Company decides not to rebuild chlorine plant with history of fires, explosions and toxic clouds
CONYERS, Ga. (AP) — The company that operated a Georgia chlorine plant with a history of explosions, chemical fires and toxic clouds that have drifted over neighborhoods outside Atlanta has decided not to rebuild the main manufacturing facility in Conyers.
In a statement, BioLab Inc. said it has been unable to resume manufacturing operations in Conyers after the most recent catastrophe on Sept. 29.
'After taking steps to meet customer needs through alternative production, and in considering our future business needs carefully, we have made the difficult decision not to restart manufacturing at the Conyers plant,' it said.
Though manufacturing won't restart, the company's Conyers distribution center will remain operational and fill customer orders for products from other manufacturing facilities, BioLab said.
'We take our role in Conyers very seriously, and as we move forward, the safety and wellbeing of the Conyers community remain a top priority.'
The September fire sent a huge plume of orange and black smoke into the Georgia sky, forcing nearby residents to shelter in place, leading to classes canceled for schoolchildren and the closure of a major interstate.
Last month, the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board released an update on its investigation. The company improperly stored hazardous chemicals, federal authorities said. BioLab was cited for six violations, including four serious ones, and more than $60,000 in proposed penalties, the U.S. Department of Labor said.
BioLab makes chemicals that kill algae and bacteria in water, primarily for swimming pools and hot tubs. The company is a subsidiary of Lawrenceville, Georgia-based KIK Consumer Products.
Its Conyers plant is about 25 miles (40 kilometers) southeast of downtown Atlanta.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gizmodo
an hour ago
- Gizmodo
Battery Recyclers Don't Know How to Respond to Trump's Clean Energy Reversal
In a recycling facility in Covington, Georgia, workers grind up dead batteries into a fine, dark powder. In the past, the factory shipped that powder, known in the battery recycling industry as black mass, overseas to refineries that extracted valuable metals like cobalt and nickel. But now it keeps the black mass on site and processes it to produce lithium carbonate, a critical ingredient for making new batteries to power electric vehicles and store energy on the grid. From Nevada to Arkansas, companies are racing to dig more lithium out of the ground to meet the clean energy sector's surging appetite. But this battery recycling facility, owned by Massachusetts-based Ascend Elements, is the first new lithium carbonate producer in the nation in years — and the only source of recycled lithium carbonate in North America. The company is finalizing upgrades to its Covington facility that will allow it to produce up to 3,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate per year beginning later this month. Right now, the only other domestic source of lithium carbonate is a small mine in Silver Peak, Nevada. Since January, President Donald Trump has taken a sledgehammer to the Biden administration's efforts to grow America's clean energy industry. The Trump administration has frozen grants and loans, hollowed out key agencies, and used executive action to stall renewable energy projects and reverse climate policies — often in legally dubious ways. At the same time, citing economic and national security reasons, Trump has sought to advance efforts to produce more critical minerals like lithium in the United States. That is exactly what the emerging lithium-ion battery recycling industry seeks to do, which is why some industry insiders are optimistic about their future under Trump. Nevertheless, U.S. battery recyclers face uncertainty due to fast-changing tariff policies, the prospect that Biden-era tax credits could be repealed by Congress as it seeks to slash federal spending, and signs that the clean energy manufacturing boom is fading. Battery recyclers are in 'a limbo moment,' said Beatrice Browning, a recycling expert at Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, which conducts market research for companies in the lithium-ion battery supply chain. They're 'waiting to see what the next steps are.' To transition off fossil fuels, the world needs a lot more big batteries that can power EVs and store renewable energy for use when the wind isn't blowing or the sun isn't shining. That need is already causing demand for the metals inside batteries to surge. Recycling end-of-life batteries — from electric cars, e-bikes, cell phones, and more — can provide metals to help meet this demand while