logo
11 Syracuse high schoolers face charges over an alleged team hazing. Here's what we know about the possible punishment

11 Syracuse high schoolers face charges over an alleged team hazing. Here's what we know about the possible punishment

CNN01-05-2025

The legal punishments for each of the 11 Syracuse high school students who surrendered for their alleged involvement in the extreme hazing of five younger lacrosse players could vary, legal experts say.
The Westhill High School student athletes – who are not being identified due to their age – are accused of staging an armed abduction of younger members of the school's lacrosse team last week in what 'went way beyond hazing,' Onondaga County District Attorney William Fitzpatrick has said.
Most of the suspects are minors, but at least one is over the age of 18, Onondaga County First Chief Assistant District Attorney Joseph Coolican told CNN Wednesday.
The suspects face misdemeanor charges of unlawful imprisonment, Fitzpatrick said. The students turned themselves in within a day after the district attorney on Tuesday raised the prospect of them facing the more serious charge of felony kidnapping if they didn't do so within 48 hours.
But their legal outcomes will all depend on each person's age and culpability, experts said.
Under New York state law, more leniency is given in the criminal justice system for those aged 19 and under to be eligible for Youthful Offender Status, which seals their criminal record and gives greater discretion to the punishment they face.
The Youthful Offender Status is 'designed to give people aged 16 but younger than 19 sort of a second chance to straighten out their lives,' said David Shapiro, lecturer at the City University of New York's John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
'It's recognition of the state of mind and the comparative development as a person moves from a child to an adult,' Shapiro said. In any case, the 'fairly young age of the offenders would be considered at sentencing,' he added.
The non-juvenile students will be arraigned, while the juveniles will proceed to family court, the district attorney said. There are separate legal tracks that could determine the punishment for each suspect, according to CNN legal analyst Joey Jackson.
In New York, the cases of those under 16 go straight to family court, where the consequences are focused on rehabilitation and diversion initiatives such as community service or educational programs, Jackson said.
The judge presiding over the case could decide to send an 18-year-old to the Youth Part of the Supreme Court, according to Jackson, where the suspect would be considered a juvenile delinquent and thus treated more gingerly than an adult in their early 20s. This means they don't face prison time and can receive the same services and programs as a juvenile delinquent, Jackson added.
However, there are caveats to obtaining the Youthful Offender Status, as the judge has to look at the nature of their offense, whether they have prior felony convictions or are accused of other violent crimes, which may make them ineligible for that treatment.
'The whole essence of this in New York is you're examining there's a distinction when you're young between rehabilitation and punishment,' Jackson said.
For the suspects over the age of 18, Jackson said it's likely defense lawyers will ask for their clients to be given Youth Offender Status 'because it's the more favorable treatment in terms of the sealing of their record and the punishment' as opposed to 'getting slammed as an adult.'
The incident, which has stunned the community, began last Thursday when some of the suspects tricked the younger lacrosse players after a game into believing they were going to McDonald's, District Attorney Fitzpatrick said Tuesday.
The driver of the vehicle claimed he was lost in a remote part of the southern county in a wooded area when 'accomplices' – dressed in black and wielding what appeared to be at least one handgun and at least one knife – jumped out and pretended to be kidnappers, Fitzpatrick said.
While some of the victims managed to escape, one of the students couldn't flee, he said. The group put a pillowcase over that teen's head, tied him up and threw him in the trunk of a car before ditching him in another wooded part of the county, Fitzpatrick said.
Before he was eventually returned home, there was a period of time when the younger player thought he was 'going to be abandoned in the middle of nowhere,' the district attorney said.
Fitzpatrick said he had seen a videotape of what happened which captured reactions from some of the suspects. 'You can hear that some of the individuals found it amusing.'
'It is not a rite of passage. It is not a trivial matter. I don't know how long this young man will be affected by what happened to him,' Fitzpatrick said.
Fitzpatrick did not say whether the apparent gun used was real or fake but asserted: 'We're not going to charge anybody with possession of a weapon.'
Westhill Central School District said the rest of the varsity boys' lacrosse season has been canceled. Someone familiar with the reasoning behind the decision told CNN there were concerns that teams would not want to play against Westhill.
Westhill School Superintendent Stephen Dunham told CNN in a statement Wednesday that it would not provide further comment about the incident because the investigation is ongoing.
However, he wrote: 'What I can share, as Superintendent, is that any behavior that endangers the physical safety, mental health, or well-being of our students will always be addressed promptly and in accordance with our Code of Conduct.'
Dunham said the school district remains 'committed to addressing serious issues directly and thoughtfully, and we will make the decisions necessary to uphold the values of our school community.'
There are varied levels of culpability depending on the facts and the seriousness of the case, along with the age of those involved, according to Shapiro, the John Jay College lecturer.
While the district attorney can make a formal request to keep a case in family court or move it to the Supreme Court's Youth Part, ultimately it's the judge's call, according to the law, Shapiro said.
'Once you put a person in the criminal justice system as a convict or delinquent, there's a great probability that you've lost that person for the rest of his or her life,' Shapiro said. 'The law recognizes that, and they allow judicial discretion to say: 'Some individuals still possess hope. Some individuals have not committed crimes so egregious that we cannot sort of give them leniency.''
The 11 student athletes will be exposed to a legal process that addresses the allegations of law violations with sensitivity to their ages, maturity levels, the seriousness of the offense and the underlying assumption the victims were not seriously harmed, Shapiro said.
It's not clear how the case will play out in court, and ultimately the punishment 'has to be consistent with, factually, the charges against you,' according to Jackson, a CNN legal analyst.
CNN's Holly Yan contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘That's problematic:' Woman accused of taking money from homeowners instead of cutting down trees
‘That's problematic:' Woman accused of taking money from homeowners instead of cutting down trees

