Former Premier League star facing 13 YEARS in prison as he stands accused of importing two tons of cocaine worth £48m
A former Premier League star has been accused of smuggling two tons of cocaine, with a street value of an incredible £48million.
The ex-player featured in front of a court on Tuesday alongside their brother in Breda, the Netherlands where they stood accused of bringing in the drug illegally from South America in 2020 and 2021.
Should he be found guilty, the former defender could be hit with up to 13 years behind bars, as well as a fine of £1.5m.
Former Wigan and Twente star Ronnie Stam was arrested in June along with his parents, brother and girlfriend and he has remained in custody ever since.
During the court hearing, prosecutors claimed that evidence of encrypted phone logs had been found between Ronnie and brother Rudi, evidencing drug shipments, with pictures also said to have been shared of cocaine.
The Sun reports that he informed the court his healthy bank balance was a direct result of his professional football career.
Despite this the prosecutors are thought to have called for a 13-year sentence for the former defender, which would see him remain imprisoned until 2038 due to his role in the crimes.
Stam is reported to have told the court he was an accomplice in the import of 20kg of cocaine to Germany from Brazil back in 2020, but is thought to have denied any further involvement or wrongdoing.
Stam played for Wigan between 2010 and 2013, and represented Twente and Standard Liege during his career as well as having two spells at NAC Breda. He won the FA Cup with Wigan in 2013 but didn't feature in the final.
In September last year a court in Breda heard that Stam was involved in trafficking 2,217 kilos of cocaine.
A prosecutor told the hearing: 'This case concerns hundreds of kilos of cocaine each time. I contend that Stam was a major player in the drugs world.'
Stam wasn't in court to hear the accusations against him last year. In June police raided six homes and a camper van as part of the investigation. They found £85,000 in cash.
Police seized the money, three properties, a yacht, three cars, six luxury watches and jewellery.
Stam is the only family member who remains in custody, with his lawyer asking for him to be provisionally released. The judge refused, with there being concerns that Stam could flee to Dubai to join his brother.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Defendants should be allowed to ask for jury-free trials to reduce court backlogs, top judge says
Defendants should be allowed to ask for a jury-free trial to reduce court backlogs, a top judge has said. Sir Brian Leveson, who is heading up a review set up by the government, is to propose a 'once in a generation' reform to tackle record court backlogs that would see the UK follow the likes of Canada, Australia and New Zealand. He is to make the recommendation to tackle delays in the legal system, which has a current backlog of 75,000 cases, forcing victims to wait four to five years for justice in many cases. Sir Brian told a conference: 'I can see the advantage in lots of cases. You will get a reasoned judgment [from a judge]. In front of a jury, you don't get a judgment at all, you get guilty or not guilty. 'The case will be undeniably speedier because the judge doesn't have to explain to the jury all the basic premises of the criminal law.' Other reforms could include sparing the public from sitting as jurors in any case scheduled to last more than 12 months due to the disruption to their lives and careers, the Telegraph reports. This could also apply to factually or legally complex cases, where jurors may struggle to understand the full details. The right to a jury trial could also be restricted for lower level offences including assaulting a police officer while resisting arrest, dangerous driving and possession of drugs. Instead, these crimes could be tried by a court comprising of a judge and two magistrates or by extending magistrates' powers to sentence offenders to up to two years in prison, double their current limit. This would mean more cases could be dealt with at a magistrates' court, freeing up more space in the crown courts for more serious offences. Speaking at the conference, Sir Brian warned that the backlog of cases could reach 100,000 if no radical action is taken. He added he believes judges should have the right to overrule a defendant's request for a judge only trial if it is in the public interest. 'There are some cases, which I would not consider appropriate for a judge to try alone, and I would give the judge a discretion,' Sir Brian said. 'So a defendant may say, 'I would like to be tried by a judge alone', and the judge would be perfectly entitled to say, 'I think not'.' Sir Brian is due to deliver his report next week to Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood, with publication expected next month.