reducing the need for destructive mining. It's already happening on a large scale in China, where most of the world's lithium-ion battery manufacturing takes place and where recyclers benefit from supportive government policies and a steady stream of manufacturing scrap. When the Biden administration attempted to onshore clean energy manufacturing, U.S. battery recyclers announced major expansion plans, propelled by government financing and other incentives. Under former president Joe Biden, the U.S. Department of Energy, or DOE, launched research and development initiatives to support battery recycling and awarded hundreds of millions of dollars in funding to firms seeking to expand operations. The DOE's Loan Program's Office also offered to lend nearly $2.5 billion to two battery recycling companies. The industry also benefited from tax credits established or enhanced by the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, the centerpiece of Biden's climate agenda. In particular, the 45X advanced manufacturing production credit subsidizes domestic production of critical minerals, including those produced from recycled materials. For battery recyclers, the incentive 'has a direct bottom-line impact,' according to Roger Lin, VP of government affairs at Ascend Elements. The DOE didn't respond to Grist's request for comment on the status of Biden-era grants and loans for battery recycling. But recyclers report that at least some federal support is continuing under Trump. In 2022, Ascend Elements was awarded a $316 million DOE grant to help it construct a second battery recycling plant in Hopkinsville, Kentucky. That grant, which will go toward building capacity to make battery cathode precursor materials from recycled metals, 'is still active and still being executed on,' Lin told Grist, with minimal impact from the change in administration. Ascend Elements expects the plant to come online in late 2026. American Battery Technology Company, a Reno, Nevada-based battery materials firm, told a similar story. In December, the company finalized a $144 million DOE contract to support the construction of its second battery recycling facility, which will extract and refine battery-grade metals from manufacturing scrap and end-of-life batteries. That grant remains active with 'no changes' since Trump's inauguration, CEO Ryan Melsert told Grist. Yet another battery recycler, Cirba Solutions, recently learned that a $200 million DOE grant to help it construct a new battery recycling plant in Columbia, South Carolina, is moving forward. At full capacity, this facility is expected to produce enough battery-grade metals to supply half a million EVs a year. Cirba Solutions is also still spending funds from two earlier DOE grants, including a $75 million grant to expand a battery processing plant in Lancaster, Ohio. 'I think that we aligned very much to the priorities of the administration,' Danielle Spalding, VP of communications and public affairs at Cirba Solutions, told Grist. Those priorities include establishing the U.S. as 'the leading producer and processor of non-fuel minerals,' and taking steps to 'facilitate domestic mineral production to the maximum possible extent,' according to executive orders signed by Trump in January and March. Because critical minerals are used in many high-tech devices, including military weapons, the Trump administration appears to believe America's national security depends on controlling their supply chains. As battery recyclers were quick to note following Trump's inauguration, their industry can help. 'Critical minerals are central to creating a resilient energy economy in the U.S., and resource recovery and recycling companies will continue to play an important role in providing another domestic source of these materials,' Ajay Kochhar, CEO of the battery recycling firm Li-Cycle, wrote in a blog post reacting to one of Trump's executive orders on energy. Li-Cycle, which closed a $475 million loan with the DOE's Loan Programs Office in November but is now facing possible bankruptcy, didn't respond to Grist's request for comment. While Biden's approach to onshoring critical mineral production was rooted in various financial incentives, Trump has pursued the same goal using tariffs — and by attempting to fast-track new mines. Although economists have criticized Trump's indiscriminate and unpredictable application of tariffs, some battery recyclers are cautiously optimistic they will benefit from increased trade restrictions. In particular, recyclers see the escalating trade war with China — including recent limits on exports of various critical minerals to the U.S. — as further evidence that new domestic sources of these resources are needed. (China is the world's leading producer of most key battery metals.) 