logo
David Siegel, founder of Westgate Resorts, dead at 89

David Siegel, founder of Westgate Resorts, dead at 89

Yahoo06-04-2025

LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — The founder and executive chairman of Westgate Resorts, David Alan Siegel, has died at the age of 89, the company announced Saturday.
Siegel's journey from delivering newspapers in his early childhood days to building Westgate, the largest privately owned timeshare company in the world, showcased his entrepreneurial spirit and relentless drive, the statement said.
After the tragic loss of his daughter Victoria, he became a passionate advocate for addiction prevention and his work led to national awareness efforts, legislative change and life-saving access to resources like Naloxone.
He is survived by his wife Jacqueline, nine children, two stepdaughters, 12 grandchildren and step-grandchildren, and his brother Barry.
'David never forgot his humble roots, starting Westgate in his garage and using the company as a way to lead others to become inspired and successful,' said Jim Gissy, Chief Executive Officer of Westgate Resorts. 'David worked hard to leave us a company that will continue to preserve its family origins, and the significant resources and ambition to instill joy in the lives we touch through the hospitality we provide.'
Westgate Resorts locations feature more than 13,500 luxury villas and hotel rooms in popular vacation destinations throughout the U.S., including in Las Vegas.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Las Vegas home prices stable; market shifting toward buyers, LVR says
Las Vegas home prices stable; market shifting toward buyers, LVR says

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Las Vegas home prices stable; market shifting toward buyers, LVR says

LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — Home prices held steady in May, remaining within $5,000 of the all-time highs recorded in the first three months of 2025, according to a Friday report from Las Vegas Realtors (LVR). With single-family homes going for a median price of $480,000, buyers for condominiums and townhomes saw a $5,700 increase that put the median price at $307,000, the report showed. The median price is the one in the middle — half are higher and half are lower. 'Home prices have been very steady so far this year, with more homes on the market,' LVR President George Kypreos said. 'This increase in inventory and slower sales pace is giving buyers more options and negotiating power. This is a shift from the highly competitive seller's market we experienced in recent years.' LAST MONTH: Las Vegas home prices drop from record highs; more homes for sale That observation was confirmed by a Thursday report from online real estate company Redfin. Nationally, pending home sales declined to their lowest May level since 2020, and mortgage applications declined week-over-week. 'Prospective buyers are backing off because housing costs are near record highs, with the median home-sale price up 1.2% year over year and the weekly average mortgage rate approaching 7%, and because the U.S. economy is unpredictable,' the report said. Redfin listed Las Vegas among the five markets where pending sales have dropped the most year over year, at -15.4%. Miami topped the list at -19.6%. LVR's figures, based on its Multiple Listings Service (MLS), show sales down 13.1% for homes and down 19.0% for condos and townhomes. The median price of a single-family home in Las Vegas is still 1.5% higher than it was a year ago, LVR said. And condos/townhomes are up 4.1%. The record high for condos came seven months ago (October 2024) at $315,000. Another measure of the slowing market is inventory, which has grown to a 3½ month supply. By the end of May, 6,646 homes were listed for sale without no offers — up 71.8% from one year earlier. The 2,510 condos and townhomes listed without offers in May represent an 89.6% jump from one year earlier, LVR reported. In May, 81.6% of all existing local homes and 76.5% of all existing local condos and townhomes sold within 60 days. That's down from one year earlier, when 85.6% of all homes and 85.6% of all condos and townhomes sold within 60 days. Sales of distressed homes amount to less than 1% of all property sales, LVR said, adding that cash buyers had dropped to around 23% of all sales. Total sales for single-family homes totaled more than $1.2 billion, with condos/townhomes reaching more than $182 million. Bankrate listed 30-year fixed mortgages available at 6.625% in Nevada as of Thursday. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Nevada public lands likely a target again when Senate takes up Trump's ‘one big, beautiful bill'
Nevada public lands likely a target again when Senate takes up Trump's ‘one big, beautiful bill'

Yahoo

time18 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Nevada public lands likely a target again when Senate takes up Trump's ‘one big, beautiful bill'

LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — Nevada's lone Republican in Congress failed in an effort to sell off public lands in the state, but a Utah senator might revive the tactic as President Trump's 'one big, beautiful bill' progresses this summer. A late-night amendment by U.S. Rep. Mark Amodei (R-Nev.) was heavily criticized by Nevada's Democratic representatives. It ended up dying, a casualty of political dealing after Montana Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke, the former Interior secretary during Trump's first term, threatened to vote no on the giant House funding bill. Zinke called out Amodei's amendment as the vote drew near, and Republicans weren't sure if they could pass the spending bill without him. Now, Republican Sen. Mike Lee is working on selling public lands as the Senate prepares to take up the spending bill. While he hasn't said which states will be targeted, he has taken Montana off the list. A Thursday report from The Hill indicated that Republicans could be in a similar position when the Senate vote arrives. Trump wants the Senate to pass the bill by July 4, but that's already looking unlikely. The Congressional Budget Office projected Wednesday that spending bill passed by the House will add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade, and some senators are saying they can't accept that. Amodei's move to sell public lands was among the proposals to come up with money to pay for the renewal of tax cuts passed under Trump in 2017. Lee said his plan is expected to be released on Monday, according to a Bloomberg report. With 63% of the state federally-owned, Utah is second only to Nevada. More than 80% of Nevada is federally owned — nearly 57 million acres. Most of the land is under the control of the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (63%, 47 million acres), followed by the U.S. Forest Service (5.7 million acres), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2.3 million acres), the National Park Service (797,000 acres) and the Department of Defense (60,000 acres), according to a 2020 report. That report didn't account for the Nevada National Security Site (formerly the Nevada Test Site), which covers 880,000 acres in southeastern Nye County or the Tonopah Test Range, 370,000 acres farther north in Nye County. Next is Idaho at 61.9%, Alaska at 60.9% and Oregon at 52.3%. Western states dominate the list. Utah Republican Gov. Spencer Cox has challenged federal decisions about land in the state, objecting to expansions of national monuments. Bears Ears and Grand Staircase Escalante expansions were disputed in years past. Now, the Trump administration is opening up more federal land to oil and gas exploration, fast-tracking geothermal projects and looking at mineral deposits on national park land. Gov. Joe Lombardo cited the Biden Administration's move creating the Avi Kwa Ame National Monument south of Las Vegas. He said it would prevent development at a time when Nevada needs federal land to address a housing crisis. Housing has been at the center of the public land debate recently in the Las Vegas valley. An agreement with the BLM under Biden provided opportunities to buy federal land within the valley for $100 an acre, an incentive to get builders to deliver affordable housing. Nevada Gov. Lombardo unveils $1 billion affordable housing plan: 'We have to expand'? Rural Nevadans have had a sometimes-strained relationship with federal landowners. It's only been 11 years since Cliven Bundy's armed standoff with BLM officers along Interstate 15 northeast of Las Vegas, near the town of Bunkerville. Ranchers were angry after the BLM rounded up their cattle a tense battle over grazing rights. The cattle were eventually released, diffusing the situation, but prosecutors pursued a court case against Bundy and his family. Before that, the Sagebrush Rebellion in the 1970s and 1980s traces its roots to Nevada and other western states. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Lululemon looking more to China, Europe as its US growth slows
Lululemon looking more to China, Europe as its US growth slows

Yahoo

time21 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Lululemon looking more to China, Europe as its US growth slows

