A curriculum divided
The draft English curriculum has sparked fierce debate among teachers over equity, achievement and Shakespeare's place in the classroom. But not every teacher is opposed, writes Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin.
Draft curriculum sets off nationwide conversation
Few education debates in recent years have ignited as much heat as the draft replacement English curriculum for secondary schools. Released for consultation in April and due to be implemented in 2026, the proposed curriculum has sparked fierce division among teachers, academics and the wider public. At its core is a shift toward a 'knowledge-rich' curriculum, with foundational grammar instruction in Years 7-10 and mandated Shakespeare and 19th-century literature at senior levels. Its emphasis on sequenced learning and a common canon of texts departs sharply from the more flexible, bicultural approach of recent years.
An argument for equity
While public pronouncements from the educational sector about the draft have been overwhelmingly negative, not every teacher is opposed to the change. For Tansy Oliver, an English teacher at a formerly decile one school, the new curriculum represents a necessary intervention to address persistent educational inequities. Writing in The Spinoff this morning, Oliver defends the curriculum's focus on structured literacy and sequenced teaching, arguing that 'students from low decile areas… often need specific, explicit teaching with clear sequences and connections, like the new curriculum proposes'.
According to Oliver, the backlash from many of her colleagues is disconnected from the daily reality of students, in which foundational literacy remains a barrier to success. 'Literacy is essential and no matter how smart a student is, without it, they are limited and their world will shrink,' she writes. 'Our students deserve to have the same access to the world as anyone in the decile 10 school 20 minutes down the road.'
While Oliver acknowledges concerns over the omission of te ao Māori from the curriculum, she contends that teachers still have the flexibility to include these perspectives, and that the bigger issue is the longstanding failure to deliver equitable outcomes for Māori and Pasifika students.
A Eurocentric approach?
Oliver's article is a response to David Taylor, head of English at Northcote College, who has declared that he will not teach the new curriculum. In his piece, also published in The Spinoff, Taylor argues that the new curriculum enables systemic racism by stripping out references to Te Tiriti o Waitangi and pedagogical approaches known to support Māori achievement. Describing the draft document as 'damaging' and ideologically regressive, Taylor says the media focus on the teaching of Shakespeare 'misses the fundamental problems with this new national directive'. Among them: the sidelining of student voices and creativity, resulting in a curriculum that 'talks at them, with little interest in listening to them'.
His piece, which has been widely shared and debated over the past seven days, encapsulates a broader anxiety: that the draft curriculum privileges a narrow, Eurocentric view of literature at the expense of diversity, critical thinking and real-world relevance. For Taylor and many others, the fight over English in schools is about more than pedagogy – it's about what kind of education system New Zealand wants to build.
Tensions over process and politics
Controversy has dogged the draft from long before its public release. Beginning last year, the Post Primary Teachers' Association (PPTA) and the New Zealand Association of Teachers of English (NZATE) raised serious concerns about the consultation process, which they say excluded educators and lacked transparency. NZATE formally withdrew from engagement in February, citing the ministry's 'unreliable' approach and unaddressed concerns about unrealistic teaching expectations and cognitive overload, reported RNZ's John Gerritsen.
Prior to the withdrawal, reports that the rewrite had been taken over by a ministerially appointed group, including a small number of academics and teachers from elite schools, had already inflamed tensions. The PPTA called the process 'an absolute shambles' and accused the government of sidelining teacher expertise in favour of a narrow ideological agenda.
