the 1st Ward will feature incumbent Jeffrey Whidden and Jeffrey Harris.
All other council seats including that of president, held by William Rozell, are unopposed.Council members will be paid $9,207 annually beginning in January 2026. The president's seat will pay $9,863 annually.
AT LARGE RACE
Why are you running?
Friedly: The citizens of Troy want a servant leader that will get out among them and listen to their concerns. I have a long history of serving in roles that require this. I also have a significant interest in the laws and regulations governing our city.
Severt: I am seeking a seat on City Council and running at this time as I feel I can give back to my community through effective representation and advocacy the wishes and concerns of the community.
Snee: I want to be involved in our local government because I believe the decisions made at this level have a significant impact on the community. If I am re-elected, I plan to continue to listen to citizens and support new and different ways to communicate with our community. I will support efforts to make our local government responsive, efficient and effective.
Westfall: Troy has been my home for most of my life, having been married for 43 years and raising four sons here, I care deeply about Troy's future and want to keep it a vibrant, safe, and welcoming place for future generations. I'm running for reelection because I believe in Troy's potential-and I want to continue building on the progress we've made. Before serving on City Council, I spent several years on the Park Board, where I worked to support and preserve the parks and recreational spaces. As a nurse for the past 43 years, I've spent my career advocating for others and bring that same dedication and voice to City Hall.
What do you see as the three top issues that are being or should be addressed by the council/city? How would you address them?
Friedly: 1) The increased promotion of human life both at its beginnings and in young adulthood. I would provide as much support as possible to those organizations successfully working to provide parent teaching, mentoring and training, as well as practical items. Conduct research as to what types of programs have been the most successful in promoting the health and wellbeing of future productive citizens. Seek to bring and practically support those programs in our city.
2) The promotion of fully engaged and joyful young adult life: Investigate the most successful programs that address young deaths occurring due to drug and alcohol addictions. Perhaps we need to think outside of the box as to what we can invest in that will bring long-term results. Even zoo therapy, utilizing trained animals and staff in a controlled environment, to help young people, could be considered and supported.
3) Over-regulation, which requires more taxing to support, needs to be addressed: Did we truly need a rule called DORA? I believe we want to promote honest, useful and even recreational businesses in Troy, but adding more regulations and red tape is not the proven way to do it. Citizens expressed a good deal of unhappiness with having the downtown area tied up for years because of a dispute over what to do with one building. I would seek to cut unnecessary red tape, regulation and excessive fees.
Severt:
1) The restoration of engagement by the community. I recently found a booklet from 1975 put out by the Troy Chamber titled: Where Civic Pride is City Wide. We Trojans have a lot to be proud of with our beautiful downtown, recreation amenities and healthy economy, but I feel like we have lost some of that old school charm and swagger that made all citizens proud. We want citizens to feel welcome and engaged and that's one of the reasons I helped start the quarterly at large meetings throughout the community.
2) The need for affordable housing. The housing market is strong in our town and that is generally a good thing, but we need to make sure we are having access to reasonable housing for those wishing to reside or return to the area.
3) Amenities to attract a vibrant workforce. The environment of labor is changing, and the fact is people wish to reside where they have recreational, social and educational opportunities that extend beyond customary. Troy has many of these such as Hobart Arena, the Urban Nature Preserve, etc. However, it is important we continue to invest and grow our opportunities to attract and retain our citizens.
Snee: 1) Economic development — This has remained the City Council's top objective for many years. I will continue to support the Council's efforts to work with the Chamber of Commerce, Community Improvement Corporation, and other organizations to develop vacant land needed for industrial use. I will support business retention and expansion efforts because I think that it is as important to assist our current businesses as it is to attract new businesses to our area.
2) Citizen communication — This is both an issue that has come up over time about general communications and an issue that came to light with the recent water main break. The need for emergency communications with citizens is something that should be a primary consideration for Council in the near future, and an issue that needs to be reviewed often and improved as technology advances. As councilmembers, we also need to continue to suggest ways to communicate information on a regular basis to inform and educate citizens.
3) Project Management — The city will have several major projects involving road construction, streetscape improvement and maintenance of city facilities over the next five to 10 years. As a council member, I will encourage stakeholder meetings to hear feedback about projects from city residents. I will also expect to see planning for future projects included in the annual budget proposals prepared by city staff.
Westfall: 1. Jobs & Economic Development: Jobs and economic development are a priority for me. Troy's future depends on a strong, diverse economy. I'm committed to attracting new industries, supporting local businesses and protecting our industrial base to create good paying jobs and generating long-term growth.
2. Housing That Works for Everyone: We need housing options that meet the needs of all residents from young families to seniors. Thoughtful planning and smart development will ensure Troy remains affordable, accessible and livable for all.
3. A Safe and Vibrant Downtown: A thriving downtown is the heart of a strong community. I will continue to advocate for public safety, smart investment and revitalization efforts that make our downtown a place where people want to live, work, shop and gather. For over 30 years, I've been actively involved in revitalizing our downtown--- renovating nine historic buildings and adding commercial, retail and residential spaces while preserving Troy's unique charm. This work isn't done. I want Troy to be the kind of place where children grow up proud of their community and where they return to raise families of their own. I'll continue fighting for smart growth, strong neighborhoods and a city that works for everyone.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump Weighs In on 'Civil War' Concerns
Donald Trump Weighs In on 'Civil War' Concerns

Newsweek

time30 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Weighs In on 'Civil War' Concerns

