Oil climbs 2% to 2-week high on geopolitical tensions
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Oil prices climbed about 2% on Tuesday to a two-week high as persistent geopolitical tensions between Russia and Ukraine, and the U.S. and Iran looked set to keep sanctions on both OPEC members Russia and Iran in place for longer.
Brent crude futures rose $1, or 1.5%, to settle at $65.63 a barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude rose 89 cents, or 1.4%, to close at $63.41.
"Risk premium has ramped up this week as the prospect of a Russia/Ukraine ceasefire as well as an Iranian nuclear deal now appear to have been pushed back for weeks if not months," analysts at energy advisory firm Ritterbusch and Associates said in a note.
Russia said work on trying to reach a settlement to end the war in Ukraine was extraordinarily complex and that it would be wrong to expect any imminent decisions but that it was waiting for Ukrainian reaction to its proposals.
Russia is a member of the OPEC group that includes the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and allies, and was the world's second biggest producer of crude in 2024 behind only the U.S., according to U.S. energy data.
OPEC member Iran, meanwhile, was set to reject a U.S. nuclear deal proposal that would be key to easing sanctions on the major oil producer.
Iran was the third biggest producer of crude in OPEC behind Saudi Arabia and Iraq in 2024, according to U.S. energy data.
In Canada, wildfires burning in Alberta have affected more than 344,000 barrels per day of oil sands production, or about 7% of the country's overall crude output, according to Reuters calculations.
In Europe, Euro zone inflation eased below the European Central Bank's (ECB) target last month on surprisingly benign services costs, underpinning expectations for further policy easing even as global trade tensions fuel longer-term price pressures.
Central banks like the ECB use interest rates to keep inflation in check. Lower interest rates can spur economic growth and demand for oil by reducing consumer borrowing costs.
But, in the U.S., Chicago Federal Reserve President Austan Goolsbee said higher inflation from U.S. import tariffs could become evident quickly, but he said it would take longer to see a tariff-induced economic slowdown.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), however, revised down its forecast for global economic growth as the fallout from U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war takes a bigger toll on the U.S. economy.
U.S. job openings increased in April, but layoffs posted their biggest rise in nine months, suggesting that labor market conditions were softening amid a dimming economic outlook because of tariffs.
The U.S. has asked countries to make their best offers on trade negotiations by Wednesday as U.S. officials ramp up efforts to deliver multiple agreements to Trump before a self-imposed deadline just five weeks away.
WEEKLY US CRUDE DRAW SEEN
Analysts forecast energy firms pulled about 1.0 million barrels of crude from U.S. stockpiles last week, reducing inventories for a second week in a row.
That compares with an increase of 1.2 million barrels during the same week last year and an average decrease of 2.3 million barrels over the past five years (2020-2024).
The American Petroleum Institute (API) trade group and the Energy Information Administration (EIA) release weekly U.S. oil inventory data on Tuesdays and Wednesdays, respectively. [EIA/S] [API/S]
(Reporting by Scott DiSavino and Alex Lawler; Additional reporting by Michele Pek and Anjana Anil; Editing by Marguerita Choy and David Gregorio)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
6 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
A new paradigm in Russia-Ukraine war
On Sunday, Ukraine executed one of the most extraordinary asymmetric operations in modern military history. Using domestically built first-person-view (FPV) drones deployed from deep inside Russian territory, Kyiv launched a coordinated assault against several military airbases as far as eastern Siberia, the border with Mongolia, and the Arctic. Known as Operation Spiderweb, the attacks destroyed or severely damaged as many as 20 strategic aircraft, including nuclear-capable bombers and early-warning planes; Kyiv claims the true toll could reach 41. Only two days later, on Tuesday, the Ukrainian Security Service (SBU) struck again – this time detonating underwater explosives and damaging the Kerch Bridge, the critical rail and road artery connecting Russia to occupied Crimea. The combined message from Kyiv could not have been clearer: We may be far smaller and — on paper at least — weaker, but we can strike hard and reach far into Russia. Using drones produced indigenously for less than the cost of an iPhone, Ukraine took out strategic bombers worth upward of $100 million each — many of which are nearly impossible to replace due to sanctions and Russia's degraded industrial base. At a 300,000-to-one return on investment, this is the kind of asymmetric operation that can upend the rules of modern warfare. Just as significant as the material damage is what the attacks revealed: That a small but determined and innovative nation can deploy cheap, scalable, and decentralised tech to challenge a much larger, conventionally superior foe – and even degrade elements of a nuclear superpower's second-strike capacity. The lessons will reverberate globally, from Taipei to Islamabad. Perhaps the biggest impact of Ukraine's battlefield coup may be to challenge the core strategic presumption that has guided Vladimir Putin's thinking for over three years — that time is on his side. Since the invasion began, Putin has bet on outlasting Ukraine — grinding down its defences, draining Western support, and waiting for the political winds in Washington and Europe to shift. That assumption has underpinned his refusal to negotiate seriously. But the success of Ukraine's drone and sabotage operations challenges that theory of victory. It shows that Ukraine is not simply holding the line or surviving a war of attrition; it is shifting the battlefield and expanding the costs of continued war for Russia in ways the Kremlin has not anticipated. That shift matters, especially in the diplomatic context. The timing of the drone campaign — just 24 hours