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Defendants should have right to choose judge-only trial, says Leveson
Defendants are to get the right to ask for a judge-only trial without a jury. Under plans for 'once-in-a-generation' reform to reduce court backlogs, an independent review set up by the Government will recommend ministers should follow the example of Canada, Australia and New Zealand and allow defendants in the crown court to opt for a judge-only trial. Sir Brian Leveson, the senior judge heading the review, will recommend the move as a way to speed up trials to tackle the record backlog of more than 75,000 cases which is forcing some victims to wait up to four or five years for justice. He told a conference on modernising justice: 'I can see the advantage in lots of cases. You will get a reasoned judgment [from a judge]. In front of a jury, you don't get a judgment at all, you get guilty or not guilty. 'The case will be undeniably speedier because the judge doesn't have to explain to the jury all the basic premises of the criminal law.' Sir Brian is also expected to recommend that the public should be spared jury service if a case is going to last more than 12 months because of the 'unfairness' of it taking a year out of their lives and livelihoods. Instead, such cases would be heard by a judge without a jury. Other proposals will further scale back people's right to a jury trial for some lower level offences such as assault of a police officer while resisting arrest, racially aggravated criminal damage, dangerous driving and possessing a class B drug like cannabis. These are likely to be tried either by an intermediate court comprising a judge and two magistrates or by extending the powers of magistrates to try cases carrying sentences of up to two years, rather than only those with maximum jail terms of one year, as at present. Sir Brian was appointed by Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary, who said that 'once-in-a-generation reform' of the courts was the only way to tackle justice delays for victims. Internal Ministry of Justice forecasts suggested the backlogs could rise to 100,000 without radical action. Sir Brian said there was a 'real risk that the system will collapse' as defendants take advantage of cases being delayed as long as 2029 and 'threw the dice' in the hope their victims or witnesses disengaged and prosecutions were abandoned. He also said it would be up to the Government to decide which types of cases it felt were appropriate for defendants to have the right to spurn a jury but he said the judges would have the discretion to overrule any request if it was in the public interest to do so. 'There are some cases, which I would not consider appropriate for a judge to try alone, and I would give the judge a discretion,' Sir Brian said. 'So a defendant may say, 'I would like to be tried by a judge alone', and the judge would be perfectly entitled to say, 'I think not'.' Public opprobrium He suggested one type of case judge-only trials could be where there was significant 'public opprobrium' over the case such as sexual or sadistic violence and could sway the jury. 'I can see defendants, perhaps charged with cases that attract public opprobrium being concerned about a jury coming in from their daily lives to face that trial,' he said. 'Equally, I can see if it's that much public opprobrium, why a judge may say, 'I'm not sure about that.' So there is a balance to be done, but judges make judicial decisions all the time.' He said it could also apply to factually or legally extremely complex cases where a jury may struggle to fully understand the case. A third type could where there had been alleged confession or identification, where judges tended to be more rigorous in scrutinising its validity than necessarily a jury. Sir Brian said there had been a limited number of cases where judges had heard cases alone such as where a jury had to be discharged due to evidence of jury tampering. He is expected to deliver his report to Ms Mahmood next week with publication expected in early July. It follows a similar review of sentencing by David Gauke, the former Tory justice secretary, which recommended freeing some prisoners as little as a third of the way through sentence to tackle prison overcrowding.
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Two men arrested after shocking discovery inside a Sydney unit block
Two men allegedly involved in a South American crime syndicate have been charged with drug offences after allegedly selling fake cocaine. NSW Police Organised Crime Squad detectives arrested the men, aged 61 and 27, at a unit in North Rocks, Sydney, around 8.15pm on Wednesday. Police allege the group travelled from Spain to Sydney in May and sold fake cocaine to four Sydney-based criminal networks. The group is also believed to have run similar operations in London earlier this year. Footage released by NSW Police captured the moment officers attached to Strike Force Bookara pounded on the door of the unit before forcing entry. During the raid, officers allegedly found ten bricks of a white substance believed to be cocaine, but later confirmed through testing not to be. Police claim the syndicate sold the fake product to other criminal groups for $90,000 per kilogram. Police also seized $121,000 in Australian cash, foreign currency, 14 mobile phones, multiple SIM cards, bank cards, and documents related to foreign currency and cryptocurrency transfers. Photos released by police show plastic-wrapped bundles of cash and white powder bricks seized from the unit. Another image shows five people with blurred faces sitting on black leather couches around a glass coffee table during the raid. All five were taken to Parramatta Police Station, where the two men were charged with supplying a prohibited drug in both small and large commercial quantities. They were refused bail and are due to appear in Parramatta Local Court on Friday. The other three were released and are pending further investigation. Anyone with information that could assist police with inquiries into organised criminal activity is urged to contact Crime Stoppers.
