Hegseth slams Fox reporter at press conference: ‘You're about the worst'
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth attacked Jennifer Griffin, his former colleague at Fox News and a longtime member of the Pentagon press corps amid a broader push to discredit media outlets over reporting on intelligence laying out the extent of damages done by U.S. strikes to Iranian nuclear sites.
'Do you have certainty that all the highly enriched uranium was inside the Fordo mountain?' Griffin asked Hegseth during a contentious press conference early Thursday morning.
Griffin noted satellite imagery she said showed 'more than a dozen trucks' at the site of the attacks 'a few days in advance.'
'Of course we're watching it,' Hegseth said before attacking the reporter. 'Jennifer, you've been about the worst. The one who misrepresents the most intentionally.'
Griffin sat up in her chair to push back on Hegseth's attack.
'In fact, I was the first to describe the B-2 bombers, the refueling, the entire mission with great accuracy,' she said. 'So I take issue with that.'
'I appreciate that,' Hegseth replied.
The spat came as Hegseth admonished the press corps for its coverage of the strikes on the three Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend, arguing members of the media should be more focused on the details and danger of the mission carried out by U.S. service members rather than leaked intelligence showing the damage might not have been as severe as previously thought.
Trump and other top administration officials have dismissed what they are calling 'early' intelligence that was leaked to outlets like CNN, the New York Times and Washington Post, leading the president and his allies to attack journalists who reported on the materiel.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters earlier this week that the individual who leaked the intelligence to journalists show 'be in jail.'
Griffin is a longtime Pentagon correspondent for Fox, known widely for her reporting on military and foreign affairs.
She earlier this spring reported on Hegseth's sharing of 'classified' information via the Signal group chat with President Trump's Cabinet members, citing sources at the time who told her it put 'the joint force directly and immediately at risk.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
19 minutes ago
- New York Post
Jamaal Bowman blames black health issues on being called the N-word ‘every day'
Ex-New York Rep. Jamaal Bowman is blaming the higher rate of chronic diseases among the black community on being called the 'N-word directly or indirectly every day.' The far-left former 'Squad' member theorized during a roundtable discussion on 'CNN NewsNight,' where he grew animated when referring to 'America's original sin and its disease of hate and racism towards black and brown people,' at times raising his voice. Far-left ex-New York Congressman Jamaal Bowman had an animated appearance on 'CNN NewsNight' in which he blamed chronic health issues in the black community on racism. CNN Advertisement He also hit out on Republicans as a whole, scolding White House official Marc Short for what he views as the sins of the party. 'Your colleagues in the Republican Party do not hold each other accountable when it comes to the racism that comes from the party on a consistent basis,' he erupted, talking over Short. 'You can't be calm about this! I'm a black man in America! The reason why heart disease and cancer and obesity and diabetes are bigger in the black community is because of the stress we carry from having to deal with being called the N-word directly or indirectly every day,' he alleged. Advertisement 'If your colleagues would listen and try to learn and engage and grow, and stop being so hateful, we could have a better country, but unfortunately we're still here.' Former Republican California Lt. Gov. Abel Maldonado, striking a calmer tone, attempted to reason with Bowman. 'I understand where you're coming from, sincerely, I really really do, it happens on both sides Jamaal, you might think it happens more on your side … you should see my Twitter feed,' he said before Bowman interrupted, closing his eyes for dramatic effect. 'We have cops beating black people to death,' he wailed. Advertisement Bowman has a history of questionable statements and antics, including pulling a Capitol Hill fire alarm during a government shutdown vote in 2023. Getty Images Bowman, known for unhinged antics like pulling a Capitol Hill fire alarm during a government shutdown vote in 2023, lost his seat in the 16th Congressional District last year to Westchester County Executive George Latimer. Leading up to the election, Bowman held a rally in the Bronx with fellow 'Squad' member Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, in which the former congressman bellowed 'we're gonna show them who the f–k we are! We are gonna show f–king AIPAC the power of the motherf–king South Bronx!' He also chanted his own name before grabbing a stool from the stage, waving it in the air and slamming it down on the ground.
