logo
Editorial: Vaccines save lives; politics kill — Bobby Kennedy's nutty ideas put Americans at risk

Editorial: Vaccines save lives; politics kill — Bobby Kennedy's nutty ideas put Americans at risk

Yahoo19-03-2025

Vaccines are a modern miracle, saving an estimated 154 million lives in the last half-century. Vaccine skepticism is a fast-spreading virus against which America's inoculation is flagging.
So count it as a very small victory that President Donald Trump and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s choice to lead the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a vax skeptic named Dave Weldon, couldn't get through a U.S. Senate where even a couple of Republicans can see basic scientific truth.
Weldon, a former congressman and former practicing physician, has shamefully promoted the utterly discredited but still deeply corrosive claim that vaccines cause autism.
We don't know what causes the set of conditions on that spectrum, which now affect some 1 in 36 children according to the best stats we have, provided by the same CDC. There are thousands of smart people doing research to try to crack the mystery all the time in labs and through carefully constructed, ethically sound clinical trials, hungry to find evidence that's significant and replicable.
The hypothesis that vaccines cause autism never held up to scrutiny — but it's the one that seems to best fit the conspiracy-theory-infected worldview of the likes of Weldon and Kennedy and Trump, so it lives and lives and lives.
It has casualties, and growing ones. As more and more families reject shots for their kids, diseases we had permanently purged from America find their way back inside our bodies. (Talk about a foreign invasion.)
Measles, once eradicated, is again spreading in New Mexico and West Texas and even in our own area, where vaccine skepticism has long had a foothold in some parts of the ultra-orthodox Jewish community. In nearby Rockland County, a 2018-19 outbreak led to more than 300 verified cases, numbers that could pale in comparison to what might happen now that anti-vax people are at or clutching for the levers of power in Washington.
Today in Rockland, just 62% of children countywide have had a measles shot by the age of 2. In Monsey, where there's a large ultra-Orthodox community, the numbers are as low as 41%. Medical history's many Jewish vaccine pioneers would shudder.
This is not to say that every vaccine makes sense at all times for all people. They're medicine, like anything. People should consult their doctors and get the shots that work for them. Off the top of our head we can rattle off the flu shot and the COVID shot. There's the shingles and RSV vaccines. And the tetanus and hepatitis A shots. Listen to your doctor, not kooks like Bobby Kennedy and Dave Weldon.
Medical professionals need to make wise recommendations to their patients, who should listen with open minds. Those recommendations are rooted in research that often gets funded if not conducted by, then synthesized by, good people in the federal government, chiefly the CDC.
It all breaks down if the Senate assents to letting an ideological, evidence-denying vaccine skeptic like Weldon take charge of the apparatus.
Good for Sens. Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski and Bill Cassidy (a medical doctor himself) for bucking their party and siding with Democrats against Weldon, Kennedy and Trump. It's a small step but a real one.
___

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

State lawmakers should reconsider plans to end highly successful health program
State lawmakers should reconsider plans to end highly successful health program

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

State lawmakers should reconsider plans to end highly successful health program

Patients have their blood pressure checked and other vitals taken at a mobile dental and medical clinic. (Photo by) One of the most encouraging public health initiatives to come along in several years is a state Department of Health and Human Services pilot program launched in 2022 called 'Healthy Opportunities.' The program is based on the simple premise that providing for food, transportation, housing, and other non-medical health-related needs of people enrolled in Medicaid would improve their physical health. And you know what? It did. Program participants were healthier and ended up in hospital emergency rooms less. Indeed, when researchers compared health care costs in the 12 months before and the 12 months after enrollment in Healthy Opportunities, they found cost savings of 85 dollars per person per month. Talk about improving health care system efficiency. Unfortunately, neither of the recent budget bills passed by the state House and Senate would keep the program up and running and that's a big mistake. The bottom line: Healthy Opportunities is the kind of commonsense program the state needs more of, not less. Lawmakers should find the money to keep and expand it. For NC Newsline, I'm Rob Schofield.

Why has there been a global surge of new Covid variant NB.1.8.1?
Why has there been a global surge of new Covid variant NB.1.8.1?

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why has there been a global surge of new Covid variant NB.1.8.1?

