logo
'Magnets for human connection': Why Japanese ‘micro-forests' are transforming our cities

'Magnets for human connection': Why Japanese ‘micro-forests' are transforming our cities

Euronews17-02-2025

Between busy streets, parks and shopping centres, a green transformation is quietly underway, bringing nature back to the urban sprawl of cities. Micro-forests, small areas of densely planted woodland trees, are being planted everywhere from London to Los Angeles.
But what are they and how can they make our built-up metropolises better?
What are micro-forests and why do we need them?
More than 420 million hectares of forest have been lost to other uses since 1990, according to the UN's 2020 State of the World's Forests Report.
With more than 85 per cent of the global population living in urban areas, micro-forests in cities offer an essential opportunity to combat deforestation.
The Miyawaki Forest Technique, invented by Japanese botanist and plant ecology expert Professor Akira Miyawaki in the 1970s, is the inspiration for micro-forests worldwide.
These diverse, organic small forests can be created on sites as small as nine square metres, and only use native species that would otherwise grow naturally in the planting area. They grow up to 10 times faster than monoculture forests, in just two to three decades.
Since Miyawaki's work began, more than 280 micro-forests have been planted.
NGO Earthwatch Europe has planted 285 tiny forests since 2022. Their plots, made up of 600 trees, can attract more than 500 animal and plant species within the first three years. Locations include a sports ground and park in Haringey, North London. Meanwhile 'SUGi', a tree-planting programme which aims to restore biodiversity and reintroduce native species, has created 230 'pocket forests' in 52 cities across the world, from Toulouse, France, to Saint George in Romania and Madrid, Spain.
How do micro-forests benefit the environment?
In polluted urban areas, micro-forests can help to restore soil, water and air quality, according to the Woodland Trust.
Their small size allows plantation in relatively limited urban space, often taking advantage of unused spaces such as school playgrounds, cemeteries, and near metro stations. They can also help to reduce the impact of heavy rainfall, and to keep towns and cities cooler.
They become magnets for human connection
Elise Van Middelem
Founder and CEO of SUGi.
Micro-forests can create more habitats for wildlife in cities, such as blackbirds or hedgehogs. When planted in distinct layers, they can also develop plant communities of smaller shrubs and herbs, which allow the micro-forests to become self-sustaining after just three to five years of growth.
'Our pocket forests offer a myriad of benefits' says Elise Van Middelem, Founder and CEO of SUGi.
'Perhaps most importantly, they can support the positive well-being of communities. From a psychological perspective, interacting with nature reduces physical stress and can improve symptoms of mental ill health, including anxiety or depression.'
'They become magnets for human connection. People take respite during the heat of the day or visit to read a book; at other times the forest becomes a place of dancing, learning, discussion, and leisure. They are self-sustaining within 2-3 years from an ecological standpoint, but at a much deeper level, community members become stewards of the land itself.'
She adds: 'They also positively impact children and youth. 140 of our pocket forests were planted in schools together with almost 80,000 children. Planting pocket forests provides children with a unique opportunity to engage with nature and see that their actions can have tangible environmental outcomes. Engaging the next generation with nature is critical, because in order for us to want to protect and care for nature, we need to feel a connection with it'
What are the challenges of planting in urban areas?
Despite the benefits of urban micro-forests, there are also issues involved in growing in cities.
Exposure to pollutants, high temperatures and drought can prevent deep root growth, and increase the likelihood of disease, according to Cities4Forests, a global alliance supporting nature in cities.
Van Middelem also highlights the challenge of gaining communities' support in growing micro-forests: 'It is necessary to effectively engage stakeholders in the community and get resident buy-in. A pocket forest cannot be planted without their approval', she says. 'However, none of these challenges are insurmountable.'
These are all issues that must be considered - but with time, micro-forests could help to reduce pollution in cities as well as making them more pleasant places to live.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israeli military announces Syria shelling after projectiles launched
Israeli military announces Syria shelling after projectiles launched