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. On Monday, President Donald Trump was asked about Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom's remarks that his Republican administration wants "civil war on the streets" amid ongoing protests against raids by Los Angeles Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The president was asked by a reporter, "What do you make of the fact that [Newsom] says you want a civil war?" Trump responded, "No, it's the opposite. I don't want a civil war. Civil war would happen if you left it to people like him." REPORTER: Gavin Newsom says you want a Civil War. TRUMP: "It's just the opposite, I don't want a Civil War. Civil War would happen if you left it to people like him." — Breaking911 (@Breaking911) June 9, 2025 This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

Newsom blasts Trump's arrest threat as ‘unmistakable step toward authoritarianism'
Newsom blasts Trump's arrest threat as ‘unmistakable step toward authoritarianism'

San Francisco Chronicle​

time31 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Newsom blasts Trump's arrest threat as ‘unmistakable step toward authoritarianism'

President Donald Trump on Monday endorsed the idea of arresting California Gov. Gavin Newsom over the state's resistance to federal immigration enforcement efforts in Los Angeles, intensifying a clash that has already drawn legal challenges and fierce rebukes from Democratic leaders. 'I would do it if I were Tom,' Trump said, referring to Tom Homan, his border czar, who over the weekend suggested that state and local officials, including Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, could face arrest if they interfered with immigration raids. 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing,' Trump added. Trump's remarks signal a sharp escalation in the administration's crackdown on sanctuary jurisdictions and a willingness to target political opponents in unprecedented ways. Newsom responded swiftly, calling Trump's words a chilling attack on American democratic norms. 'The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor,' Newsom wrote on X. 'This is a day I hoped I would never see in America. I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.' Tensions escalated sharply after Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles following days of civil unrest related to Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. The deployment marked the first time a president has federalized a state's National Guard without the governor's consent since 1965. Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced plans to sue Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, alleging the deployment was unlawful. 'Federalizing the California National Guard is an abuse of the President's authority under the law,' Bonta said at a press conference. 'There is no invasion. There is no rebellion.' Meanwhile, David Huerta, president of SEIU California, was charged with felony conspiracy to impede an officer after his arrest during the L.A. protests. Despite the furor, legal experts note that Homan lacks the authority to arrest elected officials, and his role remains advisory. Still, Trump's rhetoric has raised alarms among critics who view his comments as part of a broader pattern of undermining democratic institutions. 'This is a preview of things to come,' Newsom warned in an interview with Brian Taylor Cohen that he shared on social media. 'This isn't about L.A., per se,' the Democratic governor added. 'It's about us today, it's about you, everyone watching tomorrow. This guy is unhinged. Trump is unhinged right now, and this is just another proof point of that.' At a news conference held by lawmakers in Sacramento to discuss the protests in Los Angeles, Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas, D-Hollister, said Trump's threat to arrest Newsom is a 'direct assault on democracy and an insult to every Californian.'

Minnesota budget deal cuts health care for adults who entered the US illegally
Minnesota budget deal cuts health care for adults who entered the US illegally

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Minnesota budget deal cuts health care for adults who entered the US illegally

ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — Adults living in the U.S. illegally will be excluded from a state-run health care program under an overall budget deal that the closely divided Minnesota Legislature convened to pass in a special session Monday. Repealing a 2023 state law that made those immigrants eligible for the MinnesotaCare program for the working poor was a priority for Republicans in the negotiations that produced the budget agreement. The Legislature is split 101-100, with the House tied and Democrats holding just a one-seat majority in the Senate, and the health care compromise was a bitter pill for Democrats to accept. The change is expected to affect about 17,000 residents. Democratic Gov. Tim Walz, who insisted on maintaining eligibility for children who aren't in the country legally, has promised to sign all 14 bills scheduled for action in the special session, to complete a $66 billion, two-year budget that will take effect July 1. After an emotional near four-hour debate, the House voted 68-65 to send the bill to the Senate, where Majority Leader Erin Murphy, of St. Paul, had already said she would supply the necessary Democratic vote to pass it. Under the agreement, the top House Democratic leader, Melissa Hortman, of Brooklyn Park, was the only member of her caucus to vote yes. 'This is 100% about the GOP campaign against immigrants,' said House Democratic Floor Leader Jamie Long, of Minneapolis, who voted no. 'From Trump's renewed travel ban announced this week, to his effort to expel those with protected status, to harassing students here to study, to disproportionate military and law enforcement responses that we've seen from Minneapolis to L.A., this all comes back to attacking immigrants and the name of dividing us.' But GOP Rep. Jeff Backer, of Browns Valley, the lead author of the bill, said taxpayers shouldn't have to subsidize health care for people who aren't in the country legally. Backer said California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, has proposed freezing enrollment for immigrants without legal status in a similar state-funded program and that Illinois' Democratic governor, JB Pritzker, has proposed cutting a similar program. He said residents can still buy health insurance on the private market regardless of their immigration status. 'This is about being fiscally responsible,' Backer said. Enrollment by people who entered the country illegally in MinnesotaCare has run triple the initial projections, which Republicans said could have pushed the costs over $600 million over the next four years. Critics said the change won't save any money because those affected will forego preventive care and need much more expensive care later. 'People don't suddenly stop getting sick when they don't have insurance, but they do put off seeking care until a condition gets bad enough to require a visit to the emergency room, increasing overall health care costs for everyone,' Bernie Burnham, president of the Minnesota AFL-CIO, told reporters at a news conference organized by the critics. Walz and legislative leaders agreed on the broad framework for the budget over four weeks ago, contrasting the bipartisan cooperation that produced it with the deep divisions at the federal level in Washington. But with the tie in the House and the razor-thin Senate Democratic majority, few major policy initiatives got off the ground before the regular session ended May 19. Leaders announced Friday that the details were settled and that they had enough votes to pass everything in the budget package.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store