I walked 8,000 steps with the Apple Watch 10 vs Garmin Forerunner 570 — and one was more accurate
These days, the best fitness trackers on the market do a hell of a lot more than just count your steps. Both the Garmin Forerunner 570 and Apple Watch 10 are designed to be worn 24/7, and can track everything from your heart rate variability to your menstrual cycle.
But if you've wondered which is more accurate when it comes to step-counting, you've come to the right place. In my latest step-counting challenge, I strapped the Garmin Forerunner 570 to one wrist, my Apple Watch Series 10 to the other, and manually counted my steps to compare. Read on to find out which came out on top.
Both watches count your steps by using an internal accelerometer, which measures the swing of your arm. Each swing counts for two steps. It doesn't matter whether you wear your watch on your dominant or non-dominant hand, or whether you're walking with your hands in your pockets, or holding something, the accelerometer should still measure your body's movement.
I've used both devices for tracking my workouts in the past, although the Garmin Forerunner 570 is a newer device, only launching a month ago.
If you've followed Tom's Guide for a while, you'll know this isn't my first step-count comparison.
In fact, you can read what happened when I did the same test with the Garmin Forerunner 570's predecessor in my Garmin Forerunner 265 vs Apple Watch 10 face-off here. For all of these challenges, I use my trusty clicker counter. Every step I took, I clicked. When I got home, I downloaded all the data.
If you own an Apple Watch, you'll also know that Apple doesn't include step count data in its workout summaries. You can see your overall steps for the entire day, but not how many steps you took on a particular walk (probably because steps aren't actually that useful a metric, but annoying for me when writing these articles.)
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
This challenge was originally 10,000 steps, but I lost the beginning of my walk as the StepsApp on my Apple Watch decided to stop working. I switched to the Pedometer+ app and started again.
Here are the results:
Manual:
8,000 steps
Garmin Forerunner 570:
8,100 steps
Apple Watch 10
7,700 steps
As you can see from the results, the Garmin Forerunner 570 was pretty much spot on, counting 100 steps more than I did. The Apple Watch 10, on the other hand, missed 300 steps.
Of course, to truly test the accuracy of the two watches, you'd need to do a lot more testing on a much bigger scale. I'm also not saying that the Apple Watch 10 isn't accurate. The average person takes 2,000 steps in a mile, so missing 300 steps isn't a lot in the grand scheme of things.
Interestingly, for the walk, my Apple Watch recorded the distance as 3.79 miles, whereas my Garmin recorded 3.85 miles. Again, we're talking about very small differences here.
Without getting into the smartwatch vs sportswatch debate, it seems important to also point out that these watches do a lot more than just count steps.
Without getting into the smartwatch vs sportswatch debate, it seems important to also point out that these watches do a lot more than just count steps. The Apple Watch 10 is the best smartwatch on the market and is like having your iPhone on your wrist.
The Garmin Forerunner 570, by comparison, doesn't have as many smartwatch features but is Garmin's mid-tier Forerunner, designed to accurately track your marathon training. It's one of the best Garmin watches I've ever tested, and the bright screen is truly beautiful.
Whichever device you choose to strap to your wrist, know that they're both counting your steps, so, unlike me, you don't have to.
While counting steps isn't always the best metric to focus on when it comes to getting in shape and losing weight, it's a good place to start. A review of 32 studies, published in the International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity found that '10,000 steps/day is a reasonable target for healthy adults.'
If you're looking for more inspiration, you've come to the right place — read what happened when I tried this Japanese walking method, as well as this 5-4-5 walking technique.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
29 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
How Europe Is Losing the Global Tech Race
The U.S. is pulling away from Europe in economic growth—and one big reason is the continent's inability to create new big tech firms the size of Apple, Meta or Google. Europe is generating far fewer unicorns—new, privately held companies that are worth more than $1 billion—than China and the U.S. Unicorns are a good measure of capitalist innovation; they are almost always fast-growing firms that have found a new way of doing something and are shaking up an existing industry.
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Apple Developer Event Will Show It's Still Far From Being an AI Leader
Apple, a year after debuting its AI platform, will do little at WWDC to show it's catching up to leaders like OpenAI and Google. Also: The latest macOS gets its new California theme; a look at why the company is moving to an iOS 26 and macOS 26 naming system; and details on Apple's dedicated gaming app. Last week in Power On: Jony Ive's deal with OpenAI ups the pressure on Apple to find its next breakthrough product.
