logo
Fresh proof school choice can save Catholic schools — and help more generations of kids thrive

Fresh proof school choice can save Catholic schools — and help more generations of kids thrive

New York Post2 days ago

Over the past decade, no state in the country has been a bigger poster child for the decline of America's Catholic schools than New York. And no state has offered more hope about the reversibility of that tragic trend line than Florida.
From 2015 to 2025, enrollment in the nation's Catholic schools fell another 13%, per a report to be released Wednesday by Florida nonprofit Step Up For Students.
New York led the way, with a 31% drop.
In Florida, though, enrollment grew — by 12%. In fact, Florida is the only US state in the top 10 of Catholic-school enrollment to see any growth in that span.
The big reason: school choice.
Florida has long had the most robust private-school choice programs in America. In 2023, it made every student eligible for choice scholarships, each worth roughly $8,000.
This year, 500,000 students in Florida are using scholarships, including 89% of the students in its Catholic schools.
New York families still have no private-school choice. Which is why, as The Post recently described it, Catholic schools are falling like dominoes.
This isn't just tragic for Catholics. This is tragic for New York.
For generations, Catholic schools have delivered top-notch education at low cost to masses of low-income families, many of them not Catholic.
The 'Catholic school effect' is well documented: Catholic schools lifted millions of working-class families into America's middle class.
They strengthened fragile communities. They saved taxpayers billions.
Today, if America's Catholic schools collectively counted as a state, they'd rank first in reading and math, per the most recent results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress.
Despite that success, thousands of Catholic schools have closed, not because families no longer want them, but because families can no longer afford them.
For those of us who believe low-income families deserve access to more high-quality learning options, this is heartbreaking.
But it's not inevitable. One potential solution is the Educational Choice for Children Act, a congressional proposal for a national school-choice program.
ECCA would essentially bring the Florida choice model to every state. Under the plan, nonprofit scholarship groups would oversee funds raised through tax-credited contributions from individuals.
Even if a state didn't have a choice program, families could apply for a federally supported scholarship.
Florida shows the upside of expanding choice. In the 1990s, its education system was a joke.
It ranked near the bottom on the NAEP tests; barely half its students graduated.
Today, Florida's graduation rate is approaching 90%, it ranks No. 7 in Advanced Placement performance, and its demographically adjusted NAEP performance is among the nation's best.
This progress comes even though Florida's per-pupil spending is among the lowest in the country.
Federal data that allows for state-to-state comparisons show that New York spent $29,873 per pupil in 2022, the most in America. Florida spent $11,076. (New York's per-pupil spending has since climbed to more than $36,000 a year.)
Private-school choice in Florida has been especially good for low-income students.
A 2019 Urban Institute study found low-income students using choice scholarships were up to 43% more likely than their public-school peers to attend four-year colleges, and up to 20% more likely to earn bachelor's degrees.
Another research team found that as private-school choice in Florida expanded, high-poverty public schools most impacted by the competition saw higher test scores, lower absenteeism and fewer suspensions.
Florida's Catholic schools have been in the thick of this change. They've become increasingly diverse, in terms of students served, and increasingly diversified, in terms of programs offered — all while holding true to the core values that have made them so vital for so long.
All education sectors in Florida know families now have the power to choose them, or not, and all have responded accordingly.
New York could use more of that choice and competition — and the expanded options and opportunities that brings to low-income families.
The result would be not only a comeback for Catholic schools, but systemic improvements in education that are long overdue.
Danyela Souza Egorov is the founder of Families for NY. Lauren May is senior director of advocacy at Step Up For Students, which administers Florida's school-choice scholarship programs, and a former Catholic-school teacher and principal.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court sides with Catholic Charity in tax case
Supreme Court sides with Catholic Charity in tax case

Yahoo

time44 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Supreme Court sides with Catholic Charity in tax case

The Supreme Court sided with a Catholic charity in a legal dispute with Wisconsin state authorities over unemployment benefit taxes. Justice Sonia Sotomayor's opinion for the court cited the First Amendment's mandate of 'government neutrality between religions.' As framed by the charity, the legal question in the case was whether a state violates the First Amendment by 'denying a religious organization an otherwise-available tax exemption because the organization does not meet the state's criteria for religious behavior.' Catholic Charities Bureau argued that its exclusion by the state from a religious exemption was unconstitutional 'in at least three ways,' including for allegedly being discriminatory. A divided Wisconsin Supreme Court sided with the state last year. The court's liberal majority concluded that the charity isn't 'operated primarily for religious purposes' under state law, over conservative dissent that said the majority 'rewrites the statute to deprive Catholic Charities of the tax exemption, rendering unto the state that which the law says belongs to the church.' Reversing the state court on Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court deemed this case an easy one, reasoning that the state court failed to apply the rigorous constitutional analysis required. 'When the government distinguishes among religions based on theological differences in their provision of services, it imposes a denominational preference that must satisfy the highest level of judicial scrutiny,' Sotomayor wrote for the court. 'Because Wisconsin has transgressed that principle without the tailoring necessary to survive such scrutiny, the judgment of the Wisconsin Supreme Court is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion,' she wrote, referring to the process of a higher court sending a case back to a lower court. The March 31 oral argument reflected bipartisan concern among Supreme Court justices in the charity's favor. The state had argued that the group didn't engage in 'distinctively religious activities' and didn't assert 'a religious objection to contributing to unemployment insurance.' Subscribe to the Deadline: Legal Newsletter for expert analysis on the top legal stories of the week, including updates from the Supreme Court and developments in the Trump administration's legal cases. This article was originally published on