France 24

time3 hours ago

  • France 24

Israeli military announces Syria shelling after projectiles launched

The Israeli military said it was shelling targets in Syria on Tuesday in response to a pair of projectile launches, with Defence Minister Israel Katz saying he held Syria's leader "directly responsible". A military statement said that "two projectiles were identified crossing from Syria into Israeli territory, and fell in open areas", adding in a subsequent statement that its "artillery struck in southern Syria" following the launches. Syria's official news agency SANA reported shelling "targeting the Yarmuk Basin, in the west of Daraa" province. Britain-based war monitor the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said bombardments had hit farmland in the province, without reporting casualties. There were no reports of casualties or damage on the Israeli side due to the projectiles, which the military said triggered air raid sirens in parts of the southern Golan Heights, a territory Israel conquered from Syria in 1967 and annexed in 1981. Katz, the Israeli defence minister, said in a statement released by his office that "we view the president of Syria as directly responsible for any threat or fire directed at the State of Israel." "A full response will follow shortly," he added. Syria's interim president, Ahmed al-Sharaa, led the Islamist group that spearheaded the offensive that toppled longtime ruler Bashar al-Assad in December. 06:19 Israeli media said Tuesday's projectiles were the first fired from Syria into Israeli territory since Assad's fall. Following his overthrow, Israel moved its forces into the UN-patrolled demilitarised zone in the Golan Heights, and has carried out hundreds of strikes against military targets in Syria. Israel says the strikes aim to stop advanced weapons reaching Syria's new authorities, whom it considers jihadists. In a statement on Sunday, Israel's military said its troops were continuing "defensive operations in southern Syria" to "dismantle terrorist infrastructure and protect the residents of the Golan Heights". Syria and Israel have technically been at war since 1948.

El Salvador holds trial for army killing of Dutch journalists
El Salvador holds trial for army killing of Dutch journalists

France 24

time6 hours ago

  • France 24

El Salvador holds trial for army killing of Dutch journalists

Koos Koster, Jan Kuiper, Hans ter Laag and Joop Willemsen were killed in 1982 while filming a television documentary during El Salvador's civil war. The accused are General Jose Guillermo Garcia, 91, former police colonel Francisco Antonio Moran, 93, and ex-infantry brigade commander Mario Reyes Mena, 85. In 1993, a UN-sponsored Truth Commission found the journalists had walked into an ambush planned by Reyes, who lives in the United States, and with the knowledge of other officers. The Salvadoran Supreme Court approved an extradition request for Reyes in March, but there has been no progress so far. Garcia and Moran are under police surveillance in a private hospital in San Salvador. The hearing in the northern city of Chalatenango is expected to conclude on Wednesday with a verdict from a five-member jury. If convicted, the defendants face prison sentences of up to 30 years. The trial was closed to the media, but activist Oscar Perez of the Fundacion Comunicandonos confirmed from the courtroom that it was under way. The NGO and the Salvadoran Association for Human Rights hailed the trial as a "decisive step" in the search for truth and justice. "We trust that this trial sets a historic precedent in the fight against impunity," they said in a joint statement. The Netherlands' Costa Rica-based ambassador to Central America, Arjen van den Berg, was in court. The case remained unresolved for decades after the presiding judge received threats in 1988, prompting her to seek refuge in Canada. It was reopened in 2018 after the Supreme Court declared an amnesty law for civil war crimes unconstitutional, but relatives of the victims still had to wait years for the main hearing. Evidence such as a statement from a former US military attache and a military expert's report "directly points" to the defendants' responsibility, said lawyer Pedro Cruz, who represents the victims' families.

France bears the brunt of Israel's isolation ire
France bears the brunt of Israel's isolation ire

