Nebraska would rev up role in curbing undocumented workers under bill targeting employers
In this aerial view, Mexican immigration officials and police escort deportees after they were sent back into Mexico on Jan. 22, 2025, as seen from Nogales, Arizona. U.S. President Donald Trump signed executive orders on his first day in office declaring a state of emergency at the U.S. southern border, halting asylum claims and launching a campaign of mass deportations. (Photo by)
LINCOLN — Nebraska would step up its role against illegal immigration under a newly proposed state law requiring businesses with at least 25 workers to use an online system aimed at ferreting out undocumented workers.
State Sen. Kathleen Kauth of Omaha, under Legislative Bill 532, wants to create graduated state penalties, including suspension of a business license, for employers that don't partake in the E-Verify program to check an applicant's eligibility to work and that knowingly hire people unauthorized to work in the United States.
Furthermore, the measure calls upon the Nebraska Department of Labor to develop and carry out random audit inspections and expose violators using a public-facing database.
'We're saying that every business should be doing this,' Kauth, chair of the Legislature's Business and Labor Committee, said of the electronic verification. 'I want them to do the right thing.'
The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 makes it unlawful under federal law to knowingly employ undocumented workers. Arizona in 2008 became the first state to require E-Verify as a further deterrent, using revocation of a license to do business in the state as a hammer, and some states and cities have followed suit.
Kauth said her proposal was inspired by constituent concerns, but that her intent is not only to curb the undocumented workforce. She sees it as protection for vulnerable workers who may be taken advantage of by employers because of legal status.
Pillen orders Nebraska agencies to fall in line with Trump immigration crackdown
The proposal comes as Gov. Jim Pillen issued a directive to state government agencies and law enforcement officials to adhere to President Donald Trump's executive orders cracking down on illegal immigration and border security. Trump's executive orders have created fear and concern in many communities. His effort to roll back birthright citizenship already faces legal challenges.
Lawyers in Nebraska who work in immigration and labor law fields question the effectiveness of a state E-Verify push. Currently, mandatory E-Verify checks in Nebraska apply to a smaller group: public contractors and employers that receive tax incentives from the state.
The Internet-based system is set up to compare and match information provided by a job applicant with records available to the Social Security Administration and U.S. Department of Homeland Security, essentially verifying a person's status to work. It's a free and fast service, according to a federal government website promoting E-Verify.
But a major criticism of the electronic verification system is that workers using fraudulent or borrowed identities can and have evaded detection, said Amy Peck, who manages the immigration practice of Jackson Lewis law firm.
Of LB 532, Peck said: 'Will it solve the illegal immigration problem for employers? No. Does it make everyone feel good? Maybe.'
Daniel Martin DeLoa, a trial attorney at Omaha-based Pesek Law, sees the Kauth proposal as opening the door to potential selective enforcement and posing a barrier to doing business in Nebraska.
He views the legislative proposal more as a show of support for the priorities of the president.
'This is one of many examples we will see when the Nebraska Legislature expresses clear agreement and alignment with the policies and priorities of the new Trump administration,' Martin DeLoa said.
Under the Kauth proposal:
An employer must verify a new hire's work eligibility using E-Verify or a similarly recognized program by the federal government. If the state labor commissioner detects noncompliance, the business has a certain amount of time to contest. Penalties include probation of a business' operating license or, for repeat violations, suspension of the license.
Employers that knowingly employ an unauthorized immigrant worker face suspension of their business license. The license can be reinstated if the employer fires the worker in question or pays the cost of either the Labor Department's investigation or $1,000. Suspensions are longer with repeat violations.
A business that 'in good faith' uses E-Verify is presumed not to be in violation, subject to rebuttal by evidence. And an employer who fires a worker to comply with the statute won't be subject to a civil action for wrongful termination of the employee.
The state Labor Department, in administering a statewide random auditing program, gains the authority to enter a business at 'reasonable times' and question bosses and workers, examine and photograph relevant records.
Bryan Slone, chief executive of the Greater Omaha Chamber of Commerce, said that many businesses in Nebraska already use E-Verify.
While the chamber has not yet examined the bill, or taken a position, its leaders tend to take a practical point of view, he said.
