South Africa to ramp up vaccinations as foot-and-mouth disease spreads
(Reuters) - South Africa is building up vaccine stocks and expanding inoculations to fight a worsening foot-and-mouth disease outbreak, the agriculture ministry said, as the country faces threats to beef supplies.
Foot-and-mouth disease is a highly contagious, viral infection of cloven-hoofed animals that may also affect other species. Flare-ups have been reported over the past several months in five of South Africa's nine provinces, with KwaZulu- Natal being the worst affected.
This week, Karan Beef, which operates the country's largest feedlot and one of the world's biggest, reported an outbreak at its facility in Heidelberg, about 50 kilometres southeast of Johannesburg. The quarantine imposed on the feedlot, which slaughters about 2,000 cattle daily, could impact beef supplies.
The government has ordered over 900,000 doses of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines with the first batch expected to
arrive next week, the agriculture ministry said in a statement late on Thursday.
"These plans are not only about responding to outbreaks, but also about building permanent infrastructure to manage future risks," it said.
There are growing calls by some cattle producers to declare a "state of disaster" and protect the industry from financial losses. Invoking disaster law gives the government additional powers to intervene in a crisis.
The foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks have resulted in South African beef and related products being banned in markets such as China, Namibia and Zimbabwe.
South Africa's livestock sector is also recovering from its worst avian flu outbreak, which destroyed a third of the national chicken flock in 2023.
On Thursday, the government announced the first ever mass vaccination of poultry to prevent a repeat outbreak of high-pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI), a bird flu that spreads rapidly in an infected flock, causing a high death rate.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Experts doubt FBI's claim that crop fungus smuggled by Chinese students is a threat
By Heather Schlitz CHICAGO (Reuters) -A biological sample that a Chinese researcher was accused of smuggling into the United States and that prosecutors cast as a "dangerous biological pathogen" is a common type of fungus already widespread in U.S. crop fields that likely poses little risk to food safety, experts said. On Tuesday, U.S. federal prosecutors accused two Chinese researchers of smuggling samples of the fungus Fusarium graminearum into the U.S., describing it as a potential agricultural terrorism weapon. Yunqing Jian, 33, a researcher at the University of Michigan's Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology has been charged in connection with allegations that she helped her boyfriend, Zunyong Liu, 34, smuggle the pathogen into the U.S. However, agriculture experts interviewed by Reuters this week said the fungus has been in the U.S. for more than a century, can be prevented by spraying pesticides, and is only dangerous if ingested regularly and in large quantities. "As a weapon, it would be a pretty ineffective one," said Jessica Rutkoski, a crop sciences professor, wheat breeder and geneticist at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Rutkoski and other researchers said extensive testing for the fungus' toxin, widespread use of fungicides and the difficulty of intentionally creating an infection with the pathogen would make it a clumsy weapon. The U.S. Attorney's Office and the FBI declined Reuters' request for comment. Since the 1900s, U.S. farmers have been battling the fungus, which causes Fusarium head blight, usually known as "scab," which often infects wheat, barley and other grains on farms during rainy years. The telltale pink streaks on the grain heads contain a toxic byproduct called vomitoxin, which is tested for and tightly controlled by grain elevators where farmers sell their crops. Constant testing and monitoring means that only negligible amounts of vomitoxin ever make it into the bread, pasta and cookies Americans eat, far below levels that would sicken a human, experts said. "We have a long history of managing epidemics of scab," said Andrew Friskop, professor and plant pathologist at North Dakota State University, noting that farmers have access to many tools to prevent and control the disease. Farmers began regularly spraying their fields with fungicide as early as the 1990s, and researchers have since developed multiple strains of fungus-resistant wheat. Plant experts said that it would be difficult to fully assess the risks posed by the samples without more information on the particular strain. But Rutkoski, whose research involves intentionally contaminating wheat with the fungus, said that she isn't always successful at infecting her test field's wheat with scab. She said the pathogen is difficult to control, and her lab has to strike the right balance of temperature and humidity to create an infection. In federal court in Detroit on Tuesday, Jian was charged with conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud the U.S., smuggling goods into the U.S., false statements and visa fraud. Jian did not comment on the charges, and the lawyer who represented her in court was not immediately available for comment. Liu could not be immediately reached for comment. The court scheduled Jian's bail hearing for June 13.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Contraceptives for poorest countries stuck in warehouses after US aid cuts
By Jennifer Rigby LONDON (Reuters) -Contraceptives that could help prevent millions of unwanted pregnancies in some of the world's poorest countries are stuck in warehouses because of U.S. aid cuts and could be destroyed, two aid industry sources and one former government official said. The stock, held in Belgium and Dubai, includes condoms, contraceptive implants, pills and intrauterine devices, together worth around $11 million, the sources told Reuters. It has been stalled since the Trump administration started cutting foreign aid as part of its 'America First' policy in February, as the U.S. government no longer wants to donate the contraceptives or pay the costs for delivery, they said. The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has instead asked the contractor managing its health supply chain, Chemonics, to try to sell it, two of the sources said. An internal USAID memo, sent in April, said a quantity of contraceptives was being kept in warehouses and they should be "immediately transferred to another entity to prevent waste or additional costs". A senior U.S. State Department official told Reuters no decision had been made about the future of the contraceptives. They did not respond to questions about the reasons why the contraceptives were in storage or the impact of the U.S. aid cuts and delays. A spokesperson for Chemonics said they were unable to comment on USAID's plans, but added that the company is working with clients to deliver life-saving aid globally and would continue to support the U.S. government's global health supply chain priorities. The stock represents just under 20% of the supply of contraceptives bought annually by the U.S. for donation overseas, a former USAID official told Reuters. Selling or donating the contraceptives has been challenging, according to the former USAID official, although talks are ongoing. Another option on the table is destroying it, at a cost of several hundred thousand dollars. As time goes on, shelf-lives will also become an issue, one of the sources said. The sources told Reuters that one of the key delays is a lack of response from the U.S. government about what should be done with the stock. It had been destined largely for vulnerable women in sub-Saharan Africa, including young girls who face higher health risks from early pregnancy as well as those fleeing conflict or who otherwise could not afford or access the contraceptives, the sources added. The condoms also help stop the spread of HIV, the former USAID official said. "We cannot dwell on an issue for too long; when urgency and clarity don't align, we have to move on," said Karen Hong, chief of UNFPA's supply chain. She said the agency is now working on Plan B to help fill critical supply gaps.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
How should Ramona invest a critical illness insurance payout of $300,000?