The Hill
34 minutes ago
- The Hill
Leavitt attacks CNN reporter for Iran intel leak story
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt attacked CNN reporter Natasha Bertrand in response to her reporting on leaked intelligence relating to U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities last weekend. 'This reporter wrote a lie from the intelligence community to seek a narrative she wanted to prove,' Leavitt said of Bertrand, calling her out by name during a briefing with reporters on Thursday. 'This is a reporter who has been used by people who dislike Donald Trump in this government to push fake and false narratives.' Leavitt's criticism of the reporter came a day after President Trump called for her firing and accused her of 'attempting to destroy our Patriot Pilots by making them look bad.' CNN issued a statement on Wednesday defending Bertrand and saying it 'does not believe it is reasonable to criticize CNN reporters for accurately reporting the existence of the assessment and accurately characterizing its findings, which are in the public interest.' Jake Tapper, a top anchor at the network, also defended Bertrand. 'President Trump and his administration are going after shooting the messengers in an increasingly ugly way,' he said. The White House has sought discredit the leaked intelligence, which suggested the Saturday strikes only set Iran's nuclear program back by a few months.
34 minutes ago
Hegseth calls Trump-directed Iran strikes 'resounding success,' intel leak political
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday said the U.S. military bomb strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities had "significantly damaged [Iran's] nuclear program" and "set it back by years" in a confrontational news conference called to counter an early intelligence assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency that said Iran's program had been set back only by months. Hegseth described news reports about the leaked DIA report as "half-truths" intended "to cause doubt and manipulate" and instead said he would focus on what he called the "bottom line" of Saturday's strikes involving seven B-2 stealth bombers that dropped 14 massive ordnance penetrators on two of the three Iranian sites. "President Trump directed the most complex and secretive military operation in history, and it was a resounding success, resulting in a ceasefire agreement and the end of the 12-day war" in Iran, Hegseth said. "Because of decisive military action, President Trump created the conditions to end the war, decimating – choose your word – obliterating, destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities." Asked twice during the briefing about enriched uranium that may have been moved from nuclear sites before the attack -- a key outstanding question as the intelligence community assesses post-strike realities -- Hegseth said the Pentagon was "watching every aspect" and did not say the U.S. believed it was under rubble at the sites. But he said he hasn't reviewed any intelligence "that says things were not where they were supposed to be," whether "moved or otherwise." The director general of the UN's nuclear oversight agency, Rafael Grossi, has said he believes the material was moved from the sites before the attacks. Hegseth lashed out against news media reporting about the early DIA assessment and said it was a "re-strike report" intended to gauge whether a site would need to be hit again. Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, standing next Hegseth, referred questions about damage assessments to the intelligence community. Hegseth said Caine told him in the White House Situation Room "that the first reports are almost always wrong." "They're almost always incomplete," he said Caine told him. The defense secretary appeared to read from the preliminary DIA assessment that he said "admits itself, in writing, that it requires weeks to accumulate the necessary data to make" the assessment it made. That assessment was made with "low confidence," according to Hegseth, and was not coordinated with the broader intelligence community. Hegseth said the DIA report was based on a "linchpin assumption," which, he said, means "your entire premise is predicated on a linchpin" and "if you're wrong, everything else is wrong." Caine, who had noticeably refrained from repeat Presdient Trump's "obliterated" claim at a Sunday news conference the morning after the strikes, told reporters Thursday that "the Joint Force does not do [battle damage assessments] … the intelligence community does." Instead, he focused on tactical details and seemingly described a mission that unfolded without a hitch. Describing "what we know," Caine said "the weapons functioned as designed, meaning they exploded." Planners "accounted for everything," the chairman said. "We know that the trailing jets saw the first weapons function and the pilots stated, quote, 'This was the brightest explosion that I've ever seen. It literally looked like daylight.'" Hegseth told reporters it was "my lane" as the top civilian leader at the Defense Department, to "do politics." He said it was part of his job to "translate and talk about those types of things." "So, I can use the word 'obliterated.' He could use 'defeat, destroyed,' [and] assess all of those things." When asked, "Have you been pressured to change your assessment or give a more rosy intelligence assessment to us by any political factors, whether it's the president or the secretary? And if you were, would you do that?" Caine said that was an "easy" question to answer. "I've never been pressured by the president or the secretary, to do anything other than tell them exactly what I'm thinking," he said. "And that's exactly what I've done."
