logo
AI Agents In The Enterprise & Their Implications For Identity Security

AI Agents In The Enterprise & Their Implications For Identity Security

Forbes07-05-2025

Tarun Thakur is Cofounder and CEO of Veza.
getty
The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) and GenAI has ushered in a new era of technology. We see them embedded in every product, software product road map and industry analyst presentation. Now, the AI revolution is impacting automation, becoming an active participant in enterprise workflows. Agentic AI —AI systems that can function autonomously, make decisions, retrieve real-time data and execute complex actions across the enterprise environment—is driving this shift.
While these AI agents promise tremendous productivity gains, they also introduce significant identity security challenges that organizations must address proactively.
Understanding AI Agents: Key Characteristics
AI agents differ from traditional LLM-based chatbots like ChatGPT in several key ways. AI agents have:
• Goal-Driven Autonomy: AI agents pursue objectives independently, continuously adapting based on inputs and results at each stage.
• Real-World Connectivity: These agents will integrate with multiple enterprise systems—retrieving, processing and writing real-time data.
• Decision Making Capabilities: AI agents analyze data, apply logic and execute tasks without constant human oversight.
• Cross-Application Orchestration: Leveraging LLMs, they operate across multiple enterprise applications, blurring traditional application and system-specific security boundaries.
The Rise Of AI Agents In The Enterprise
Organizations are embedding agents into both customer-facing products and internal workforce-facing operations. We expect initial use cases to include:
• Software Development: Agents will generate, debug, optimize and potentially deploy code automatically.
• Marketing And Content Creation: They can draft content, run A/B testing, optimize campaigns and analyze audience engagement.
• Customer Support: Agentic AI will extend current chatbot capabilities with workflows to make customer account changes, order replacement parts, process refunds and upsell subscriptions.
• Supply Chain Management: Besides optimizing logistics and forecasting demand, agents will place orders with suppliers, check inventory and leverage voice interfaces to enable automated connections to vendors without deep technical infrastructures.
Nevertheless, initial missteps in early deployments of LLMs in the enterprise tend to remain embedded in memory. For example, Air Canada deployed a chatbot that mistakenly provided incorrect information about bereavement fares, leading to a customer dispute. The company tried to dispute the claim and avoid responsibility for the incorrect information that the chatbot provided, but it lost the case in court.
While this incident highlights the potential risks of such use, perhaps more damaging would be anyone who assumes the technology isn't ready for prime time. A common truism is that AI is currently the worst it will ever be. The AI future is coming, and AI agents will be a significant part of the enterprise landscape.
The Two Primary Flavors Of Enterprise AI Agents
In thinking more deeply about how agents will work, we should distinguish between two "flavors."
1. Enterprise-Managed AI Agents
These are typically top-down, organization-approved AI implementations that connect via APIs and service accounts to integrate seamlessly with enterprise workflows. Examples include Google Agents, which automate enterprise decision making across multiple applications, and Goldman Sachs' GS AI Assistant.
2. Employee-Managed AI Agents
Employees individually adopt these agents, often without explicit organizational approval. They typically operate within a user's browser session and leverage employee credentials for access. These agents can automate with systems that require interactive MFA, typically a barrier to most API-based authentication. Examples include OpenAI Operator and Anthropic's "Computer Use" mode, which employees can download and deploy on their company or personal computer.
Identity Security Challenges
Agentic AI brings into focus challenges for identity security—in different ways, depending on the flavor.
Challenges With Enterprise-Managed AI Agents
1. Complex Least Privilege Enforcement: Organizations will aspire and push to make agents as "general purpose" as possible rather than building up a set of fragmented tools. General-purpose AI agents will require broad permissions across systems, which makes defining "least privilege" difficult.
2. Separation Of Duties (SoD) Concerns: Similarly, when general-purpose agents have access to different roles for different purposes across applications, it can lead to potential compliance and security loopholes in SoD.
3. Dynamic Nature: The landscape and use cases for agents are changing quickly and are only expected to accelerate. As LLMs evolve and expand, defining static security policies becomes impractical and difficult to enforce.
Challenges With Employee-Managed AI Agents
1. Overpermissioning Risks: Employees may grant AI assistants excessive access for convenience. It's easier to grant access to essentially everything that I have as a member of the workforce. In the world of federated authentication, granting access to only an app or two is actually harder to do than giving access to everything.
2. Goal-Driven Behavior's Unintended Consequences: Simply setting a reasonable goal for an agent could take actions outside the intended parameters. How do you specify and validate the proper set of goals for an agent? For example, if an employee asked an agent to "maximize the chance of getting me promoted," might it decide to pursue strategies around highlighting the most significant failures of other likely candidates for the higher role?
3. Persistent Data Access: To effectively execute against longer-term goals, agents tend to retain and recall information over a longer term than simple queries of a chatbot. Enterprise data would likely persist and potentially be recalled in unexpected ways, raising legitimate data security concerns.
4. Audit And Compliance Complexity: Even today, organizations struggle to differentiate between humans and non-humans accessing different systems (the "NHI security" problem). With the adoption of agents, the issue of differentiation becomes much more difficult. When an auditor asks an organization to attest to the accuracy of an audit report showing "every AI agent that has touched customer data," what will the response be?
The good news is that the core issues in identity security in the world of agentic AI come back to the ones we've struggled with for years: Least privilege is the foundation. You need to understand what you have today to know where you want to go. Start small, learn quickly and iterate.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Couche-Tard Sees ‘Clear Path' to Seven & i Deal With US Stores Divestment
Couche-Tard Sees ‘Clear Path' to Seven & i Deal With US Stores Divestment

