
Morgan Stanley Keeps Their Buy Rating on REA Group Ltd (RPGRF)
Morgan Stanley analyst Andrew McLeod maintained a Buy rating on REA Group Ltd (RPGRF – Research Report) today and set a price target of A$280.00. The company's shares closed last Monday at $149.00.
Protect Your Portfolio Against Market Uncertainty
Discover companies with rock-solid fundamentals in TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter.
Receive undervalued stocks, resilient to market uncertainty, delivered straight to your inbox.
McLeod covers the Communication Services sector, focusing on stocks such as News Corp, REA Group Ltd, and Seek Limited. According to TipRanks, McLeod has an average return of 1.6% and a 50.00% success rate on recommended stocks.
The word on The Street in general, suggests a Moderate Buy analyst consensus rating for REA Group Ltd with a $165.83 average price target, implying an 11.30% upside from current levels. In a report released on May 9, Citi also maintained a Buy rating on the stock with a A$275.00 price target.
Based on REA Group Ltd's latest earnings release for the quarter ending December 31, the company reported a quarterly revenue of $983.1 million and a net profit of $441.3 million. In comparison, last year the company earned a revenue of $847.5 million and had a net profit of $127.4 million
Based on the recent corporate insider activity of 7 insiders, corporate insider sentiment is negative on the stock. This means that over the past quarter there has been an increase of insiders selling their shares of RPGRF in relation to earlier this year.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Scott Galloway sends strong message on Morgan Stanley and work
Scott Galloway, the popular podcaster and New York University professor, spoke with LinkedIn CEO Ryan Roslansky on June 3 and revealed his path to success. The discussion involved some words of weakness and strengths that Americans may find important and inspiring. Significantly, Galloway revealed why he decided to leave Morgan Stanley. Don't miss .the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter "The reason I left the corporate world was I literally recognized, 'I don't have the skills for this.'" Galloway told Roslansky on LinkedIn's The Path. "I was too insecure. People would go into a conference room at Morgan Stanley, and I would assume they were talking about me." "I couldn't handle people getting promoted that I didn't think were smart," Galloway continued. "It was a jambo of nerves and insecurity and I realized I am not cut out for the corporate world. I'm just not good at it. It wasn't because I thought, 'I'm so awesome. I need to let my freak flag of entrepreneurship fly.' I just knew I wouldn't be successful at a big company." Related: Scott Galloway warns Americans on 401(k), US economy threat Galloway talked more about how he found his calling, including some bad advice from wealthy people that he suggests people might not want to follow. "The worst advice the billionaires give is 'follow your passion.'" Galloway said. "Anyone who tells you to 'follow your passion' is already rich." "What I would say to anyone in their twenties is: 'Your job is to workshop.' If you're one of those people who knows exactly what you want to do and gets traction in it right away, that puts you in the 2% most fortunate," he said. "The key is just to keep trying, be resilient until you land on something you think you could be great at." Galloway explained his personal past and how it led to making choices that many would see as out of the ordinary. "I was raised by a single immigrant mother who lived and died as a secretary. Neither of my parents graduated from high school," Galloway explained. "Our household income was never over $40,000, so it wasn't a given that I was going go to college." Galloway talked more about his weaknesses and the fact that those problems did not discourage him. "I was remarkably unremarkable but America used to love unremarkable people," he said. "I got into UCLA with a 2.27 GPA and spent most of college watching Planet of the Apes. Now, you have to weigh off your economic situation, the value of the degree and if you could go out and make more money on your own." More on the U.S. economy: Dave Ramsey sounds alarm for Americans on Social SecurityScott Galloway warns Americans on 401(k), US economy threatShark Tank's Kevin O'Leary has message on Social Security, 401(k)s Galloway also discussed his warnings and about being an entrepreneur, particularly about romanticizing the notion. For Galloway, it appears he had some fears about leaving the Morgan Stanley and the corporate world. Related: Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary sends strong message on Social Security Galloway explains his experience with teaching college students about their hopes and dreams. "A ton of kids come to my office hours and they'll say, 'I have offers from Google and Salesforce, but I really want to start my own business,'" he said. "And I'll say, 'Don't be an idiot, go work for Google.'" Galloway clarified more about his thoughts on advising students. "They don't expect to hear that from me. We have a tendency to romanticize entrepreneurship," he said before asking a vital question. "Just ask yourself, 'Are you willing to risk public failure? Are you willing to be emotionally stressed? Are you willing to strain your relationships? Are you willing to borrow money from your in-laws?'" "With a prospect, you might have to show up at Thanksgiving having lost it," Galloway stressed. "Are you willing to sell everyone all the time?'" Related: Dave Ramsey sounds alarm for Americans on Social Security The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Big Tech's AI Ambitions Could Supercharge These Energy Stocks
