logo
‘We won't be safe if we're silent': Young trans leaders want to build a network of their own

‘We won't be safe if we're silent': Young trans leaders want to build a network of their own

Yahoo18-02-2025

Ahead of her sophomore year of college, Lily Rood was thinking about her future: her career, her LGBTQ+ advocacy, her interest in politics and government. As the first transgender woman to be class president at Mount Holyoke College — and someone who first went door-knocking for a congressional campaign at 13 — she wanted to find ways to become a better leader.
She looked for conferences to hone her skills. She searched for groups cultivating trans leaders at a national level, and came up short. So, she decided to make her own. It's not just for her future: the United States needs transgender leaders now more than ever, she said.
Trans Americans are being targeted under a presidential administration that is hostile to their very existence. To counter this dehumanization, Rood said, trans leadership is key. Empowering trans people is an antidote to the divisions that politicians create for their own gain, she said: If more trans people run for Congress, get involved in their local school board, create art, lead scientific research or do community service, these actions create stronger community bonds that enable more people to understand what trans experiences are like.
'When we're understood and when we're known, we can't be so easily villainized with rhetoric that is simply untrue and manipulative,' Rood said. The anti-trans political movement wants to keep people divided from each other, to ostracize trans people from their communities, she said. The more she watches this, the more she feels the need to do something.
'I just feel a sense of defiance. I feel like, no, I'm not going to step back, I'm not going to hide.'
Rood has seen how that rhetoric can become violent. She's seen the hate messages that trans leaders receive. And she's watched that vitriol be encouraged by the president of the United States. It can be scary, she said, but she feels driven to keep going.
At 19, Rood is founding a group to cultivate trans leaders across the country: the National Transgender Leadership Conference Committee (NTLCC). The goal is to launch a summit this fall in Western Massachusetts for 30 young and early-career trans people. Based on how well fundraising goes, Rood and her colleagues will organize a conference in 2026 or 2027.
To launch NTLCC, Rood called on other student advocates — including Jay Jones, the first transgender student body president at Howard University, and Forest Cusolito, a student at Smith College who has been active in LGBTQ+ advocacy since they were 15. NTLCC isn't meant only for students, but right now, the group is entirely student-led. Rood, Jones and Cusolito all juggle advocacy with schoolwork, part-time jobs or consulting gigs. They want to oversee a nationwide effort to create the next generation of trans leaders.
'We have a need for this,' said Jones. 'We are starting to witness leadership, people in the highest offices of the land, essentially saying we don't exist.'
Jones, who's 22, serves as the group's executive vice president and director of partnerships. She wants to help trans people build the kind of leadership skills that so many are never guided on — particularly through mentorship. To become the first trans woman president at a historically Black college and university (HBCU), she relied on her own network of mentors who advised her on what to do and not to do, where to get involved, and how to spend her time.
'If you've seen it, you can believe in yourself that you can do it. And I think sometimes people really just need to see that someone else has done it before, and here was the route that they took,' she said.
Jones and her colleagues want to offer online programs throughout the year to help trans people build skills in communication, networking, accepting feedback, facilitating meetings and organizing, while bringing prominent trans keynote speakers to their conference and summit. Trans leaders may also need to develop deeper skills in community building than cisgender leaders, Rood said, especially to navigate moments of crisis or situations where they have to speak to members of the press.
Those programs, and the conference itself, are meant for trans adults who have held two or fewer professional leadership roles, regardless of age. Trans people who came out later in life are just as welcome as recent college graduates. The group also plans to keep advocating against anti-trans policies: In January, NTLCC wrote to 47 senators urging them to block the first federal anti-trans law brought to a vote in a newly Republican-controlled Congress.
NTLCC plans to expand its senior leadership team, Rood said, and the group will file for 501(c)(3) status later this year. Right now, the group is volunteer-run, but she hopes that a successful fundraising campaign will enable everyone to get paid.
Transgender people have long faced uphill battles to attain and keep leadership positions, let alone to stay afloat in their careers. Many trans people are fired or passed up for promotions because of their gender expression, or not hired in the first place. Trans women face one of the widest pay gaps of any demographic in the workforce, and trans and nonbinary employees are more than twice as likely as cisgender queer employees to face discrimination and harassment on the job.
Now, trans people living in the United States face a political environment that is actively trying to erase them from public life. Trans people working in the military and the federal government are fighting to keep their jobs and fear for their safety under the Trump administration.
Trans people are constantly facing hatred and despair amid so many political attacks, Cusolito said. To them, focusing on trans leadership means looking to the future, instead of falling into despair — and that's what resistance should look like.
'They want us to give up. The Trump administration doesn't want us to fight back, they want us to feel despair and feel like there's no avenue for us to still create change. Giving up is just giving in to what they would want,' Cusolito said.
Cusolito, who's 19, feels like they have no other choice but to advocate for their community. They need other trans people to know that they can still find ways toward a better future. As vice president for administration at NTLCC, their job is focused on recordkeeping and organizing behind the scenes. They've already been doing that work for years: They were organizing protests as an LGBTQ+ advocate in high school and president of the Genders & Sexualities Alliance.
Jones and Rood have similar backgrounds: feeling drawn to advocacy from a young age. Jones has worked with the Human Rights Campaign to advise C-suite executives on how cisgender women can be better allies to trans women. While studying politics, Rood has been following the careers of trail-blazing trans women for years, including Zooey Zephyr, Andrea Jenkins and Danica Roem.
Although Rood knows that inherent risks come with taking on a more public advocacy role, she feels that the risks would be the same even if she did nothing.
'If I were to stop my advocacy, if I were to not make this organization, as many risks as it may take on for me, I still wouldn't be safe from the people who don't understand trans experience and want trans people to be eradicated,' she said. 'We won't be safe if we're silent, or if we speak out. So I'm going to keep speaking out.'
The post 'We won't be safe if we're silent': Young trans leaders want to build a network of their own appeared first on The 19th.
News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday. Subscribe to our free, daily newsletter.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump has come after me, and he may come after you
Trump has come after me, and he may come after you

