logo
UK sailor missing after yacht found 'eviscerated'

UK sailor missing after yacht found 'eviscerated'

Yahoo27-01-2025

A British sailor is lost at sea after his yacht was found "eviscerated" off the south-western French coast in stormy weather, maritime officials have said.
The 73-year-old set off his distress beacon on Saturday after getting into difficulty approximately 80km (50 miles) west of Lacanau, the Préfecture maritime de l'Atlantique said in a statement.
A French air force helicopter was dispatched to find the man, but found his 12-metre yacht, the Tiger PA, "eviscerated" in the Bay of Biscay.
Two divers were then winched down to the wreckage, where they discovered an empty raft, officials added.
A Portuguese cargo ship and a Spanish hospital vessel were both diverted to the area and to help with the search, alongside the French navy.
After several hours of searching, it was called off in the early hours of Sunday morning "due to a lack of information".
In the statement the the Préfecture maritime de l'Atlantique reminded people to be careful in the waters during the stormy weather.
It comes after Storm Herminia, named by the Spanish weather service Agencia Estatal de Meteorología (Aemet) on Friday, brought heavy rains and wind battered the north of Spain and western France.
Gusts of wind exceeded 62mph and floodwaters caused by the storm also left cars and buildings submerged in western France.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The man whose D-Day weather forecast saved the world
The man whose D-Day weather forecast saved the world

Boston Globe

time2 days ago

  • Boston Globe

The man whose D-Day weather forecast saved the world

On June 6, 1944, Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower ordered more than 150,000 Allied troops to storm the beaches of Normandy in one of the largest seaborne invasions in history. But hours before, Eisenhower's eyes were fixed not on the battlefield, but on the skies. More precisely, on the weather report laid out before him. And the meteorologist who had created it, described by his son as 'a dour irascible Scot,' had to get it right. 'The weather forecast was a go or no-go,' said Catherine Ross, a library and archive manager at the Met Office, the weather service for the United Kingdom. 'Everything else was ready.' Advertisement Success demanded a very specific set of conditions: ▪ Before the landings, the weather needed to be calm for 48 hours. ▪ For the three days following, the wind needed to stay below Beaufort Force 4, equivalent to a moderate breeze. ▪ Parachutists and other air support needed less than 30 percent cloud cover below 8,000 feet, with a cloud base no lower than 2,500 feet and visibility of over 3 miles. Advertisement ▪ A low tide at dawn was needed to expose German defenses. ▪ The invasion had to occur one day before or four days after a full moon for nighttime operations. ▪ Furthermore, the invasion had to align with the Soviet summer offensive in the East, to maximize pressure on German forces. The Allies identified a window: between June 5 and June 7. The odds were daunting. According to Ross, the likelihood of all the desired weather conditions aligning was 13-to-1— and roughly triple that once the full moon was added to the equation. Making matters worse, the beginning of June brought a spell of highly unsettled weather. 'There was a succession of low pressures and fronts coming across the Channel, and the challenge was trying to find a gap,' she said. 'Not just to allow them to invade, but to be able to get enough backup troops and supplies across.' The fifth 'was the ideal day,' Eisenhower recalled in an interview 20 years later. But the date was subject to last-minute revision in the event of bad weather. The man tasked with delivering that all-important forecast was Stagg, the chief meteorological adviser to Eisenhower from the British Meteorological Office. He was responsible for producing a unified forecast based on input from three independent groups, two British and one American. With today's advanced forecasting, and the help of supercomputers, satellites, and a range of sophisticated models, meteorologists can produce fairly accurate predictions several days in advance. But there was no unified approach to forecasting in 1944. The American team, part of the newly formed US Strategic Air Forces based near Eisenhower's headquarters in southwest London, employed analog forecasting, a method that compared current conditions to historical weather patterns. The British teams relied on hand-drawn charts, observational data and, newer understandings of upper-atmosphere patterns. These approaches often clashed. Advertisement 'At the time, it was very much an evolving science that evolved in different ways in different countries,' said Dan Suri, a meteorologist at the Met Office. Suri said that some of these methods remain in use today, albeit digitally. 'Aspects of what they did still feature, and the D-Day forecasters would recognize aspects of what they did in what we do today,' he said. James Stagg's job was not just scientific, but diplomatic — a delicate act of balancing contrasting forecasts from the American and British teams, and shaping them into a coherent narrative with a single decisive recommendation for Eisenhower. 'That wasn't always entirely possible,' Suri said. 'He had quite a difficult job, really.' Ahead of the invasion, tensions rose between the forecasting teams. Transcripts from the daily telephone discussions among Stagg, the general, and the three forecasting teams revealed a strong difference of opinions among the groups. The American meteorologists believed that June 5 or 6 would offer suitable weather. The British, however, opposed June 5. 'He had to make the decision of which side he was going to go with,' Ross said, 'and take that to Eisenhower.' According to professor Julian Hunt in his book 'D-Day: The Role of the Met Office,' a high-pressure system over the Atlantic Ocean and a strong storm near northern Scotland were expected to cause rough seas and excessive cloud cover in the English Channel on June 5. James Stagg delivered his decision: Gales would sweep through Normandy, making landings impossible. 'He gave us the worst report you ever saw,' Eisenhower later recalled. Convoys that had already set off were ordered to turn back. Advertisement But by June 4, forecasts indicated that the storm system would shift northeast, giving way to a brief period of calmer conditions June 6. Still, Stagg was uncertain. His diary reveals his doubt: 'I am now getting rather stunned— it is all a nightmare.' Ross said the decision to go ahead was a compromise. 'It was a question of, will the sixth be good enough? And the call was, yes, it will be good enough. But it was a challenge.' Eventually, the American and British meteorologists moved toward consensus for June 6. On the evening of June 4, Stagg returned with the more optimistic forecast. Eisenhower later described a 'little grin on his face.' 'We hoped that with this break, we could do it,' Eisenhower later said. After a brief moment of contemplation—'about 45 seconds,' he recalled— he gave the order that would change the course of history: 'OK, we'll go.' The invasion went ahead June 6, 1944, but the forecast turned out to be off the mark. Suri said that, instead of moving northeast, the storm over northern Scotland shifted southward into the North Sea, weakening as it did. This unexpected change allowed winds to ease slightly, and visibility improved as the front over northern France moved away. 'That's why things got better,' Suri said. 'So they were right for the wrong reasons.' But conditions were windy, and the seas remained rough. Many of the first troops to cross the English Channel had 'considerable seasickness,' The Associated Press wrote, and the strong winds whipped up whitecaps, making the journey to the beaches even more punishing. Advertisement The marginal weather may have given the Allies a vital edge. In the aftermath of the invasion, as the weight of its success came into focus, the full significance of the meteorological gamble became clear. In a memorandum accompanying an official report to Eisenhower, Stagg reflected on just how close they had come to disaster. Had the invasion been postponed to the next suitable tides, the troops would have faced the Channel's worst storm in 20 years. 'Thanks,' Eisenhower wrote in response. 'And thank the Gods of war we went when we did.' This article originally appeared in

