A fortune in rare earths, Zelenskky visit, Putin reaction: What to Know
A fortune in rare earths, Zelenskky visit, Putin reaction: What to Know
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Zelenskyy said he is willing to step down to join NATO, blasts Trump
Ukrainian President Zelenskyy said he would step down if it meant Ukraine could join NATO. He also blasted Trump's mineral reserves proposal.
As President Donald Trump works to strike a deal to end the three-year war in Ukraine, an important piece of the negotiations for the president has revolved around accessing rare earth elements from the war-torn country as compensation for American military support.
During a meeting with French President Emmanuel Macron in the White House on Monday, Trump said that the agreement was 'very close to a final deal.'
'The agreement's being worked on now . . . they're very close to a final deal. It'll be a deal with rare earths and various other things,' he said, adding that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy might come to the Oval Office as early as this week to sign the agreement.
In a post on Truth Social on Monday, Trump wrote that during the Group of Seven summit earlier in the day, he had emphasized the importance of the 'vital 'Critical Minerals and Rare-Earths Deal' between the United States and Ukraine.'
'This deal, which is an 'Economic Partnership,' will ensure the American people recoup the Tens of Billions of Dollars and Military Equipment sent to Ukraine, while also helping Ukraine's economy grow as this Brutal and Savage War comes to an end,' he wrote.
Concurrently, he said he was 'in serious discussions with President Vladimir Putin of Russia concerning the ending of the War.' Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022,
Meanwhile, U.S. opposed a Europe-backed U.N. resolution on Monday, condemning Russian aggression and calling for the immediate withdrawal of Russian forces from Ukraine.
What are the rare earths and why does Trump want them?
The rare earths are a group of 17 metals that are key ingredients in things such as magnets, batteries, aircrafts and medical imaging and are used in many manufactured items, from cell phones to cars.
Crucial in a variety of industries such as health care, power generation, petroleum refining and consumer electronics, they can play a crucial role in national security, energy independence, environmental future and economic growth, according to the U.S. Department of Energy.
China, with whom Trump has threatened a trade war, is the world's largest producer of rare earths.
About 40% of Ukraine's metal resources are now under Russian occupation, according to Reuters, which cited estimates by Ukrainian think-tanks We Build Ukraine and the National Institute of Strategic Studies.
How much did the U.S. spend on the war in Ukraine?
Since Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine three years ago, Congress has appropriated $183 billion for Operation Atlantic Resolve and the broader Ukraine response, according to the government's Ukraine Oversight Working Group, a federal oversight committee. In addition, the U.S. provided $20 billion in loans as part of the G7 nations extraordinary revenue acceleration loans initiative.In a Feb. 10 interview with Fox News, Trump said Ukraine had 'tremendously valuable land in terms of rare earth' and that he wanted the 'hundreds of billions of dollars' the U.S. was spending 'back.'
'I told them that I want the equivalent like $500 billion worth of rare earth. And they've essentially agreed to do that so at least we don't feel stupid,' Trump said, without giving an explanation of where the figure came from.
On Feb. 12, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent presented Zelenskyy a minerals cooperation agreement calling for 50% of Ukraine's mineral and natural resources revenues to go to the U.S. But Zelenskyy refused to sign the agreement as it included no security guarantees for Ukraine. A new agreement is currently being worked on.
"We're going to get our money back because it's just not fair," Trump said at the Conservative Political Action Conference on Feb. 22.
What is Russian President Vladimir Putin's take on U.S. interest in rare earths?
Russian President Vladimir Putin, speaking to state TV Kremlin on Monday, said that a U.S.-Ukraine possible deal involving rare earth metals is not a concern for Russia, according to Reuters.
Putin said that potential rare earth metals exploration deals could also be extended to deposits in territory in eastern Ukraine that Russia controls after three years of military action. He also offered the U.S. the opportunity for joint exploration of the country's rare earth metals deposits, as well as the supply of aluminum to the U.S. domestic market, under a future economic deal, reported Reuters.
Russia has the world's fifth-largest reserves of rare earth metals, after China, Brazil, India and Australia, according to the U.S. Geological Survey data.
Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy is a White House Correspondent for USA TODAY. You can follow her on X @SwapnaVenugopal
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
28 minutes ago
- Fox News
RNC senior advisor reacts to 'embarrassing' Iran strike leaks
All times eastern FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: President Trump's trip to the Netherlands for NATO Summit


The Hill
32 minutes ago
- The Hill
Witkoff bashes ‘treasonous' leak of US intel assessment of Iran strikes
Steve Witkoff, President Trump's top envoy to the Middle East, blasted what he called 'treasonous' leaking of information after multiple media outlets reported that the administration's strikes on Iran only set its nuclear program back a few months. 'Well, it goes without saying that leaking that type of information, whatever the information, whatever side it comes out on, is outrageous,' Steve Witkoff told Fox News's 'The Ingraham Angle' Tuesday night. 'It's treasonous.' 'So it ought to be investigated and whoever did it, whoever is responsible for it should have been — should be held accountable,' Witkoff said. 'It could hurt lives in the future. There is — leaking is a completely unacceptable thing.' CNN, The New York Times and other news outlets reported Tuesday that an internal government report found strikes on the three facilities over the weekend delayed Iran's nuclear program by only a few months, despite initial assertions from Trump administration officials that those sites had been destroyed. The report also said Iran had moved much of its enriched uranium before the strikes, according to multiple outlets. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Wednesday at the NATO summit in the Netherlands that a leak investigation was underway, while Trump blasted the news outlets that reported on the internal assessment as 'scum.' Trump and other top officials have been adamant that the nuclear facilities were 'obliterated,' even as experts have said it would take days to determine the extent of the damage.


New York Post
33 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump reveals Israel sent agents to Iran's bombed nuclear sites to confirm their ‘total obliteration'
President Trump revealed Wednesday that Israel sent agents to Iran's bombed nuclear sites to confirm their 'total obliteration' — while insisting his surprise attack was too quick for Tehran to have removed its uranium. Trump was adamant the strikes wiped out Iran's nuclear facilities and set the program back decades — despite a leaked preliminary intelligence assessment suggesting Tehran could salvage it within months. 'Israel is doing a report on it now, I understand, and I was told that they said it was total obliteration,' Trump told reporters at the NATO summit in the Netherlands. 4 President Trump said he believed Iran's bombed nuclear sites were totally obliterated. POOL/AFP via Getty Images 4 A photo shows apparent holes from bunker bombs at the Fordow nuclear facility. ©2025 Maxar Technologies 'You know they have guys that go in there after the hit, and they said it was total obliteration,' he continued, adding 'I believe it was total obliteration.' He insisted Iran wouldn't have been able to remove the uranium being enriched at the sites before he gave the order to drop the barrage of massive bunker-buster bombs on the three sites. 'They didn't have a chance to get anything out because we acted fast. If it would have taken two weeks, maybe. But it's very hard to remove that kind of material, very hard and very dangerous for them to remove it,' Trump said. 4 A picture of the Fordow nuclear site appears to show damage, holes from bunker bombs. ©2025 Maxar Technologies 'Plus they knew we were coming, and if they know we're coming, they're not going to be down there.' He argued, too, that the strikes had set Iran's nuclear ambitions back 'basically decades.' It comes after the White House trashed a classified Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) bomb damage assessment leaked to CNN that claimed Iran could bring back its nuclear program within months. 'This alleged 'assessment' is flat-out wrong and was classified as 'top secret' but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt wrote on X. 4 A B-2 bomber arrives at Whiteman Air Force Base Mo., Sunday, June 22, 2025. AP 'The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program,' she added. 'Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000-pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration.'