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘That's problematic:' Woman accused of taking money from homeowners instead of cutting down trees

Victims who say a metro Atlanta tree removal business stole their money have been waiting seven years for their day in court which has still not come. Angela Hodges is charged with felony counts of theft by taking and theft by deception, dating all the way back to 2018. But she was initially a no-show, once again, in DeKalb County Superior Court for a pretrial hearing. Judge Asha Jackson was fed up with what she said appeared to be delay tactics. [DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] 'This is ongoing. Every time we have a pretrial or an arraignment, it's always something. Always. That's problematic,' Judge Jackson said. Jackson initially issued a bench warrant for Hodges after suspecting that a doctor's note claiming Hodges was sick that was sent to the court was a fake. 'The veracity of this is troubling to me. I've never seen anybody send over something that looks cut and pasted,' Jackson said. But less than 40 minutes later, Hodges appeared in the courtroom. Channel 2 Consumer Investigator Justin Gray caught up with her as she was leaving the courthouse. 'So, what happened in there? We were in there. And you didn't show?' Gray asked. 'No. As soon as I got released from the hospital, I did show. And the judge took the information and is willing to hear our side of the story to get the case moving forward,' Hodges replied. Channel 2 Action News Investigates has been reporting on Angela Hodges and problems with her tree removal service since 2023. MORE FROM 2 INVESTIGATES: Is Georgia losing OB-GYNs because of the state's abortion law? Here's what we found Alleged squatter turns himself in after Channel 2 investigation DeKalb family says childhood home taken over by squatters planning VIP pool party But customer complaints date back years before that. She's been arrested multiple times in multiple counties. And there have been at least 40 civil cases. Hodges calls her business Don's Tree Experts. It is suspiciously similar to a highly rated tree removal business, Don's Tree Service. Confused customers who thought they got the other Don's told us in 2023 that they end up paying for tree removal which never happened. 'Weeks turned into months, months turned into years, and nothing has been done,' Joseph Gordon said. Channel 2 Consumer Advisor Clark Howard says it is tough to ever get your money back in civil or criminal court in cases like this. 'The cases are hard to prove. They're hard to investigate. And so, consumers are left without any help at all. Your money is gone,' Howard said. Hodges claims all her victims in the case have been refunded. A motions hearing on the criminal charges is scheduled for September with a trial date in October. [SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]

Trump administration returns migrant hastily deported to Mexico back to the US
Trump administration returns migrant hastily deported to Mexico back to the US

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump administration returns migrant hastily deported to Mexico back to the US

A Guatemalan national who says he was wrongfully deported to Mexico is back in the United States, his legal team told CNN, in what appears to mark the first time the Trump administration has brought back a migrant after a judge ordered the administration to facilitate their return. O.C.G., a pseudonym the migrant is using in the case, landed in the United States on Wednesday and made contact with a member of the litigation team challenging the Trump administration's moves to send migrants to countries where they have no ties, according to Trina Realmuto, executive director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance. The team expects he will be taken into the custody of the Department of Homeland Security, though it's unclear where he'll be detained, Realmuto told CNN. This is a developing story and will be updated.

DHS official concedes undocumented migrant believed to have been framed is no longer under investigation
DHS official concedes undocumented migrant believed to have been framed is no longer under investigation

CNN

time2 hours ago

  • CNN

DHS official concedes undocumented migrant believed to have been framed is no longer under investigation

A Department of Homeland Security official conceded Wednesday that an undocumented migrant believed to have been framed with threatening to kill President Donald Trump is no longer under investigation. DHS and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had initially highlighted the arrest of Ramon Morales-Reyes in connection with the threat before CNN reported law enforcement believed he was a victim of a setup. The department has not issued a correction or taken down a news release on the case since then, though the DHS official conceded Morales-Reyes is no longer being examined for the purported threat. 'This criminal illegal alien is no longer under investigation for threats against the president, but will remain in ICE custody pending removal proceedings as he is in the country illegally with previous arrests for felony hit and run, criminal damage to property, and disorderly conduct with a domestic abuse modifier,' the official said Wednesday. Wednesday's admission came after CNN pressed White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt about whether the Department of Homeland Security would issue a clarification or correction to their previous statements. 'We can ask the Department of Homeland Security and get back to you,' Leavitt told CNN's Kaitlan Collins at Tuesday's press briefing. Earlier Wednesday, an immigration judge said she needed more time to review the case and delayed a hearing for a week. The judge said she would only be weighing whether Morales-Reyes is a danger to the community or a flight risk during the next hearing, scheduled for June 10. 'That is what I'll be analyzing during the next court hearing,' the judge said, noting that despite the case garnering news coverage, 'the court will look at the evidence before it. Not anything else.' In late May, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers detained Morales-Reyes after receiving a letter purporting to be from him threatening to kill Trump before self-deporting. Police quickly suspected a setup and, from reviewing jailhouse phone calls, discovered that a man who allegedly assaulted Morales-Reyes in 2023 had orchestrated the letters in order to have the migrant deported, court records allege. State prosecutors have separately charged that man. This story has been updated with additional details.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store