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Spatial Meetings Go Beyond Remote Learning With 'Distance Zero'
Inside the Spatial Meeting environment, students have an immersive experience of being in the ... More classroom while also being able to engage with renderings of objects, achieving an experience Cisco calls "Distance Zero." Cisco Systems has partnered with Apple and H-Farm, an Italian educational institution and technology incubator, to launch an innovative educational initiative called 'Spatial Meetings.' This collaboration leverages Apple's Vision Pro headset and Cisco's immersive meeting infrastructure to achieve 'Distance Zero,' a term coined by Cisco to refer to the ability of technology to replicate the immediacy and interpersonal dynamics of face-to-face meetings, even when participants are geographically distant. Cisco's Spatial Meetings utilize high-resolution, stereoscopic 3D video combined with true-to-color rendering, delivered through Apple's Vision Pro headset. This combination allows participants to see detailed facial expressions and body language and even interact with objects in a virtual yet realistic environment. As Snorre Kjesbu, Senior Vice President & General Manager of Collaboration Devices at Cisco explains, 'Good technology should always be the supporting actor. It should never get in the way—it should support what you're doing.' The goal, after all, is not to have the most realistic virtual environment possible; the goal is to have highly effective meetings in which the focus is on the content of the meeting and not the experience of the conference room. The site for this experiment has been the campus of H-Farm. Located near Venice, Italy, H-Farm began as a startup incubator and has evolved into an educational hub, serving over 3,000 students across high school and university levels. The institution prioritizes digital innovation and, as such, was a natural early adopter of Cisco's Spatial Meetings. Diego Pizzocaro, Director at H-Farm College, recalled their initial experience of seeing the Spatial Meetings technology: 'When we tried it, it was basically a lightbulb moment.' Describing the Spatial Meetings is challenging, as it is very much the type of thing one needs to experience for oneself. What is remarkable about the environment is the fact that it easily achieves many of the benchmarks essential for an immersive conference experience. To begin with, the head sizes and positions of the other participants are effectively the same as your own. This gives the sense of people actually being in a common space rather than being technologically mediated. The other key element is the ability to readily convey non-verbal information. Depending on the context, non-verbal communication can account for anywhere from 60% to 90% of what is communicated. Anyone who has been in a seminar where two people arguing have gone off the rails has had the experience of turning to a classmate and both rolling your eyes. This is an essential experience of a rich environment and one that is typically lacking in standard video conferencing. In Spatial Meetings these types of interactions occur naturally. Educational applications at H-Farm using Spatial Meetings focus heavily on hybrid learning environments, significantly enhancing student engagement and concentration. 'Our students reported increased immersion and focus,' Pizzocaro noted. 'They can attend a math lecture from literally anywhere and feel like they're in the front row.' Another significant advantage is that, unlike in typical video conferencing environments, they are fully immersed in the experience, free from the distraction of competing apps or objects in their surroundings. Cisco's Spatial Meetings allow educators and students to interact with physical objects alongside virtual renderings, facilitating interactive and comparative analysis in fields such as design, architecture, and engineering. Cisco's technology includes specialized hardware already installed in thousands of locations globally, facilitating seamless integration of this immersive meeting experience. Standing in front of a properly equipped conference room, a professor can demonstrate the properties of a physical object and then send a digital copy to a remote participant who can explore just as if she were in the classroom. In addition to bringing remote participants into the classroom and classroom objects to remote participants, the space created by the Spatial Meetings can also facilitate interaction between students and AI. Since the meeting space is virtual, remote students and generated participants are joining the same virtual space in the same way, providing a type of ontological parity between the attendees. The fact that only one exists elsewhere in physical space ceases to be a point of significance. Moving forward, Cisco and Apple plan to deepen their collaboration, enhancing the capabilities of the Spatial Meetings platform. H-Farm continues to develop educational content and tools to take advantage of the environment, enabling educators to integrate immersive experiences into their teaching more easily. Demonstrations and further integrations of this technology are planned to showcase its broader applicability and effectiveness. For now, the biggest challenge is the limited availability of the headsets, but this should change as newer models are released and prices come down. At the end of the day, the collaboration among Cisco, Apple, and H-Farm provides a striking illustration of how technology can not only bridge physical distances but also fundamentally enhance the educational experience.