France 24

time8 hours ago

  • France 24

France bears the brunt of Israel's isolation ire

The Franco-Israeli relationship was once a subject of obsessive scrutiny by the CIA as US intelligence scrambled to uncover proof that Tel Aviv was deceiving Washington as it built a nuclear bomb in secrecy – with more than a little help from the French. CIA documents from the early 1960s that have since been declassified record speculation about the political backing in Paris for the suspicious nuclear cooperation between the French and Israeli militaries. In a 1961 report, the CIA noted that the French ambassador to Israel 'confirmed' that his military attaché in Israel 'was much more intimately connected to the Israeli Army than is usual for an attaché'. The document concluded that, 'It is unlikely that such cooperation would be possible without political support.' France, at that time, was trying to recover diplomatically from the disastrous 1956 Suez crisis, which saw the British-French-Israeli invasion of Egypt until heavy pressure from Washington and Moscow prompted an embarrassing withdrawal. With the Algerian independence war raging, the French government, under Charles de Gaulle, did not want to bear the onus of Arab hostility for arming Israel – publicly. But the high-level 'cooling off' in French-Israeli relations 'does not seem to have affected the close military ties cemented by cooperation in the Suez incident', the CIA concluded. That was more than 60 years and many Mideast wars ago. US suspicions about French-Israeli relations have now given way to outrage as President Emmanuel Macron pushes several Western countries to jointly recognise the state of Palestine. France is also co-hosting, along with Saudi Arabia, a June 17-20 UN summit to accelerate a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian crisis. The French diplomatic drive appears to have incensed the top US diplomat in Israel. In an interview with Fox News over the weekend, US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee lashed out at Macron's advocacy for a Palestinian state. "If France is really so determined to see a Palestinian state, I've got a suggestion for them – carve out a piece of the French Riviera and create a Palestinian state,' he said. Meanwhile Israel, facing increasing international isolation over the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, has kept up a high-octane tirade against France over the past few weeks. On Friday, shortly after Macron asserted that a recognition of a Palestinian state was " not only a moral duty, but a political necessity", Israel issued a blistering response. "President Macron's Crusade Against the Jewish State Continues," said an Israeli foreign ministry statement posted on X. Countering yet another UN warning of a looming, Israeli-imposed enforced famine in Gaza, Israel maintained that the 'facts do not interest Macron. There is no humanitarian blockade. That is a blatant lie." French-Israeli relations have come a long way since the inception period of close political and military ties following the 1948 creation of Israel. Over the past seven decades, bilateral relations have careened from cooperation over shared strategic interests in the Arab world to periods of arms embargoes and warnings, followed by phases of rapprochement until they hit rocky ground again. Along the way, French noises about recognising a Palestinian state have been invariably met with Israeli allegations of anti-Semitism and barbed reminders of the Vichy-era collaboration with the Nazis. Tempers flare in church The latest anti-French screed by Israel and its supporters have been met, for the most part, with a Gallic shrug in French Mideast circles. 'The reactions are not really surprising. They are pretty much in line with the hawkish rhetoric that has been emanating from the Israeli government. But they have taken it up a notch because they are sort of panicking, because they realise that Western public opinion is shifting very rapidly,' said Karim Emile Bitar, a lecturer in Middle East studies at SciencesPo, Paris. 'This is not something new. French relations with Israel have always been difficult. Almost every French president since Charles de Gaulle has been called anti-Semitic by the Israeli government. Almost everyone, except perhaps Sarkozy,' added Bitar, referring to former French president Nicolas Sarkozy. 'But today, the Israelis are becoming almost insulting. Sometimes, it appears that there is a willingness to humiliate France.' The slights have included diplomatic dust-ups, such as a brief detention of French embassy staff in November during a visit by French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot to a holy site in Jerusalem historically administered by France. When Israeli security forces entered the compound of the Church of the Pater Noster on the Mount of Olives and detained two French consulate gendarmes, Barrot had to cancel his church visit and France issued a summons to the Israeli ambassador in Paris. It was not the first such incident at French-administered religious sites in a part of Jerusalem annexed by Israel in the 1967 war. In January 2020, Macron was forced to put his foot down during a visit to the Church of Sainte-Anne in the walled Old City, when Israeli security forces pushed their way into the site. 'Everybody knows the rules,' Macron berated the security officials. 'I don't like what you did, in front of me. Go outside.' In France, presidential explosions – in heavily French-accented English – in Jerusalem churches are viewed as emblematic of the long-standing yet testy ties between the two countries. They even inspire memes and musicians. In 1996, for instance, an exasperated Jacques Chirac told Israeli soldiers at Sainte-Anne: 'What do you want? You want me to go back to my plane and come back to France?' Chirac's lines are often repeated in France, including in song lyrics. Moving G7 nations to recognise Palestinian statehood But French patience with heavy-handed Israeli security personnel is wearing thin, particularly when it comes to defenceless Palestinians. As Gazans face starvation, death and dislocation, Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz's pledge that 'no humanitarian aid will enter Gaza' or National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir 's assertion that Gazans deserve 'not even an ounce of food or aid' have been met with horror in France. Israel's refusal to address core issues of the Palestinian conflict and its verbal lashings of its allies for bringing it up are also exasperating diplomats in Paris. Michel Duclos, a former French ambassador to Syria and a special adviser to the Paris-based Institut Montaigne, believes there are two elements behind the recent Israeli backlash. 