Another lawsuit alleges there were `preventable' security failures in New Orleans truck attack
NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A group of victims of the New Orleans New Year's Day terror attack have filed suit against city officials and contractors, saying they failed to protect revelers from a 'preventable' truck ramming incident that killed 14 people and injured dozens.
The 21 plaintiffs range from Louisiana residents to visitors from Alabama, Florida, Texas and other states. Lead plaintiff Antoinette Klima shared a 12-year-old boy with Reggie Hunter, a 37-year-old Baton Rouge man who died in the attack. She said it was devastating that Hunter would no longer be there for all their son's future milestones: learning to drive and graduating from , getting married.
'I've survived Hurricane Katrina. I've lost loved ones before,' Klima said. 'And still nothing compares to the pain of losing Reggie and having to break the news to our son.'
Klima and the other victims are represented by New Orleans-based law firm of Maples & Connick and Chicago-based Romanucci & Blandin.
Their suit, filed Wednesday in Orleans Parish Civil District Court, echoed the allegations of another lawsuit filed in the same court earlier this month by six victims and the father of a man who killed in the attack on Bourbon Street, the city's famous and festive thoroughfare in the historic French Quarter.
Both lawsuits name the city and two contractors as defendants and said city officials were repeatedly warned of Bourbon Street's vulnerability to a vehicle-ramming attack. A contractor even presented the city with a scenario in April 2024 showing an F-150 pickup truck turning onto Bourbon Street and running into pedestrians, which is what the Islamic State group-inspired attacker Shamsud-Din Jabbar did around 3:15 a.m. on New Year's Day.
Police fatally shot Jabbar, 42, in an exchange of gunfire at the scene of the deadly crash.
The lawsuits have pointed out that the city was in the process of replacing a faulty bollard system of protective columns designed to block vehicle traffic in the run-up to the Super Bowl to be held Feb. 9 in New Orleans.
'The city of New Orleans so recklessly and outrageously mismanaged the timing of the bollard replacement system projects with a singular focus on the Super Bowl preparedness that it left the obvious and significant target night of New Year's and the Sugar Bowl badly exposed,' said Michael Cerasa, a Romanucci & Blandin partner.
The suit also names as plaintiffs the New Orleans Police Department and the French Quarter Management District, a state-created body overseeing the city's historic French Quarter whose tasks include improving public safety.
The French Quarter Management District 'negligently and recklessly' replaced the bollard system during New Year's and the Sugar Bowl, the lawsuit said.
The New Orleans Police Department 'failed to follow its own security measures' at Bourbon Street by deploying a police cruiser as a makeshift barrier instead of the larger truck called for in the department's security plan, among other 'woefully inadequate, incompetent and incomplete preparations,' the lawsuit said. It noted that the attacker was able to drive his rented F-150 truck around the smaller police car.
The lawsuit states that city contractor Mott MacDonald implemented 'poorly designed and manufactured' security barrier systems that broke down and required replacement and that general contractor Hard Rock Construction erred by attempting to replace the bollards during one of the 'busiest nights of the year.'
Hard Rock Construction did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The city and the other defendants all declined to comment, citing pending litigation.
Piecing together responsibility for the tragedy would be a 'jigsaw puzzle,' the attorneys said, adding more defendants may join.
The lawsuit recounted how victims had to crawl to safety as they struggled with life-threatening traumatic injuries. Many are now fearful of crowded public spaces and are 'suffering from severe post-traumatic stress' it said.
'I have been experiencing a lot of nightmares that have caused me to go endless nights without sleep and continue to prevent me from attending public places during busy hours,' Daniel Ortega, an Alabama resident and plaintiff in the lawsuit, said in a written statement.
Romanucci & Blandin helped the family of George Floyd obtain a $27 million settlement from Minneapolis and its police department after Floyd's murder. The firm also secured a $98 million verdict for the family of Botham Jean, a man fatally shot by a Dallas police officer.