before a direct round of talks between Russian and Ukrainian officials in Istanbul — was hardly coincidental. Kyiv's actions were designed to signal that Ukraine is not negotiating from a position of weakness and won't be coerced into a bad deal. Though the Istanbul meeting itself was predictably fruitless — lasting just over an hour and reinforcing the irreconcilability of the two sides' positions— the fact that the Kremlin showed up fresh off such a high-profile embarrassment suggests it may be starting to realise that Ukraine has cards to play and continuing the war carries risks for Russia. This may not be enough to bring Russia to the negotiating table in good faith, but it could make it more open to limited agreements. To be sure, a permanent peace settlement remains as distant as ever. Kyiv continues to push for an unconditional ceasefire that Russia rejects out of hand. In Istanbul, Moscow proposed two equally unacceptable alternatives: Either Kyiv retreats from Russian-claimed territories or accepts limits on its ability to rearm, including a halt to Western military aid. But the right kind of pressure from the US, coordinated with European allies, could now stand a better chance of extracting a first-phase deal — whether that's a 30-day ceasefire, a humanitarian corridor, or a prisoner swap — that could then potentially turn into something bigger and more durable. At the same time, Ukraine's gains increase the tail risks of dangerous escalation. Russia's deterrent posture has been eroded. Putin's red lines – on Nato enlargement, Western weapons use, attacks inside Russia – have been crossed repeatedly without serious consequence. That makes him look weak but also increases the risk that he will feel compelled to escalate the conflict more dramatically to restore his credibility at home and abroad. Russia's immediate response to the recent attacks will be more of the same: heavier indiscriminate bombing of Ukrainian cities and infrastructure. But a darker possibility is that, boxed in and humiliated, Putin might consider a tactical nuclear strike. The threshold for such an extreme step is high — not least because China, Russia's most important global partner, strongly opposes nuclear use. That scenario remains unlikely, but less so than before June 1. And Putin is emboldened by the belief that the West — particularly Donald Trump's US — fears direct military confrontation more than anything. If he assesses that Russia's position in the war is becoming untenable or its conventional deterrence is crumbling, his calculus could change. Ukraine has just reminded the Kremlin — and the world — that it can shape events, not just react to them. This doesn't put it on a path to victory or bring the war to an end. But by showing that it has leverage and that Moscow has more to lose than it thought, Ukraine has altered the strategic equation and opened a narrow window for diplomacy — even if the endgame remains as elusive as ever. The alternative is a deeper and more unpredictable conflict that grows more dangerous the longer it drags on. Ian Bremmer is the founder and board president of Eurasia Group Foundation. The views expressed.
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
Apple gives Tata India iPhone repair business as partnership expands, sources say
Apple has brought in Tata Group to handle repairs for iPhones and MacBook devices in its fast-growing Indian market, signalling the Indian conglomerate's deepening role in the U.S. tech giant's supply chain, two people familiar with the matter said. As Apple looks beyond China for manufacturing, Tata has fast emerged as its key supplier and already assembles iPhones for local and foreign markets at three facilities in south India, with one of them also making some iPhone components. In its latest partnership expansion, Tata is taking over the mandate from an Indian unit of Taiwan's Wistron, ICT Service Management Solutions, and will carry out such after-sales repairs from its Karnataka iPhone assembly campus, both sources said. The market for repairs is only going to boom in India, the world's second-biggest smartphone market, as iPhone sales skyrocket. Counterpoint Research estimates around 11 million iPhones were sold in India last year, giving Apple a 7 per cent market share, compared to just 1 per cent in 2020. The latest contract award signals Apple's growing confidence on Tata as it hopes to win more business from the world's most valuable smartphone company. "Tata's deepening partnership with Apple could also pave the groundwork for Apple directly selling refurbished devices in India, like how it does in the United States currently," said Prabhu Ram, a vice president at Cybermedia Research. The takeover from ICT by Tata is currently ongoing, both sources said, who declined to be named as they were not authorized to speak on the matter. Apple and Wistron did not respond to requests for comment, while a spokesperson for Tata declined to comment. While Apple's official service centres across India can do basic repairs, they would now ship phones and laptops to Tata's facility for more complex issues. Wistron's ICT however will continue to service other clients excluding Apple, one of the sources said. Amid an impending threat of U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs on China, India is also emerging as a favoured destination for iPhone exports. Apple CEO Tim Cook has said the bulk of iPhones sold in the United States during June quarter will be made at factories in India.
India.com
20 minutes ago
- India.com
Donald Trump Holds Talk With Xi Jinping Amid US-China Trade Tensions
United States President Donald Trump and his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, had a conversation over the phone on Thursday, according to Xinhua. Xinhua also reported that the talks over the phone between the Presidents of the US and China were held at Trump's request. The details of the conversation have not been revealed yet. This conversation comes a day after the US President, in a post on his Truth Social handle, said that although he likes Xi Jinping but the Chinese leader is "very tough" to make a deal with. "I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!" he wrote. US-China Trade Tensions The talks between the two leaders also come amid the trade tensions between their countries.