'There is a chance that limiting the amount that is being imported from China … could really strengthen' mineral production in other regions, including the U.S., Browning said. Trade restrictions between the U.S. and key partners outside of China could be more harmful. Today, Browning says, U.S. recyclers often sell the black mass they produce to refiners in South Korea, which don't produce enough domestically to meet their processing capacity and are paying a premium to secure material from abroad. Trump imposed 25 percent tariffs on Korean imports in April, before placing them on a 90-day pause. If South Korea were to implement retaliatory tariffs in response, it could cut off a key revenue stream for the U.S. industry. However, recycling companies Grist spoke noted that there are currently no export bans or tariffs affecting their black mass, and emphasized their plans to build up local refining capacity. 'The short answer is that we see the tariffs as an opportunity to focus on domestic manufacturing,' Spalding of Cirba Solutions said. While battery recyclers seem to align with Trump on critical minerals policy, and to some extent on trade, their interests diverge when it comes to energy policy. Without a clean energy manufacturing boom in the U.S., there would be far less need for battery recycling. Today, nearly 40 percent of the material available to battery recyclers in the U.S. is production scrap from battery gigafactories, according to data from Benchmark. Another 15 percent consists of used EV batteries that have reached the end of their lives or been recalled, while grid storage and micromobility batteries (such as e-bike batteries) account for 14 percent. The remaining third of the material available for processing is portable batteries, like those in consumer electronics. In the future, as more EVs reach the end of their lives, an even greater fraction of battery scrap will come from the clean energy sector. If a large number of planned battery and EV manufacturing facilities are canceled in the coming years — due to a repeal of Inflation Reduction Act tax incentives, a loss of federal funding, rising project costs, or perhaps all three — the recycling industry may have to scale back its ambitions, too. The budget bill that passed the House in May would undo a number of key Inflation Reduction Act provisions. Some clean energy tax credits, like the consumer EV tax credit, would be eliminated at the end of this year. The legislation was kinder to the 45X manufacturing credit, scheduling it to end in 2031 rather than the current phase-out date of 2032. But the bill could face significant changes in the Senate before heading to Trump's desk, possibly by July 4. Despite uncertainty over the fate of IRA tax credits, Trump's actions have already put a damper on U.S. manufacturing: Since January, firms have abandoned or delayed plans for $14 billion worth of U.S. clean energy projects, according to the clean tech advocacy group E2. While the battery recyclers Grist spoke with are putting on a brave face under Trump's second term, some are also looking to hedge their bets. As Ascend Elements ramps up lithium production in Georgia, it has lined up at least one buyer outside the battery supply chain. The battery industry accounts for nearly 90 percent of lithium demand globally, but the metal is also used in various industrial applications, including ceramics and glass making. Integrating into the EV battery supply chain remains 'the ultimate goal,' Lin told Grist. 'But we are looking at other plans to ensure … the economic viability of the operation continues.' This article originally appeared in Grist at Grist is a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future. Learn more at
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
New MSU AD J Batt: Michigan State 'a top-10 athletic department in the country'
EAST LANSING — A little more than a month ago, Michigan State President Kevin Guskiewicz determined his athletic department needed a change in leadership. The school hired Atlanta-based firm TurnKeyZRG to conduct a search for candidates to replace Alan Haller. In charge would be Chad Chatlos, the company's managing director of athletics administration and coaching. Advertisement Unlike Guskiewicz, in his position for a little over a year and still learning about MSU, Chatlos is the son of former Spartan football player George Chatlos and understands the history and scope of MSU's athletic department and community. And Guskiewicz charged Chatlos with one duty. 'I said, 'I want to know the top five or six people in the country,'' Guskiewicz recalled Wednesday, June 4. 'And (Chatlos) said, 'Do you want to know the top five or six who are moveable, or do you want to know the top five or six?' 