Attorney Antonio Romanucci did not say how much the New Orleans attack victims would seek in damages, explaining that 'the losses here are immeasurable.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
NFL, NFLPA continue to hide ruling from collusion grievance
The NFL benefits from an endless stream of bright, shiny objects. Even in the offseason, there's always something to distract fans and media from taking a closer look at something the powers-that-be are trying to hide. As it relates to a significant collusion grievance that resulted in a 61-page written ruling from an arbitrator, both the NFL and the NFL Players Association continue to conceal the document. Advertisement The grievance focused on the refusal to give fully-guaranteed contracts to specific veteran quarterbacks — with primary focus on Lamar Jackson, Russell Wilson, and Kyler Murray. The arbitrator found, we're told, that the NFL encouraged teams not to give those players fully-guaranteed contracts. However, the evidence presented regarding the impact of this approach on the three quarterbacks at the heart of the case wasn't strong enough to trigger damages. So it was a mixed result. The NFLPA won, to the extent that evidence of collusion was found. The NFL won, to the extent that no money was awarded to any of the players. But neither side felt sufficiently good about the outcome to disclose it. The NFL danced around it in January. The NFLPA has said nothing about it, either. If this dispute had played out in court, the ruling would be a matter of public record. The NFL and NFLPA have created a private system for resolving disputes. And while the arbitrators who handle such matters typically insist on confidentiality while the cases are pending, there's nothing that prevents either the league or the union from publishing the ruling. Advertisement From the Super Bowl to the Scouting Combine to free agency to the draft to OTAs, it's been easy to forget about the 61-page collusion grievance ruling. A ruling that apparently contains something they don't want us to see. So what can it be? It could be (and we're not saying it is) that the evidence in the case includes some frank and candid internal communications that one side doesn't want to see the light of day — and that the other side has gone along with that. It also could be that the two sides were at one point actively negotiating redactions to the 61-page order to ensure that such frank and candid internal communications would not be communicated externally. Whatever the explanation, there's an important document that the NFL and the NFLPA are hiding from everyone. Despite the private nature of the arbitration agreement, pro football is an inherently public entity. It has millions of customers. It finagles billions in taxpayer money. It has a federal antitrust exemption that results in significantly more valuable TV rights. The NFL should be expected to release this document. The union should be, too. But with no one pressuring them to do it, they can jointly continue to hide behind the various bright, shiny objects that will continue to keep us properly distracted.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
‘Devil in the Ozarks' Grant Hardin captured by Border Patrol team
(NewsNation) — A special tactical unit of U.S. Customs and Border Protection is being credited with helping capture fugitive Grant Hardin, the so-called 'Devil in the Ozarks' who escaped from an Arkansas prison May 25. Multiple sources tell NewsNation correspondent Ali Bradley that three agents from the Border Patrol Tactical Unit, or BORTAC, apprehended Hardin on Friday. BORTAC, which is based out of El Paso, Texas, has members deployed throughout the country. Protesters confront ICE agents in cities across US Federal officials said BORTAC agents out of the Rio Grande Valley Sector had been assigned to search for Hardin. Details were still emerging about Hardin's capture, which was announced Friday by the Stone County, Arkansas, Sheriff's Office. CBP said BORTAC agents have 'advanced search capabilities' and extensive training in navigating complex terrain such as the region into which Hardin disappeared. Chief Border Patrol Agent Gloria Chavez said the unit's 'unique capabilities and training are well-suited for the demands of this critical mission.' The BORTAC team is often called in when all other options for search assistance have been exhausted, federal officials said BORTAC agents were also called into action when reports emerged of an active shooter at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas in 2022. Texas Monthly reported at the time that BORTAC agents were investigating stash houses on the border just west of Uvalde when agents were dispatched to the school where the shooting took place. BORTAC agents were later credited with fatally shooting the suspect in the high-profile school shooting. The presence of border agents caused some to question why federal immigration agents were involved, but agency officials told the outlet that agents are routinely present in