Q. I am 44 years old and have recently received a payout from a critical illness insurance policy. I now have a lump sum, tax-free, amount of $300,000 and have to figure out how to invest it. I earn $80,000 annually and my husband Richard earns $95,000. So far, I can still work and do not have any major medical expenses. We have $10,000 in consumer debt, tax-free savings accounts (TFSAs) of $65,000 or so each, and registered education savings plans (RESPs) for each of our three kids to which we usually contribute $2,500 per child annually. We also have registered retirement savings plan (RRSP) contribution room of $88,000 for me and $73,000 for Richard. Should we contribute this amount all in one year? Or divide it up over several years? If we make full contributions, should we claim it all in one year or over several years? We have a $200,000 mortgage at 4.2 per cent for another three years. Should we put some money down on it to reduce the principal? Or would we get a better investment return by topping up our TFSAs and RRSPs? We presently invest TFSA and RESP money in blue-chip dividend-paying stocks. Is a different strategy better for RRSPs, or can we stick with this same strategy that we feel comfortable with? —Ramona FP Answers: This is a great question to ask because not many know about critical illness insurance (CI). For background, CI has only been available in Canada for about 30 years and about two million Canadians hold either personal or group CI policies. Contrast that to life insurance that has been offered in Canada since 1847 and currently more than 22 million Canadians have personal or group coverage. CI was started in 1983 by a South African doctor to help those who are diagnosed with a critical illness (most commonly heart attack, stroke or cancer) and as a result suffer financial hardship. The critical illness policy holder can choose to use the funds in any way they wish: medical expenses; loss of income; home renovations or travel for medical assistance. A lump sum, tax-free benefit is paid 30 days after a diagnosis of a listed and defined illness. Ramona, because you have $10,000 of consumer debt, I suggest that would be the first place to use the CI benefit. Consumer debt has a high interest rate, often at 20 per cent or more. Continue to pay off the minimum balances to avoid the high interest rate. Consider any events or goals that you have coming up so that you can set funds aside for those expenses. RESPs offer a 20 per cent Canada Education Savings Grant (CESG) on the first $2,500 contribution per child per year up to the end of the year the child turns age 15. Check with your RESP holder (usually a financial institution such as a bank) to see if you have CESG room to top up because a 20 per cent CESG is worth it. Keep in mind that the closer your kids each get to postsecondary school age — and their need to access the RESP funds — the more advisers recommend reducing the equity holdings. So by the first year of the child's postsecondary education, when university or college expenses are starting, you have a large portion, or even all, of your RESP holdings in less volatile fixed-income funds and cash. As well, depending on the age of your kids and the education assistance you plan to give to them, consider saving a portion of the CI benefit to invest and grow for their future use outside of the RESP. The money could even be used for some of their adult expenses, such as help with rent or buying a condo or a vehicle for work. RRSP contributions are best made in years when you and Richard have high incomes for the optimum tax deduction. But you should have a plan to withdraw from the RRSP in future years when income is lower, such as in retirement or years without employment. The aim is to lower the amount you owe in federal and provincial income tax. Since you are likely a few years from retirement, it is still a good long-term plan to hold your RRSP investments in primarily equity products. For the two of you this year, it does make sense to contribute to your RRSP if your incomes are high: more than about $60,000 each. This is probably a calculation to make each year, whether to contribute or not. It's not always a good idea to contribute to an RRSP all in one year unless you plan to claim the deduction over several years according to where you fall within the income tax brackets. An accountant can help you calculate that amount within the first 60 days of each year so you get maximum tax relief from your contribution, which you can then make in those first 60 days. Ramona, I also suggest maximizing your TFSAs now to create an ongoing tax-free source of money regardless of whether you need it in the short- or long- term. With a fully maximized TFSA going forward, it might be easier to keep up with the annual updates on the TFSA annual contribution room limits. In 2025, the contribution room was $7,000 each. Your mortgage rate is reasonably low for the next three years. Rather than applying a large lump sum to the principal, think about using the prepayment options that most lenders offer, such as an additional 15 per cent on each payment or a 15 per cent lump sum payment on the mortgage anniversary. This is a good idea for two reasons. First, it still allows you to have some funds available for other life events or crises. And second, the prepayments to the mortgage are applied directly to the principal, which reduces the amount of interest owing. You can easily stop the prepayments if funds are needed elsewhere. Retiring surgical nurse Richard wants to know whether to max out RRSPs or top up TFSAs Should Moira manage her $400,000 RRSP investments on her own? With the remaining money, you might be able to find a non-registered investment that can offer you a balanced fund that could earn you more than 4.2 per cent, after fees. This is a conservative way to ensure any money you have left from the critical illness insurance payout after you have made some of the investments above keeps growing for future goals. Janet Gray is an advice-only certified financial planner with Money Coaches Canada in Ottawa.