U.S. data centers are expected to consume 65 gigawatts of power between 2025 and 2028, about 45 GW more than existing capacity can accommodate, according to Morgan Stanley. Due to a mix of regulatory and economic hurdles, analysts expect AI providers and data-center operators to deploy "temporary, mobile generation" solutions to meet surging demand. Companies that make fuel cells, mobile natural gas turbines, and small modular nuclear reactors are some of the potential beneficiaries of this next phase of the AI infrastructure data centers are expected to consume a massive amount of energy in the coming years, and meeting that need could be a boon to some investments, according to Morgan Stanley. Morgan Stanley forecasts U.S. data centers will consume 65 gigawatts of power between 2025 and 2028, but available capacity could fall short by about 45 GW. To make up the difference, 'all potential 'de-bottlenecking' solutions will need to be drawn upon,' the analysts wrote in a note on Tuesday. Possible solutions, they say, include converting crypto mining operations into data centers, building data centers at large nuclear power plants, and constructing new natural gas-fired power plants. But all of that is easier said than done. First, the rising price of bitcoin could discourage miners from converting their mining facilities or selling excess power to data centers. Second, concerns about stressing regional power grids could compel regulators to mandate that new data centers not come online until additional power sources are connected to the grid. That's why Morgan Stanley expects to see hyperscalers and data-center owners adopt a 'bridge' approach, 'in which temporary, mobile generation is deployed' to address the regulatory and economic hurdles to quickly ramping power capacity. Small modular nuclear reactors are one solution that gives companies the flexibility they'll need. SMRs have the added benefit of providing reliable carbon-free energy that aligns with Big Tech's emission-reduction goals. However, small reactors are a nascent, "next decade technology," Morgan Stanley analysts said. For that reason, cloud hyperscalers like Microsoft (MSFT), Alphabet (GOOG), Amazon (AMZN), and Meta Platforms (META) increasingly have turned to existing nuclear infrastructure during the AI buildout of the past few years. Meta on Tuesday signed a 20-year deal with Constellation Energy (CEG), America's largest nuclear power provider, to sustain its AI. Constellation and Microsoft last year agreed to bring back online a reactor at Pennsylvania's Three Mile Island. With SMRs still a ways off, new data centers are likely to rely on small, mobile natural gas generators from the likes of GE Vernova (GEV) and Caterpillar (CAT). Hyperscalers may also buy from fuel cell manufacturers like Bloom Energy (BE), whose electricity servers are a low-carbon way to convert natural gas, biofuel, or hydrogen into power. These fuel cells, the analysts said, offer the benefit of short lead times, reliable equipment, the ability to add redundant capacity in the event of a unit failure, and exceptional flexibility in terms of power output. 'We believe [Bloom Energy] could quickly increase manufacturing capacity to ~3 GW per year, with the potential for further increases in output if demand grows,' the analysts wrote. 'Bloom Energy is in our view one of the under-appreciated beneficiaries of the rapid growth in data center power demand globally.' Read the original article on Investopedia Sign in to access your portfolio


Entrepreneur
5 hours ago
- Entrepreneur
Morgan Stanley Builds AI Tool That Fixes Major Coding Issue
Morgan Stanley first introduced the AI tool in January, and it has since saved developers 280,000 hours of work. Morgan Stanley built its in-house AI tool to tackle a difficult coding problem: reworking old legacy code into more updated coding languages. Morgan Stanley introduced the AI tool, which is based on OpenAI's GPT models, in January, per The Wall Street Journal. The tool, called translates code in older languages, such as Perl (released in 1987), into plain English, which developers can then use as a basis for rewriting the code into newer languages like Python. Related: Amazon Cloud CEO Predicts a Future Where Most Software Engineers Don't Code — and AI Does It Instead Mike Pizzi, Morgan Stanley's global head of technology and operations, told WSJ that in the five months since its launch, has worked through nine million lines of code, saving the firm's 15,000 developers roughly 280,000 hours of work. Pizzi said that Morgan Stanley opted to build the tool itself because tech companies didn't have any solutions that could fit Morgan Stanley's exact specifications. Commercial tools lacked expertise in deciphering older coding languages, especially those specific to a company. "We found that building it ourselves gave us certain capabilities that we're not really seeing in some of the commercial products," Pizzi told WSJ. "We saw the opportunity to get the jump early." Related: Morgan Stanley Plans to Lay Off 2,000 Workers, Replacing Some with AI Morgan Stanley trained on languages within its own code base, including languages customized for the company. However, the AI tool still has growing to do when it comes to full translation. Though the tool can, in theory, rewrite code from an older language to a newer one, it doesn't know how to write the new code efficiently or as well as a human developer, Pizzi said. That's why Morgan Stanley is keeping human developers involved in the process of translating old or legacy code to new languages. Pizzi disclosed that the firm will not be reducing its software engineering workforce as a result of the AI tool, though the company did lay off 2,000 of its 80,000-person workforce in March. Morgan Stanley has released several AI apps for employees, including one that helps them summarize video meetings and another that quickly finds information for them from the company's body of research. Morgan Stanley CEO Ted Pick told investors last year that the AI tools could save employees up to 15 hours per week and be "potentially really game-changing," per Reuters.