Bloomberg

time33 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Couche-Tard Sees ‘Clear Path' to Seven & i Deal With US Stores Divestment

Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. said several potential buyers have made proposals to acquire convenience stores in the US that overlap with Seven & i Holdings Co., showing progress toward a deal that could help the Canadian retailer win regulatory approval for its proposal to buy its Japanese rival. The two agreed earlier this year to discuss the potential divestment of more than 2,000 stores in the US and seek out interested parties in order to address concerns by Seven & i over a merger being blocked by the US Federal Trade Commission. Couche-Tard also pushed back against any parallels to the failed $24.6 billion merger of grocery chains Kroger Co. and Albertsons Cos.

These L.A. Business Owners Say Protest-Fueled Mayhem Is Hammering Their Sales
These L.A. Business Owners Say Protest-Fueled Mayhem Is Hammering Their Sales

Wall Street Journal

time37 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

These L.A. Business Owners Say Protest-Fueled Mayhem Is Hammering Their Sales

LOS ANGELES—Johnny Wong has been painting over graffiti outside his downtown flower shop every morning since political protests marred by vandalism and violence began late last week. On Wednesday morning, he gave up. 'We just got tired,' said Wong, whose revenue is down 80% in the past few days. He closes each day around noon. Foot traffic has plummeted and many people aren't braving the streets to pick up orders.

Female athletes contest new NCAA ruling, claiming violations of federal anti-discrimination law
Female athletes contest new NCAA ruling, claiming violations of federal anti-discrimination law

Fox News

time39 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Female athletes contest new NCAA ruling, claiming violations of federal anti-discrimination law

Eight women's college soccer, volleyball and track and field athletes have filed an appeal challenging the House v. NCAA antitrust settlement. U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken approved the settlement last week, clearing the way for direct payments from universities to athletes. The eight women argue female athletes won't receive their fair share of $2.7 billion in back pay for athletes barred from making money off their name, image and likeness (NIL). Kacie Breeding of Vanderbilt; Lexi Drumm, Emma Appleman, Emmie Wannemacher, Riley Haas, Savannah Baron and Elizabeth Arnold of the College of Charleston; and Kate Johnson of Virginia lead the appeal. They all previously filed objections to the proposed settlement. Ashlyn Hare, one of the attorneys representing the athletes, said in a statement the settlement violates Title IX, the federal law that bans sex-based discrimination in education. "We support a settlement of the case, but not an inaccurate one that violates federal law. The calculation of past damages is based on an error that ignores Title IX and deprives female athletes of $1.1 billion," Hare said. "Paying out the money as proposed would be a massive error that would cause irreparable harm to women's sports." The House settlement figures to financially benefit football and basketball stars at the biggest schools, who are likely to receive a big chunk of the $20.5 million per year that colleges are permitted to share with athletes over the next year. Some athletes in other sports that don't make money for their schools could lose their partial scholarships or see their roster spots cut. "This is a football and basketball damages settlement with no real benefit to female athletes," Hare said. "Congress has expressly rejected efforts to exempt revenue-generating sports like football and basketball from Title IX's antidiscrimination mandate. The NCAA agreed with us. Our argument on appeal is the exact same argument the conferences and NCAA made prior to settling the case." The appeal, filed by the law firm Hutchinson Black and Cook of Boulder, Colorado, was first reported by Front Office Sports. It will be heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store