A 'Parent Portal' has been launched to give caregivers a better understanding of their children's education, including the new curriculum (Adam Pearse, NZ Herald)
The 'good old days' of our education system weren't actually good (David Hill, The Spinoff)
Should Shakespeare be compulsory? A student's perspective (JJ Mathias, The Spinoff)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
22 minutes ago
- Scoop
‘Trump Of The North' Will Not Seek Re-Election As Mayor
Article – Susan Botting – Local Democracy Reporter A controversial Northland mayor will not be standing for a second mayoral term. In a shock move, Kaipara Mayor Craig Jepson on Tuesday confirmed he would not be standing for the $138,441-a-year position in the October local election. Mangawhai's Jepson (67) is instead backing Kaipara District Council (KDC) Deputy Mayor Jonathan Larsen (54). Jepson appointed Larsen to the deputy role in October 2022. And Jepson – who has referred to himself as the 'Trump of the North' – will be standing as a councillor in his Kaiwaka-Mangawhai ward. The position pays $68,719 annually. Jepson's about-turn comes after consistently indicating he will be standing for a second tilt at the Kaipara mayoralty. He would not be drawn on the reason for the tack change, other than to say he wanted to step down from the top job and spend more time on issues close to his heart as a councillor. Jepson's political move comes as first-term KDC councillor Ash Nayyar said for the first time that he would be taking a tilt at the top job. Dargaville's Nayyar believed too many KDC decisions were being made behind closed doors, and unnecessary pet projects were being adopted by the council. He said he was unhappy KDC, in his opinion, had generally ignored the voice of the people during public consultation. Nayyar claimed Kaipara's west had been neglected and as Mayor he would do all parts of the district justice. He has a Master of Business administration, Bachelors of Commerce and Law and 40 years' banking experience. Topuni's Larsen was first elected onto KDC in 2010. He resigned in protest in August 2012, just under two years into a three-year term. He said he left over his dissatisfaction with the council making closed-door decisions on the future of the controversial Mangawhai wastewater scheme, including $30 million in extra spending on the project. Larsen said he had brought this matter to the attention of the Auditor-General. government ministers and Ombudsman. The government appointed commissioners to run KDC in September 2012. Larsen was re-elected in 2016 and has been a KDC politician since. If successful in October, it would see him elected for a fifth term. He has a Bachelor Science, and an Executive Master of Business Administration with first class honours. Jepson's big calls as mayor In his first controversial move, Jepson canned karakia from council meetings in November 2022, just two months into the job. KDC later became the only council to can its Māori ward in August 2024 after government law changes – one of Jepson's proudest achievements, and one which was also backed by Larsen. Jepson said he was proud of his council's 'small' 8.2 percent rates rise for 2025/2026. He said another positive move was his council withdrawing from national councils' representative body Local Government New Zealand. The mayor said there were a range of issues he wanted to work on as a councillor. Getting rid of mangroves would be one of the major issues he wanted to invest in. 'I want to get rid of mangroves from our harbours, not just Mangawhai Harbour, but Kaipara Harbour and the whole of Northland,' Jepson said. Jepson said he also wanted to boost the fight against Auckland's Dome Valley landfill – which is just across the local political border in Auckland Council – and educate people about the merits of waste to energy technology. He has strongly campaigned for such a plant in Kaipara. Larsen and Jepson jointly conducted information visits to constituents around Kaipara on the plants. Meanwhile, Jepson has long-challenged current science backing climate change. KDC axed its Ruawai-based Northland climate change pilot midstream. KDC also got rid of its key climate change policy in 2023 in a move brought to the council table by Larsen. Larsen said that even if climate change was a reality, the actions of Kaipara's 18,000 ratepayers would not make a jot of difference in a world with 8 billion people. Jepson was elected with a big majority in 2022. Jepson said that many had encouraged him to stand again, to do a 'lap of victory', but being a local politician was not about ego. It was about what was best for the district.
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
PM Must Stop Changes Further Failing Children
Press Release – New Zealand Labour Party Christopher Luxon must step in and cancel boot camps and restore funding to frontline community providers before its too late, Labour childrens spokesperson Willow-Jean Prime said. Today's damning report on Oranga Tamariki shows Māori children are being left with little chance of success, or even survival, after their experiences in the state care system, and Minister for Children Karen Chhour is making it worse. 'This report is the first of its kind and reveals a disturbing and urgent problem which can no longer be ignored by the Prime Minister who has overseen dangerous changes to Oranga Tamariki during his term in government,' Labour children's spokesperson Willow-Jean Prime said. 'The Government has cut early intervention, continued with botched bootcamps that have never worked, and taken away funding from community-run services that help children and whānau. 'Christopher Luxon has allowed an ACT Minister to recklessly erode the services that have been built up to support children. 'As well as repealing Section 7AA, Karen Chhour has removed a key target for placement of children with whanau, and removed the target for investment for services provided by Iwi organisations. 'The Government has taken away actions specifically put in place to address the significant disparities for Māori children in care. 'Christopher Luxon must step in and cancel boot camps and restore funding to frontline community providers before it's too late,' Willow-Jean Prime said.
