Erin Patterson mushroom murder trial: Lies told to police over foraging, dehydrator
A Supreme Court jury has heard from accused mushroom cook killer Erin Patterson for the first time as her record of interview was played in her triple-murder trial.
In her own words, Ms Patterson answered questions from homicide squad detectives, telling them she had 'never' foraged for mushrooms and did not own a dehydrator.
But the defence has admitted these were lies, conceding in its opening address that she has foraged for mushrooms and did own a dehydrator, which she later dumped at a local tip.
Ms Patterson is standing trial in Morwell, accused of murdering her estranged husband's parents Don and Gail Patterson, both 70, along with Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, 66.
In her record of interview, Ms Patterson said she loved her in-laws, describing them as 'good, decent people that have never done anything wrong by me'.
Don, Gail and Heather died after she served them individual beef wellingtons allegedly laced with lethal death cap mushrooms at her Leongatha home on July 29, 2023.
When detectives executed a search warrant at the home on August 5 after the sisters had died, the court heard they told Ms Patterson it was in 'connection with the death of two people', prompting her to ask: 'Who died?'
Heather's husband, pastor Ian Wilkinson, 71, was the only guest to survive.
Ms Patterson, 50, has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder, claiming what happened was a 'tragedy and a terrible accident'. THE RECORD OF INTERVIEW
Detective Leading Senior Constable Stephen Eppingstall, the lead investigator and final witness for the prosecution, took to the stand on Tuesday as the Crown edges closer to closing its case against Ms Patterson.
He told the court her record of interview was conducted at Wonthaggi Police Station on August 5 at 4.41pm after the search warrant had been executed.
Wearing a light brown sweater, Ms Patterson was interviewed by Constable Eppingstall and his corroborator Detective Senior Constable David Martin-Alcaide.
Seated in the dock of the courtroom, Ms Patterson at times became emotional as she watched herself on a small screen answering the detectives' questions.
Constable Eppingstall told Ms Patterson she was being interviewed over the deaths of Gail and Heather as police were trying to understand what had happened.
'I've never been in a situation like this before and I've been very, very helpful with the health department through the week, because I wanted to help that side of things as much as possible, because I do want to know what happened,' she replied.
Constable Eppingstall said police were concerned about the source of the mushrooms and asked Ms Patterson if she had foraged for them in the past.
'Never,' she replied.
He also asked about a Sunbeam dehydrator, telling Ms Patterson they found an instruction manual for the device in her kitchen drawer.
'Do you know anything about a dehydrator in your house?' he asked.
'No,' she replied.
'Do you own a dehydrator?' he asked.
'No,' she replied.
'I've got manuals of lots of stuff I've collected over the years … I just keep them all.'
At the start of the trial, the defence said it was its case that Ms Patterson 'panicked because she was overwhelmed by the fact that these four people had become so ill because of the food that she'd served to them'.
Defence barrister Colin Mandy SC admitted she lied about foraging for mushrooms, but said his client 'denies that she ever deliberately sought out death cap mushrooms'.
When asked in the record of interview about her relationship with the Pattersons and why she invited them to lunch, Ms Patterson said it was because she had no other family.
'I want to maintain those relationships in spite of what's happening with Simon, I love them a lot,' she continued.
She said Don and Gail had 'always been good to me'.
'They always said to me that they would support me with love and emotional support even though Simon and I were separated,' she added.
She said it was important to her that the Pattersons remained grandparents to her children, adding that she thought her estranged husband 'hated' that she had a relationship with them after their separation.
Constable Eppingstall also asked Ms Patterson why she first presented to Leongatha Hospital two days after the lunch and left five minutes later.
'When you've got animals at home and children who have multiple after school activities, you can't just be told to drop everything and you're off to Melbourne overnight,' she said.
'So I had to go home and feed the animals and pack my daughter's ballet bag.' THE SEARCH WARRANT
Earlier, Detective Sergeant Luke Farrell told the court he attended Ms Patterson's house on August 5 with Constable Eppingstall to execute the search warrant.
