Trump admin tells immigration judges to dismiss cases in tactic to speed up arrests
A recent memo to immigration judges obtained by NBC News provides fresh insight into how the Trump administration is pulling off a new tactic — dismissing pending immigration cases, then immediately moving to arrest the immigrants — that is part of its bid to quickly increase the number of immigrants it is detaining.
In the memo, the Justice Department instructs immigration judges, who report to the executive branch and are not part of the independent judiciary, to allow Department of Homeland Security lawyers to make motions to dismiss orally and then move quickly to grant those dismissals, rather than allow immigrants the 10-day response time that had been typical.
'Oral Decisions must be completed within the same hearing slot on the day testimony and arguments are concluded,' says the memo, which is dated May 30. It also tells the judges that '[n]o additional documentation or briefing is required' to grant the dismissals.
Once their cases are dismissed, the immigrants in question may be put in expedited removal proceedings, which means they can be deported without a chance to make their cases for asylum before immigration judges. The memo notes that people in expedited removal proceedings 'are subject to mandatory detention' and can be taken into custody by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which falls under DHS.
The Justice Department did not respond to a request for comment.
A source close to the immigration judges' union said that the move is legal but that it is still upsetting to many immigration judges.
'They think it makes a mockery of the whole process and that it flies in the face of what Trump ran on. Immigration enforcement means it's done in a fair manner ... and this isn't fair,' the source close to the union said. Immigration judges are not authorized to speak to the media except through their union.
The memo cites a provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act that sets out the conditions under which the government can move to dismiss an immigrant's case. But it misstates the statute. The memo says, without quotation marks, that judges may grant motions to dismiss when 'circumstances have changed to such an extent that continuation is no longer in the best interest of the government.' But the Immigration and Nationality Act's wording is more specific; it states that cases can be dismissed when 'circumstances of the case have changed to such an extent that continuation is no longer in the best interest of the government.'
Greg Chen, senior director of government relations at the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said he believes the new guidance violates that provision of the Immigration Nationality Act and is not legal.
'The omission of the words 'of the case' is deliberate because DHS is trying to avoid having to speak to the individual case. The law requires them to provide particular reasons for their motion, and they are not doing that. The email is the written policy that contradicts the law,' Chen said.
Jason Houser, who was chief of staff at ICE during the Biden administration, said dismissing cases that way will allow ICE to arrest more people but will not really help it speed up deportations because it lacks enough space to detain those arrested before deportation.
The tactic of dismissing cases and then arresting people whose cases were dismissed 'targets vetted migrants who were working and had legal status,' he said. 'Flooding the system with thousands of noncriminals wastes time and resources when federal law enforcement should be focused on national security threats.'
As the agency steps up arrests, it faces an overcrowding issue. More than 51,000 immigrants were in ICE custody as of May 23, according to ICE data, though it is funded to hold only 41,500. Former ICE officials have said the agency can run over that allotment by only so much, and then only for a short amount of time, before it risks budget shortfalls and possible penalties from courts for living conditions that fall below court-mandated standards.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
44 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump's border tsar: We'll flood liberal cities with ICE raids
Donald Trump's border tsar says he will 'flood the zone' with arrest squads in liberal sanctuary cities as he punches back against protests that have rocked Los Angeles for days. In an interview with The Telegraph, Tom Homan said the protesters will do nothing to slow the pace of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detentions. 'If they think they're going to shut ICE operations down, they're wrong,' he said, after returning to Washington DC from California, where he had seen the protests up close. 'What they're going to see is an increase in ICE operations especially in sanctuary cities.' Last week the Department of Homeland Security issued a list of 500 cities, counties and states it said obstructed the Trump administration's deportation plan by protecting illegal immigrants. Mr Homan said he already had teams operating across places including New York and Chicago, where local law enforcement did not share immigration status of people in detention. 'We're going to send massive teams, we are going to flood the zone,' he said. 'If we can't arrest the bad guy in jail we'll arrest them in the neighbourhood. If we can't find them there we'll arrest them at a workplace. 'So sanctuary cities are gonna get exactly what they don't want – more agents in the neighbourhood, more work site enforcement operations.' Mr Homan, a former police officer who has also served as acting head of ICE, is the public face of Mr Trump's operation to deport as many as a million people in a year. So far, he said, the number was at about 140,000. But with fewer people crossing the southern border the pace of detentions has slowed since the Trump administration took power. The result has been a broader operation to find migrants wherever they might be. Immigration officers, backed by FBI agents, raided several sites around Los Angeles on Friday triggering protests that grew into riots at the weekend. Mr Trump responded by sending in 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines. Since then protests have spread around the country offering Democratic politicians their first real chance to unite against Mr Trump. Gavin Newsom, the Democratic governor of California, accused the administration of drawing a 'military dragnet' across the nation's second biggest city. However, Mr Homan said media coverage had missed a key point about the raids. 'It wasn't an immigration raid, it was a criminal investigation,' he said. The operation was investigating money laundering, tax evasion and customs fraud at a business, he said. 'The big overarching investigation is looking at whether some of this money is making it to Mexico and Columbia to fund cartel activities,' he said. Relatives and protesters arrived as news of the raids spread. Some tried to confront the federal agents wearing camouflage. One person fell to the ground in front of a vehicle as he attempted to stop its progress. Mr Homan said the FBI and ICE were investigating several organisations he believed supplied bricks and gas masks to protesters. 'So we know there's a couple organisations that are behind it that's under criminal investigation,' he said. 'I can't talk about it but we're going to prosecute them to the full extent of the law.' Online conspiracy theories have – without any evidence – suggested that George Soros, the Jewish donor to liberal causes, or Karen Bass, the city's mayor, were responsible for depositing pallets of bricks at strategic locations. Other commentators point out that one of the biggest flashpoints was beside a Home Depot store, which would have been stocked with building materials. Protests slowed on Tuesday and Wednesday, in part because of a curfew. Mr Homan said his officers had been placed at risk, night after night. 'I was there Friday night. I saw the federal building surrounded with close to 1000 people,' he said. 'I saw the threats. I saw the damage. 'I saw them trying to breach the federal building.' He said officers had been doxxed and assaulted for trying to do their job. Sending in the troops was not a piece of political theatre or an effort to create a crisis. 'Thank God President Trump deployed the National Guard when he did,' he added.