One problem, Slone said, is that there is not a consistent approach to worker verification among all states and cities and, generally, a patchwork of regulations hampers business.
Some Nebraska businesses also have employees in multiple states, he noted.
'It means employers have to keep track of all these different provisions in different jurisdictions,' he said. 'It's always better to have uniform federal rules from a compliance standpoint.'
From a broader perspective, he said, businesses want a better federal immigration system that processes work visas faster and in ways that provide more legal workers to U.S. employers struggling with a shortage of applicants.
'This is nothing the State Legislature can fix,' he said, but it is a priority for an alliance of Nebraska organizations including the Nebraska Chamber.
Kauth said she recognizes that a legislative proposal is a work in progress, and she welcomes input from taxpayers and others during public hearings.
'We're going to find out what people think,' she said. 'Perhaps it's just the first step in, How do we make it better?'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
22 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump doesn't know if he's the hero or villain in 'Les Mis.' How ironic.
Trump doesn't know if he's the hero or villain in 'Les Mis.' How ironic. | Opinion Sending the military in to quell protests is more aligned with the French monarchy than the revolutionaries. Show Caption Hide Caption Trump met with boos, cheers before Les Misérables at Kennedy Center President Donald Trump attended "Les Miserables" at the Kennedy Center after overhauling its leadership and naming himself chairman. On June 11, President Donald Trump appeared at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts for the opening night of 'Les Misérables.' If you're at all familiar with the musical, you'll understand why that's so ironic. Trump staged a hostile takeover of the Kennedy Center back in February, changing up the board and making himself chairman of the iconic performing arts venue. It led several artists to cancel performances. According to The New York Times, some 'Les Misérables' cast members had considered boycotting the Wednesday performance that kicked off the summer 2025 season. The president, oblivious as always, says the show is 'great.' Ever the musical theater fan, he has used one of the most recognizable songs from 'Les Mis' at multiple rallies over the years. You know, the one the cast sings on the eve of revolting against the monarchy? Surely the man who has inspired nationwide 'No Kings Day' protests understands how laughable that is. Does Trump identify with hero or villain of 'Les Mis'? He doesn't know. If you're unfamiliar with the musical, let me give you a rundown. Based on the novel by Victor Hugo, the story follows Jean Valjean after he leaves prison for stealing a loaf of bread for his starving relatives. After an interaction with a priest, he is inspired to live a better life, which includes adopting and raising a child named Cosette after her mother dies. The musical is set during a French revolution that culminates in the 1832 June Rebellion, where a group of student revolutionaries known as the Friends of the ABC try to lead the city into revolt. These are the students Republican leaders would want to deport. Opinion: Trump supporters, this is what you're cheering as his deportation scheme unfolds Apparently, despite his love of the musical, Trump doesn't know if he's the hero or villain of this story. He told The Washington Post he wasn't sure if he identified more with Valjean or Javert, the prison guard turned inspector who is obsessed with bringing Valjean to justice. It's an ironically indecisive thing to say, considering he has sent military troops to Los Angeles to quell protests against raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and has spent much of the past few months raging against students protesting for Palestine. It's hard to picture Trump as the hero of this story. That would require him learning how to be a more caring person over time. Given his rhetoric on immigrants, trans people and basically anyone who disagrees with him, I doubt he's experienced that kind of transformation. Imagine treating immigrants like they stole bread Art has always been part of protest and resistance. The theater is no exception. These forms of expression can also be used as propaganda. With Trump's declaration that the Kennedy Center's "woke" programming is done for, it seems that only tolerable art will make it through the vetting process. Somehow, "Les Mis" slipped through the cracks, likely because Trump actually likes the musical. Opinion: I told you GOP would come for marriage. Southern Baptists just proved my point. If Trump actually paid attention to the songs and themes of "Les Mis," maybe he'd realize that his desire to lay down the law is more aligned with Javert than anyone else in the show. Maybe he'd realize that sending the military to quell protests is more aligned with the actions of the French monarchy than those of the revolutionaries. Maybe he'd realize that he has more in common with the monarchy than the people. Probably not. But maybe. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter, @sara__pequeno