The court heard her two children and the family dog were present for the search, which stretched from about 11.40am to 3.40pm.
Photos taken during the search were beamed into the courtroom, providing the jury its first look inside the house where the accused hosted the lunch.
The court heard detectives found a manual for a dehydrator inside a kitchen drawer, while a best-selling RecipeTin Eats cookbook was spotted on the kitchen bench.
Sergeant Farrell said a 'piece of tissue' had been used as a bookmark and the cookbook had been 'spattered' with food remnants.
Constable Eppingstall told the court Ms Patterson told him during the search she used the cookbook to make the beef wellington meal.
The six-page recipe was shown to the jury, including a photo of a latticed beef wellington log.
The court heard detectives also located a Cooler Master computer, a Samsung phone and a Samsung tablet in one of the children's bedrooms.
Sergeant Farrell confirmed a video was taken during the search and captured plates as detectives opened kitchen drawers and the dishwasher.
In one screenshot from the video, four small plates 'with a red top and dark bottom' could be seen, as well as a larger plate of the same description.
Sergeant Farrell agreed that he was aware at the time of the search that the 'issue of plates' was of interest to police, but he conceded photos were not taken of all the plates in the house and none were seized.
The court heard Sergeant Farrell asked Ms Patterson for her phone at the end of the search.
'I asked for it and she gave it to me,' he said. THE HEALTH INVESTIGATION
Senior public health adviser Sally Ann Atkinson returned to the witness box on Tuesday and said the Department of Health investigation concluded that it was 'highly unlikely' the commercial food chain had been contaminated with death cap mushrooms.
'The risk to public health was deemed very low,' she said, adding that no food was recalled.
She told the court only one Asian grocer stocked dried mushrooms 'similar' to the description provided by Ms Patterson, but she said this product was notably larger.
'Nothing (was found) that matched the description she gave at all,' she said.
She confirmed the Department of Health deemed it an 'isolated event'.
The trial continues.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


West Australian
2 hours ago
- West Australian
Experts flag increasing sexual violence in conflicts
Sexual violence is becoming more prevalent in conflicts and experts are calling on Australia to hold state and non-state perpetrators accountable. For the first time, Australia is hosting an international conference on the topic of conflict-related sexual violence, seeking to draw attention to the issue particularly in the Indo-Pacific region. Experts, advocates, researchers and survivors will discuss patterns of violence in conflict and why so many perpetrators go unpunished at the Justice Denied conference. Speakers include Australian Ambassador for Gender Equality Stephanie Copus Campbell, Victorian Supreme Court Justice Lesley Taylor and Papua New Guinea social anthropologist Fiona Hukula. Keynote speaker Jacqui True is director of the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for the Elimination of Violence against Women and an expert on gender, peace, security and violence against women. There had been an uptick in the use of violence against women in conflicts since 2014, often as a way of oppressing communities, she said. "In many cultures, the stigma attaches to the victim not the perpetrator," Professor True said. "We want to seek accountability to prosecute these crimes and hold state and non-state actors accountable. "This should not be a type of violence used in war and there should be support for redress to ensure the safety and recovery of survivors." The conference, being held over two days in Melbourne, aimed to bridge the gap between research, practice and policy making. Of particular focus would be increasing violence in the Indo-Pacific region, where there are some of the highest rates of conflict as a result of growing economic instability and tribal rivalries. "Papua New Guinea particularly is highlighted as we've seen a diffusion of conflict-related sexual violence there in a way that was never present before," Prof True said. "Australia has a really important role to bring attention and support local actors in these sensitive situations to respond to survivors and to drive changes in communities." 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028


Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Experts flag increasing sexual violence in conflicts