'I said, Chad, Michigan State deserves the best. I want to know who the best five or six are.' J Batt speaks Wednesday, June 4, 2025, after being introduced as Michigan State University's new athletic director. INSIDE THE SPARTANS: New Michigan State AD J Batt's priority list: Make connections, build fundraising Advertisement At the top of the list was J Batt, the athletic director at Georgia Tech (also located in Atlanta). It not only happened to be a name Guskiewicz was familiar with, but a person he'd known for a quarter-century. Familiarity and serendipity intersected. 'Michigan State University deserves the best,' Guskiewicz said, 'and that's what we got.' Batt was introduced as the Spartans' 21st athletic director on Wednesday as the school's first outside hire to the position in 30 years. And the 43-year-old —an MSU outsider like Guskiewicz — made clear his biggest immediate tasks are to learn and to get his new department and its benefactors moving into the future of college athletics collectively. Advertisement 'My first priority is to is to listen, to ask a bunch of questions,' Batt said. 'So I'll meet with all of our head coaches, I'll meet with all of our staff. And then I'll hit the road. I don't sit still well, so I'll go on the road to meet with donors and supporters, our trustees. And I'll learn. I'll learn a lot. I think it's the most important thing, particularly when you start one of these new opportunities. 'This is an incredible place. It's an incredible place with great tradition and history. And my job one is to learn all of that.' Contract terms are not expected to be released until MSU's Board of Trustees approve it at a June 13 meeting, but Batt is expected to receive a six-year contract for around $1.8 million per year, a source familiar with the deal told the Free Press on Sunday. 'This is a top-10 athletic department in the country,' Batt said. Advertisement Batt has spent his entire life in university communities. He was born in Champaign, Illinois, as his parents worked for the University of Illinois before moving to Charlottesville, Virginia, where they worked at the University of Virginia's medical center. Batt went on to play soccer at the University of North Carolina, where he first met Guskiewicz. Guskiewicz, who received his PhD from UVA, was researching concussions as a professor at UNC when the two first met. The two kept in touch. After graduating from Chapel Hill with an undergraduate degree in journalism and a master's in athletic management, Batt moved into the athletic fundraising world. It included stops at his alma mater, as well as East Carolina, Maryland, James Madison and William & Mary. He became Alabama's executive deputy director of athletics, chief operating officer and chief revenue officer before getting his first athletic director job at Georgia Tech in October 2022. Meanwhile, Guskiewicz arrived at MSU last year after serving as chancellor at UNC for five years. While MSU explored potentially hiring from the private business sector, Guskiewicz said Batt's experience in recruiting donors along with having been a Division I athlete and a sitting athletic director made him uniquely qualified to lead MSU into the changing world of college athletics. 'He's walked the sidelines. He's been on the sidelines as an athlete himself, but also spending a lot of time with coaches — and some really good coaches,' Guskiewicz said. 'But he understands the business side, the corporate side of this. And so I think we got the best of both (worlds).' Advertisement Hall of Fame MSU basketball coach Tom Izzo, who served as co-interim athletic director after Haller's removal on May 1, flew to Atlanta to meet with Batt and had an initial 'gut-check' that Batt was the right fit. He also consulted with former Spartans and Alabama football coach Nick Saban as well as current Atlantic Coast Conference commissioner Jim Phillips, who told Izzo that MSU 'hit a home run' with Batt. Michigan State Athletic Director J Batt, middle, and wife Leah share a laugh with MSU basketball coach Tom Izzo, right, Wednesday, June 4, 2025, before Batt was introduced as the Spartan's new athletic director. And Izzo felt the connection between Batt and Guskiewicz is important. 'The same reason I really liked Kevin when I first interviewed him on the committee, the first thing he said is, 'I love to fundraise.' And I said, 'Any president that says that, he gets a vote from me and he gets a 'what the hell's wrong with you?' Because nobody likes to fundraise,'' Izzo said. 