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump has come after me, and he may come after you

Advertisement To be clear, much of this was foreseeable. Trump pledged 'retribution' during his campaign. Many of us who worked for him came forward to warn it would be the all-consuming priority of his second term. More than a year before his reelection, I compiled a comprehensive overview of the revenge actions he would take if he won a second term and documented them. In ' Advertisement Those fears are materializing in real time. Since taking office, the president has launched a full-frontal assault on institutions he views as personal adversaries. This includes wielding presidential power to punish law firms, universities, and even businesses he deems as being threats to his agenda. What's more, media outlets have been targeted, nonprofit watchdogs maligned, and civil servants sacked en masse or sidelined. He's also pursuing individual opponents directly. Legal scholars have noted that the executive order naming me is But more alarming is how quickly the scope of Trump's revenge campaign is expanding beyond these targets to entire swaths of the country. The White House has ordered troops into Los Angeles, ostensibly to quell riots in response to immigration arrests. But those of us who worked under Trump know better. He's been looking for the opportunity to use the military to advance his agenda, especially in Democratic-leaning states and localities. The situation in California is a manufactured pretext to make that happen. What once seemed unimaginable — a militarized presidency enforcing the dictates of an increasingly authoritarian state — is beginning to take form. Even if the actions in California fall short of a formal invocation of the president's most extreme emergency powers, such as the Insurrection Act, the precedent is perilous. Advertisement Deploying the military in service of a political message is the crossing of a Rubicon. Americans must be clear-eyed about what may come next. The president could take the next step and invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy the military into other cities that defy his directives. He could declare a national emergency to seize control of communications infrastructure or justify mass arrests of protestors. He could weaponize surveillance tools designed for foreign threats against domestic critics. These hypotheticals may seem outlandish, but so are the actions we have already seen from the White House. Indeed, these are powers that exist under federal statute, and in the hands of a man obsessed with revenge, they become tools of repression. The danger is not just that presidential authority could be abused. It already is — in sweeping and unprecedented fashion. The real danger is that Americans may come to accept it or to see it as merely politics. The slow normalization of authoritarian tactics is how democracies erode: not with one dramatic moment, but with a series of escalating actions that become routine. Such a dark outcome is not inevitable. There are still ways to pull back from the brink. Federal institutions, such as inspectors general, courts, and state governments, must be willing to act. Whistleblowers and public servants must speak out, even at great personal risk. And most importantly, the American people must reject the idea that a president can use the powers of the state to settle personal scores. Advertisement If we fail to oppose a president implementing a 'revenge agenda' — any president, of any political party — we may soon find ourselves in a country where dissent is treated as a crime, where loyalty is rewarded above lawfulness, and where the line between democracy and autocracy is all but erased. That's the question we now face: not whether the revenge agenda is real — but whether we're prepared to stop it, before it's too late.

