logo
Myanmar earthquake survivors without food and shelter, aid groups say

Myanmar earthquake survivors without food and shelter, aid groups say

CBC01-04-2025

Social Sharing
Aid groups in the worst-hit areas of Myanmar said there was an urgent need for shelter, food and water after an earthquake that killed more than 2,700 people, but said the country's civil war could prevent help reaching those in need.
The death toll had reached 2,719 and is expected to rise to more than 3,000, Myanmar's military leader Min Aung Hlaing said in a televised address on Tuesday. He said 4,521 people were injured, and 441 were missing.
The 7.7 magnitude quake, which hit around lunchtime on Friday, was the strongest to hit the Southeast Asian country in more than a century, toppling ancient pagodas and modern buildings alike.
WATCH | Crews continue search for signs of life in Myanmar, Thailand after earthquake:
Crews look for signs of life after Myanmar-Thailand earthquake
9 hours ago
Duration 2:16
A crucial window to find survivors of the devastating earthquake in Myanmar and Thailand has closed, but crews continue to search for any signs of life in the rubble as families hope for a miracle.
In Myanmar's Mandalay area, 50 children and two teachers were killed when their preschool collapsed, the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs said.
"In the hardest-hit areas ... communities struggle to meet their basic needs, such as access to clean water and sanitation, while emergency teams work tirelessly to locate survivors and provide life-saving aid," the UN body said in a report.
The International Rescue Committee said shelter, food, water and medical help were all needed in places such as Mandalay, near the epicentre of the quake.
"Having lived through the terror of the earthquake, people now fear aftershocks and are sleeping outside on roads or in open fields," an IRC worker in Mandalay said in a report.
U.S. reponse hobbled, ex-official says
The U.S. State Department on Monday said that a U.S. Agency for International Development team (USAID) was heading to Myanmar to help identify the country's most pressing needs but a former top USAID official said the overall response from Donald Trump's administration response has been hobbled by the huge fund cuts, contractor terminations and plans to fire nearly all staff.
The response has been hurt by "a lot of internal confusion about capability to respond and willingness to respond," said Sarah Charles, who headed the agency's humanitarian assistance bureau until February 2024.
Speaking at a daily briefing, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce rejected criticism that funding and personnel cuts were impeding USAID's response and said that Washington was working with partners in Myanmar to get help to affected people.
Trump, through an initiative led by billionaire adviser Elon Musk, in February began the process of closing USAID and merging its operations into the State Department. Thousands of staff were placed on administrative leave, hundreds of contractors were fired and more than 5,000 programs terminated, disrupting global humanitarian aid efforts on which millions depend.
On Friday, the day the earthquake struck Myanmar and Thailand, the administration told Congress that it was firing nearly all remaining USAID personnel and closing its foreign missions.
The processes that trigger rapid USAID disaster responses "that were pretty automatic" no longer are, and the "process of getting approval to do things, the process of deploying people, is all being negotiated in real time," said Charles.
According to Human Rights Myanmar, an aid group, the U.S. accounted for a quarter of all aid to Myanmar before Trump was inaugurated, and U.S. assistance was seen as crucial for the Rohingya refugees who fled the country and languish in camps in Thailand and Bangladesh.
Military rule a complicating factor
The civil war in Myanmar, where the junta seized power in a coup in 2021, has complicated efforts to reach those injured and made homeless by the Southeast Asian nation's biggest quake in a century.
Amnesty International said the junta needed to allow aid to reach areas of the country not under its control. Rebel groups say the junta has conducted airstrikes after the quake.
"Myanmar's military has a longstanding practice of denying aid to areas where groups who resist it are active," Amnesty's Myanmar researcher Joe Freeman said.
"It must immediately allow unimpeded access to all humanitarian organizations and remove administrative barriers delaying needs assessments."
The junta's tight control over communication networks and the damage to roads, bridges and other infrastructure caused by the quakes have intensified the challenges for aid workers.
Thai officials said a meeting of regional leaders in Bangkok later this week would go ahead as planned, although the junta's leader may attend by teleconference.
Before the quake struck, sources said the junta chief had been expected to make a rare foreign trip to attend the summit in Bangkok on April 3-4.
Hopes dim at collapsed Thai building
In neighbouring Thailand, rescuers were still scouring the ruins of an unfinished skyscraper that collapsed for any signs of life, but aware that as four days had passed since the quake, the odds of finding survivors lengthened.
"There are about 70 bodies underneath ... and we hope by some miracle one or two are still alive," volunteer rescue leader Bin Bunluerit said at the building site.
Bangkok Deputy Gov.Tavida Kamolvej said six human-shaped figures had been detected by scanners, but there was no movement or vital signs. Local and international experts were now working out how to safely reach them, she said.
Search and rescue efforts continued at the site, as family and friends said they feared the worst.
"The rescue teams are doing their best. I can see that," said 19-year-old Artithap Lalod, who was waiting for news of his brother.
"However it turns out, that's how it has to be. We just have to accept that things will be the way they are," he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pentagon deploys 700 Marines to Los Angeles to respond to immigration protests
Pentagon deploys 700 Marines to Los Angeles to respond to immigration protests

Toronto Star

time2 hours ago

  • Toronto Star

Pentagon deploys 700 Marines to Los Angeles to respond to immigration protests

LOS ANGELES (AP) — The Pentagon deployed about 700 Marines to Los Angeles on Monday to help National Guard members respond to immigration protests, officials said, as California prepared to sue President Donald Trump over his use of the Guard troops and demonstrators took to the city's streets for a fourth day. The Marines are being deployed from their base at Twentynine Palms in the Southern California desert to protect federal property and personnel, including federal immigration agents, U.S. Northern Command said in a statement.

