logo
Wannabe GI Jane sues Navy after her dream of becoming first female SEAL comes to a crashing end over age

Wannabe GI Jane sues Navy after her dream of becoming first female SEAL comes to a crashing end over age

Yahoo19-04-2025

A wannabe-G.I. Jane's dream of becoming the first female Navy S.E.A.L. ended because military recruiters delayed her application so long that she aged out, she claimed in a lawsuit.
The US Navy officials failed to advance Amanda S. Reynolds' application, then told her in the fall that she would no longer qualify for Naval Officer Training Command in Newport, RI, because she'd be over the age limit of 42 by the time she graduated, according to court papers.
'The opportunity . . . was kind of taken away from me. I would like that to be reinstated,' Reynolds, 41, told The Post. 'I would just like the outcome to be determined by the merits instead of by some sort of technicality.
'I could have gone to officer candidate school in February, [but] they delayed my application without reason or cause and then they told me I was too old,' she said.
The Long Island lawyer first sought to join the Navy in 2018.
'I was working in litigation for 12 years, and I kind of got burnt out working 24/7,' the Woodbury resident said, calling the SEALs 'such a more noble cause.'
An avid long-distance runner and swimmer who is SCUBA certified, Reynolds said the special forces 'kind of jibed with my physical pursuits.'
In a personal statement submitted as part of her efforts to enlist, Reynolds wrote of her 'Viking-like pursuit' to be a SEAL.
'As an American, I was born with what I can only describe as an inexpressible, indefatigable nature to dream,' she wrote. 'And so, dream I do — never forgetting it is only under the auspices of this great nation's military who protects my inalienable right to do so that I may.'
Service runs in the family, Reynolds said. Her grandfather served in the Norwegian Ski Patrol; her uncle was an American World War II pilot shot down in the Pacific, and her older brother is an FBI agent.
'I hope to serve as this country's first female Navy SEAL Officer, so that there may be a second, and a third, and an infinitesimal many more female candidates who might impress upon you these shared values in the very same way,' she wrote.
But her dream stalled almost from the get-go.
Reynolds, who is representing herself in her Brooklyn Federal Court age-discrimination case against the US Navy, claimed she was 'sworn into' the Navy in Brooklyn in 2018 but 'was never assigned anywhere or deployed.'
Reynolds filled out 'enlistment paperwork' in 2019, according to the Navy, which had 'no record of service' for her.
She then moved to Utah where she worked as a lawyer and revisited her enlistment in 2020. But she was was arrested in July 2020 for allegedly driving under the influence, a misdemeanor which was dismissed in 2023, court records show.
She returned to Long Island and again chased her dreams of joining the SEALs, but found recruiters were quick to urge her to use her legal skills in the military's Judge Advocate General.
She claims recruiters told her that 'age waivers were always obtainable.'
'I was really gearing up to participate in the pipeline process, really taking all the right steps to proceed with the application,' she said. But the app 'was not submitted' by recruiters and 'unjustifiably delayed,' she claimed.
The Navy declined comment on the litigation.
The Defense Department opened the military's elite units, such as the SEALs and the Army's Green Berets, to women in 2016 but no woman has ever finished the process to become a SEAL.
'It was never really about me being a female SEAL, it was just about me being a SEAL who happened to be a woman,' she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Juneteenth Is Under Attack Because It Tells the Truth About Power
Juneteenth Is Under Attack Because It Tells the Truth About Power

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Juneteenth Is Under Attack Because It Tells the Truth About Power

On Dec. 21, 1848, two people boarded a train in Macon, Ga., beginning a journey to Philadelphia. They were traveling together, but laws, particularly slave codes, made it so they needed to sit in separate cars. To others on the train, everything seemed relatively normal. In their eyes, a white man with an injured arm and bandages on his face had boarded the train with his dark-skinned slave. He sat down in the comfortable "whites only" section while his devoted slave, assured that his "master" was relaxed, proceeded to the crowded "negro" car to find his seat. On a surface level, the traveling pair symbolized differences in the life experiences of Black men versus white men. At each stop on their four-day journey, the Black man was degraded and sent away to eat and sleep where he would not be seen and where conditions would be subpar. The white man, on the other hand, traveled in luxury, welcomed with sympathy. In other words, one of the two travelers was seen as a human being with rights to live freely and make their own decisions, to be treated with dignity and care; the other was either infantilized at best or completely dehumanized. A Juneteenth flag waves in front of the main door of the Department of Commerce, on June 21, 2024. A Juneteenth flag waves in front of the main door of the Department of Commerce, on June 21, 2024. Getty Images What the people they encountered were unaware of was that this duo was relying on the assumptions of their time, the prejudices of their contemporaries, and the dictates of the status quo for far more than a medical trip. They were heading to Philadelphia in search of freedom from it all, to release the chains of captivity that bound them, and to escape the cruel, inhumane practice of slavery. This quest was not solely for the liberation of William Craft, the Black man. It was also for his wife, an enslaved woman named Ellen, who cut her hair to neck length, sewed herself a pair of men's trousers, and wore a hat and glasses to conceal her identity. The couple knew that if Ellen were to pose as a white man she would be required to sign documents on behalf of her "slave," but because both of them had been restricted by law from learning to read or write, they wrapped her arm in bandages and feigned an injury. As we celebrate Juneteenth this year, all while facing the attempted erasure of this important day on behalf of our current administration, the true story of Ellen and William Craft reveals far more than historical injustice. It shows us how the desire to eliminate the day that commemorates Black American freedom is an attempt to uphold a social order that relies on categorizing human beings based on skin color and sex, a social order that I refer to as American patriarchy. American patriarchy is a system that has long defined national identity by the dominance of white, cisgender, straight, able-bodied men. This ideology has always relied on the exclusion, suppression, and erasure of other histories. Their story reminds us that understanding and resisting American patriarchy is essential if we hope to create something new. The Craft's ability to run to freedom in this way displayed a mastery of a book they had been forced to study all their life. Ellen knew her character well because her survival had already depended on it long before she cut her hair and sewed her pants. She had picked up the knowledge she needed to turn American patriarchy into her escape, by observing those who called themselves her masters. She had been forced to learn the intricacies of American patriarchy from the moment she was born, to examine those who aimed to oppress her down to the smallest of details. Once fluent in their ways, with the story of American patriarchy memorized, she transferred it beautifully into her four-day journey as a white man. This is why knowledge of Juneteenth, Black Independence Day, is under attack: it threatens the story that power must remain unchallenged. When we know stories like those of Ellen and William Craft, we know how far we have come, we know we cannot ever stop being keenly aware of what we are facing, and we know we must use that knowledge to escape the traps of American patriarchy. When Juneteenth and all the stories it carries are erased from our institutions, it is not because they are unimportant; it is because they threaten a narrative that insists power must remain concentrated and historical accountability avoided. Juneteenth is a reminder of a different legacy, one of resistance, survival, and the persistent redefinition of what this country can become. Recognizing Juneteenth, defending its place in our national consciousness, is not just about honoring the past. It is about being fully aware of what we are up against and choosing the kind of future we are willing to fight for. Anna Malaika Tubbs is a scholar, advocate, and two time bestselling author currently making headlines for her newest release Erased: What American Patriarchy Has Hidden from Us. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store