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Report On Outcomes For Tamariki And Rangatahi Māori In The Oranga Tamariki System – A Story Of Consequence
Press Release – Aroturuki Tamariki Aroturuki Tamariki Chief Executive Arran Jones says the report is a story of consequence of needs not addressed by a system that is not always able to work together to get the right support in place at the right time. In the first of a new annual report series – Outcomes for tamariki and rangatahi Māori and their whānau in the oranga tamariki system – Aroturuki Tamariki | Independent Children's Monitor found tamariki (children) and rangatahi (young people) Māori and their whānau are over-represented in the oranga tamariki system and the system is letting them down. While Oranga Tamariki has a pivotal role, the system includes NZ Police and the Ministries of Health, Education and Social Development. Most tamariki and rangatahi Māori have no involvement in the oranga tamariki system. But when they do, there are increasing levels of over-representation – almost 50 percent of reports of concern made to Oranga Tamariki are about tamariki and rangatahi Māori, they make up two-thirds of those in care, and more than three quarters of those in youth justice custody. Aroturuki Tamariki Chief Executive Arran Jones says the report is a story of consequence – of needs not addressed by a system that is not always able to work together to get the right support in place at the right time. 'The needs of tamariki and rangatahi then multiply as they escalate through the system,' Mr Jones said. Data shows 92 percent of rangatahi referred to a youth justice family group conference in 2023/24 had concerns raised about their safety and wellbeing when they were younger. 'Tamariki and rangatahi come to the attention of Oranga Tamariki because someone has raised concerns about alleged abuse, or their wellbeing. This is the moment to get the right services and supports in place so tamariki and rangatahi don't escalate through the system,' says Mr Jones Escalation through the system can eventually mean involvement with the Police – and Police data shows a difference in the severity of proceedings against tamariki and rangatahi Māori in 2023/24: tamariki Māori aged 10–13 are less likely to be referred to alternative action or given a warning and more likely to be prosecuted or referred to a youth justice FGC than others rangatahi Māori aged 14–17 are less likely to get a warning or be referred to alternative action and more likely to be prosecuted than others. The outcomes for tamariki and rangatahi Māori currently involved with the oranga tamariki system are less positive than those for Māori with no involvement. In 2022, tamariki and rangatahi Māori: in care or custody, achieved education qualifications at almost half the rate of Māori with no involvement in the oranga tamariki system, were significantly more likely to be hospitalised for self-harm than those with no involvement in care, used mental health and addiction services at nearly five times the rate of Māori with no involvement. Rangatahi Māori in youth justice custody used these at 15 times the rate – 60 percent of rangatahi Māori in youth justice custody used mental health and addiction services. Considering 92 percent of these rangatahi had reports of concern made about their safety and wellbeing when they were younger, this is no surprise. 'The outcomes for young Māori adults, aged 27–30, who were involved in the oranga tamariki system as children are sobering. The data paints a stark picture of the consequence of the oranga tamariki system not doing more to help. Māori adults who had been in the system as children are less likely to be employed, less likely to have a driver licence, more likely to be on a benefit, more likely to be in emergency housing, and more likely to be hospitalised for self-harm than Māori who had no involvement. Mortality rates are double or triple those of Māori with no involvement in the oranga tamariki system for vehicle accidents and for self-harm (including suicide),' says Mr Jones. The report also identifies the importance of breaking the cycle. For Māori parents (aged 27–30 years) who had previously been in care themselves, 68 percent have children involved with Oranga Tamariki in some way and one in eight have had one or more children in care at some point. 'This report highlights initiatives and ways of working that provide a pathway ahead for all government agencies. Working with tamariki and rangatahi alongside their whānau, building trusted long-term relationships, looking outside of organisational silos to understand their wider needs and providing services across government and community agencies. To paraphrase one of the providers we heard from, this is where the magic happens,' says Mr Jones. The initiatives highlighted in the report include a statutory youth justice delegation from Oranga Tamariki to Whakapai Hauora by Rangitāne o Manawatū. Whakapai Hauora provides wraparound support to rangatahi Māori who have offended, reporting only one referral proceeding to a court order. Some rangatahi who have completed programmes have returned as mentors and one rangatahi is now employed by the retailer he offended against. In Auckland, Kotahi te Whakaaro, brings together government and non-government organisations. It works alongside whānau to support tamariki and rangatahi who have offended, to prevent further offending. They look across housing, schooling, health and financial challenges and put supports in place. We heard about significant reductions in reoffending, with one rangatahi telling us 'I think stealing is just an idiot move now'. In Porirua, Te Rūnanga o Toa Rangatira has built a strong relationship with Oranga Tamariki. They reported that a combination of early intervention initiatives for whānau who come to the attention of Oranga Tamariki has resulted in a 21 percent reduction in renotifications (reports of concern) – to the lowest rate in Porirua in four years. 'Before tamariki and rangatahi come to the attention of Oranga Tamariki they will have been seen by education and health staff and the parents may be known to social housing and welfare. It should not take offending, or an incident of abuse or neglect to get the support that was always needed,' says Mr Jones. For this report, we looked at the performance under the Oranga Tamariki Act – this Act places specific obligations on Police and Oranga Tamariki. It is clear there are opportunities to do better and this report highlights some of those. 'Data shows that tamariki and rangatahi Māori in the system today have similar hopes and aspirations for their future as those not in system. As one rangatahi we met with told us they'd 'just like to grow up successful and, if I find the right person, to give my kids what I couldn't have',' Mr Jones said. Read the report on our website Aroturuki Tamariki – the Independent Children's Monitor checks that organisations supporting and working with tamariki, rangatahi and their whānau, are meeting their needs, delivering services effectively, and improving outcomes. We monitor compliance with the Oranga Tamariki Act and the associated regulations, including the National Care Standards. We also look at how the wider system (such as early intervention) is supporting tamariki and rangatahi under the Oversight of Oranga Tamariki System Act. Aroturuki Tamariki works closely with its partners in the oversight system, Mana Mokopuna – Children and Young People's Commission, and the Office of the Ombudsman.
