
Steel industry braced for 50% Trump tariff despite UK-US deal
Downing Street would not say on Tuesday whether British steel exporters would be hit with 50% tariffs from the US from Wednesday, despite an agreement to eliminate the charges.
Last week US President Mr Trump announced he was doubling tariffs on the imports of steel from 25% to 50%.
The UK struck a deal with Washington for import taxes on its steel to be removed weeks ago, but its implementation has not been finalised.
The steel industry is working on the understanding that the sector will be impacted by the new rules and the 50% levy will likely affect UK steelmakersfrom Wednesday.
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds was due to meet US trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris on Tuesday.
Asked whether it was 'embarrassing' that steelmakers could face a worse situation despite the announcement of the deal last month, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'I'm not going to get ahead of announcements for the United States.
'But what you've seen so far is the US and the UK agree a landmark deal across sectors to protect British industries – cars, steel, aluminium – and you've seen the welcoming statements the industries have made in support of the agreement.
'When it comes to implementation of the agreement, that work is ongoing.'
Number 10 later insisted that Mr Trump would keep his word on the UK-US deal.
Asked if Mr Trump could be trusted, a No 10 spokesman said: 'Yes, absolutely. We have a very close relationship with the US. I think that's reflected in the fact that this deal has been signed, and that it is, as we've said before, the first of its kind.'
UK Steel has previously said the tariff announcement is a 'body blow' for the industry.
Director general Gareth Stace said: 'The deal that the Prime Minister and President Trump struck just a few short weeks ago is yet to be finalised, so this doubling of tariffs plunges the UK steel industry further into confusion.
'Uncertainty remains as to whether and when our second biggest export market will be open for business or is being firmly shut in our faces.'
Meanwhile, a Tata Steel director told the Business and Trade Committee on Tuesday that the UK 'absolutely' needs to go faster in supporting the steel industry in response to US tariffs.
Russell Codling, director of markets, business development and commercial services at Tata said: 'It is not just for us making sure that this deal (with the US) is the right deal, it is also about making sure that the trade protection measures are the appropriate ones in the UK, and they are at least as good as other trading partners around the world.'
When asked if the UK needs to go faster on the issue, Mr Codling said: 'Absolutely.'
The same committee also heard from leaders in other sectors that have been affected by the tariff arrangements, including car manufacturing.
An industry figure told the MPs that motoring firms would 'of course' like the 100,000 quota for a 10% tariff on car imports into the US to be higher.
Murray Paul, public affairs director at Jaguar Land Rover said: 'Of course we'd prefer for it to be higher.
'But I think if we're honest it's there or thereabouts what the current market volume is of producing from the UK into the US.
'We are expectant that it's administered fairly, that if there's a small amount of pain that that is distributed equally amongst British manufacturers of goods.
'Obviously, we would like it to grow in the future because we think there's a growth opportunity in the US market as the incredible cars that we produce in this country are admired around the world.'
A Government spokesperson said: 'Ministers and officials have worked tirelessly to ensure that the UK was the first country to secure a trade deal with the US, helping us deliver on the Plan for Change.
'The Government is engaging intensively with the US to implement the Economic Prosperity Deal that we agreed on May 8 at pace, including on steel and aluminium, and will update on progress in due course.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Wales Online
30 minutes ago
- Wales Online
all you need to know and what it means for Brits
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Donald Trump has implemented one of the most extensive travel bans in history. The US President has announced new travel restrictions on 19 countries, which is approximately a tenth of all nations globally. From June 9, nationals from Afghanistan, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Myanmar, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen will be prohibited from entering the United States under the new regulations. Citizens from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela will encounter partial restrictions, losing access to all immigrant visas and several non-immigrant travel options, with only a select few on special visas, such as diplomats, permitted entry into the US from these nations. Trump has cited various reasons for imposing these bans, including insufficient traveller screening, "a significant terrorist presence" within these countries, governments that are hesitant to repatriate deported nationals, or citizens who frequently overstay their visas in the US, reports the Mirror. The bans are the latest in a series of anti-immigration moves introduced by Trump, which also include a block on people coming over the southern border to claim asylum and instructing heavily armed ICE immigration officers to make raids across the country. (Image: Getty) Why is the ban happening now? The announcement was made in the days after an Egyptian man in Colorado was arrested and charged with carrying out an attack on a group honouring hostages held in Gaza. The US President directly linked the travel bans to the "recent terror attack", claiming that it "underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted". Trump added: "We don't want them." In reality, the incident provides a convenient political reason to resurrect and expand policies that featured in Trump's first presidency, and comes after several months of build-up. In his first term, Trump was explicit about his desire to ban citizens from countries where Islam is the primary religion. At that time, he ordered a travel ban against people from seven Muslim-majority countries from coming to the US. This set of restrictions has clear echoes of the first. Made louder