'First, it has been years and years now since the Israelis have taken a very hard stance against France. Second, they are very upset about the issue of the recognition of the state of Palestine. They consider, rightly so, that Macron is leading the move from the very last G7 countries that have not recognised the state of Palestine.' While much of the Arab world, Africa, Asia and several eastern European countries recognised the state of Palestine in the 1980s, Western nations have held back, maintaining that Palestinians can only gain statehood as part of a negotiated peace with Israel. But Israel's latest military onslaught in Gaza, which has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, has boosted European support for Palestinian statehood. Out of 193 UN member states, 147 recognise the state of Palestine, including Spain, Ireland, Norway and Slovenia, the latest European additions to join the ranks. The G7 countries – comprising Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK and the US – have held out, with the US using its veto at the UN Security Council last year to prevent a Palestinian bid to become a full UN member state. In the lead-up to the June 17-20 UN summit, French foreign ministry statements have carefully noted that the 'legitimate aspiration' for a Palestinian state must be accompanied by a comprehensive strategy that includes disarming Hamas, the release of hostages held by the militant group after the October 7, 2023 terrorist attack, a reform of the Palestinian Authority and a 'day after' reconstruction plan for Gaza. The Israeli response has focused on characterising the French initiative as a 'reward to Hamas ', Duclos notes. 'Maybe they believe that. I don't know, I can't say. But if that's the case, I think it's a mistake because you can argue that it's exactly the opposite. The way to deprive Hamas of legitimacy is to say that there should be a Palestinian state, of course – not in the hands of Hamas or in the hands of the extremists, but in the hands of a reformed Palestinian Authority.' Back to 'Gaullo-Mitterrandism'? Since the October 7 Hamas attack, Macron has shifted his position with the deteriorating humanitarian situation on the ground in Gaza. It's a move dictated by ethical, international as well as domestic concerns in France, home to Europe's largest Muslim and Jewish communities, where the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a lightning rod issue. 'Macron has been trying to use his traditional en même temps approach to foreign policy,' said Bitar, referring to the French term for 'at the same time' – a phrase deployed for Macron's frequent, seemingly contradictory positions. 'Initially, he was very supportive of Israel after the October 7th massacres. But progressively, he started to change his rhetoric, and he became increasingly critical of Israel.' While critics lampoon the centrist president's en même temps proclivity, Macron's shifts on the Mideast have been consistent with changing French positions on a longstanding crisis. De Gaulle, France's first post-war president, did the first presidential flip when he finally put the brakes on military ties with Israel and imposed an arms embargo after the 1967 Arab-Israeli war. He then launched what is called the politique arabe de la France, France's Arab policy, which brought Paris closer to the demands of the Palestinians and of other Arab countries. The position continued under the presidency of Socialist leader François Mitterrand, sparking the concept of ' Gaullo-Mitterrandism ' in French foreign policy circles. Gaullo-Mitterrandism placed France within the Western alliance as a sort of dissenting member – never fully aligned, unlike Britain – with US foreign policy. Mitterrand's successor, Jacques Chirac, put Gaullo-Mitterrandism on centre stage in 2003, when France opposed the US invasion of Iraq, which was vociferously supported by Israel. When Chirac's successor Nicolas Sarkozy came to power in 2007, 'things started to change', explained Bitar. 'In France, he was the first openly pro-Israel French president. And after Sarkozy, under François Hollande, France started to be perceived as just another Western country: it was no longer sending a discordant, dissident voice within the collective West,' he noted. 'France ... lost its soft power in the Arab world because of this.' After nearly two decades of French alliance with the US on Mideast policy, 'Macron is trying to bring some balance, maintain solid relations with Israel, but criticising it whenever necessary. And in the past few months, he has been raising his tone,' Bitar said. As US President Donald Trump 's hostility toward Europe and its institutions draws other Western capitals closer together, Macron has been spearheading talks with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Canada's Mark Carney, Australia's Anthony Albanese and other leaders ahead of the upcoming UN two-state solution summit. Experts agree that a Western recognition of a Palestinian state, if it were to happen, is unlikely to change the situation on the ground in Gaza and the West Bank while Israel continues to enjoy Washington's protection. They can't seem to agree, however, on what to make of a slate of recent Trump administration moves in the region that are firmly opposed by Israel. These include reopening nuclear talks with Iran, lifting sanctions on Syria and meeting interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa, as well as announcing a truce with Yemen's Houthis and directly dealing with Hamas for the release of a US hostage in Gaza. While the latest Trump twists in the region are being closely followed in foreign policy circles, Duclos believes they are unlikely to impact geostrategic calculations in European capitals. 'You can't base your policy on what Trump thinks today when you don't know what he's going to think tomorrow,' he said. These geostrategic shifts may account for the tone of Israel's vitriolic broadsides against Paris in recent months. 'France is perceived as a European heavyweight because it's a former colonial power in the Middle East,' said Bitar. 'France's diplomacy can have an important symbolic weight.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store