President Donald Trump pushes ahead with his maximalist immigration campaign in face of LA protests
President Donald Trump pushes ahead with his maximalist immigration campaign in face of LA protests

Toronto Star

time2 hours ago

  • Toronto Star

President Donald Trump pushes ahead with his maximalist immigration campaign in face of LA protests

WASHINGTON (AP) — Donald Trump made no secret of his willingness to exert a maximalist approach to enforcing immigration laws and keeping order as he campaigned to return to the White House. The fulfillment of that pledge is now on full display in Los Angeles. The president has put hundreds of National Guard troops on the streets to quell protests over his administration's immigration raids, a deployment that state and city officials say has only inflamed tensions. Trump called up the California National Guard over the objections of Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom — the first time in 60 years a president has done so — and is deploying active-duty troops to support the guard.

What happened the last time a U.S. president overrode a state to deploy the National Guard
What happened the last time a U.S. president overrode a state to deploy the National Guard

CBC

time2 hours ago

  • CBC

What happened the last time a U.S. president overrode a state to deploy the National Guard

On an unseasonably chilly but sunny day, March 20, 1965, U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson stood on the porch of his Texas ranch and read a telegram he had just sent to Alabama Gov. George Wallace. "I am calling into federal service selected units of the Alabama National Guard… to help you meet your state responsibilities," Johnson said. For more than a week, Johnson and Wallace had been going back and forth about the president's concerns for the safety of Black Alabamians trying to exercise their right to vote and peacefully protest police brutality. Wallace, a segregationist, refused to call in his state's National Guard to protect the Black protesters — who had planned a march from Selma to Montgomery — so Johnson did it in his place. To do so, Johnson invoked the Insurrection Act, an 18th century law that allows the president to deploy military forces inside the U.S. It's what many legal scholars and democracy watchers believed U.S. President Donald Trump might one day use to clamp down on dissent against his administration's policies. For the first time since Johnson, Trump on Saturday overrode a state's authority and called up its National Guard to quell protests in Los Angeles over recent raids by federal immigration authorities. He sent 2,000 members of the California National Guard into the city on Saturday. But Trump used a more obscure law, Title 10 of the U.S. Code, which allows the president to federalize National Guard units in case of an invasion, rebellion, or when police are unable to enforce the country's laws. "It was a bit of a surprise attack," said Kim Lane Scheppele, a professor at Princeton University who specializes in new autocracies. "I think it was something for which Trump's opposition was less well prepared legally." Another law, 1878's Posse Comitatus Act, generally forbids the U.S. military, including the National Guard, from taking part in civilian law enforcement. Title 10 does not override that prohibition, but allows the troops to protect federal agents who are carrying out law enforcement activity and to protect federal property. For example, National Guard troops cannot arrest protesters, but they could protect U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement who are carrying out arrests. 'Unmistakable step toward authoritarianism' What has worried legal scholars in Scheppele's circles even more, though, is that Trump's proclamation deploying the National Guard made no mention of California or a specific time period. "There's nothing to prevent him from calling out the National Guard … anywhere else that [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] has been active or where public protests have arisen against it." Newsom sued the Trump administration on Monday, calling Trump's move "an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism." The biggest difference "between now and 1965 is the degree to which this is basically a manufactured conflict," said Barry Eidlin, an assistant professor of sociology at McGill University, who researches social change in the U.S. and Canada. Sixty years ago, Johnson wanted National Guard troops to "quell a reactionary segregationist counterinsurgency against dissolving federal policy in favour of civil rights for all," he said, newly returned to Montreal from L.A., where his family lives and where he splits his time. "Whereas the current administration is basically trying to rollback civil rights for all." John Carey, a professor of government at Dartmouth College in New Hampshire and the co-founder of Bright Line Watch, a group monitoring threats to American democracy, also says Trump is trying to provoke violence. "I think what's actually going on is the president and his administration are trying to bait California state officials and the protesters," he said, adding that immigration is one of the issues on which Trump has the broadest support. "I worry tremendously about the implications of this for American democracy." The idea, Carey and Eidlin say, is that National Guard troops' presence could escalate violence — which already appears to be the case — further justifying federal intervention. Eidlin said Trump wants to create "a rationale for further Draconian crackdowns." The day after Johnson deployed Alabama's National Guard, more than 3,000 marchers began their 87-kilometre walk from Selma to Montgomery along Route 80. They walked for four days without interference from white supremacists, law enforcement or vigilantes. By the time they arrived, the march had swelled to around 25,000 people. Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his "How long, not long" speech on the steps of the State Capitol, calling for racial justice. Later that year, the Voting Rights Act was passed, outlawing voter suppression practices, such as literacy tests and poll taxes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store