Donald Trump Tells ICE Agents To Target Democrat Strongholds
Donald Trump Tells ICE Agents To Target Democrat Strongholds

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Tells ICE Agents To Target Democrat Strongholds

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. U.S. President Donald Trump ordered Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to focus its operations on "the core of the Democrat Power Center" and said his administration "would put every resource possible" into mass deportations. Trump praised ICE officers for their "incredible strength, determination, and courage" in carrying out his administration's policy of mass deportations of illegal immigrants that are unprecedented in scale. Federal immigration raids have faced fierce opposition from Democratic politicians and protesters, who accuse ICE and the administration of heavy-handed tactics that spread fear and chaos in peaceful, hardworking immigrant communities. ICE "must expand efforts to detain and deport Illegal Aliens in America's largest Cities, such as Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York, where Millions upon Millions of Illegal Aliens reside," Trump wrote late Sunday. "These, and other such Cities, are the core of the Democrat Power Center, where they use Illegal Aliens to expand their Voter Base, cheat in Elections, and grow the Welfare State, robbing good paying Jobs and Benefits from Hardworking American Citizens. These Radical Left Democrats are sick of mind, hate our Country, and actually want to destroy our Inner Cities—And they are doing a good job of it!" Trump continued: "I want our Brave ICE Officers to know that REAL Americans are cheering you on every day. The American People want our Cities, Schools, and Communities to be SAFE and FREE from Illegal Alien Crime, Conflict, and Chaos. That's why I have directed my entire Administration to put every resource possible behind this effort, and reverse the tide of Mass Destruction Migration that has turned once Idyllic Towns into scenes of Third World Dystopia." This is a developing article. Updates to follow.

Acting head of US employment rights agency failing to protect trans and nonbinary workers, Democrats say
Acting head of US employment rights agency failing to protect trans and nonbinary workers, Democrats say

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Acting head of US employment rights agency failing to protect trans and nonbinary workers, Democrats say

Democrats are demanding the acting chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission enforce civil rights protections for transgender and nonbinary people. A letter to Andrea Lucas, a copy of which was viewed by the Guardian, alleges the agency has 'abdicated this responsibility under the law when it comes to transgender and nonbinary workers'. The letter cites that shortly after Lucas's appointment as acting chair of the EEOC in January 2025, Lucas instructed the agency to halt the processing of claims related to gender identity discrimination, and that in April 2025 the agency instructed all employees to classify gender identity discrimination complaints as its lowest priority. 'A categorization reserved for meritless charges – which essentially puts the processing of such complaints in an indefinite hold,' the letter states. The letter also notes the EEOC moved to dismiss six cases the agency had previously pursued against employers accused of gender identity discrimination, including EEOC v Boxwood Hotels, a lawsuit in which the employer is alleged to have fired a transgender employee after the employee's manager repeatedly misgendered the employee and referred to them as 'it'. Signers of the letter include 70 members of Congress, led by Congressman Mark Takano, Robert C 'Bobby' Scott and Suzanne Bonamici. The letter comes as state legislatures in the US introduced over 530 bills targeting LGBTQ+ people in 2024. The EEOC also removed the 'x' gender marker on intake forms, removed materials on rights and protections on gender identity discrimination, and issued a memorandum informing fair employment practices agencies that they will not receive credit for intakes or resolutions related to gender identity, the letter added. 'Alarmingly, in both the commission's filings in court and in your previous statements, you have invoked President Trump's sweeping executive order, which states it is the policy of the federal government to only recognize two sexes and seeks to have all agencies refuse to acknowledge the existence of transgender people,' the letter continued. 'The commission is supposed to be an independent agency, and as a commissioner and its acting chair, your job is to enforce the law. The supreme court's ruling in Bostock is the law of the land, and the commission's previous cases, including Macy v Holder, Jameson v US postal service and Lusardi v Department of the Army, are binding precedents on the agency. An executive order cannot overturn any of those precedents or the commission's obligations and responsibilities under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store