Huge change coming to Aussie car market in 2025
Don't miss out on the headlines from On the Road. Followed categories will be added to My News.
Australia's car market is undergoing one of its biggest shake-ups in decades, with some experts calling it the most dramatic shift in automotive history.
From surging Chinese car brands and a cooling electric vehicle market to aggressive discounting and oversupply, the car industry is in for a bumpy ride.
Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries data shows 1,237,287 new cars were delivered in 2024, a 1.7 per cent increase on the previous year.
But that growth is not expected to continue.
Cox Automotive Australia corporate affairs manager and analyst Mike Costello said flagging sales should improve in the second half of the year.
'Rate cuts from the RBA will help turn this around in H2, as will an uplift in government fleet post Federal Election,' Mr Costello said.
While the first half of 2024 was strong, the closing months revealed a slowdown as manufacturers cleared Covid-era backlogs and Australian buyers felt the economic pressure, from inflation and rising interest rates.
Now, in the lead-up to June 30, brands are rolling out aggressive discounts and generous drive-away deals.
The discounting we're seeing isn't just due to softening demand but is being driven by improved vehicle supply, global overproduction and intensifying competition.
The Hyundai Santa Fe is a smart pick for a family-oriented SUV thanks to its three rows of seating and ample room for people and cargo. Picture: Hyundai Motor America via AP
During the Covid-19 pandemic, stock shortages meant car dealers could sell vehicles with little or no negotiation but those days are defiantly over.
Mr Costello said the industry is at a real 'turning point'.
'We've moved from a seller's market in Covid to a buyer's market now – more in line with historical norm, there's been an improvement in vehicle supply, which has led to the return of incentives and discounting,' he said.
Global factories are also playing a role with Chinese automakers facing oversupply in their home market and tightening trade restrictions in Europe and the Unites States.
BYD has built it's own carrier vessels to transport EVs globally. Picture: AFP
Australia has become a viable market for Chinese car manufacturers which has lead to aggressive local pricing, especially from brands such as BYD, Chery and GWM.
Carsales.com.au data services Director Ross Booth said much of the automotive growth is coming from electric and electrified vehicles.
'We're seeing a clear shift towards more fuel-efficient vehicles, with strong growth in New Energy Vehicles – which include hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and battery electric vehicles,' Mr Booth said.
Hybrid and electric vehicle sales made up just 8 per cent of new cars in 2021, jumping to 25 per cent by the end of 2025.
'Looking ahead, we're predicting NEVs to account for up to 35 per cent of the new vehicle market by the end of 2025, driven largely by increased demand for hybrids and PHEVs,' Mr Booth said.
Conventional hybrids like the Toyota RAV4 seem to be a sweet spot for buyers. Picture: AFP
Conventional hybrids seem to be the sweet spot for buyers not ready to take the full EV jump.
In 2024, more than 172,000 hybrid vehicles were sold in Australia, a 76 per cent year-on-year increase, according to Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI) data.
EV uptake is slowing down despite new models reaching showrooms each month.
The biggest shake-up for the industry comes from China.
New brands such as BYD, Xpeng, Zeekr and Chery appeal to cost-conscious buyers.
BYD sales are up 103 per cent this year, Chery is up 234 per cent and GWM is up 14 per cent.
Despite the growth, Mr Costello said some buyers still have reservations.
'It's clear that while a subset of buyers still have reservations, perhaps in part because of their broader opinions on the Chinese State, an ever-growing cohort are opting for more affordable Chinese cars, swayed by their long warranties, cutting-edge tech, and modern designs,' Mr Costello said.
'People are also learning that these vehicles are often no less reliable or capable than other products.'
