logo
Tories ‘got it wrong' when they backed 2045 net zero target, Findlay says

Tories ‘got it wrong' when they backed 2045 net zero target, Findlay says

Tory MSPs had voted for legislation in 2019 which commits Scotland to achieving net zero by that date.
But Mr Findlay now says they had been 'wrong' to do so.
🗣️ @RussellFindlay1:
"The only just transition is an affordable transition – one that protects North Sea jobs and cuts energy bills for families and businesses.
"We would scrap the SNP's 2045 net zero target.
"It is unaffordable and unachievable."#SCC25 pic.twitter.com/MA0Pe6dtfr
— Scottish Conservatives (@ScotTories) June 14, 2025
His comments came as a new policy paper published by the party said reaching this target would result in 'unaffordable costs for struggling families across Scotland and put at risk our oil and gas industry and farmers' businesses'.
UK Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has already said the UK target of reaching net zero by 2050 – five years later than the Scottish date – is 'impossible'.
While Scottish Tories had previously backed the 2045 date, Mr Findlay told the PA news agency: 'I think yes, we did get it wrong'.
When Conservative MSPs at Holyrood supported the 2045 date, he said they had done so 'so on the basis of what was known in those moments'.
But he added: 'The situation has become clearer, it is evident to everybody watching this, to everybody in the Scottish Parliament, if they were being honest.
'Both Labour, the SNP and the rest of them would admit that the 2045 target isn't just unaffordable it's unachievable – that's the reality.
'So we're telling the truth to the Scottish public.'
Mr Findlay continued: 'We want to reach net zero fairly and quickly. We understand the climate crisis emergency but we cannot harm our own economy and force householders who are already struggling to pay the bills with yet more great costs.
'Whether it be ripping out their gas boilers and putting in costly heat pumps, or forcing them to get rid of their cars and buying very expensive electric alternatives.
'This has got to be about the balance between ensuring we reach net zero properly and speedily, but recognising that it cannot come at a crippling cost to those people out there who are having to pay for it.'
Asked later by journalists if his party was pandering to climate sceptics, Mr Findlay said they were 'absolutely not', adding the Tories were the only party 'telling the truth' on the issue.
His comments came as the Scottish Conservatives promised to give every household in Scotland a £100 discount on their energy bills – with this to be funded from money accrued from the ScotWind auction, where areas of the seabed were leased for offshore wind power projects.
The paper also said the Tories would make pylons 'an option of last resort for energy infrastructure projects' – with the party promising legislation to give people 'greater decision-making authority over local infrastructure projects' by abolishing the Scottish Government's existing energy consents union.
Speaking about the changes as he addressed the Scottish Conservative conference in Edinburgh, Mr Findlay said: 'We would scrap the SNP's 2045 net zero target. It is unaffordable and unachievable.'
He added that instead of spending money on 'SNP eco-projects', the Tories would 'use it to protect oil and gas workers' livelihoods'.
Mr Findlay continued: 'We would take £100 off every household energy bill in Scotland from the proceeds of leasing our waters to wind farms.
'We will also give residents new legal powers to oppose mega-pylons.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Almost 17,500 ScotRail services cancelled last year, figures show
Almost 17,500 ScotRail services cancelled last year, figures show