Uvalde, which is located about 80 miles from northern Mexico. Grand theft cargo: Sinaloa cartel targets US rail companies BORTAC was also involved in the 2023 capture of Danelo Cavalcante, who escaped from a Pennsylvania prison and was captured after a two-week manhunt. Cavalcante, a convicted murderer, was located as part of a multi-unit search in which officers were able to surround him in a wooded area of the state without his knowledge. The specialized Border Patrol team was also called in to assist with another jailbreak at a maximum-security prison in New York in 2015. Agents shot and killed one of the escaped inmates, Richard Matt. In that operation, BORTAC agents swooped into a wooded area by helicopter and fatally shot Matt after he reportedly pointed a shotgun at agents, NBC News reported. Agents were also dispatched to the Los Angeles riots in 1992, in which they assisted local police officers in dealing with the civil unrest that followed the police-involved beating of Rodney King. BORTAC agents are also sometimes assigned to provide security assistance at high-profile events like the Super Bowl, to assist with response to natural disasters and to assist with immigration operations in sanctuary cities, according to reports. BORTAC was created in 1984 to serve as a civil disobedience function to respond to riots at legacy Immigration and Naturalization Service detention centers, CBP officials said. The tactical team was quickly shifted to assist with high-risk warrant service, intelligence and reconnaissance missions and well as foreign law enforcement. The training for BORTAC agents is designed to mirror aspects of the U.S. Special Operations Forces, CBP officials said. Agents are put through training that can often last more than a month, which involves physical testing and pistol qualification, as well as swimming, treading water and drown-proofing. Agents who pass the physical portion of the training are then put through weeks of intensive training in small unit tactics, defensive tactics and airmobile operations, the agency said. The tactical training involves putting trainees through sleep deprivation and stress conditions training, as well as learning advanced techniques in weapons and tactics. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Harvey Weinstein Speaks Out as Retrial Nears End: My Actions Were ‘Immoral,' ‘Never ‘Criminal'
Harvey Weinstein gave a rare interview to New York's local Fox station on Friday as his retrial for charges of first-degree sexual assault and third-degree rape nears its end. 'I regret [that] I put my family through this, that I put my wife through this, that I acted immorally, that I put so many friends through this,' he said. 'I hurt people that were close to me by actions that were stupid but never illegal, never criminal, never anything.' The former producer also said that his attorney, Arthur Aidala, advised him not to take the stand in his own defense during the trial. 'I desperately wanted to,' he said. 'Arthur said to me that the jury … understood our case and would be sympathetic to our case, and that the D.A. would try to rip me apart if I took the stand. I'm not afraid of the D.A., but this is the best advice, and this is the advice you often hear: Don't take the stand if you don't have to.' More from Rolling Stone Sean Combs Accuser Sues Harvey Weinstein for Sexual Assault Harvey Weinstein Rape Retrial Begins as Prosecutors Detail New Charge and Identify New Accuser Harvey Weinstein Granted Hospital Transfer Ahead of Rape Retrial Weinstein spoke by phone from Bellevue Hospital, where he has been held for the duration of the proceeding due to his multiple health issues. ('I have spinal stenosis. I have bone marrow cancer. I have a thing called burning mouth disease. I have a list of ailments longer than an encyclopedia,' he said of his health.) The New York Court of Appeals overturned Weinstein's 2020 rape conviction last year. He had previously been found guilty of a felony sex crime and third-degree rape, two out of five charges he faced at the time. But the appeals court decided that prosecutors should not have been allowed to present testimony from accusers whose allegations did not specifically relate to the charges against him. The retrial, which began in April, focused on the claims of three women, two of whom were part of the 2020 case. Weinstein pleaded not guilty. The prosecutor and Weinstein's legal team presented their closing arguments this week. Jury deliberations began Thursday. When asked what he thought of the women who'd levied accusations against him in this trial, Weinstein told Fox, 'I think Arthur says they have four million reasons to testify, as in dollars.' Weinstein was sentenced to 16 years in prison for a separate sexual assault conviction in Los Angeles. In December 2022, a jury there found Weinstein guilty of one count of rape and two counts of sexual assault. He has filed an appeal. Best of Rolling Stone Every Super Bowl Halftime Show, Ranked From Worst to Best The United States of Weed Gaming Levels Up