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Editorial: Law must prevail over force — There's no invasion of LA except for federal troops
Despite what President Donald Trump and his border czar Tom Homan claim, the only invasion of Los Angeles is by the illegally mobilized National Guard and Marines, brought into the city against the will of California Gov. Gavin Newsom. The anti-ICE protests in L.A. were being contained and handled by local law enforcement, the robust LAPD and even larger Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. And today Newsom's lawsuit has a hearing in federal courts to end the military deployments even as the governor is facing idle threats of arrest from Homan and Trump himself. There is a thick stack of red lines that the administration has crossed just in the last few days. Troops in the streets? Check. Those troops conducting domestic law enforcement in clear violation of the law? Check; we are already seeing images of National Guard soldiers actively backing masked federal agents up as these round people up, reportedly soon joined by the Marines. In a speech, Newsom said: 'Authoritarian regimes begin by targeting people who are least able to defend themselves. But they do not stop there.' Trump openly admires foreign strongmen who put down dissent. Here he gets to try it out here at home. There is no emergency, other than the one that Trump has manufactured. But for a few spots here and there, 99% of L.A. is going about their daily live without incident. Trump is using apocalyptic language and deploying the troops not because he wants the situation to de-escalate but precisely because he wants very badly for there to be escalation, as that gives him additional latitude to crack down. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, long Trump's preeminent anti-immigrant zealot, has given the game away yet again with his descriptions of what's so wrong with L.A. that federal troops need to be brought in to fix it, moaning on Twitter that 'huge swaths of the city where I was born now resemble failed third world nations,' by which he really just means they're full of nonwhite people. This whole effort can best be understood as more akin to an occupation than an attempt to preserve order that the L.A. authorities are perfectly capable of maintaining themselves. Other cities, New York included, need to prepare given reports that ICE is surging special units to Seattle, Chicago, Philly, northern Virginia and New York as large protests are planned for this weekend against the ICE raids and Saturday's D.C. military parade on Trump's birthday. Knowing that there are nationwide protests planned against his procession, Trump has said that protesters will be met with 'very big force,' not bothering to distinguish between constitutionally protected speech and violence, because he neither understands nor cares about such distinctions. We hope that the courts will ignore the DOJ's mealy-mouthed defenses and act fast to state the obvious, which is that Trump is way overreaching his federal powers, and we hope that such rulings are expeditiously enforced, unlike the administration's track record so far of defying federal judges. For our service members who may be called upon to enact Trump's designs, we will remind you that your oath is not to the president, but to the Constitution. There are some lines that cannot be uncrossed. _____
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump Makes Outrageous Claim About Taylor Swift
President Donald Trump is catching major heat for his latest blunt take on Taylor Swift. 'Has anyone noticed that, since I said 'I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT,' she's no longer 'HOT?'' the President of the United States wrote via his Truth Social platform on Friday, May 16. Trump, 78, was referencing his September 2024 all-caps statement, during which he declared, "I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT!" While it was unclear at the time what prompted the president's bold remark against the 35-year-old pop star, she had previously spoken out against Trump multiple times. In November 2024, a little less than two months after Trump's initial Truth Social post, Swift endorsed Kamala Harris for president in the election. As for Trump's most recent post, fans immediately began hitting back at the controversial president. "Has anyone noticed that literally no one gives a fuck abt donald trump's opinion on taylor swift?" one person wrote via X, paraphrasing the beginning of Trump's own message. "Taylor's breaking records, you're breaking down. Stay pressed," another user commented. "why is this mf still hurting omg. teenage boy getting rejected by his crush behavior," a third person posted. "he has talked more about taylor than america itself atp talk about obsession," another fan claimed. Most recently, Trump cracked a joke about the 14-time Grammy winner during the Philadelphia Eagles visit to the White House last month, two months after they won the 2025 Super Bowl. "I watched in person. I was there along with Taylor Swift. How did that work out?" he quipped during the meeting. "How did that one work out?" Swift, who was booed at the event, was on hand to watch boyfriend Travis Kelce and his Kansas City Chiefs take on the Eagles. The Eagles won 40-22.