STV News

time42 minutes ago

  • STV News

Almost 17,500 ScotRail services cancelled last year, figures show

More than 17,000 ScotRail trains were cancelled in the last year, a freedom of information request has found. The data, released after a request by the Scottish Liberal Democrats, found 17,491 services were cancelled in 2024/25. Some 306,120 trains did not arrive within a minute of their scheduled arrival time, which the party said accounted for 45% of all trains. Another 71,691 were late by five or more minutes – around 10% of all trains. Jamie Greene, the Lib Dem transport spokesman at Holyrood, said the Scottish Government must deliver a transport system that works for all of Scotland. He said: 'When it is done right, train travel is swift, reliable and reduces traffic on our roads. 'Unfortunately these figures show that a considerable number of passengers are shelling out huge sums of money to travel by train, only to find that some services simply don't arrive. 'It's more than three years since the SNP Government took over responsibility for Scotland's trains but we are still seeing tens of thousands of trains cancelled or running late. 'If we want to coax people out of their cars, that has to start with a service that runs on time.' Mr Greene urged the Government to work with ScotRail to drive down train delays. PA Media Scottish Liberal Democrat MSP Jamie Greene urged the Scottish Government to improve ScotRail. He added: 'We also want to see Government working with councils to explore new lines, especially in areas where public transport links are poor, and new options for two/three-day-a-week season tickets. 'That's how to make Scotland's railways an attractive prospect for tourists and commuters alike.' Mark Ilderton, ScotRail's service delivery director, said: 'ScotRail operates more than 2,100 services every day, with around nine out of 10 of those services meeting the punctuality target, getting customers to where they need to be. 'Cancellations can be for a number of reasons, many of them outside the control of ScotRail, but represented less than 3% of more than 650,000 services we operate across the country over the course of the year. 'We know how frustrating it is when a service is cancelled or delayed, and that is why everyone at ScotRail is working hard to deliver the safe and reliable railway that our customers expect and deserve, and to encourage more people to travel by train instead of using the car. 'With more than nine out of ten customers satisfied with our service according to Transport Focus, the independent watchdog for transport users, it's testament to the hard work of ScotRail staff in delivering a safe, reliable and green railway.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'These cancellations for the period reported represent 2.1% of all ScotRail services. 'Train performance and passenger satisfaction in Scotland is consistently higher than the GB average – but we will keep making improvements so more people choose to travel by rail. 'While our ability to invest and improve services is impacted by ongoing UK Government spending decisions, we have invested over £12bn in rail infrastructure in Scotland since 2007 with a further £1.5 billion investment planned for this financial year. 'Fare increases are lower than elsewhere in the UK, and we're permanently removing ScotRail peak fares from September 1, 2025. 'This move will help people with ongoing cost-of-living pressures, eradicate child poverty and tackle the climate emergency by saving existing rail passengers money, including parents, and encouraging new, potential passengers on to the train and to leave the car at home. 'The Scottish Government believes fundamentally that a fully devolved and integrated railway, publicly controlled and operated in the service of the people of Scotland and truly accountable to them, will deliver better and more efficient services for our people and our communities. 'We will keep pressing for full devolution of all the powers over rail infrastructure and to have full powers to nationalise Scotland's railway.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Starmer focused on grooming victims not ‘grandstanding', says Reeves
Starmer focused on grooming victims not ‘grandstanding', says Reeves

South Wales Argus

timean hour ago

  • South Wales Argus

Starmer focused on grooming victims not ‘grandstanding', says Reeves

The Chancellor said that Sir Keir has been looking at 'actually doing the practical things to ensure that something like this never happens again'. After initially resisting pressure to implement a full probe, the Prime Minister said he had read 'every single word' of an independent report into child sexual exploitation by Baroness Louise Casey and would accept her recommendation for the investigation. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is set to address Parliament on Monday about the findings of the review. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage described the move as a 'welcome U-turn', while Kemi Badenoch called on him to apologise for 'six wasted months'. Asked whether the Prime Minister had changed his mind about the idea of a national inquiry, the Chancellor told the Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme: 'I think Keir Starmer, our Prime Minister, has always been really focused, as he was when he was director of public prosecutions, on the victims and not grandstanding. 'But actually doing the practical things to ensure that something like this never happens again, but also to ensure that the victims of this horrific abuse over many, many years is got to grips with and that people have answers to their questions.' Earlier this year, the Government dismissed calls for a public inquiry, saying its focus was on putting in place the outstanding recommendations already made in a seven-year national inquiry by Professor Alexis Jay. Shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride criticised the Government's 'very late' decision to launch the inquiry, and claimed it had only come after pressure from the Tories. Shadow chancellor of the Exchequer Mel Stride arrives at BBC Broadcasting House (James Manning/PA) Sir Mel told BBC One's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg: 'It's a very late decision – it should have happened far, far earlier. 'We've been calling for this for many, many months.' He accused Sir Keir of previously dismissing concerns from senior Tory figures. 'Kemi Badenoch, Chris Philp and others have been derided by the Prime Minister for hopping on some kind of far-right bandwagon, dog-whistle politics and the rest of it,' Sir Mel said. 'That was the wrong response. This is just another example of the Prime Minister being pressurised by us into U-turning.' The inquiry will be able to compel witnesses to give evidence, and it is understood that it will be national in scope, co-ordinating a series of targeted local investigations. Baroness Louise Casey (Kirsty O'Connor/PA) Speaking to reporters travelling with him on his visit to Canada on Saturday, the Prime Minister said: 'I have never said we should not look again at any issue. 'I have wanted to be assured that on the question of any inquiry. 'That's why I asked Louise Casey who I hugely respect to do an audit. 'Her position when she started the audit was that there was not a real need for a national inquiry over and above what was going on. 'She has looked at the material she has looked at and she has come to the view that there should be a national inquiry on the basis of what she has seen. 'I have read every single word of her report and I am going to accept her recommendation. 'That is the right thing to do on the basis of what she has put in her audit.'