India is the latest country to report a surge in new Covid cases, as the latest variant NB.1.8.1 spreads across the globe. Cases have now been reported in Asian countries such as Thailand, Indonesia and China, while the UKHSA recorded the first 13 cases in England last week. However, the true numbers are unlikely to be known, given the significant decrease in the number of people testing compared to the figures seen during the global pandemic five years ago. NB.1.8.1 stemmed from the Omicron variant and was first detected in January this year. It has quickly spread across China and Hong Kong, and has now been recorded in several states across the United States and Australia. By late April, NB.1.8.1 comprised about 10.7 per cent of submitted sequences globally, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). This rose from just 2.5 per cent one month before. The WHO declared the NB.1.8.1 strain a 'variant under monitoring' on 23 May, which means scientists believe it could potentially affect the behaviour of the virus. Lara Herrero, a virologist from Griffith University in Australia, suspects that NB.1.8.1 spreads more easily than other variants. 'Using lab-based models, researchers found NB.1.8.1 had the strongest binding affinity to the human ACE2 receptor of several variants tested, suggesting it may infect cells more efficiently than earlier strains,' Dr Herrero wrote last month in The Conversation. Dr Chun Tang, GP at Pall Mall Medical, added: 'NB.1.8.1 isn't too different from the Omicron variant, but it does have some tweaks to its spike protein, which might make it spread a bit more easily or slip past some of our existing immunity. 'That said, early signs suggest it doesn't seem to cause more serious illness, but of course, we're still learning more about it.' 'Its spread has been identified in around 22 countries,' said Dr Naveed Asif, GP at The London General Practice. 'The WHO assesses the additional risk to the global public as currently low, and existing Covid-19 vaccines are considered effective in preventing severe disease.' However, Nimbus does appear to be more transmissible than previous variants, with notable increases reported in India, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Thailand, notes Dr Asif. Common symptoms of the NB.1.8.1 variant include a severe sore throat. fatigue, mild cough, fever, muscle aches and congestion. It has also been reported that some patients have experienced gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea and diarrhoea. Healthcare experts have stressed, however, that there is no evidence that the new strain is more deadly or serious than previous variants, and that current Covid vaccines are expected to remain effective and protect anyone infected from severe illness.

How animal welfare became a GOP issue
How animal welfare became a GOP issue

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

How animal welfare became a GOP issue

Animal welfare is becoming part of the Trump health team's agenda, as officials press for changes to drug approvals and product evaluations and portray lab animal testing as a symptom of big-government bloat. Why it matters: The effort is the product of a more than decade-long push to elevate animal welfare issues with the political right that now features congressional oversight hearings and threats to cut off taxpayer funding. Case in point: The Food and Drug Administration is phasing out animal testing requirements for antibody therapies and other drugs and telling companies that use other methods that they may receive streamlined product reviews. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the leaders of the FDA and National Institutes of Health urged Canadian food inspection officials last month to spare hundreds of ostriches infected with bird flu from a planned cull, saying there would be benefit in studying the birds' immune response. Congressional Republicans like Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) have also held hearings on " taxpayer funded animal abuse" and proposed measures that would close down federally funded labs that use animals. Trump had a mixed record on animal welfare issues in his first term. While he signed a federal law outlawing animal cruelty as well as animal fighting, his administration rolled back protections for certain at-risk animals, reversed rules restricting hunting on public lands and even deleted records of animal welfare violations. The FDA's new non-animal testing strategy could accelerate the process for bringing cures to market and give drug and biotech companies more flexibility — though it relies on some still-unproven alternatives like certain AI models. Between the lines: Among those driving the shift is the White Coat Waste Project, a libertarian-leaning group that is targeting what it calls "wasteful and secretive" taxpayer-funded experiments over its ethical concerns around animal testing. Founder Anthony Bellotti, a former Republican congressional staffer, told Axios the group adapted the playbook for cutting off federal funding for Planned Parenthood. Activists "went after the money source, because if you can fund a problem, you can defund it," Bellotti said. "And I said, 'Holy crap, animal testing is virtually all taxpayer-funded.'" The group has portrayed animal experiments as government waste, pointing to studies that show an 85% failure rate in studies that rely on animal models. The group has published controversial investigations of NIH-funded research, claiming taxpayers funded experiments where beagles were "bitten to death by flies" and that former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director Anthony Fauci wasted $1 million on painful experiments on the dogs. NIAID has disputed the findings. Zoom in: The shift in framing animal welfare so it appeals to conservatives, including linking it to causes like states' rights, has taken place over many years, said Republican lobbyist Marty Irby. "I use the term creation care a lot ... we have all these things that we talk about: taking care of people, health care, whatever the case may be. But you know, you can't just push animals to the side." Efforts to address factory farming not only overlap with the Make America Healthy Again movement's interest in food quality but with national security concerns, since one of the biggest pork producers, Smithfield Foods, is owned by a Chinese company, Irby pointed out. There also are attempts to tie animal testing back to conservative suspicion over the pandemic response, including subjecting hamsters, rabbits, monkeys and many other animals to infectious disease experiments without pain management. The issue polls highly among voters on both sides of the aisle, Irby said. The other side: Animal testing remains critical to understanding disease progression and evaluating the safety of drugs, vaccines, food additives and household products. Because they're susceptible to many of the same diseases and have shorter life spans, lab animals provide a window into disease processes across several generations. Experts say the solution in the near time likely will involve a combination of animal and non-animal testing. What's next: Bellotti said plans to phase out animal testing don't go far enough, and he's continuing to push for more lab closures. "There's a lot of rhetoric coming out of the NIH that doesn't match reality," he said. "Without a funding cut for animals and labs, without a timetable and a deadline and a commitment to phasing it out ... it's status quo."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store