The Fascinating Way Hurricanes Will Get Their Names in 2025
The Fascinating Way Hurricanes Will Get Their Names in 2025

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

The Fascinating Way Hurricanes Will Get Their Names in 2025

As hurricane season ramps up, we are always wondering how the names for hurricanes and tropical storms are picked. In the U.S., the Atlantic hurricane season is typically June through November. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is predicting an "above-normal" tropical storm season for 2025, with an estimated 13 to 19 storms that will reach winds high enough to be named. That means we'll be hearing these names on news reports in the coming months. A storm gets a name once it reaches tropical storm status (that is, it has a rotating circulation pattern and sustained winds of 39 miles per hour). The list is compiled by the United Nations' World Meteorological Organization. The list of 21 Atlantic hurricane names is alphabetical, and letters Q, U, X, Y, and Z are never used. Before 1978, names were exclusively female, but they have since alternated between male and female names. The WMO chooses names that are short and distinctive to help convey information with clarity, and they select a mix of English, French, and Spanish names. The names are planned out through 2028, but the lists actually repeat every six years. The names of the 2025 storms will be used once again in 2031. The only time the rotating lists of names changes is if a name is retired. Andrea Barry Chantal Dexter Erin Fernand Gabrielle Humberto Imelda Jerry Karen Lorenzo Melissa Nestor Olga Pablo Rebekah Sabastien Tanya Van Wendy Yes, according to the NOAA, a hurricane name will be retired if a storm is "so deadly or costly that the future use of its name for a different storm would be inappropriate for reasons of sensitivity." If that happens, the WMO will choose another name to take its place. Since 1954, a total of 99 hurricane names have been retired and replaced, including Andrew, Katrina, Sandy, Irma, Ivan, and Hugo. Prior to 2021, if the list of 21 named storms was exhausted in a given year, the remaining storms would be named according to the Greek alphabet (Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, etc.). The WMO changed that procedure after the active 2020 season, when all 22 names and the first 9 letters of the Greek alphabet were used. The committee made the change "because it creates a distraction from the communication of hazard and storm warnings and is potentially confusing." Instead, a list of alternative names was compiled, and the WMO will choose names from that list if the need arises. You Might Also Like 70 Impressive Tiny Houses That Maximize Function and Style 30+ Paint Colors That Will Instantly Transform Your Kitchen

Thunderstorms to bring more rain this weekend than all of May
Thunderstorms to bring more rain this weekend than all of May

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Thunderstorms to bring more rain this weekend than all of May

Thunderstorms will bring more rainfall in six hours this weekend than England and Wales saw in the whole of May. The Met Office has warned that 'all areas' of Britain face torrential rain and thunder this weekend. Heavy showers would be accompanied by lightning and hail in some places, the forecaster added. Tom Morgan, a Met Office meteorologist, said 50mm of rain could fall within the space of six hours on Saturday. He said: 'That is more than what we have seen in the whole of the month of May. 'There will be some heavy downpours with thunder, lightning and hail. 'Most places are at risk of thunderstorms.' On average, England saw 33mm of rainfall in the whole of May. This was roughly half as much as usual, the forecaster said. Wales had 51mm of rainfall. Mr Morgan warned people to keep abreast of the forecasts as the weather was looking 'pretty changeable'. He said: 'There are a lot of outside events taking place this weekend. There is the potential for some disruption. 'We could see some flooding and surface water on the roads. Strong winds will mean temporary structures such as marquees could be vulnerable. 'It is welcome rain, really, for a lot of people, particularly farmers and gardeners.' On Friday night, a new weather front will bring rain and thunder for the weekend, but temperatures are set to rise next week to just above average for the time of year. Andrea Bishop, the Met Office spokesperson, said: 'The weather will be changeable for the rest of this week, with everyone likely to see some showers at some point. 'Generally, the theme is the continuation of something a bit cooler, a bit breezy at times, and a bit wet at times too. 'We are keeping an eye on a new front which looks like it will move in on Friday night, bringing rain which could be heavy, and possibly thundery at times on Saturday. 'Rainfall totals of 20-30mm are likely in places and at present, this looks like it will affect the southern half of the UK. We are keeping a close eye on this to see how it evolves over the next 24 hours or so.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store