Energy minister 'won't apologise' for investment in nuclear power
Energy minister 'won't apologise' for investment in nuclear power

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Energy minister 'won't apologise' for investment in nuclear power

Scottish Labour MP Michael Shanks insisted that nuclear was part of the UK's 'energy mix' and claimed the SNP's 'ideological opposition' to nuclear is costing Scotland jobs. It comes after we told how in last week's spending review Chancellor Rachel Reeves effectively cut £2.5 billion of funding for GB Energy. Reeves said the state-owned clean energy company would now share the overall £8.3bn funding with a separate body looking to invest in nuclear energy. READ MORE: UK jets being sent to the Middle East as Keir Starmer refuses to rule out defending Israel The Treasury said the £2.5bn would go towards a new generation of small modular nuclear reactors. On BBC Scotland's Sunday Show, Shanks was challenged on the fact that billions intended for renewables will now be invested in nuclear power. Journalist Martin Geissler pointed out there was no mention of nuclear anywhere in the Labour party's manifesto ahead of the 2024 general election, but it instead focussed on clean power projects such as onshore wind, solar, and hydro power. 'Well, it's not an exclusive list, because there's a lot of other clean energy technologies,' Shanks said. 'Nuclear is part of our energy mix. 'I'm not going to make any apologies for the government investing in nuclear where thousands of highly skilled jobs can be delivered, including in Scotland if it wasn't for the ideological position of the SNP to block new nuclear, could be delivering those well paid skilled jobs here in Scotland. (Image: BBC) 'They turned their face against that, and they will have to answer for that.' He added: 'The broader point here is Great British Energy is all about harnessing the power of the public purse to invest not just in clean power projects directly but supply chains that drive them. 'Because unlike the previous government, we want to see those well paid, industrialised jobs coming alongside us, not towing in offshore wind and switching it on, but building it in this country and getting the manufacturing jobs that go with it. That's how we deliver the jobs of the future.' Geissler put it to Shanks that oil and gas companies are leaving Aberdeen and that the just transition should be a 'safety net' for workers, but that currently there is 'no net' for workers. Asked if that was a fair assessment, Shanks said: 'Well, look, every single job loss is hugely distressing for the individuals and for their families and communities. 'I don't for a second discount the impact that job losses have, but I don't think that is an entirely fair assessment, because yes, there's been job losses recently announced, but there's also been thousands of jobs created.' READ MORE: Ian Murray 'does not understand how devolution works', minister says He added: 'We shouldn't just look at one side of the equation here. 'A transition means there will be jobs moving from one part of the industry into the other. 'We need to make sure that that happens, but we also need to support the workers to get those jobs, and that's why we announced incredibly quickly that passporting support, where if you're an offshore oil and gas worker doing a particular job and you could do the same job in offshore wind, you shouldn't have to re qualify and have your skills reassessed. You should be able to move straight into that job. That's something the previous government developed for a long time. We delivered it.' We told how GB energy chair, Jürgen Maier, who will be based in Manchester, poured cold water over another Labour pledge of creating 1000 jobs for Aberdeen – saying it might take 20 years.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store