Lululemon Athletica (LULU) stock is sinking in extended hours trading after releasing its first quarter earnings results that came out largely in line with analyst estimates while missing second quarter revenue forecasts. Morningstar senior equity analyst David Swartz reacts to the athleisure brand's quarterly performance and how it is seeking out expansion opportunities in other regions beyond the US and North America. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime here. Let's get more reaction now to Lululemon earnings. For that, we bring in David Swartz, senior equity analyst at Morningstar. David, it's good to see you. Um, what is going on with Lululemon, particularly in the Americas? Is this a competition issue? Is this a merchandise mix issue? Why do you think we are not seeing better performance in their comps in the Americas? I think it's both of those things. Uh, we have seen over the last few quarters, uh, that competition has had some impact on Lululemon, which is unusual because Lululemon historically has always been able to overcome competition. It's really nothing new in this industry. Lululemon has always faced imitators and contenders. Uh, but we have seen some companies like Alo Yoga and Vuori, uh, to name two that have, that have done very well in the, um, the upscale women's athleisure space, and that has affected Lululemon to some degree. Uh, we also have seen a situation which Lululemon has kind of struggled to get the right products into its stores. Uh, the company, um, had a change last year in its design team. Uh, their lead designer, uh, Sancho, left to become president of Vans, and that, that did affect Lululemon, I think, for some time, and there has been a reorganization of that part of the business. I, I still think that Lululemon is very strong in, in product development, uh, but we haven't seen it quite as much recently. And then also, it's just a natural slowing down of Lululemon's business in North America. The company already has stores in all major metropolitan regions in, in the US and Canada. And so it was almost certainty that it would not be able to post the same kind of growth rates that it had in the past. And so that's why it's looking for places like China and Europe, uh, for a lot of future growth. David, what is this company's tariff exposure, and how, how are they navigating that dynamic? Yeah, so like just about everybody else in this industry, Lululemon uses a primarily Asia-based, uh, production, uh, primarily third-party factories. I don't think Lululemon has a lot of direct exposure from China, uh, because like others in this industry, including Nike, a lot of the production in China has shifted to other countries in recent years, and also a lot of the production in China is actually designed for Chinese consumers. And Lululemon has been opening a lot of stores in China, uh, but Lululemon certainly has exposure to countries like Vietnam and other, and other countries in Southeast Asia, uh, which have emerged as major sportswear producers in recent years. Uh, and it does have high exposure to the US. So it, it certainly does have exposure to tariffs, but, uh, Lululemon does have pricing power. Its products are generally more expensive than others, and so I think it can actually raise prices to offset tariffs better than most of their competitors. Um, and what about its business in China? Um, I mentioned before that we saw comps there, um, rise at a faster pace, but that's, that's been the case there than in the Americas. Is that business meeting your expectations? And is that momentum going to continue, do you think? I think maybe it has slowed down a little bit because there were times when we were seeing growth rates over 30% in China. Uh, Lululemon is opening a lot of stores there. Uh, it's still a relatively small business. If you look at competitors like Adidas and Nike, they have thousands of stores in China. So Lululemon could conceivably open many more. Uh, it's, it's a market, though, right now that is troubled. Uh, we've seen some pretty weak results, uh, from sportswear companies in China recently and apparel companies overall, uh, because China's economy has not been very strong, and that's especially true, uh, with high youth unemployment in China, and that's affecting companies like Lululemon sale, like Lululemon. And so, um, you know, we may see a bit of a slowdown there, uh, but it's still a very high potential market for Lululemon. Uh, its market share right now is still very low and awareness is low, and it certainly could be much higher in, in future years. David, correct me if I'm wrong, but I, I believe you have the equivalent of a hold on this name. Uh, so what would you need to see, David, before you were telling clients to get more bullish? Yes, so before today's report, my fair value estimate was $100, it was $315. So it, I thought it was maybe a little bit overvalued. Uh, now with the stock down in, in the aftermarket today, maybe it's a little bit undervalued. Uh, I, you know, I would like to see the company, uh, get its growth rate in the Americas back up a little bit. We're never going to see the same kind of double-digit numbers that we saw in the past, most likely, uh, but if it could get back into, into like the, the single, you know, mid-single digit range, that would certainly impress, um, investors, and I think that could potentially, uh, get the, the price a little bit higher. But, you know, Lululemon stock price tends to be very volatile. At times, it often gets to be quite expensive. Certainly when it was over $500 a share, I was maybe one of the few people who thought it was really expensive and overpriced. Um, but you know, there are buying opportunities. If it continues to, to go down, you know, this could be a buying opportunity in Lululemon, I think, because this is still a very strong company with, with incredible, uh, earnings power and cash flow and no debt. So there's a lot of things to like with this company. David, always great to see you. Appreciate that instant analysis. Thank you. Thanks. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store