Sexual violence is becoming more prevalent in conflicts and experts are calling on Australia to hold state and non-state perpetrators accountable. For the first time, Australia is hosting an international conference on the topic of conflict-related sexual violence, seeking to draw attention to the issue particularly in the Indo-Pacific region. Experts, advocates, researchers and survivors will discuss patterns of violence in conflict and why so many perpetrators go unpunished at the Justice Denied conference. Speakers include Australian Ambassador for Gender Equality Stephanie Copus Campbell, Victorian Supreme Court Justice Lesley Taylor and Papua New Guinea social anthropologist Fiona Hukula. Keynote speaker Jacqui True is director of the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for the Elimination of Violence against Women and an expert on gender, peace, security and violence against women. There had been an uptick in the use of violence against women in conflicts since 2014, often as a way of oppressing communities, she said. "In many cultures, the stigma attaches to the victim not the perpetrator," Professor True said. "We want to seek accountability to prosecute these crimes and hold state and non-state actors accountable. "This should not be a type of violence used in war and there should be support for redress to ensure the safety and recovery of survivors." The conference, being held over two days in Melbourne, aimed to bridge the gap between research, practice and policy making. Of particular focus would be increasing violence in the Indo-Pacific region, where there are some of the highest rates of conflict as a result of growing economic instability and tribal rivalries. "Papua New Guinea particularly is highlighted as we've seen a diffusion of conflict-related sexual violence there in a way that was never present before," Prof True said. "Australia has a really important role to bring attention and support local actors in these sensitive situations to respond to survivors and to drive changes in communities." 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028

The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
What happens to men who have caused harm to women?
A number of prominent Australian men – including Supreme Court judges – attended a recent launch of a book by supposedly 'disgraced' former High Court judge Dyson Heydon. In 2020, Heydon was found by an independent High Court inquiry to have sexually harassed six young female associates. Heydon maintains his innocence. None of this is any surprise. Donald Trump has been found guilty in a civil court of sexual misconduct, and was subsequently returned to the White House by voters. The longstanding myth that being accused of (or even found to have committed) sexual harassment ruins your career and life forever is being publicly and repeatedly debunked. This is a reminder that the people who subject others to sexual harassment or perpetrate sexual assault are often normal people embedded in and atop the fabric of our society, not outcast from it. So, what do we actually want from men who have been found to have caused harm? Is it punishment, rehabilitation, or both? How do we measure what level of social ostracism it would take for them to not harm again? Should victim satisfaction or future behaviour be the focal point of these reflections? Power and entitlement are the bedrock of all forms of sexual harassment and assault. Powerful people have access to subordinates and have seen institutions or circles they are part of routinely protect their own kind, while silencing victims. This creates a sense of legal and reputational immunity (one that is often proven correct), and contributes to levels of entitlement that manifest as their prerogative to the bodies of others. One of the criminal justice system's greatest failings in addressing sexual harm is its all-or-nothing approach – unable to reckon with the complexity of human experience and interpersonal harm. The criminal system was designed by men, for men, when sexual harm was an act of 'damaging' another man's 'property'. We still lack a socially acceptable form of accountability outside the criminal system, a system many victims avoid, not just because of its traumatising process or the slim chance of a conviction, but because many do not want their perpetrators jailed, especially when they are friends, mentors or colleagues. The problem here is that each victim will have their own threshold for what constitutes justice. Loading Some perpetrators face social consequences for their actions – terminated or forced resignations from positions, exclusion from parties, or reputational damage – but when you're close to the harm, it feels irrelevant compared with the gravity of consequences for the victim. Both things can be true: accountability can exist in public form (generally, men fear this), and yet this can feel painfully insufficient to those who bore the impact (generally, women resent this). However, it must not be forgotten that the question of accountability is only being explored at all because Heydon was found by a High Court inquiry to have committed the actions he was accused of. I wonder whether, had the standard of proof in this inquiry been 'beyond reasonable doubt', the women who spoke up would be branded as 'attention-seeking liars'. The reality was the same, regardless, but the finding is what has shaped the public narrative.