Originally published as Huge change coming to Aussie car market in 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
6 hours ago
- The Age
‘China has Apple by the balls': How the rising superpower captured the tech giant
This story is part of the June 14 edition of Good Weekend. See all 14 stories. Investigative journalist Patrick McGee describes it as the biggest untold story of technology in the 21st century: how, over decades of jaw-dropping investment in China, Apple became one of the world's biggest companies – but in the process helped China become a technology and manufacturing superpower. That power is now being used to challenge the West. You've said that Apple wouldn't be Apple today without China. And China wouldn't be China without Apple. How so? By 2015, Apple was investing $55 billion a year into China, and a lot of that was in training people to assemble iPhones, iMacs and other Apple products – by [Apple CEO] Tim Cook's public estimate, 3 million people were trained. Apple sent planeloads of its best engineers – from MIT, Caltech and Stanford – to train the Chinese on how to produce their products. Overall, it has trained 28 million people in its supply chain since 2008. That's bigger than the labour force of California or the population of Australia. It has had more impact on China than the Marshall Plan on Europe after World War II. In 1999, none of Apple's products was made in mainland China; by 2009, virtually all were, and company profits shot into the stratosphere as a result. Apple was on the brink of bankruptcy in 1996 but within a decade became the richest company on Earth, thanks to sales of its iPhone and iPad. What did China offer that no other country could? China has policies and a population base tailor-made for the electronics industry. They created bonded zones [places offering generous tax breaks and streamlined customs procedures to attract foreign investment] in cities like Shenzhen. Back in the 1980s, Shenzhen was a series of fishing villages. Today, it's a city of 18 million people. We in the West don't understand how easy it is to build a factory in an area like Shenzhen. The government provides you with the labour from the western part of the country, where literally millions are leaving backbreaking agricultural jobs to work 12-hour shifts in factories. Businesses get free land and cutting-edge machinery. Local cadres in the political system are incentivised to build factories and get growth from their region. The bureaucracy is shaped to be more like a venture capitalist. China has invented a new form of capitalism, where instead of having dynamism in the private sector, it's on the public side. 'Apple provided China with the Ivy League equivalent of a hardware engineering education.' You write that Apple essentially cracked the code on how to manufacture the world's best products without doing it itself. In the early 2000s, Apple was figuring out how to manufacture their products in China without owning any of the factories. It was about orchestrating the production of the products rather than building them themselves. But the orchestration they've done is just phenomenally obsessive. This isn't normal outsourcing. They're not just saying, 'Here's a blueprint of what we need; let us know when it's ready.' They're inventing the processes, the components. So by bringing all its technological expertise and sophisticated production methods to China, Apple taught the Chinese how to develop high-level manufacturing … Indeed. Jony Ive [instrumental in the design of the iPhone, iPad, iMac and Apple Watch] came up with some spectacular-looking products. But the only way those designs came into large-scale reality was that China was investing massively in supply chains, in infrastructure and in ports. And as one engineer told me, Apple provided China with the Ivy League equivalent of a hardware engineering education. Because Apple is epic, the technology transfer is also epic. Loading US Vice President J.D. Vance has very patronisingly reduced the Chinese competitive advantage to its having 'millions of peasants' available to work in factories. But its economy has moved far beyond just low-cost labour producing cheaper products, hasn't it? Yes and no. China has robotics and automation on a scale we [the United States] completely lack. But hundreds of millions of people still live in impoverishment, and go to cities like Shenzhen and Guangzhou to work in factories. China has the capacity to move an entire Western city's worth of people, say, up to 500,000, who are willing to relocate for a few months at a time to assemble iPhones and then go someplace else. We have nothing like that. Even if it could, we in the West wouldn't want that to change, because that's not what anybody really wants to do with their life.
Sydney Morning Herald
6 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘China has Apple by the balls': How the rising superpower captured the tech giant
This story is part of the June 14 edition of Good Weekend. See all 14 stories. Investigative journalist Patrick McGee describes it as the biggest untold story of technology in the 21st century: how, over decades of jaw-dropping investment in China, Apple became one of the world's biggest companies – but in the process helped China become a technology and manufacturing superpower. That power is now being used to challenge the West. You've said that Apple wouldn't be Apple today without China. And China wouldn't be China without Apple. How so? By 2015, Apple was investing $55 billion a year into China, and a lot of that was in training people to assemble iPhones, iMacs and other Apple products – by [Apple CEO] Tim Cook's public estimate, 3 million people were trained. Apple sent planeloads of its best engineers – from MIT, Caltech and Stanford – to train the Chinese on how to produce their products. Overall, it has trained 28 million people in its supply chain since 2008. That's bigger than the labour force of California or the population of Australia. It has had more impact