on Wednesday evening when Trump alluded to migration from Middle Eastern countries to Europe. "We will not let what happened in Europe happen to America," he said. Are there exemptions? Yes. If you are a national from one of the 19 "banned" countries, but have an existing visa to the US, you will be exempt from the ban, the New York Times reports. Green card holders, athletes travelling to the US for the coming World Cup and Olympics, and Afghans eligible for the Special Immigrant Visa program that was introduced following the US's invasion of the country, are also exempt. Those from the "banned" countries seeking visas through connections to US family members can continue to do so. That means those who have trips planned to the US, but already have their paperwork in order, will be able to travel. Whether they want to is a different question. There have been many reports of tourists to the US facing lengthy scrutiny at the US border since Trump's second term began, having their phones combed through and even being placed in detention for days at a time. The cooling effect is already being felt. The United States is on track to lose $12.5bn (£9.4bn) in international travel spending this year, according to a study published on Tuesday by the World Travel and Tourism Council. What if I'm a dual citizen? This is a situation a lot of Brits may find themselves in. If, for example, if you've got dual Somalian and British citizenship, you are exempt from the order. The same goes for all of the 19 countries included on the list. What if I've been to one of the banned countries? This is a little complicated, and the full answer is not yet clear. As things are now, UK passport holders can apply for an Electronic System for Travel Authorisation (ESTA), instead of getting a full visa. If, however, you're British but were in the following countries on or after March 2011, then you can't get an ESTA. The countries include: Iraq Libya North Korea Somalia Sudan Syria Yemen You cannot apply for an ESTA visa waiver if you travelled to or were in Cuba on or after 12 January 2021. However, if you fall into that camp, you can still apply for a visa. That is a lengthier process and the chances of getting rejected are higher. Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox Find out what's happening near you


Reuters
33 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK Market Exodus: Companies that have moved away from a London listing
June 5 (Reuters) - British money transfer firm Wise (WISEa.L), opens new tab became the latest UK listed firm on Thursday to say that it intends to move its primary listing to the U.S. from London. A growing number of companies have shelved or shifted plans to list in London, due to investor pushback and Brexit-related challenges that have pressured UK market valuations. Instead, they have opted for the U.S. and other markets, where they see stronger appetite and higher valuations. Cobalt: The Glencore-backed metals investor scrapped its plans for a London IPO (IPO-COBL.L), opens new tab on Wednesday, which, according to one source, was driven by a lack of demand. The company, valued at around $230 million, would have seen London's largest market debut since Air Astana's ( opens new tab listing in February 2024. Indivior (INDV.L), opens new tab: The drugmaker said on Monday it will cancel its secondary listing on the London Stock Exchange effective July 25, citing cost savings and a desire to align more closely with its U.S.-focused operations. The 1.25 billion pound ($1.70 billion) pharmaceutical firm will retain its primary listing on the Nasdaq. BHP: The world's largest miner by market value ($125.10 billion) made Australia ( opens new tab its primary stock market when it ended its dual-listing structure in 2021. The company was the second largest by market value in London when it left the stock market. Unilever (ULVR.L), opens new tab: The Ben & Jerry's maker in February picked Amsterdam as the primary listing for its ice cream business. The business, which generated a turnover of 8.3 billion euros ($9.47 billion) in 2024, will have secondary listings in London and New York. Glencore (GLEN.L), opens new tab: The Swiss miner said in February it was considering moving its primary listing from London. The company, with a market value of 34.5 billion pounds, said New York was at the top of the list under consideration. Shein: The online fast fashion retailer is working towards a listing in Hong Kong after its proposed initial public offering (IPO) in London failed to secure the green light from Chinese regulators, three sources with knowledge of the matter told Reuters in May. However, before its attempt to list in London, Shein had pursued a listing in New York, as part of its efforts to gain legitimacy as a global, rather than a Chinese company, and access to a wide pool of large Western investors. Ashtead (AHT.L), opens new tab: The second-largest equipment rental company in the U.S. said in December it plans to shift its listing to New York. With a market value of 18.3 billion pounds, Ashtead has been listed in London since 1986, and transformed into a major U.S. player in the early 2000s. Just Eat Takeaway ( opens new tab: The Amsterdam-listed food delivery company delisted from the London Stock Exchange in December, citing efforts to reduce administrative and regulatory costs. The company has a market value of 4.05 billion euros. Flutter Entertainment (FLTRF.L), opens new tab: The FanDuel-owner in 2024 moved its primary listing to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), just a few months after it added a secondary listing in the US. CRH (CRH.N), opens new tab: The building materials solutions provider, which has $61.29 billion in market value, switched its primary listing to the NYSE in 2023, while maintaining a standard listing on the London Stock Exchange. Arm Holdings: The UK-based chip designer chose Nasdaq over London for its 2023 IPO — the largest of that year. The company, now valued at just over $138 billion, was previously listed in London for 18 years till 2016, when it was taken private by SoftBank (9984.T), opens new tab in a $32 billion acquisition. ($1 = 0.8763 euros) ($1 = 0.7355 pounds)


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Supreme Court makes it easier to claim 'reverse discrimination' in employment, in a case from Ohio
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.