'J kind of said the same thing. … And if you've got somebody at the top that understands all that and that is willing to go out and raise money and do the things that we have to do now and be a leader in that area, I think it's going to be very valuable.' Advertisement Even with his background as an Olympic-sport athlete in college, Batt pointed to MSU's football program as being the primary revenue driver and pledged to give second-year coach Jonathan Smith the funding and resources to build the Spartans back to national prominence. 'It's imperative we support all our sports,' Batt said. 'But do not be confused. Every athletic department competing at the highest level must be successful in football.' Smith pointed to Batt being part of the NCAA's House Settlement Implementation Committee, which is working to 'implement a new model for the future of college sports focused on stability and fairness,' as giving MSU a major voice in what the evolving rules changes with name, image and likeness and other significant issues will look like. 'He's been in those circles, sat in the seat,' Smith said. 'I do know some people that have worked with him before and did talk to them, and he's highly, highly recommended. So it's impressive. … Advertisement 'He mentioned the word multiple times, 'alignment' in our approach. And so when he gets back here in a couple of weeks, we'll tighten that up and go to work.' Michigan State Athletic Director J Batt, right, speaks, Wednesday, June 4, 2025, after being introduced by MSU President Kevin Guskiewicz. Batt had signed a contract extension at Georgia Tech in December that ran through 2029, so that was part of the reason he initially did not appear in play for MSU. But Guskiewicz joked that, 'Just the fact that he took my call when I was told he wouldn't, that was a good start.' Now, the synergy between the two — once mentor and student, now becoming a working relationship — will be critical to try and return MSU to national visibility and prominence. Advertisement 'He certainly knows what high level intercollegiate athletics looks like at a championship level, and I have full faith and trust in him,' Batt said of Guskiewicz. 'And so when he made that call through the search firm, it was one of those — 'Absolutely.' 'I certainly can tell you that there's lots more to learn, but it's a heck of a starting place.' Contact Chris Solari: csolari@ Follow him @chrissolari. Subscribe to the "Spartan Speak" podcast for new episodes on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or anywhere you listen to podcasts. And catch all of our podcasts and daily voice briefing at This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Michigan State AD J Batt praises Spartans: 'A top-10 athletic department'


Geek Wire
3 hours ago
- Geek Wire
AIM raises $50M to retrofit bulldozers and excavators to operate autonomously
GeekWire's startup coverage documents the Pacific Northwest entrepreneurial scene. Sign up for our weekly startup newsletter , and check out the GeekWire funding tracker and venture capital directory . (Photo via AIM) AIM Intelligent Machines (AIM), a Seattle-area startup that retrofits heavy earthmoving machinery to operate autonomously, raised $50 million in new funding, the company announced Tuesday. Investors include Khosla Ventures, General Catalyst, Human Capital, Ironspring Ventures, Mantis, DCVC, and Elad Gil, among others. AIM's technology platform accommodates heavy equipment such as bulldozers and excavators, regardless of make, model, size or age. The intent is to improve safety and productivity in extreme working conditions, such as mining. Semafor reported that AIM attaches the same sensors that power many self-driving cars to machinery to build a real-time, three-dimensional map of the equipment's surroundings. An edge compute system then takes over the controls to dig, haul, plow, fill, and level the ground without a human in the driver's seat. One person can remotely manage an entire site of working vehicles. The Bellevue, Wash.-based startup, which employs about 40 people, was founded in 2021 and built by engineers with experience at Waymo, SpaceX, Google, Stripe, Tesla and Apple. 'Everything is either mined or grown, and efficient earthmoving is required for both,' CEO Adam Sadilek said in a statement. 'Since the introduction of hydraulic machines like excavators in the 1800s, mining and construction have seen little of the automation that's transformed other industries. These are still among the most dangerous jobs in the world, and outcomes aren't getting better fast enough. AIM is changing that.' Driving by labor shortages and demand for efficiency, the autonomous construction equipment market is expected to grow from $4.43 billion in 2024 to $9.86 billion by 2030. Seattle startup Carbon Robotics recently revealed its latest product, the Carbon AutoTractor, an AI-powered, autonomous platform designed to fit on and control existing equipment for farming.