Jon Stewart roasts Elon Musk over spectacular fall from grace at the White House
Jon Stewart has roasted Elon Musk as 'one of America's least efficient government workers' as his time in the White House came to an end.
The talk show host laid into the world's richest man in a blistering monologue on The Daily Show on Monday, saying Donald Trump has 'broken this poor man'.
'Elon spent $300 million of his own money to get Trump elected, irreparably damaged his personal brand and almost all of his business, and is clearly suffering some kind of issue,' the comedian said.
He referenced a New York Times report last week alleging Musk took a cocktail of drugs including ketamine, ecstasy and psychedelic mushrooms during the 2024 presidential election campaign.
The report claimed the Tesla founder took so much ketamine it impacted his bladder, with Stewart saying his time heading DOGE left him a shell of his former self.
'Let this be a lesson to Elon and anybody in Trump's orbit: whatever your passionate political belief or whatever your ideology is, you will go from reaching for mine stars to dissolving in a puddle of your own urine and shame,' Stewart said.
The host's monologue also took aim at Musk's poor relationship with his transgender child, saying he was 'starting a fight club with your kid just to be able to feel because Trump… Trump doesn't believe in anything, man.'
The talk show host laid into the world's richest man on Monday's The Daily Show monologue, saying that President Trump has 'broken this poor man' and devastated his businesses as Musk's five-month stint leading DOGE concluded
Musk left the White House in controversial fashion as he slammed President Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' in a media blitz as he departed DOGE.
He has claimed to have saved over $100 billion in the federal government's budget, but Trump's legislation is set to raise the national deficit by over $2 trillion, with Musk saying Trump had 'undermined' his work.
Stewart ridiculed the way that Musk had fawned over Trump in his early days in the administration, as he went from a 'tech titan given a mandate to move fast and crush the deep state' to a 'guy who had a bad night in a Nashville bar he can't remember.'
'He's leaving his job to make more family with his time,' he quipped, pointing to Musk's ever-growing number of children.
As he brought up a picture of Musk jumping up and down on stage by Trump at a campaign rally and then to an image of Musk with a black eye at his final Oval Office press conference, Stewart continued: 'Look at this poor b***ard.
'He's looking beaten down. He's got that look on his face that I imagine his employees normally have — black eye, 1000-yards stare. This dude has seen some s***.'
Musk said in his first media interviews after leaving the White House that he was going back to his multiple businesses '24/7.'
At an event on Thursday for his space travel company SpaceX, Musk unveiled bold plans for his starships to soon colonize Mars.
Branding it the next phase in space exploration, Musk said SpaceX aims to launch its first crewed Starship mission to the Red Planet in 2026, with a Tesla Optimus robot on board.
'Launching two years later, we would be sending humans, assuming the first missions are successful,' said Musk.
But while the SpaceX event saw Musk confidently speak of the future, his interview with CBS on Tuesday got awkward as the billionaire bristled at questions on his history with Trump.
CBS' David Pogue first queried Musk on whether his businesses had been impacted by President Donald Trump's tariffs and then asked the South African-born Musk if he supported Trump's attempts to ban foreign students.
'Yeah. I mean, I think we wanna stick to, you know, the subject of the day, which is, like, spaceships, as opposed to, you know, presidential policy,' Musk responded.
Pogue pushed backing telling the billionaire that he had been told 'anything is good' as far as an interview subject.
'No, well - no,' Musk replied.
But throughout the sit-down, Musk complained that DOGE became blamed for anything unpopular the Trump Administration was doing.
'Yeah, I think … what was starting to happen was that, like, it's a bit unfair because, like, DOGE became the whipping boy for everything,' Musk said. 'So, if there was some cut, real or imagined, everyone would blame DOGE.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump is strongarming companies elsewhere into cutting DEI. Those that cave in now will regret it later
Organising a women's networking event in the US has become an act of defiance. Companies with equality-driven agendas risk losing government contracts. Some are receiving McCarthy-like letters asking them to confirm that they have no diversity policies. Activities designed to support women, including healthcare research, are being threatened, and companies are backtracking on former commitments. Women's networking events, the gathering of diversity data and targeted training are being questioned. And some companies are requesting that charities focused on women and girls consider changes to their programmes in order to navigate the current climate. The one I founded, Inspiring Girls, has already been asked to 'include men as role models'. This anti-diversity wave isn't just a social backlash to the many excesses of wokeness – it is politically orchestrated and driven. It crystallised in 2021, when the senator Josh Hawley devoted his entire keynote speech at the second National Conservatism Conference to 'reclaiming masculinity', calling for boys (not girls) to be taught competitiveness, strength, honesty and courage – as if those were only male values. Since then, the movement has reached the highest offices of power: the White House is its headquarters and its commander-in-chief is Trump's deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller, who promised last year to tackle 'anti-white racism' if Trump won a second term. The anti-diversity brigade has no shortage of money or allies: several 'tech bros' (whether out of conviction or FOMO) have joined in – as have tech venture capitalists and other Maga financiers. These are men who operate in fields dominated almost exclusively by other men and who wield enormous wealth and influence, yet they often cast themselves as victims. They hide their anti-diversity stance under the disguise of meritocracy. On the progressive side, there is a movement claiming that it is actually boys – particularly white working-class ones – rather than girls who are 'in crisis'. It is led by the American Institute for Boys and Men, which last week received a $20m