ICE officers stranded in Dijbouti under ‘outrageous' conditions after court blocked criminal migrant deportations: source
ICE officers stranded in Dijbouti under ‘outrageous' conditions after court blocked criminal migrant deportations: source

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

ICE officers stranded in Dijbouti under ‘outrageous' conditions after court blocked criminal migrant deportations: source

WASHINGTON — Three Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers have been marooned in Djibouti with eight criminal migrants under 'outrageous' living conditions and the threat of rocket attacks from Yemen after a federal judge barred the convicts' deportation to South Sudan, The Post has learned. The eight migrants — who have been convicted of murder, sexually assaulting minors, robbery and arson, among other crimes — are being housed in a Conex shipping container on a US naval base in the African country and are watched around the clock by the team of ICE officers. Pentagon officials warned ICE after the team's arrival that Camp Lemonnier is at risk of rocket strikes from Houthi terrorists across the Red Sea in Yemen, while the officers have also been exposed to toxic smog from nearby burn pits where locals dispose of trash and human waste. Advertisement 4 Department of Defense officials warned ICE after the team's arrival that Camp Lemonnier is at risk of rocket strikes from Yemen and choked by toxic smog from nearby burn pits where locals dispose of trash and human waste. Camp Lemonnier Djibouti / Facebook Following a late May order by Boston US District Judge Brian Murphy, the officers had to land the flight carrying the migrants in East Africa without taking any anti-malaria medication — which was not provided until more than two days after they arrived. Some 'began to feel ill within 72 hours of landing in Djibouti,' a Department of Homeland Security source told The Post. Advertisement A flight nurse was able to later find some anti-malaria medication, though the supply has been limited. In addition, the officers are the only federal personnel authorized to escort the migrants to the bathroom and pat them down for weapons and contraband, and the grueling ordeal has required them to be relieved by fill-in teams periodically. 4 'It is outrageous that this judge is putting the health and safety of law enforcement officers at risk for the sake of criminals,' a DHS source told The Post. 'It is outrageous that this judge is putting the health and safety of law enforcement officers at risk for the sake of criminals,' the source said. Advertisement Murphy, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, ordered the flight grounded May 22 when he ruled that the Trump administration had 'unquestionably' violated a March court order pausing migrant removals to countries from where they do not originate. Each migrant should be given written notice and offered a chance to object to their deportation, Murphy also ordered. 4 Boston US District Judge Brian Murphy, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, grounded the flight in May. Alliance for Justice Only one of the eight migrants put on the flight was a native of war-torn South Sudan, while the others came from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar and Vietnam. Advertisement A Trump administration official previously claimed the deportees' crimes were so 'monstrous and barbaric' that no other country would take them. The migrants stranded with the ICE officers include: Enrique Arias Hierro, a Cuban national, who was convicted in 1999 of attempted second-degree murder and robbery and in 2007 for kidnapping, robbery and impersonating a police officer, earning him a 15-year prison sentence. Jose Manuel Rodriguez-Quinones, another Cuban national convicted in 2008 of arson and cocaine trafficking; in 2020 of illegal possession of a firearm; and in 2022 of attempted first-degree murder, earning him a four-year prison sentence. Thongxay Nilakout, a Laotian national, who was convicted in 1995 for the first-degree murder of a German tourist in California — and sentenced to life in prison without parole. Jesus Munoz-Gutierrez, a citizen of Mexico, who was convicted in 2005 of the second-degree murder for stabbing his then-roommate with a knife and later sentenced to 25 years in prison. Kyaw Mya, of Myanmar, who was convicted in 2019 for repeatedly sexually assaulting a minor from 2011 to 2017 starting when the victim was seven years old. Mya was later sentenced to 10 years in prison. Nyo Myint, also of Myanmar, who was convicted in 2020 of first-degree sexual assault involving a victim mentally and physically incapable of resisting. He was sentenced to 12 years in prison. Tuan Thanh Phan, of Vietnam, was convicted in 2001 of first-degree murder after he 'randomly' discharged a firearm into a crowd following a gang dispute and later sentenced to 22 years in prison. Dian Peter Domach, the only Sudanese national in the group, was convicted in 2014 of armed robbery and sentenced to 14 years in prison. All eight were either given final removal orders or did not appeal their initial deportation order following a conviction, the DHS source noted. 4 The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to overturn the lower court decision that has forced the migrants and ICE officers to remain in Djibouti for the time being. AP The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to overturn the Murphy's decision, but no action has yet been taken. 'This case addresses the government's ability to remove some of the worst of the worst illegal immigrants,' Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote in an emergency appeal to the high court on May 27. 'The United States is facing a crisis of illegal immigration, in no small part because many aliens most deserving of removal are often the hardest to remove.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store