on China than the Marshall Plan on Europe after World War II. In 1999, none of Apple's products was made in mainland China; by 2009, virtually all were, and company profits shot into the stratosphere as a result. Apple was on the brink of bankruptcy in 1996 but within a decade became the richest company on Earth, thanks to sales of its iPhone and iPad. What did China offer that no other country could? China has policies and a population base tailor-made for the electronics industry. They created bonded zones [places offering generous tax breaks and streamlined customs procedures to attract foreign investment] in cities like Shenzhen. Back in the 1980s, Shenzhen was a series of fishing villages. Today, it's a city of 18 million people. We in the West don't understand how easy it is to build a factory in an area like Shenzhen. The government provides you with the labour from the western part of the country, where literally millions are leaving backbreaking agricultural jobs to work 12-hour shifts in factories. Businesses get free land and cutting-edge machinery. Local cadres in the political system are incentivised to build factories and get growth from their region. The bureaucracy is shaped to be more like a venture capitalist. China has invented a new form of capitalism, where instead of having dynamism in the private sector, it's on the public side. 'Apple provided China with the Ivy League equivalent of a hardware engineering education.' You write that Apple essentially cracked the code on how to manufacture the world's best products without doing it itself. In the early 2000s, Apple was figuring out how to manufacture their products in China without owning any of the factories. It was about orchestrating the production of the products rather than building them themselves. But the orchestration they've done is just phenomenally obsessive. This isn't normal outsourcing. They're not just saying, 'Here's a blueprint of what we need; let us know when it's ready.' They're inventing the processes, the components. So by bringing all its technological expertise and sophisticated production methods to China, Apple taught the Chinese how to develop high-level manufacturing … Indeed. Jony Ive [instrumental in the design of the iPhone, iPad, iMac and Apple Watch] came up with some spectacular-looking products. But the only way those designs came into large-scale reality was that China was investing massively in supply chains, in infrastructure and in ports. And as one engineer told me, Apple provided China with the Ivy League equivalent of a hardware engineering education. Because Apple is epic, the technology transfer is also epic. Loading US Vice President J.D. Vance has very patronisingly reduced the Chinese competitive advantage to its having 'millions of peasants' available to work in factories. But its economy has moved far beyond just low-cost labour producing cheaper products, hasn't it? Yes and no. China has robotics and automation on a scale we [the United States] completely lack. But hundreds of millions of people still live in impoverishment, and go to cities like Shenzhen and Guangzhou to work in factories. China has the capacity to move an entire Western city's worth of people, say, up to 500,000, who are willing to relocate for a few months at a time to assemble iPhones and then go someplace else. We have nothing like that. Even if it could, we in the West wouldn't want that to change, because that's not what anybody really wants to do with their life.
Sydney Morning Herald
18 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Crown started as a high rollers' casino and should not become an RSL
After the federal government streamlined visas for Chinese citizens to gamble in Australian casinos, NSW governments were happy to allow casino group Crown Resorts to prey on high rollers from the Mainland so long as they stayed away from the locals. The Herald cautiously supported an invitation-only casino with no poker machines and no access for the general public on the eve of the original Packer-Crown casino being approved in 2013. We considered the high rollers option the best chance to capitalise on gambling tourism without changing the vibe of the city or exploiting Sydneysiders. But the Chinese vanished and in a breach of faith, Crown has gambled irresponsibly on going after our most vulnerable players. In an exclusive story, the Herald's Harriet Alexander this week revealed Crown Resorts executives are lobbying Minns government MPs, the opposition and crossbenchers to support a company proposal to install 500 cashless poker machines at Barangaroo. This time Crown is preying on other NSW gambling venues, hoping to remove 500 cash poker machines and installing a similar number of cashless poker machines under the specious claim of proving the new technology works. There may be an argument that relocating in a highly regulated casino could be a better outcome. But the issue facing NSW is to reduce poker machine numbers, not move them around between venues. Loading Crown's sleight of hand on poker machines treats the people of NSW with contempt and ignores the important principle at stake: the casino was licensed on a promise of no poker machines. Now, behind closed doors Crown has chosen to break that promise. Premier Chris Minns on Friday ruled out changing legislation to permit Crown Resorts to offer poker machines at Barangaroo. Importantly, he did not say how Labor would vote should a crossbencher introduce such a bill. But the revelations emerged the same day as a damning audit of gambling regulations in NSW by the auditor-general found that it would take 55 years for NSW to reduce its poker machine numbers to the national average at the current rate, and that the government had no targets to reduce gambling harm. NSW had 87,749 poker machines operating across 2000 venues in 2023-24, and they generated a profit of $8.4 billion, which the auditor-general took as the best measure of loss to patrons. They accounted for half the machines operating in Australia.