grant from Melinda French Gates. They argue that boys lag behind girls in education and employment. It is true, of course, that many of the manufacturing jobs that many young men used to rely on are vanishing due to automation and tech (ironically, for the benefit of mostly male tech moguls). Unfortunately, however, this well-meaning movement is fuelling the anti-diversity brigade's narrative – because they can now claim that even progressives admit it is white men who are suffering. The Trump administration has not yet imposed specific obligations on businesses to withdraw diversity programmes beyond companies who have contracts with the government – including, now, some companies across the EU, but many are taking spontaneous actions. Some companies are doing so because their diversity policies were just for show, while others are simply acting out of fear. The trend is clear: many are eliminating references to diversity and equality from their websites and in their reporting; others are reneging from aspirational targets, stopping data-gathering on recruitment and promotions, and dismantling training programmes. Some of the companies that are backtracking have headquarters in the UK or Europe. And many of the US tech companies and funds that are leading the diversity backlash have subsidiaries and offices on this side of the Atlantic. Their actions are in straightforward conflict with the letter and the spirit of British and EU legislation on equality, such as EU corporate sustainability reporting rules or equal opportunities and equal pay directives. And yet the equality ministries in the British and other European governments – and in the European Commission – have remained largely silent. Most equality ministries and agencies are led by herbivorous politicians and officials who favour performative programmes over meaningful action. Confronting Trump is far too scary for them, which is why they have not set the limits of what companies can and cannot do, whether specifically or in general guidelines. Over time, it is possible the anti-diversity movement will yield some positives, as it could drive companies who continue to believe in diversity towards more meaningful, effective and data-based policies. Besides, in a litigation-led country such as the US, it is only a matter of time before the courts impose some limits on government-led anti-diversity intimidation. When they do, the backlash against companies that have acted spinelessly will have its own consequences. But the UK and the rest of Europe cannot be passive spectators waiting for the pendulum to swing again. Our equality authorities should counteract Trump's raid on diversity by providing clear official guidance to companies on what they can and cannot do – it is their legal and moral duty to do so. America First should not mean America Everywhere when it comes to the fundamental principles of diversity, equality and inclusion. Miriam González Durántez is an international trade lawyer and the founder and chair of Inspiring Girls
The Independent
35 minutes ago
- The Independent
White House staff were ‘caught off guard' by Elon Musk's broadside against Trump's bill, report says
President Donald Trump 's White House advisers were 'caught off guard' by Elon Musk 's astonishing attack on his 'big, beautiful bill' this week while Trump himself is said to be 'losing patience' with his billionaire ally, according to a report. Just days after Musk's 130-day tenure as a special government employee came to an end, the world's richest man began lashing out at Trump's signature tax and spending package, calling it a 'disgusting abomination' in an X post on Tuesday. A senior White House official now tells The Wall Street Journal that the president is not happy about Musk's intervention and is 'confused' by the billionaire's stance, given that they have spent the past four months working closely together. Asked whether it had hurt the relationship between the two men, the Journal 's sources indicated it was 'too soon to tell' but noted that, while Trump can be forgiving, he does not easily forget slights. Musk's bond with Trump certainly appears to be fraying, with the Big Tech boss cutting an increasingly beleaguered figure and reportedly annoyed by the bill's inclusion of a cut to an electric vehicle tax credit that benefits his Tesla customers and by Trump's recent decision to scrap his friend Jared Isaacman 's nomination to lead Nasa. The Tesla CEO last intervened over a Republican spending bill six months ago, firing out a string of tweets that forced House Speaker Mike Johnson into hasty rewrites just hours before Congress broke up for the Christmas recess. Musk's tweet on Tuesday sent shockwaves across the corridors of power in DC. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it,' Musk wrote. He followed that up on Wednesday with a fresh appeal to 'KILL the BILL', imploring his millions of followers to contact their representatives and senators to remind them that 'bankrupting America is NOT ok!' Musk's opposition has garnered the support of conservative fiscal hawks like Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, who share his concern that the bill could add at least $2.4 trillion to America's national debt over the next decade, with some estimates placing the total closer to $5 trillion. Invited to respond on Tuesday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said: 'The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill; it doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it.' While that has not yet happened this time, Speaker Johnson has expressed frustration. 'We had a great, very friendly, very fruitful conversation together,' Johnson said of Musk at his weekly press conference on Wednesday. 'Twenty-four hours later, he does a 180 and he comes out against the bill. And it surprised me, frankly.' Johnson argued that Musk is 'flat wrong' in his objections and said that while he himself was 'not upset,' Trump was 'not delighted that Elon did a 180,' a statement that might well be interpreted as a warning. One person who was delighted with Musk was Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, one of just two House Republicans who voted against the bill in the lower chamber last month. 'I figured he would eventually get there,' Massie told the Journal. 'You don't land rockets backwards or get cars to drive themselves by ignoring the people who are lying to you.'
Times
38 minutes ago
- Times
Eurostar challengers ‘need to think about storing rolling stock'
Act now to keep your subscription We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