NBC News
44 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump signs resolutions blocking California's pro-EV rules
President Donald Trump signed three resolutions on Thursday barring California from mandating electric vehicle sales and setting tailpipe emissions standards designed to galvanize the transition away from combustion engines. The resolutions undo California's 2024 landmark decision to ban new gasoline-powered car sales by 2035 and revoke the federal waiver that allows California to set its own tailpipe emissions standards under the Clean Air Act. Seventeen states representing 30% of the U.S. vehicle market had adopted the plan, which Trump has called California's 'EV mandate.' With Trump's move, the 17 states will no longer be able to enforce California's standards mandating electric vehicle sales by 2035. Trump also repealed California's plan requiring a rising number of zero-emissions heavy-duty truck sales. 'We officially rescued the U.S. auto industry from destruction by terminating the California electric vehicle mandate once and for all,' Trump said at a White House news conference. California Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a statement that the state will be suing to 'stop this latest illegal action by a President who is a wholly-owned subsidiary of big polluters.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Iran's nuclear programme may get bombed by Israel. That would be bad for America - but not Trump's friends
Donal Trump has a problem – his affections appear to have been divided - because of Iran. Vladimir Putin, who he sees as a model leader, and Benjamin Netanyahu, who has a tough guy vibe the US President finds irresistible, are on opposite sides over Tehran's march towards nuclear weapons. The UN's International Atomic Energy Authority has just announced that Iran is in breach of its non-proliferation obligations. Iran says it has been warned by a 'friendly country' that Israel may attack its nuclear facilities. Israel fears Tehran is building a Bomb and its leaders have frequently pledged to wipe the Jewish state off the face of the earth. The Trump administration has seen this coming. The defence department has re-routed 20,000 air defence missiles destined for Ukraine to US forces in the Middle East. The US is also drawing down on embassy staff, warning Americans to get out of Iraq, and generally bracing for what may be retaliation following a unilateral Israeli attack on Iran. Of course, such an attack would need to be supported by the US – not least in terms of air refuelling and logistical support. It would probably involve the use of US bombs and certainly US manufactured aircraft. Iran has ordered its armed forces are mobilized for drills focussed on 'enemy movements'. Gulf nations like Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates will be jittery – they've signed the Abraham Accords normalizing relations with Israel and, along with Qatar, have large US naval or air force bases on their territory. Trump has long derided the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action agreed with Iran which dialled back its nuclear ambitions and has frequently warned Iran not to try to develop a nuclear weapon. He would be happy to see Israel take the initiative – after all he has defended Netanyahu's actions in Gaza, even putting sanctions on the International Criminal Court because is 'abused its power by issuing baseless arrest warrants targeting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Former Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant'. But Russia is deeply involved in Iran's nuclear programme. Moscow has a long-standing programme to develop Iran civilian nuclear power industry and has already built the Bushehr I plant, is building the Bushehr II reactor and is planning on more at Sirik and Karun. Iran also supplies drones, built drone factories in Russia, helps with missile technology and is bound into Moscow's military-industrial complex at deep levels that have grown deeper with the Russian full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Iran is a key ally in Russia's war in Europe. Trump has maintained staunchly pro-Russian positions on Ukraine in demanding that any future peace deal leaves Russia in control of about a fifth of Ukraine, and out of Nato. Trump has taken Russia's side at UN refusing to condemn Moscow's invasion. He has stopped allocating military aid to Kyiv. A large-scale Israeli attack on Iran aimed at its nuclear programme would also have to focus on its wider military capabilities. Those are capabilities that Russia draws on. Trump has little real influence over Netanyahu and will not try, publicly anyway, to hold him back for fear of rejection. The Israeli Prime Minister has repeatedly shown that he's largely immune to pressure from the White House. But as Trump's agenda so far this year has been to undermine long-standing alliances and friendships with the US in favour of Israel and Russia – the threat of conflict between Israel and Iran doesn't tear at his loyalties. Israel could remove a growing nuclear threat from Iran's regime which has threatened annihilation. Russia is already benefitting from Ukraine's loss of 20,000 missiles. And if Iran counter attacks with assaults on US targets in the Middle East the US president is confident his forces could defend themselves. But pressure to further downgrade US involvement in the region will grow in Washington – and that suits Putin just fine. None of this would be good for America. But at home and abroad, that doesn't look like a priority for Trump – who consistently favours men like Putin and Netanyahu and who both may gain from chaos in the Middle East.
